Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T12:30:54.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trypanosoma cruzi: separation of broad and slender trypomastigotes using a continuous hypaque gradient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. M. Schmatz
Affiliation:
Department of Immunoparasitology, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA
R. C. Boltz
Affiliation:
Department of Immunoparasitology, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA
P. K. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Immunoparasitology, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA

Summary

Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes occur as a mixture of morphologically distinct forms in natural and experimental infections. We have been able to separate mixed populations into slender and broad forms using a continuous gradient composed of 12·5–25·0% hypaque in culture media. Previously, comparisons could only be made by using various strains of T. cruzi which show a predominance of either form. This separation procedure gave recoveries of 88–98% and had no effect on the viability of the parasites. Infectivity studies showed that slender forms were much more infectious to cultured muscle cells than were broad forms. However, studies with macrophages from CFW mice showed both forms to be equally capable of infection. It is concluded that the mechanism by which each form infects host cells is different; slender forms being capable of infecting both by penetration and by phagocytosis, while broad forms are only capable of infecting through phagocytosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcantara, A. & Brener, Z. (1978). The in vitro interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi bloodstream forms and mouse peritoneal macrophages. Acta Tropica 35, 209–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Bertelli, M. S. M. & Brener, Z. (1980). Infection of tissue culture cells with blood-stream trypomastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Parasitology 66, 992–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brener, Z. (1964). Comparative studies of different strains of Trypanosoma cruzi. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 59, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brener, Z. (1969). The behaviour of slender and stout forms of Trypanosoma cruzi in the bloodstream of normal and immune mice. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 63, 215–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brener, Z. (1980). Immunity to Trypanosoma cruzi. Advances in Parasitology 18, 247–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagas, C. (1909). Nova tripanozomiase humana. Estudos sobre a morfologia e ocielo evolutivo de nova entidade morbida do homen. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 1, 159218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, M. P. (1979). Significance of polymorphism in Trypanosoma cruzi. (Abstract) Congresso Internacional Sobre Doenca de Chagas. Rio de Janeior, Brazil A6-A7.Google Scholar
Deane, M. P., Kloetzel, J. & Milder, R. (1976). Polymorphism of Trypanosoma cruzi. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 18, 145–6.Google Scholar
Dvorak, J. A. (1975). New in vitro approach to quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi vertebrate cell interactions. Pan American Health Organization, Scientific Publication 318, 109–19.Google Scholar
Howells, R. E. & Chiari, C. A. (1975). Observations on two strains of T. cruzi in laboratory mice. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 69, 435–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, T. L., Calich, V. L. G. & Dias De Silva, W. (1979). Active entry of bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma cruzi into macrophages. Parasitology 78, 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krettli, A. U. & Brener, Z. (1976). Protective effects of specific antibodies in Trypanosoma cruzi infections. Journal of Immunology 116, 755–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krettli, A. U., Carrington, P. W. & Nussenzweig, R. S. (1979). Membrane bound antibodies of bloodstream Trypanosoma cruzi in mice; strain differences in susceptibility to complement mediated lysis. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 3, 18.Google Scholar
McHardy, N. (1977). Passive immunization of mice against Trypanosoma cruzi using convalescent mouse serum. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologic 28, 195201.Google ScholarPubMed
Meyer, H. & Oliveira, M. X. (1948). Cultivation of Trypanosoma cruzi in tissue cultures: a four-year study. Parasitology 39, 91–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, N. & Cohn, Z. (1976). Trypanosoma cruzi: Mechanism of entry and intracellular fate in mammalian cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 143, 1402–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzi, T. P. (1953). Sobre el problema de las formas delgadas de Trypanosoma cruzi. Boletin de Informaciones Parasitarias Chilenas 8, 2630.Google Scholar
Sanderson, C. J., Thomas, J. A. & Twomey, C. E. (1980). The growth of Trypanosoma cruzi in human diploid cells for the production of trypomastigotes. Parasitology 80, 153162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schamatz, D. M., Boltz, R. C. & Murray, P. K. (1982). Trypanosoma cruzi: Separation of broad and slender trypomastigotes using a continuous hypaque gradient (Abstract). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Suppl. ICOPA V, 7–14 August 1982, 588–9.Google Scholar
Schmatz, D. M. & Murray, P. K. (1981). Trypanosoma cruzi: Selective isolation of pure trypomastigotes from cultured muscle cells. Journal of Parasitology 67, 517–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmatz, D. M. & Murray, P. K. (1982). Cultivation of Trypanosoma cruzi in irradiated muscle cells: improved synchronization and enhanced trypomastigote production. Parasitology 85, 115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, L. H. P. (1959). Observacoes sobre o ciclo evoluvito do Trypanosoma cruzi. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 1, 99118.Google Scholar
Silva, L. H. P. & Nussenzweig, V. (1953). Sobre uma cepa de Trypanosoma cruzi altamente virulenta para o camundongo branco. Folia Clinica et Biologica 20, 191207.Google Scholar