Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:12:02.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trematode genetic patterns at host individual and population scales provide insights about infection mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2023

Simão Correia*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal Aquatic and Animal Health Group, CIIMAR, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal Department of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Campus Terra, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand
Sergio Fernández-Boo
Affiliation:
Aquatic and Animal Health Group, CIIMAR, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
Luísa Magalhães
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Xavier de Montaudouin
Affiliation:
CNRS, UMR EPOC, Station Marine, University of Bordeaux, F-33120 Arcachon, France
Guillemine Daffe
Affiliation:
Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers, F-33615 Pessac, France
Robert Poulin
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand
Manuel Vera*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Campus Terra, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
*
Corresponding authors: Simão Correia; Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; Manuel Vera; Email: [email protected]
Corresponding authors: Simão Correia; Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; Manuel Vera; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Multiple parasites can infect a single host, creating a dynamic environment where each parasite must compete over host resources. Such interactions can cause greater harm to the host than single infections and can also have negative consequences for the parasites themselves. In their first intermediate hosts, trematodes multiply asexually and can eventually reach up to 20% of the host's biomass. In most species, it is unclear whether this biomass results from a single infection or co-infection by 2 or more infective stages (miracidia), the latter being more likely a priori in areas where prevalence of infection is high. Using as model system the trematode Bucephalus minimus and its first intermediate host cockles, we examined the genetic diversity of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I region in B. minimus from 3 distinct geographical areas and performed a phylogeographic study of B. minimus populations along the Northeast Atlantic coast. Within localities, the high genetic variability found across trematodes infecting different individual cockles, compared to the absence of variability within the same host, suggests that infections could be generally originating from a single miracidium. On a large spatial scale, we uncovered significant population structure of B. minimus, specifically between the north and south of Bay of Biscay. Although other explanations are possible, we suggest this pattern may be driven by the population structure of the final host.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

With about 45 000 species described in a wide range of ecosystems, trematodes are one of the most common and widespread group of parasites (Carlson et al., Reference Carlson, Dallas, Alexander, Phelan and Phillips2020). They can be found at almost across all trophic levels of dynamic food chains (Bartoli and Gibson, Reference Bartoli and Gibson2007). Trematodes are an important component of ecosystem biodiversity with significant impacts at the host individuals (SchulteOehlmann et al., Reference SchulteOehlmann, Oehlmann, Fioroni and Bauer1997; Curtis et al., Reference Curtis, Kinley and Tanner2000; Thieltges, Reference Thieltges2004), host populations (Fredensborg et al., Reference Fredensborg, Mouritsen and Poulin2005) and ecosystem communities (Poulin, Reference Poulin1999; Mouritsen and Poulin, Reference Mouritsen and Poulin2002; Goedknegt et al., Reference Goedknegt, Feis, Wegner, Luttikhuizen, Buschbaum, Camphuysen, van der Meer and Thieltges2016). Besides, by contributing to the nutrient cycle, acting as indicators of environmental changes or as proxy of environmental diversity (due to multi-host life cycles), trematode presence may indicate a healthy and resilient ecosystem (Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Dobson, Lafferty, Marcogliese, Memmott, Orlofske, Poulin and Thieltges2010; Hatcher and Dunn, Reference Hatcher and Dunn2011).

Trematodes have a complex life cycle that alternates between free-living and parasitic stages. The miracidium, the trematode larva hatched from an egg, infects the first intermediate host (usually a mollusc) and transforms into sporocysts or rediae (parasitic stage). At this stage, sporocysts or rediae, through asexual multiplication, produce cercariae (free-living stage) that emerge from the first host to infect the second intermediate host (a vertebrate or invertebrate) where they settle as metacercariae. In the trematode's final host (a vertebrate), after ingestion of the second host, metacercariae develop into adult flukes, reproduce sexually, and complete the life cycle (Cribb et al., Reference Cribb, Bray, Olson and Littlewood2003; Bartoli and Gibson, Reference Bartoli and Gibson2007). In the first intermediate host, sporocyst stages are overtly destructive, replacing host tissue and reaching up to 20% of the host's biomass (Dubois et al., Reference Dubois, Savoye, Sauriau, Billy, Martinez and de Montaudouin2009; Preston et al., Reference Preston, Orlofske, Lambden and Johnson2013), with direct consequences for host reproduction (Carballal et al., Reference Carballal, Iglesias, Santamarina, Ferro-Soto and Villalba2001), growth (Bowers, Reference Bowers1969) and energy demand (Jokela et al., Reference Jokela, Uotila and Taskinen1993), leading to eventual host death (Thieltges, Reference Thieltges2006). In most species, it is currently unknown whether this sporocyst biomass results from a single miracidium, that excludes other miracidia by predation or intraspecific competition, or from co-infection. If co-infection is the rule, trematode invasion may result in a burden that the host might not be able to bear (Fredensborg and Poulin, Reference Fredensborg and Poulin2005; Mideo, Reference Mideo2009). On the other hand, co-infection can, occasionally, benefit the host by lessening the overall burden of infection, by reducing parasite infection success, or by strengthening the host's immune response, leading to higher resistance to infection (Dumont et al., Reference Dumont, Mone, Mouahid, Idris, Shaban and Boissier2007; Balmer et al., Reference Balmer, Stearns, Schotzau and Brun2009).

Determining the genetic diversity of trematode sporocysts within and among individual first intermediate hosts is therefore important to understand the biology, behaviour and evolutionary patterns of these parasites. Nonetheless, current knowledge regarding biology of these parasites, and particularly about the sporocyst life stage, is still very scarce, despite trematodes' wide distribution and importance to the ecosystem. Few studies have focused on the conspecific diversity of trematode sporocysts within the first intermediate host (Rauch et al., Reference Rauch, Kalbe and Reusch2005; Keeney et al., Reference Keeney, Waters and Poulin2007; Lagrue et al., Reference Lagrue, McEwan, Poulin and Keeney2007), showing that the likelihood of infection by conspecifics increased with the prevalence of the parasite in the community (Keeney et al., Reference Keeney, Boessenkool, King, Leung and Poulin2008; Louhi et al., Reference Louhi, Karvonen, Rellstab, Louhi and Jokela2013). Moreover, at the population level, the host has a significant impact on genetic diversity and population structure of parasites, with substantial gene flow occurring in parasite species with efficient dispersion mechanisms (Agola et al., Reference Agola, Steinauer, Mburu, Mungai, Mwangi, Magoma, Loker and Mkoji2009; Feis et al., Reference Feis, Thieltges, Olsen, de Montaudouin, Jensen, Bazairi, Culloty and Luttikhuizen2015). However, most studies of trematode genetic diversity have focused on intermediate and final hosts, with particular emphasis on trematodes with harmful impacts on human (Theron et al., Reference Theron, Sire, Rognon, Prugnolle and Durand2004; Bell et al., Reference Bell, De Roode, Sim and Read2006; Balmer et al., Reference Balmer, Stearns, Schotzau and Brun2009) or socio-economically important species, namely fish (Vilas et al., Reference Vilas, Paniagua and Sanmartin2003; Criscione and Blouin, Reference Criscione and Blouin2006).

Bucephalus minimus is a marine trematode parasite that occurs in several aquatic systems along the Northeast Atlantic coast and Mediterranean Sea (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015). In the Atlantic area, this parasite infects the European edible cockle, Cerastoderma edule, which serves as the first intermediate host when a miracidium penetrates its tissue. In cockles, the prevalence of this parasite varies greatly among coastal systems and season; depending on the time since infection, the parasite's dry mass in infected cockles can range from 1 to 20% of the total living tissue within the cockle shell (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015; de Montaudouin et al., Reference de Montaudouin, Arzul, Cao, Carballal, Chollet, Correia, Cuesta, Culloty, Daffe, Darriba, Díaz, Engelsma, Freitas, Garcia, Goedknegt, Gonzalez, Grade, Groves, Iglesias, Jensen, Joaquim, Lynch, Magalhães, Mahony, Maia, Malham, Matias, Nowaczyk, Ruano, Thieltges and Villalba2021). Bucephalus minimus initially infects the cockle's gonad and digestive gland but promptly spreads to other parts of the host, eventually invading the entire body (Desclaux et al., Reference Desclaux, de Montaudouin and Bachelet2002; de Montaudouin et al., Reference de Montaudouin, Thieltges, Gam, Krakau, Pina, Bazairi, Dabouineau, Russell-Pinto and Jensen2009). Infection by B. minimus results in castration (Carballal et al., Reference Carballal, Iglesias, Santamarina, Ferro-Soto and Villalba2001) and energy consumption (Dubois et al., Reference Dubois, Savoye, Sauriau, Billy, Martinez and de Montaudouin2009), leading to starvation and autolysis of the host's digestive tract. This parasite is considered as one of the most harmful trematode parasites infecting C. edule (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015; de Montaudouin et al., Reference de Montaudouin, Arzul, Cao, Carballal, Chollet, Correia, Cuesta, Culloty, Daffe, Darriba, Díaz, Engelsma, Freitas, Garcia, Goedknegt, Gonzalez, Grade, Groves, Iglesias, Jensen, Joaquim, Lynch, Magalhães, Mahony, Maia, Malham, Matias, Nowaczyk, Ruano, Thieltges and Villalba2021). Inside cockles, B. minimus produces sporocysts and cercariae through asexual multiplication, which emerge and infect the goby Pomatoschistus spp. (second intermediate host), where they encyst and develop into metacercariae. The final host, Dicentrarchus labrax, the European seabass, is infected after consumption of parasitized gobies. Metacercariae develop into adult flukes and produce eggs, through sexual reproduction, to complete the cycle (Pina et al., Reference Pina, Barandela, Santos, Russell-Pinto and Rodrigues2009; Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015).

Due to the limited information regarding this trematode's sporocyst stages, the primary goal of the present study was to assess the genetic variability of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) region of B. minimus sporocyst DNA within and among the first intermediate host, C. edule. We tested the hypothesis that higher genetic variability at the host individual scale (resulting in 2 or more haplotypes among sporocysts in a single cockle) are more common in localities with high prevalence of infection, where joint infections should be more frequent by chance alone. As our second goal, a phylogeographic study of B. minimus was also carried out combining information available in the literature and from samples taken on cockle beds that were examined in this study for the first time (i.e. Iberian Peninsula and Great Britain).

Materials and methods

Bucephalus minimus samples

The genetic variability of B. minimus sporocyst haplotypes within the same host was studied by collecting specimens present in the first intermediate host, the edible cockle, at 3 different beds with different prevalence along the European Atlantic coast: Ria de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal (lowest prevalence [Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Correia, de Montaudouin and Freitas2018]); de la Ramallosa Lagoon, Baiona, Spain (moderate prevalence [Intecmar, 2021]); and Île aux Oiseaux, Arcachon, France (with high levels of prevalence [Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015]) (Fig. 1). Adult cockles (between 20 and 30 mm shell length) were haphazardly collected at low tide and dissected in the laboratory to morphologically identify B. minimus infection. The flesh was then transferred and observed under a stereomicroscope by carefully compressing it between 2 sterilized glass slides. Four sporocyst replicates were extracted per cockle (in a total of 5 cockles per sampling site) using forceps, and preserved separately in 100% ethanol at −20°C. All material was sterilized between samples. To enhance the possibility of different clones, sporocysts were taken from different infected tissues of the same cockle (i.e. 1 from the foot, 1 from the gills and 2 from the digestive gland).

Figure 1. Geographical location of the Cerastoderma edule cockle beds sampled for the study of Bucephalus minimus genetic variability at host level (Aveiro, Baiona and Arcachon [in italics]) and for phylogeographic analysis. *Cockle beds sampled for the first time in this study.

DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA extraction from B. minimus specimens was performed using E.Z.N.A Mollusc DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Nanodrop was used to assess DNA concentration, and, if needed, aliquots were created to dilute DNA to approximately 30 ng μL−1.

The mitochondrial COI fragment was amplified using the MplatCOX1-dF (5′-TTW CIT TRG ATC ATA AG-3′) and MplatCOX1-dR (5′-TGA AAY AAY AII GGA TCI CCA CC-3′) primers (Moszczynska et al., Reference Moszczynska, Locke, McLaughlin, Marcogliese and Crease2009), resulting in sequences of 587 bp. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a final volume of 20 μL composed of 1X reaction buffer, 2.5 mm MgCl2, 100 μm deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 0.5 μm of forward and reverse primers, 0.65 units of ThermoFisher AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and 60 ng of DNA. The PCR programme employed had an initial denaturation step for 10 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C and 1 min at 72°C and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. Following this initial PCR, a second PCR was carried out using the same conditions previously described but using 2 μL of PCR product instead of DNA. The amplified PCR products were analysed by electrophoresis through a 1% agarose gel dyed with SYBR safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and visualized under UV light.

PCR products were enzymatically purified with ExoSAP mix (10 μL of PCR product, 0.6 units of EXO I [DNA nuclease] and 0.3 units of shrimp alkaline phosphatase [SAP] for a final volume of 12 μL) under the following conditions: 60 min at 37°C and 15 min at 85°C. Purified PCR products were sequenced using the ABI Prism BigDyeTM Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit protocol on an ABI Prism 3730 xl automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: OQ625925–OQ625936; Table 1). Variable sites were manually checked using the SEQSCAPE 2.5 program (Applied Biosystems) and aligned using ClustalW algorithm implemented on BioEdit v.7.2.5 (Hall, Reference Hall1999) with LaB haplotype (GenBank accession number: KF880429.1) as reference. Identification of the different haplotypes in the B. minimus specimens analysed was carried out using the software DNAsp v5.10 (Librado and Rozas, Reference Librado and Rozas2009). Finally, to check for the presence of premature stop codons, COI haplotypes identified were translated to amino acid sequences using the flatworm mtDNA code in the online software EMBOSS Transeq (Rice et al., Reference Rice, Longden and Bleasby2000; Goujon et al., Reference Goujon, McWilliam, Li, Valentin, Squizzato, Paern and Lopez2010).

Table 1. Accession number for B. minimus COI gene DNA sequences downloaded (with reference) and deposited (in bold) in GenBank

Data analysis

Bucephalus minimus genetic variability at host level

To determine the genetic variability of B. minimus specimens within the same cockle and among different cockles, haplotypes found in the different tissues of each analysed cockle were compared using BioEdit. A haplotype network was built using the obtained data, identifying haplotypes for each cockle with a different colour. The haplotype network was constructed by calculating the distance (based on number of base pair differences) between DNA sequences and determining the number of mutations between haplotypes using ‘pegas’ and ‘ape’ packages of R Statistical Software v.4.2.2 (Paradis, Reference Paradis2010; Paradis and Schliep, Reference Paradis and Schliep2019).

Phylogeographic analysis

For phylogeographic analyses, together with the specimens collected in the present study, DNA extractions of 13 specimens from 7 cockle beds sampled as part of the COCKLES Interreg project (http://cockles-project.eu/) were sequenced as previously described. Samples were available for Aveiro, Portugal (1 sample), Noia, Spain (1 sample), Arcachon, France (1 sample), Bay of Somme, France (4 samples), The Dee, Wales (2 samples), Burry Inlet, Wales (2 samples) and Wadden Sea, the Netherlands (2 samples). Additionally, the analysis included another 54 COI sequences available in the GenBank database retrieved in January 2023 (see Feis et al., Reference Feis, Thieltges, Olsen, de Montaudouin, Jensen, Bazairi, Culloty and Luttikhuizen2015 and Table 1). In total, sequences represented specimens from 11 different cockle beds located in 7 countries, covering a large part of the natural distributional range of cockles in the Atlantic area (Fig. 1).

Phylogenetic relationships were studied using different and complementary approaches. First, a haplotype network was computed for the full dataset as previously described, which included information regarding the cockle bed in which the haplotypes were found and the frequency of occurrence. Identification of unique haplotypes present in the dataset was carried out with DnaSP v.5.10 (Librado and Rozas, Reference Librado and Rozas2009). Using MEGA X software (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz and Tamura2018), the Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano nucleotide substitution rate (HKY) with a γ value of 0.655 and invariable sites of 0.728 was identified as the most probable nucleotide substitution model for our data. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using exclusively the different haplotypes identified and the nucleotide substitution model described above. Maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbour-joining rooted and unrooted trees were constructed using the R Statistical Software v.4.2.2. The rooted tree was created using the COI sequences of Rhipidocotyle sp. (a trematode from the same family as B. minimus, Bucephalidae, GenBank accession number: KM538111.1) and Himasthla quissetensis (a trematode that infects cockles as second intermediate host but from a different family, Himasthlidae; GenBank accession number: MN272732.1) as outgroups. The sequences were trimmed to 540 bp to remove missing data. The unrooted trees were constructed using the full 587 bp sequences of B. minimus. The robustness of the branches for the phylogenetic trees was estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates and a likelihood ratio test was performed based on the minimum Akaike information criterion values for ML. All phylogeographic analyses were performed with the ‘ape’, ‘pegas’, ‘ggtree’ and ‘phangorn’ packages of R Statistical Software v.4.2.2 (Paradis, Reference Paradis2010; Schliep, Reference Schliep2011; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Smith, Zhu, Guan and Lam2017; Paradis and Schliep, Reference Paradis and Schliep2019).

Genetic diversity parameters, calculated as haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (π), were estimated within each cockle bed studied using Arlequin v.3.5.1.3 (Excoffier et al., Reference Excoffier, Laval and Schneider2005). The HKY model is not available in this software. For this reason, the Tamura–Nei (TN) model with a γ value of 0.639 (similar to the HKY and identified as the third best option for MEGA X) was used for π estimations. Genetic structure and population differentiation were assessed with global and pairwise coefficients of population differentiation applying the TN with γ value of 0.639 substitution rate (ϕST values) with Arlequin. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) applying different models of a priori clustering (based on host population genetics [Souche et al., Reference Souche, Hellemans, Babbucci, MacAoidh, Guinard, Bargelloni, Chistiakov, Patarnello, Bonhomme, Martinsohn and Volckaert2015; Vera et al., Reference Vera, Maroso, Wilmes, Hermida, Blanco, Fernández, Groves, Malham, Bouza, Cockle's, Robins and Martínez2022] and observed data – see results) was carried out to study the distribution of genetic variation within (ϕSC) and among (ϕCT) bed groups using Arlequin. The significance for all the ϕ statistics was evaluated with 10 000 permutations.

Results

Bucephalus minimus genetic variability at host level

During this study, a total of 210 cockles were analysed, of which 17 were found to be infected with B. minimus (5 each in Aveiro and Baiona and 7 in Arcachon). The prevalence of B. minimus in the cockle beds sampled varied from 3.3% in Aveiro (Portugal) to 23.3% in Arcachon (France). In Baiona (Spain), B. minimus was present in 16.7% of the sampled cockles. Five infected cockles per bed were used to extract 4 sporocysts per cockle, yielding a total of 60 samples. Fifty-six samples were successfully sequenced, while 4 samples, from a single cockle from Arcachon (France), were not successfully sequenced due to DNA extraction problems. From the 56 sequenced sporocysts, belonging to 14 infected cockles, 12 different haplotypes were identified, with 5, 3 and 4 haplotypes found in Aveiro, Baiona and Arcachon, respectively (Table 2). Six of the identified haplotypes were characterized for the first time (named as BmA–BmF; see Table 1).

Table 2. Coordinates of each cockle bed, the number of analysed cockles (N cockles), number of parasites sequenced (NB. minimus), prevalence of B. minimus, number of haplotypes (k), number of polymorphic sites (PS) and haplotype composition (between parentheses the number of individuals bearing the same haplotype when different from one)

All sporocysts of B. minimus from the same cockle had identical haplotype, however B. minimus haplotypes identified in different cockles from the same bed were different, except in Baiona where the haplotype found in 3 different cockles was identical (haplotype LaE; see Table 2 and Fig. 2). Moreover, haplotypes were not shared among the 3 beds (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Haplotype network of Bucephalus minimus samples from Aveiro (Portugal), Baiona (Spain) and Arcachon (France) based on genetic distance (number of base pair differences) of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene sequences. Different haplotypes with respective names are represented by circles, with circle size proportional to observed frequency. Inferred mutation steps are shown by black dots. Colours depict samples taken from the same cockle.

Phylogeographic analysis

From the 69 DNA sequenced samples (56 for the B. minimus haplotype genetic variability at host level study, and 13 from different European sites selected from the COCKLES project), 12 resulted in novel haplotypes (Table 1). No premature STOP codons were identified in these sequences (data not shown). Thus, when GenBank resources were included, a total of 162 COI gene sequences of B. minimus specimens from 11 cockle beds were analysed. From these available sequences, 66 represented unique haplotype sequences. Shared haplotypes (i.e. those found in more than 1 cockle bed) accounted for 17% of the total. The LaAQ haplotype was the most prevalent and abundant haplotype, occurring 42 times across 6 different beds. On the other hand, 83% of the haplotypes were exclusively found in a single bed, with several reported only once (i.e. singletons). Arcachon presented the highest number of different B. minimus haplotypes detected (19, see Table 3).

Table 3. Haplotype frequency for B. minimus COI gene per cockle bed including haplotype diversity (h ± standard deviation) and nucleotide diversity (π ± standard deviation)

Due to the high variability found in the COI region, the analysis of B. minimus haplotypes across the various cockle beds produced a complex network made up of several closely connected haplotypes and associated mutational steps, with no more than 5 mutations separating any 2 successive haplotypes identified. A common haplotype (LaAQ), observed in several beds situated north of Arcachon (44°N), was located in the centre of the network, from which numerous other haplotypes diverged in a star-like pattern. These haplotypes were exclusively found in a single bed or shared between relatively close beds (Fig. 3). Nonetheless, haplotype clusters (i.e. haplogroups) were identified in specific geographic areas, and beds from the South (Merja Zerga, Aveiro, Baiona and Noia) and North (Bay of Somme, English Channel, Celtic Sea, Burry Inlet, The Dee and Wadden Sea) did not share any haplotype, with the exception of the LaE haplotype identified in Baiona, Arcachon and the English Channel. Phylogenetic relationships observed in the network were also confirmed with the phylogenetic trees (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. Haplotype network of Bucephalus minimus based on genetic distance (number of base pair differences) of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene sequences across 11 beds of Cerastoderma edule where Bucephalus minimus specimens were collected. Different haplotypes with respective names are represented by circles, with circle size proportional to observed frequency. Inferred mutation steps are shown by black dots. Colours depict sample location.

Figure 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences of Bucephalus minimus haplotypes from this study and retrieved from GenBank database. Rhipodocotyle sp. and Himasthla quissetensis haplotypes were used as outgroups. Numbers at nodes represent the percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) using neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood methods (NJ/ML). The scale bar indicates the distances in substitutions per nucleotide.

The Arcachon bed, located in the centre of cockle's distributional range between the northern and southern geographic areas, exhibited the highest number of detected haplotypes (19), sharing haplotypes with locations from both regions (Table 3). Excluding Noia, where only 1 individual was analysed, haplotype diversity ranged from 0.3846 in Merja Zerga to 1.0000 in beds where all individuals analysed had a distinct haplotype (Aveiro, Burry Inlet and The Dee). Nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0007 in Merja Zerga to 0.0076 in Baiona (Table 3). The high diversity and the haplotype distribution among locations were also reflected in the ϕST values. Global ϕST for the whole region was 0.2922 (P value < 0.001). Many pairwise ϕST values resulted in significant differences, although many comparisons between close locations were non-significant, mainly among those involving northern beds (Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, all pairwise ϕST values involving Merja Zerga were high and highly significant (P value < 0.001), suggesting the singularity of this bed (global ϕST in the whole region excluding Merja Zerga = 0.1706, P value < 0.001). These results suggest the presence of one northern group (composed by Bay of Somme, English Channel, Celtic Sea, Burry Inlet, The Dee and Wadden Sea) more homogeneous genetically (ϕST = 0.0295, P value = 0.073) than the southern one (composed by Merja Zerga, Aveiro, Baiona and Noia; ϕST = 0.6694, P value < 0.001), with Arcachon representing a potential contact region between both geographic areas. The ϕST value in the northern group increased up to 0.0336 (P value = 0.018) when Arcachon was included, while this value decreased in the southern group when this location was included although it remained quite high (ϕST = 0.4184, P value < 0.001). Hence, these results suggest a closer relationship of Arcachon with the northern group. AMOVA analysis assigned 34.58% of the genetic differentiation to differences between northern and southern groups (ϕCT = 0.3458, P value = 0.008), this percentage being three times higher than those assigned to differences among beds within groups (ϕSC = 0.2109, P value < 0.001, percentage of genetic differentiation = 13.80%). The AMOVA model including Arcachon in the northern group yielded similar values (ϕCT = 0.3100, P value = 0.006, percentage of genetic differentiation = 31.00%; ϕSC = 0.1567, P value < 0.001, percentage of genetic differentiation = 10.81%). This model assigned a higher percentage of genetic differentiation among groups and a lower percentage to differences among beds within groups than the model including Arcachon in the southern group (ϕCT = 0.1327, P value = 0.048, percentage of genetic differentiation = 13.27%; ϕSC = 0.2299, P value < 0.001, percentage of genetic differentiation = 19.13%), suggesting a more coherent grouping of the beds in the former model.

Discussion

Bucephalus minimus genetic variability at host level

Co-infection by multiple parasites, from the same or different species, within the same host is a well-recognized phenomenon in the parasitological literature (Poulin, Reference Poulin2001; Read and Taylor, Reference Read and Taylor2001). This pattern has been extensively studied for several parasite species, namely with an impact on human health (Theron et al., Reference Theron, Sire, Rognon, Prugnolle and Durand2004; Bell et al., Reference Bell, De Roode, Sim and Read2006). For example, in the case of malaria, more than 5 strains have been found to be infecting the same host (Bell et al., Reference Bell, De Roode, Sim and Read2006). The same trend was observed for the trematode parasite Schistosoma mansoni within their second and final host (Theron et al., Reference Theron, Sire, Rognon, Prugnolle and Durand2004). Similar to what is observed for metacercarial or adult stages of trematode parasites, it would be anticipated that different clones would infect the same first intermediate host when thousands of eggs per infected definitive host are shed into the water column, i.e. thousands of miracidia hatching within metres of each other. This was observed for some trematode species (Rauch et al., Reference Rauch, Kalbe and Reusch2005; Keeney et al., Reference Keeney, Waters and Poulin2007; Lagrue et al., Reference Lagrue, McEwan, Poulin and Keeney2007). In the present study, only 1 COI haplotype was found inside each infected cockle (regardless of the samples' origin), in contrast with what has been previously recorded. Nevertheless, it should be noted that in the present study only the COI region (maternally inherited) was sequenced, while for previous studies, microsatellite markers were used to identify individual variability. In fact, microsatellite markers are more accurate for population structure analysis and individual identification since they are highly variable polymorphic regions (Abdul-Muneer, Reference Abdul-Muneer2014) and inherited from both parents. Despite its limitations, the high genetic variability of the COI region found in this species (12 haplotypes out of 14 analysed cockles), as well as in each of the studied beds individually (no repeated haplotypes in 2 out of 3 studied cockle beds – see Table 2), suggests that possibly only 1 individual (i.e. 1 miracidium) of B. minimus infects the host and/or prevails inside it. Unfortunately, no microsatellite markers are currently developed for this trematode species or other closely related species (which could have been used by cross-validation). Therefore, further studies using nuclear markers that are either highly polymorphic (such as microsatellites) or in a high number (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) – which would reduce the probability of random sharing of multilocus genotypes among individuals – will be necessary to confirm our results.

In the Ria de Aveiro, given the low prevalence of B. minimus, the presence of only 1 parasite haplotype per host was not surprising. There is a well-known upwelling mechanism offshore of this coastal lagoon (Queiroz et al., Reference Queiroz, Humphries, Noble, Santos and Sims2012), resulting in low water temperature and consequently lower prevalence and abundance of trematode parasites compared to other coastal systems where cockles are distributed (Correia et al., Reference Correia, Magalhães, Freitas, Bazairi, Gam and de Montaudouin2020). Trematodes are highly sensitive to temperature, both in their free-living and parasitic stages (Thieltges and Rick, Reference Thieltges and Rick2006; Selbach and Poulin, Reference Selbach and Poulin2020). For example, the production and hatching rate of trematode eggs are positively correlated with temperature, peaking under ideal thermal conditions (Morley, Reference Morley2012; Morley and Lewis, Reference Morley and Lewis2017). The same happens with cercarial multiplication within and emergence from the first intermediate host (Poulin, Reference Poulin2006; de Montaudouin et al., Reference de Montaudouin, Blanchet, Desclaux-Marchand, Lavesque and Bachelet2016). Hence, Ria de Aveiro may have fewer free-living stages (miracidia) in the water and might take longer for the cycle to complete. Adding to it the high density of the host found in the area, a parasite intensity dilution effect (as occurs in other regions, e.g. Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas, Dairain and de Montaudouin2017) might also contribute to a single conspecific parasite infection in each individual host, as we observed. However, the same pattern (i.e. 1 haplotype per host) was found for cockles from de la Ramallosa lagoon (Baiona) and Île aux Oiseaux (Arcachon), where the prevalence of B. minimus can exceed 20%. Double infection by trematode sporocysts in cockles is rare (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015, Reference Magalhães, Daffe, Freitas and de Montaudouin2020), most likely due to rare exposure of the host to a second miracidium. However, occurrence of co-clone infection has been shown to arise when the prevalence of hosts with trematode sporocyst infection rises (Keeney et al., Reference Keeney, Boessenkool, King, Leung and Poulin2008; Louhi et al., Reference Louhi, Karvonen, Rellstab, Louhi and Jokela2013). Therefore, the rationale above that relates temperature and low prevalence as causes of single haplotype infection lacks support in Baiona (Spain) and Arcachon (France) and suggests again that B. minimus infection may originate from a single miracidium.

Alternatively, the genetic diversity at host level may be determined by the infection mechanisms of these parasites, such as intraspecific competition. The presence of a single B. minimus haplotype per host could also be explained by the production of substances that could change host chemical attractiveness (Baiocchi et al., Reference Baiocchi, Lee, Choe and Dillman2017) or be toxic against competitors (Burman, Reference Burman1982; Selva et al., Reference Selva, Viana, Regev-Yochay, Trzcinski, Corpa, Lasa, Novick and Penades2009). This is true for nematode parasites, but there is no information on trematodes. However, synthesis of harmful chemicals seems highly unlikely as it would impact the trematode's own clones. Nonetheless, to test these predictions, specific experiments would need to be conducted.

Another explanation may be that cockles with multiple infection (i.e. those with more than 1 haplotype) are rare because they incur higher mortality rates than single infections. This stage of the trematode life cycle is highly deleterious for the host and can lead to mass mortality events during outbreaks (Thieltges, Reference Thieltges2006; de Montaudouin et al., Reference de Montaudouin, Arzul, Cao, Carballal, Chollet, Correia, Cuesta, Culloty, Daffe, Darriba, Díaz, Engelsma, Freitas, Garcia, Goedknegt, Gonzalez, Grade, Groves, Iglesias, Jensen, Joaquim, Lynch, Magalhães, Mahony, Maia, Malham, Matias, Nowaczyk, Ruano, Thieltges and Villalba2021). Periods of high prevalence may also result in a rise in co-infections, which may heighten the host's susceptibility and mortality. Theoretical and empirical studies provide conflicting findings, and it is therefore unclear whether susceptibility and subsequent host death are directly connected to co-infection by conspecific parasites (Read and Taylor, Reference Read and Taylor2001; Davies et al., Reference Davies, Fairbrother and Webster2002; Alizon and van Baalen, Reference Alizon and van Baalen2008). Regardless, a study conducted using different strains of the trematode S. mansoni in their host showed an increase in overall pathogenicity (Davies et al., Reference Davies, Fairbrother and Webster2002).

As an alternative and excluding the above scenarios, it is possible that after parasite settlement, co-infection becomes unlikely due to alterations in host characteristics. For instance, the nematode Acanthocheilonema viteae induces an immune response by the host to further infection by free-living larvae, with no effect on the nematode's persistence within the host (Rajakumar et al., Reference Rajakumar, Bleiss, Hartmann, Schierack, Marko and Lucius2006). The extensive use of host tissues, particularly the gonad and digestive gland (Dubois et al., Reference Dubois, Savoye, Sauriau, Billy, Martinez and de Montaudouin2009), could be another reason for the absence of co-infection. This exhaustive use of resources might prevent the settlement of other parasite individuals. Interestingly, co-infection with another trematode species at the same sporocyst stage is exceedingly rare and less frequent than expected (in terms of probability), without predominance by either species (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Daffe, Freitas and de Montaudouin2020). The exhaustive use of tissue preventing the establishment of further miracidia seems to be the most likely explanation for our findings. Thus, the present results cannot fully demonstrate whether co-infection by conspecifics is present or not due to the limited sample size and the genetic marker used. They do, however, suggest that co-infections might be rare and not the rule, and that, for a co-infection to occur, different miracidia must infect simultaneously or within a short period of time. Further studies using codominant nuclear DNA molecular markers, such as microsatellites or SNPs (unavailable to date for B. minimus), or attempts at experimental infection of previously infected cockles, would help to determine whether co-infections are possible and confirm our results.

Bucephalus minimus phylogeography

The COI sequences amplified in this study, as well as those available from the literature (Feis et al., Reference Feis, Thieltges, Olsen, de Montaudouin, Jensen, Bazairi, Culloty and Luttikhuizen2015), were all grouped together, with short branches separating each sequence, indicating that the sequences all belong to the same species throughout the entire cockle distributional range, with no evidence of any subspecies.

The haplotype network constructed resulted in a complex pattern with several different haplotypes, generally with few mutational steps between them (at most 5 steps between 2 adjacent haplotypes) in accordance with the previous study by Feis et al. (Reference Feis, Thieltges, Olsen, de Montaudouin, Jensen, Bazairi, Culloty and Luttikhuizen2015). These results are typical of a population with relatively stable age structure and a fixed ratio of natural growth (i.e. stable demography) (Loewe and Hill, Reference Loewe and Hill2010). The absence of shared haplotypes among the various beds (most haplotypes were present in a single bed) supports this conclusion. These results were expected and consistent with previous reports on this species (Feis et al., Reference Feis, Thieltges, Olsen, de Montaudouin, Jensen, Bazairi, Culloty and Luttikhuizen2015). Trematodes have a complex life cycle that involves a vertebrate, usually a fish or a bird, as definitive host (Cribb et al., Reference Cribb, Bray, Olson and Littlewood2003). In the case of B. minimus, its final host is the European seabass, which has limited migratory capacity compared to birds (de Pontual et al., Reference de Pontual, Heerah, Goossens, Garren, Martin, Le Ru, Le Roy and Woillez2023). This limited mobility results in a higher degree of isolation between populations of B. minimus.

In our study, 2 haplogroups were identified, one located south of the Bay of Biscay (including Merja Zerga, Aveiro, Baiona and Noia) and the other to the north (including Bay of Somme, English Channel, Celtic Sea, Burry Inlet, The Dee and Wadden Sea). These groups did not share haplotypes except one (LaE). However, this division also coincides with the cockle beds where a lower number of individuals were assessed (see Table 3). Besides, it is noteworthy that there is a core haplotype present in 6 different beds from which most of the other haplotypes diverge. This haplotype has only been identified in the northernmost beds. However, it may represent an ancestral haplotype that has spread across the different regions, and then undergone evolutionary mutations that are specific to each bed in which it occurs. For example, the haplotype network created for the B. minimus genetic variability at host level study (Fig. 2) revealed higher similarity of Aveiro (south group) and Arcachon (central/north group) haplotypes than Aveiro and Baiona (south group) haplotypes due to a parsimonious position (position 50 of our alignment) in the COI sequences where a cytosine replaces a thymine in all Baiona haplotypes. Consequently, the presence or absence of haplotypes in a particular bed should be interpreted cautiously, especially for southern beds.

Despite the limitations previously described, the population genetics of B. minimus exhibited similar geographic clusters as those of its first intermediate host, C. edule [structured as northwards and southwards of French Brittany (Vera et al., Reference Vera, Maroso, Wilmes, Hermida, Blanco, Fernández, Groves, Malham, Bouza, Cockle's, Robins and Martínez2022)]. Cockle dispersal mainly occurs during their larval stages (Martel and Chia, Reference Martel and Chia1991), when B. minimus cannot infect them (Magalhães et al., Reference Magalhães, Freitas and de Montaudouin2015). It may also occur through human-mediated movements, although no information is available regarding this possibility. Therefore, it is more logical to expect a correlation with the population genetic structure of seabass, the most mobile host in the trematode life cycle (Zemmer et al., Reference Zemmer, Detwiler, Sokol, Da Silva Neto, Wyderko, Potts, Gajewski, Sarment, Benfield and Belden2020). Two distinct genetic population units, one in the Atlantic area and another in the Mediterranean, have been previously identified for seabass (Souche et al., Reference Souche, Hellemans, Babbucci, MacAoidh, Guinard, Bargelloni, Chistiakov, Patarnello, Bonhomme, Martinsohn and Volckaert2015), with a slight genetic differentiation in the Atlantic area observed south of the Strait of Gibraltar (Morocco) attributed to a hybrid zone between 2 evolutionary lineages (Lemaire et al., Reference Lemaire, Versini and Bonhomme2005; Vandeputte et al., Reference Vandeputte, Gagnaire and Allal2019). A genomic survey conducted with more than 2700 molecular markers (i.e. SNPs) throughout the Atlantic area revealed the presence of 3 different groups weakly differentiated and geographically distributed. Thus, all Atlantic wild fish belonged to a single group, except specimens from the northern North Sea (i.e. Norway) and the Strait of Gibraltar (AQUATRACE, 2017), matching the results of Souche et al. (Reference Souche, Hellemans, Babbucci, MacAoidh, Guinard, Bargelloni, Chistiakov, Patarnello, Bonhomme, Martinsohn and Volckaert2015). This structure (see Fig. S1) could explain the high B. minimus population differentiation found when Merja Zerga (located on the Moroccan coast) was compared with the remaining beds, although more beds south of the Strait of Gibraltar need to be studied, along with greater sample sizes from southern beds, especially in the Iberian Peninsula, to corroborate this explanation. Following seabass genetic structure, the other cockle beds analysed may be included within the same genetic group. Despite this homogeneity, Quéré et al. (Reference Quéré, Guinand, Kuhl, Reinhardt, Bonhomme and Desmarais2010) identified genetic differentiation between seabass from the Bay of Biscay and North Sea using a molecular marker (microsatellite) under selection associated to the somatolactin gene, although this pattern was not confirmed either by other candidate genes or adaptive variation screenings (Souche et al., Reference Souche, Hellemans, Babbucci, MacAoidh, Guinard, Bargelloni, Chistiakov, Patarnello, Bonhomme, Martinsohn and Volckaert2015; AQUATRACE, 2017). Moreover, an electronic tagging study in seabass has identified the Bay of Biscay as a potential hybridization zone for several subpopulations of seabass from various Atlantic coast locations (de Pontual et al., Reference de Pontual, Heerah, Goossens, Garren, Martin, Le Ru, Le Roy and Woillez2023), which could account for the region's high haplotype diversity and differentiation in the population genetics of B. minimus. In any event, the effect of selective processes on seabass population structure cannot be ruled out and could explain the current genetic structure in B. minimus, with the Bay of Biscay (here represented by Arcachon bed) being a possible hybrid region between northern and southern groups. Thus, the genetic structure among B. minimus population uncovered in our study may reflect local adaptation of the parasite to the most common host genotypes occurring in each of the regions sampled (e.g. Sasal et al., Reference Sasal, Durand, Faliex and Morand2000). One possible approach to further investigate this possibility would be to conduct co-phylogeographic analyses between the genetic structure of the parasite and that of their cockle and seabass hosts (e.g. Nieberding et al., Reference Nieberding, Morand, Libois and Michaux2004; Nieberding and Olivieri, Reference Nieberding and Olivieri2007).

In conclusion, with a single COI haplotype observed per host, B. minimus genetic variability at the host level was very limited. This suggests that a single miracidium may be infecting C. edule, possibly indicating the existence of strong mechanisms operating in the background to reduce the likelihood of multiple infections. However, the processes involved are currently poorly understood, with a long way to go to fully comprehend trematode host–parasite interactions. Particularly, when discussing the early stage of the parasite's life cycle (sporocysts), laboratory studies are required to confirm the likelihood of co-infections and the defence mechanisms involved. Similar to the population structure of its first host, C. edule, 2 B. minimus groups (north and south of Bay of Biscay) were found. It is probable that this pattern derives from D. labrax, this parasite's final host, when specific genomic areas under selection are investigated. However, this structure may also be the result of sampling limitations mostly in the southern beds. The full parasite population connectivity will only be revealed by additional research, specifically by increasing the number of samples of understudied beds, such as in the Mediterranean.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000987

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this manuscript are provided in the text and are also available from the corresponding authors (S.C. and M.V.) upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Txetxu Santiago and Leslie Stout for their help in cockle sampling and Cristina Alonso for her technical support. We are also grateful to Professor J. Russell Stothard and the anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on an earlier version. Simão Correia benefited from PhD grant (2020.04688.BD) funded by National Funds through the Portuguese Science Foundation (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, FCT). Luísa Magalhães is funded by national funds (OE), through FCT (grant 2021.01858.CEECIND). Thanks are also due to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020 + UIDB/50017/2020 + LA/P/0094/2020). Sampling in Arcachon (France) was performed thanks to Planula 4 vessel (CNRS-INSU, Flotte Océanographique Française) and its staff.

Author contributions

S.C., S.F.-B., L.M. and M.V. conceived and designed the study. S.C. conducted data gathering. X.d.M. and G.D. contributed with data. S.C. and M.V. performed data analyses. S.C. wrote the original draft. S.F.-B., L.M., X.d.M., R.P. and M.V. reviewed and edited the draft. S.F.-B., L.M., X.d.M., G.D. and M.V. provided resources. S.F.-B., L.M., R.P. and M.V. supervised the work.

Financial support

The COCKLES project (EAPA_458/2016 COCKLES Co-Operation for Restoring CocKle SheLfisheries and its Ecosystem Services in the Atlantic Area) contributed with samples for the phylogeographic study. The project was funded by the Interreg Atlantic Area Programme through the European Regional Development Fund.

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Abdul-Muneer, PM (2014) Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies. Genetics Research International 2014, 691759. doi: 10.1155/2014/691759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agola, LE, Steinauer, ML, Mburu, DN, Mungai, BN, Mwangi, IN, Magoma, GN, Loker, ES and Mkoji, GM (2009) Genetic diversity and population structure of Schistosoma mansoni within human infrapopulations in Mwea, central Kenya assessed by microsatellite markers. Acta Tropica 111, 219225.10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.04.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alizon, S and van Baalen, M (2008) Multiple infections, immune dynamics, and the evolution of virulence. American Naturalist 172, E150E168.10.1086/590958CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AQUATRACE (2017) The development of tools for tracing and evaluating the genetic impact of fish from aquaculture: ‘AquaTrace’. CORDIS EU research accessed 20 March 2023. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/311920/reportingGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, T, Lee, G, Choe, DH and Dillman, AR (2017) Host seeking parasitic nematodes use specific odors to assess host resources. Scientific Reports 7, 6270.10.1038/s41598-017-06620-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balmer, O, Stearns, SC, Schotzau, A and Brun, R (2009) Intraspecific competition between co-infecting parasite strains enhances host survival in African trypanosomes. Ecology 90, 33673378.10.1890/08-2291.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoli, P and Gibson, DI (2007) Synopsis of the life cycles of Digenea (Platyhelminthes) from lagoons of the northern coast of the western Mediterranean. Journal of Natural History 41, 15531570.10.1080/00222930701500142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, AS, De Roode, JC, Sim, D and Read, AF (2006) Within-host competition in genetically diverse malaria infections: parasite virulence and competitive success. Evolution 60, 13581371.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowers, EA (1969) Cercariae Bucephalosis haimeana (Lacaze-Duthiers, 1854) (Digenea – Bucephalidae) in cockle, Cardium edule L. in south Wales. Journal of Natural History 3, 409422.10.1080/00222936900770351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, M (1982) Neoaplectana carpocapsae: toxin production by axenic insect parasitic nematodes. Nematologica 28, 6270.10.1163/187529282X00510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carballal, MJ, Iglesias, D, Santamarina, J, Ferro-Soto, B and Villalba, A (2001) Parasites and pathologic conditions of the cockle Cerastoderma edule populations of the coast of Galicia (NW Spain). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78, 8797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, CJ, Dallas, TA, Alexander, LW, Phelan, AL and Phillips, AJ (2020) What would it take to describe the global diversity of parasites? Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 287, 20201841. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correia, S, Magalhães, L, Freitas, R, Bazairi, H, Gam, M and de Montaudouin, X (2020) Large scale patterns of trematode parasite communities infecting Cerastoderma edule along the Atlantic coast from Portugal to Morocco. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 233, 106546. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribb, TH, Bray, RA, Olson, PD and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Life cycle evolution in the Digenea: a new perspective from phylogeny. Advances in Parasitology 54, 197254.10.1016/S0065-308X(03)54004-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Criscione, CD and Blouin, MS (2006) Minimal selfing, few clones, and no among-host genetic structure in a hermaphroditic parasite with asexual larval propagation. Evolution 60, 553562.Google Scholar
Curtis, LA, Kinley, JL and Tanner, NL (2000) Longevity of oversized individuals: growth, parasitism, and history in an estuarine snail population. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 811820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, CM, Fairbrother, E and Webster, JP (2002) Mixed strain schistosome infections of snails and the evolution of parasite virulence. Parasitology 124, 3138.10.1017/S0031182001008873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Montaudouin, X, Thieltges, DW, Gam, M, Krakau, M, Pina, S, Bazairi, H, Dabouineau, L, Russell-Pinto, F and Jensen, KT (2009) Digenean trematode species in the cockle Cerastoderma edule: identification key and distribution along the north-eastern Atlantic shoreline. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 543556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Montaudouin, X, Blanchet, H, Desclaux-Marchand, C, Lavesque, N and Bachelet, G (2016) Cockle infection by Himasthla quissetensis – I. From cercariae emergence to metacercariae infection. Journal of Sea Research 113, 99107.10.1016/j.seares.2015.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Montaudouin, X, Arzul, I, Cao, A, Carballal, MJ, Chollet, B, Correia, S, Cuesta, J, Culloty, S, Daffe, G, Darriba, S, Díaz, S, Engelsma, M, Freitas, R, Garcia, C, Goedknegt, A, Gonzalez, P, Grade, A, Groves, E, Iglesias, D, Jensen, KT, Joaquim, S, Lynch, S, Magalhães, L, Mahony, K, Maia, F, Malham, S, Matias, D, Nowaczyk, A, Ruano, F, Thieltges, D and Villalba, A (2021) Parasites and Diseases of the Common Cockle Cerastoderma edule, 1st Edn. Aveiro: UA Editora-Universidade de Aveiro.Google Scholar
de Pontual, H, Heerah, K, Goossens, J, Garren, F, Martin, S, Le Ru, L, Le Roy, D and Woillez, M (2023) Seasonal migration, site fidelity, and population structure of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). ICES Journal of Marine Science 80, 16061618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desclaux, C, de Montaudouin, X and Bachelet, G (2002) Cockle emergence at the sediment surface: ‘favourization’ mechanism by digenean parasites? Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 52, 137149.10.3354/dao052137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, SY, Savoye, N, Sauriau, PG, Billy, I, Martinez, P and de Montaudouin, X (2009) Digenean trematodes-marine mollusc relationships: a stable isotope study. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 84, 6577.10.3354/dao02022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumont, M, Mone, H, Mouahid, G, Idris, MA, Shaban, M and Boissier, J (2007) Influence of pattern of exposure, parasite genetic diversity and sex on the degree of protection against reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology Research 101, 247252.10.1007/s00436-007-0476-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L, Laval, G and Schneider, S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1, 4750.Google Scholar
Feis, ME, Thieltges, DW, Olsen, JL, de Montaudouin, X, Jensen, KT, Bazairi, H, Culloty, SC and Luttikhuizen, PC (2015) The most vagile host as the main determinant of population connectivity in marine macroparasites. Marine Ecology Progress Series 520, 8599.10.3354/meps11096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredensborg, BL and Poulin, R (2005) Larval helminths in intermediate hosts: does competition early in life determine the fitness of adult parasites? International Journal for Parasitology 35, 10611070.10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.05.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredensborg, BL, Mouritsen, KN and Poulin, R (2005) Impact of trematodes on host survival and population density in the intertidal gastropod Zeacumantus subcarinatus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 290, 109117.10.3354/meps290109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedknegt, MA, Feis, ME, Wegner, KM, Luttikhuizen, PC, Buschbaum, C, Camphuysen, K, van der Meer, J and Thieltges, DW (2016) Parasites and marine invasions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Journal of Sea Research 113, 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goujon, M, McWilliam, H, Li, W, Valentin, F, Squizzato, S, Paern, J and Lopez, R (2010) A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Research 38, W695W699.10.1093/nar/gkq313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 9598.Google Scholar
Hatcher, MJ and Dunn, AM (2011) Parasites in Ecological Communities: From Interactions to Ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511987359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intecmar (2021) Informe Epidemiolóxico de moluscos bivalvos de Galicia, ano 2021. Intecmar – Instituto Tecnoloxico para o controlo do medio marino de Galicia, Unidade de Patoloxía, Galicia, Spain. Available at http://www.intecmar.gal/Informacion/Patoloxia/Default.aspxGoogle Scholar
Johnson, PTJ, Dobson, A, Lafferty, KD, Marcogliese, DJ, Memmott, J, Orlofske, SA, Poulin, R and Thieltges, DW (2010) When parasites become prey: ecological and epidemiological significance of eating parasites. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 362371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jokela, J, Uotila, L and Taskinen, J (1993) Effect of the castrating trematode parasite Rhipidocotyle fennica on energy allocation of fresh-water clam Anodonta piscinalis. Functional Ecology 7, 332338.10.2307/2390213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, DB, Waters, JM and Poulin, R (2007) Clonal diversity of the marine trematode Maritrema novaezealandensis within intermediate hosts: the molecular ecology of parasite life cycles. Molecular Ecology 16, 431439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeney, DB, Boessenkool, S, King, TM, Leung, TLF and Poulin, R (2008) Effects of interspecific competition on asexual proliferation and genetic diversity in larval trematode infections of snails. Parasitology 135, 741747.10.1017/S0031182008004435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 15471549.10.1093/molbev/msy096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagrue, C, McEwan, J, Poulin, R and Keeney, DB (2007) Co-occurrences of parasite clones and altered host phenotype in a snail–trematode system. International Journal for Parasitology 37, 14591467.10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, C, Versini, JJ and Bonhomme, F (2005) Maintenance of genetic differentiation across a transition zone in the sea: discordance between nuclear and cytoplasmic markers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 7080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Librado, P and Rozas, J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 14511452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewe, L and Hill, WG (2010) The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365, 11531167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louhi, KR, Karvonen, A, Rellstab, C, Louhi, R and Jokela, J (2013) Prevalence of infection as a predictor of multiple genotype infection frequency in parasites with multiple-host life cycle. Journal of Animal Ecology 82, 191200.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02028.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magalhães, L, Freitas, R and de Montaudouin, X (2015) Review: Bucephalus minimus, a deleterious trematode parasite of cockles Cerastoderma spp. Parasitology Research 114, 12631278.10.1007/s00436-015-4374-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magalhães, L, Freitas, R, Dairain, A and de Montaudouin, X (2017) Can host density attenuate parasitism? Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 97, 497505.10.1017/S0025315416001107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, L, Correia, S, de Montaudouin, X and Freitas, R (2018) Spatio-temporal variation of trematode parasites community in Cerastoderma edule cockles from Ria de Aveiro (Portugal). Environmental Research 164, 114123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magalhães, L, Daffe, G, Freitas, R and de Montaudouin, X (2020) Monorchis parvus and Gymnophallus choledochus: two trematode species infecting cockles as first and second intermediate host. Parasitology 147, 643658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martel, A and Chia, FS (1991) Drifting and dispersal of small bivalves and gastropods with direct development. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 150, 131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mideo, N (2009) Parasite adaptations to within-host competition. Trends in Parasitology 25, 261268.10.1016/j.pt.2009.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, NJ (2012) Thermodynamics of miracidial survival and metabolism. Parasitology 139, 16401651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, NJ and Lewis, JW (2017) Thermodynamics of egg production, development and hatching in trematodes. Journal of Helminthology 91, 284294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moszczynska, A, Locke, SA, McLaughlin, JD, Marcogliese, DJ and Crease, TJ (2009) Development of primers for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene in digenetic trematodes (Platyhelminthes) illustrates the challenge of barcoding parasitic helminths. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 7582.10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02634.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouritsen, KN and Poulin, R (2002) Parasitism, community structure and biodiversity in intertidal ecosystems. Parasitology 124, S101S117.10.1017/S0031182002001476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieberding, C and Olivieri, I (2007) Parasites: proxies for host genealogy and ecology? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 156165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieberding, C, Morand, S, Libois, R and Michaux, JR (2004) A parasite reveals cryptic phylogeographic history of its host. Proceeding of the Royal Society B 271, 25592568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, E (2010) pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 26, 419420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, E and Schliep, K (2019) ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526528.10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pina, S, Barandela, T, Santos, MJ, Russell-Pinto, F and Rodrigues, P (2009) Identification and description of Bucephalus minimus (Digenea: Bucephalidae) life cycle in Portugal: morphological, histopathological and molecular data. Journal of Parasitology 95, 353359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (1999) The functional importance of parasites in animal communities: many roles at many levels? International Journal for Parasitology 29, 903914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (2001) Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122, S3S11.10.1017/S0031182000016991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (2006) Global warming and temperature-mediated increases in cercarial emergence in trematode parasites. Parasitology 132, 143151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, DL, Orlofske, SA, Lambden, JP and Johnson, PTJ (2013) Biomass and productivity of trematode parasites in pond ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology 82, 509517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queiroz, N, Humphries, NE, Noble, LR, Santos, AM and Sims, DW (2012) Spatial dynamics and expanded vertical niche of blue sharks in oceanographic fronts reveal habitat targets for conservation. PLoS ONE 7, e32374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quéré, N, Guinand, B, Kuhl, H, Reinhardt, R, Bonhomme, F and Desmarais, E (2010) Genomic sequences and genetic differentiation at associated tandem repeat markers in growth hormone, somatolactin and insulin-like growth factor-1 genes of the sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquatic Living Resources 23, 285296.10.1051/alr/2010021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajakumar, S, Bleiss, W, Hartmann, S, Schierack, P, Marko, A and Lucius, R (2006) Concomitant immunity in a rodent model of filariasis: the infection of Meriones unguiculatus with Acanthocheilonema viteae. Journal of Parasitology 92, 4145.10.1645/GE-3507.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, G, Kalbe, M and Reusch, TBH (2005) How a complex life cycle can improve a parasite's sex life. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 10691075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, AF and Taylor, LH (2001) The ecology of genetically diverse infections. Science 292, 10991102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, P, Longden, I and Bleasby, A (2000) EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends in Genetics 16, 276277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasal, S, Durand, P, Faliex, E and Morand, S (2000) Experimental approach to the importance of parasitism in biological conservation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 198, 293302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliep, K (2011) phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SchulteOehlmann, U, Oehlmann, J, Fioroni, P and Bauer, B (1997) Imposex and reproductive failure in Hydrobia ulvae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Marine Biology 128, 257266.10.1007/s002270050090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbach, C and Poulin, R (2020) Some like it hotter: trematode transmission under changing temperature conditions. Oecologia 194, 745755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selva, L, Viana, D, Regev-Yochay, G, Trzcinski, K, Corpa, JM, Lasa, I, Novick, RP and Penades, JR (2009) Killing niche competitors by remote-control bacteriophage induction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106, 12341238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souche, EL, Hellemans, B, Babbucci, M, MacAoidh, E, Guinard, B, Bargelloni, L, Chistiakov, DA, Patarnello, T, Bonhomme, F, Martinsohn, JT and Volckaert, FAM (2015) Range-wide population structure of European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 116, 86105.10.1111/bij.12572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, A, Sire, C, Rognon, A, Prugnolle, F and Durand, P (2004) Molecular ecology of Schistosoma mansoni transmission inferred from the genetic composition of larval and adult infrapopulations within intermediate and definitive hosts. Parasitology 129, 57585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieltges, DW (2004) Effects of trematode parasites on mortality in the common cockle Cerastoderma edule. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 293, 5757.Google Scholar
Thieltges, DW (2006) Parasite induced summer mortality in the cockle Cerastoderma edule by the trematode Gymnophallus choledochus. Hydrobiologia 559, 455461.10.1007/s10750-005-1345-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieltges, DW and Rick, J (2006) Effect of temperature on emergence, survival and infectivity of cercariae of the marine trematode Renicola roscovita (Digenea: Renicolidae). Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 73, 6368.Google ScholarPubMed
Vandeputte, M, Gagnaire, PA and Allal, F (2019) The European sea bass: a key marine fish model in the wild and in aquaculture. Animal Genetics 50, 195206.10.1111/age.12779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vera, M, Maroso, F, Wilmes, SB, Hermida, M, Blanco, A, Fernández, C, Groves, E, Malham, SK, Bouza, C, Cockle's, Consortium, Robins, PE and Martínez, P (2022) Genomic survey of edible cockle (Cerastoderma edule) in the Northeast Atlantic: a baseline for sustainable management of its wild resources. Evolutionary Applications 15, 262285.10.1111/eva.13340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilas, R, Paniagua, E and Sanmartin, ML (2003) Genetic variation within and among infrapopulations of the marine digenetic trematode Lecithochirium fusiforme. Parasitology 126, 465472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, G, Smith, D, Zhu, H, Guan, Y and Lam, TT (2017) ggtree: and R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemmer, SA, Detwiler, JT, Sokol, ER, Da Silva Neto, JG, Wyderko, J, Potts, K, Gajewski, ZJ, Sarment, LV, Benfield, EF and Belden, LK (2020) Spatial scale and structure of complex life cycle trematode parasite communities in streams. PLOS ONE 15, e0241973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241973CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geographical location of the Cerastoderma edule cockle beds sampled for the study of Bucephalus minimus genetic variability at host level (Aveiro, Baiona and Arcachon [in italics]) and for phylogeographic analysis. *Cockle beds sampled for the first time in this study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Accession number for B. minimus COI gene DNA sequences downloaded (with reference) and deposited (in bold) in GenBank

Figure 2

Table 2. Coordinates of each cockle bed, the number of analysed cockles (Ncockles), number of parasites sequenced (NB. minimus), prevalence of B. minimus, number of haplotypes (k), number of polymorphic sites (PS) and haplotype composition (between parentheses the number of individuals bearing the same haplotype when different from one)

Figure 3

Figure 2. Haplotype network of Bucephalus minimus samples from Aveiro (Portugal), Baiona (Spain) and Arcachon (France) based on genetic distance (number of base pair differences) of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene sequences. Different haplotypes with respective names are represented by circles, with circle size proportional to observed frequency. Inferred mutation steps are shown by black dots. Colours depict samples taken from the same cockle.

Figure 4

Table 3. Haplotype frequency for B. minimus COI gene per cockle bed including haplotype diversity (h ± standard deviation) and nucleotide diversity (π ± standard deviation)

Figure 5

Figure 3. Haplotype network of Bucephalus minimus based on genetic distance (number of base pair differences) of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene sequences across 11 beds of Cerastoderma edule where Bucephalus minimus specimens were collected. Different haplotypes with respective names are represented by circles, with circle size proportional to observed frequency. Inferred mutation steps are shown by black dots. Colours depict sample location.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences of Bucephalus minimus haplotypes from this study and retrieved from GenBank database. Rhipodocotyle sp. and Himasthla quissetensis haplotypes were used as outgroups. Numbers at nodes represent the percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) using neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood methods (NJ/ML). The scale bar indicates the distances in substitutions per nucleotide.

Supplementary material: File

Correia et al. supplementary material 1
Download undefined(File)
File 401.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Correia et al. supplementary material 2
Download undefined(File)
File 4.8 MB