Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:10:24.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy of Solenopotes Enderlein, 1904, with redescription of Linognathus panamensis Ewing (Linognathidae: Anoplura)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ke Chung Kim  and
Christian F. Weisser
Ke Chung Kim
Affiliation:
The Frost Entomological Museum, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Christian F. Weisser
Affiliation:
The Frost Entomological Museum, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All the known species of Solenopotes Enderlein, 1904 are discussed with a complete synonymy, major references, diagnoses, host associations and distribution; they are S. binipilosus (Fahrenholz, 1916a); S. burmeisteri (Fahrenholz, 1919); S. capillatus Enderlein, 1904; S. capreoli Freund, 1935a; S. ferrisi (Fahrenholz, 1919); S. muntiacus Thompson, 1938; S. natalensis Ledger, 1970 and S. tarandi (Mjöberg, 1915). The species of Solenopotes are compared on the basis of major taxonomic characters. Solenopotes and Linognathus are compared and a key to the known species of Solenopotes is also presented. Taxonomic relationships among the cervid-infesting species are quantitatively studied. The status of Linognathus panamensis Ewing, 1927, previously assigned to Solenopotes, is discussed and the species is redescribed and illustrated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 107 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. & Jones, J. K. Jr (1967). Recent Mammals of the World: A Synopsis of Families. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. R. H. (1964). The arthropod and helminth parasites of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5 (9), 97–121.Google Scholar
Ansari, M. A. R. (1951). Studies on phthirapteran parasites on mammals from Panjab. Indian Journal of Entomology 13, 117–45.Google Scholar
Ansari, M. A. R. (1958). Liste alphabétique des hotes de Phthiraptera de la collection de l'Institut de Parasitologie de la faculté de Médecine de Paris. (1) Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 33 (3), 267–83.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1930). The Anoplura (sucking lice) of Northumberland and Durham. Vasculum 16, 103–6.Google Scholar
Bedford, G. A. H. (1927). Descriptions of three new species of Anoplura from South African mammals. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 14, 347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishopp, F. C. (1921). Solenopotes capillatus, a sucking louse of cattle not heretofore known in the United States. Journal of Agricultural Research 21 (11), 797–801.Google Scholar
Blagoveshtchensky, D. I. (1960). Vsi (Siphunculata) domashnich mlekopitajuscich. [Lice of domestic mammals.] Moscow Zoological Institute Akademy Nauk. USSR 73.Google Scholar
Blagoveshtchensky, D. I. (1964). 17. Order Anoplura (Siphunculata) – Sucking Lice. In: Bei-Bienko, G. Ya.et al., Keys to Insects of European U.S.S.R. Vol. 1. Apterygota, Palaeoptera, Hemimetabola, pp. 324–34. Zoological Institute Akademy Nauk U.S.S.R. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Brinck, P. (1948 a). Catalogus Insectorum Sueciae. IX. Anoplura. Opuscula Entomologica 8, 129–33.Google Scholar
Brinck, P. (1948 b). Notes on Anoplura. Especially with regard to the Swedish species. Opuscula Entomologica 8, 134–56.Google Scholar
Brinck, P. (1948 c). Den suenska Lusfaunan med särskied hänsyn till husdjurens löss och dessas bekampande. Svensk Veterinärtidskrift, pp. 12–4.Google Scholar
Brinck, P. (1949). The Fennoscandian louse fauna with special reference to the lice of domestic animals and their control. Annales Entomologici Fennici 14 (supplement), 56–61. (In Swedish.)Google Scholar
Britz, L. (1955). Über blutsaugende Läuse (Anoplura), besonders des Hausrindes. Monatshefte für Tierheilkunde 7 (8/9), 151–5.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. (1838). Rhynchota Ordo I. Tribus 1. Pediculina. Genera Insectorum 1, 1–8, pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Bussieras, J. (1966). Existence en France de las de phtiriose bovine à Solenopotes capillatus. Revue Médicine Vétérinaire 29 (3), 209–12.Google Scholar
Conci, C. (1946). Prima nota sugli anopluri Italiani. Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana 76 (1/2), 7–10.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, K. W. (1908). Anoplura. Genera insectorum 81, 1–22.Google Scholar
Denny, H. (1842). Monographia anopluronum britanniae; or An Essay on the British species of Parasitic Insects. London.Google Scholar
Dubitskii, A. M. (1960). About the finding of Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein, 1904, in Kazakhstan. Trudy¯ Instituta zoologii. Akademiya nauk Kazakhskoiˇ SSR 14, 192–3. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dubitskii, A. M. (1962). Contribution to the morphology of cattle lice. Akademia Nauk Kazakhstan SSR, Alma Ata. Institut Zoologii Parazity Sel'st. Zhivot. 2, 1962, 108–9. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. (1904). Läusestudien. I. Über die Morphologie, Klassifikation und systematische Stellung der Anopluren nebst Bemerkungen zur Systematik der Insektenordnungen. Zoologischer Anzeiger 28, 121–47.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. (1905). Läuse-Studien. III. Zur Morphologie des Läusekopfes. Zoologischer Anzeiger 28 (19/20), 626–38.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1927). Descriptions of three new species of sucking lice, together with a key to some related species of the genus Polyplax. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 29 (5), 118–21.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1929). A Manual of External Parasites. Springfield, Baltimore: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1916 a). Weitere Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Anopluren. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 81, 1–34.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1916 b). Diagnosen neuer Anopluren 3. Zoologischer Anzeiger 48, 87–93.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1917). Anopluren der Zoologischen Museums zu Hamburg. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 34 (2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1919). Zur Nomenklatur einiger Anoplurenarten: II. Niedersächsischen Zoologischer Vereins, Hannover, Jahresbericht (1913–1918), 5–10, 22–7.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H. (1936). Zur systematik der Anopluren. Zeitschrift für parasitenkunde 9, 50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1916 a). Cervophthirius crassicornis (N.) Anoplura. Entomological News 27, 197–200.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1916 b). A Catalogue and host list of the Anoplura. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 4th Series 6 (6), 129–213.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1932). Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice. Part 2. Stanford University Publication, University Series, Biological Sciences 5, 279–413.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1935). Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice. Part 8. Stanford University Publication, University Series, Biological Sciences 2 (8), 529–634.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1951). The sucking lice. Memoirs of the Pacific Coast Entomological Society 1, 1–320.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1918). Eine seltene Rinderlaus in Böhmen. Lotos 66, 40–1.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1920). Die Stigmen und Trachealatrien der Anopluren (Läuse). Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitologie, Jena (1) 84, 142–8.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1924). Läusestudie. V. Die Kaudalregion der weiblichen Läuse. Prager Archiv für Tiermedizin und vergleichende Pathologie 4 (A), 39–71.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1927). Läusestudien. IX. Die haarige Rinderlaus, Solenotopes capillatus Enderlein. Prager Archiv für Tiermedizin und vergleichende Pathologie 7 A, 215–27.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1935 a). Die Europäische Hirsch- und Rehlaus. In: Leningrad, Vsesoinznyi inst. eksper. noi med., parasites, transmetteurs, animaux venimeux; recueil de travaux dédié au 25me anniversaire scientifique du prof. E. Pavlovsky, 1909–1934, pp. 275–81. Moscow.Google Scholar
Freund, L. (1935 b). Ord. Läuse, Anoplura. In: Brohmer, D.et al., Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Band 4, Lief. 2, Teil 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gervais, F. L. (1844). Poux (pp. 291–307), Ricinus (pp. 307–61). In: Walckenaer's histoire naturelle des insectes. Atlas, 23, pp. 48–9. Paris.Google Scholar
Gerwell, C. (1953). Solenopotes capillatus dubius n.subsp. (Anoplura) Bulletin de la Société des amis des Sciences et des lettres de Poznan (B) 12, 153–65.Google Scholar
Gerwell, C. (1954 a). The fourth European founding place of Solenopotes Enderlein (Anoplura) in Poland represented by Solenopotes capillatus dubius spec.nov. Proceedings of IIIrd Meeting of the Polish Parasitological Society, Wroclaw, 1952, p. 122. Gdansk–Wrzeszcz. (In Polish, with English summary; 202.)Google Scholar
Gerwell, C. (1954 b). Materials to the fauna of Anoplura in Poland. Acta parasitologica Polonica 2, 171–208. (In Polish.)Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1861). Mittheilungen. Zeitschrift für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 18, 289–319.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1871). Analytische Übersicht der Säugethierläuse Haematopinus und Trichodectes. Zeitschrift für Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 37, 173–9.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1874). Insecta epizoa, die auf Säugethieren und Vogeln schmarotzenden Insekten, nach. Chr. L. Nitsch's Nachlass. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göllner, U. (1971). Survey of Anoplura Collections. (Personal communication.)Google Scholar
Grimshaw, P. H. (1917). The British lice (anoplura) and their Hosts. Scottish Naturalist 61, 13–7, 65–8.Google Scholar
Hase, A. (1931). Siphunculata, Anoplura, Aptera. In: Schulze, P., Biologie der Tiere Deutschlands, Lief. 34, Teil 30 (30.1–30.58). Berlin.Google Scholar
Hearle, E. (1938). Insects and allied parasites injurious to livestock and poultry in Canada. Farmer's Publications, Department of Agriculture, Canada 606, 67–77.Google Scholar
Holdenreid, R., Evans, F. C. & Langenecker, D. S. (1951). Host–parasite–disease relationships in a mammalian community in the central coast region of California. Ecological Monograph 21, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1949). The host-associations of the lice of mammals. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 119, 387–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, W. & Kahle, I. (1937). Über entomologische Sammlungen, Entomologen & Entomo-Museologie. Entomologische Beihefte 2–4, 1–536.Google Scholar
Ignoffo, C. M. (1956). Notes on louse–host associations of the Great Salt Lake Desert with keys to the lice. Great Basin Naturalist, Provo 16, 9–17.Google Scholar
Ignoffo, C. M. (1959). Key and notes to the Anoplura of Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 61, 470–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jancke, O. (1932). Mitteilungen über Anopluren: IV–IX. Zeitschrift für Parasitologie 4 (3), 522–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jancke, O. (1938). Die Anopluren Deutschlands. In: Dahl, F., Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile 35, 43–76 (57, 61–2).Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T. (1958). Type specimens of Lice (Order Anoplura) in the USNM. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 108, 48–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. T. (1962). Redescription of two cervid-infesting Anoplura from Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 64, 109–10.Google Scholar
Kéler, S. von (1963). 14. Ordnung. Läuse, Anoplura. In: Brohmer, P.et al., Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Insecten I, Teil 4, Heft 8, Leif 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kim, K. C. (1966). The species of Enderleinellus (Anoplura, Hoplopleuridae) parasitic on the Sciurini and Tamiasciurini. Journal of Parasitology 52 (5), 968–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, K. C., Brown, B. W. Jr & Cook, E. P. (1966). A quantitative taxonomic study of the Hoplopleura hesperomydis complex (Anoplura, Hoplopleuridae), with notes on a posteriori taxonomic characters. Systematic Zoology 15 (1), 24–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. C. & Weisser, C. F. (1973). Haematopinus eurysternus Denny, 1842 (Haematopinidae, Anoplura, Insecta): proposed validation under the plenary powers. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 30 (1), 42–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloet, G. S. & Hincks, W. D. (1945). A Checklist of British Insects. Stockport, England.Google Scholar
Kohn, F. G. (1929). In der Karlsbader Gegend beobachtete tierische Parasiten der Warmblüter und der Fische. Prager Archiv für Tiermedizin und vergleichende Pathologie 9 (A), 49–64.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.L. (1957). Cattle lice. Bulletin of Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas 591, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ledger, J. A. (1970). A new species of Solenopotes Enderlein (Anoplura: Linognathidae) from an African antelope. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 33 (2), 267–72.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae I, ed. 10, Holmiae.Google Scholar
Ma, S. F. (1965). The livestock lice of our country. Shengwuxue Tongbao 3, 5–7.Google Scholar
Markevich, A. P. (1961). (Collection, mounting and working up a collection of Mallophaga and Anoplura). In: Metody Izucheniya parasitologichenskoi situatsii Boriba s parazitolozami, sel'skokhozyaistuenn Zhivotnykhykh, 2nd ed., pp. 106–13.Google Scholar
Matthysse, J. G. (1944). Biology of the cattle biting louse and notes on cattle sucking lice. Journal of Economic Entomology 37 (3), 436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysse, J. G. (1946). Cattle lice, their biology and control. Bulletin (N.Y.) Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station 832, 1–67.Google Scholar
Mjöberg, E. G. (1910). Studien über Mallophagen und Aonpluren. Arkiv. för Zoologi Stockholm) 6, 1–297.Google Scholar
Mjöberg, E. G. (1915). Über eine neue Gattung und Art von Anopluren. Entomologisk Tijdskrift 36, 282–5.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G. (1909). Notes sur les Pediculides. Archiv für Parasitologie 13, 497–537.Google Scholar
Nitsch, C. L. (1818). Die Familien und Gattungen der Thierinsekten. Magazin der Entomologie 3, 261–316.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, C. L. (1864). Beobachtungen der Arten von Pediculus. Zeitschrift für gesammte Naturwisssenschaft 23, 21–32.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (1891). The Pediculi and Mallophaga affecting man and lower animals. Bulletin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology 7 (old series), 1–26.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (1896). Insects affecting domestic animals: An account of the species of importance in North America, with mention of related forms occurring on other animals. Bulletin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, N. 5 (new series), 1–302.Google Scholar
Patnaik, M. M. (1963). Some observations on the biology and control of Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein 1904; a sucking louse on Cattle of Orissa. Indian Veterinary Journal 40 (1) L, 33–7.Google Scholar
Peters, H. S. (1933). Ectoparasites of deer in Pennsylvannia. Insect Pest Survey Bulletin 13, 94–5.Google Scholar
Piaget, E. (1880). Les Pediculines–Essai Monographique, I: Texte, pp. v–xxix; II: Planches. Leide: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Pillers, A. W. N. (1923). Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein, a blood sucking louse of cattle, not previously found in England. Veterinary Journal 79, 162–4.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, F. (1967). Cattle lice in the Poznan Province. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, T. 8 (4–5), 643–51.Google Scholar
Scanlon, J. E. (1960). The Anoplura and Mallophaga of the mammals of New York. Wildlife Diseases, no. 5, May 1960.Google Scholar
Scholten, T. H., Ronald, K. & McLean, D. M. (1962). Parasite fauna on the Manitoulin Island Region. I. Arthropoda parasitica. Canadian Journal of Zoology 40 (4), 605–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopoli, J. A. (1763). Entomologia carniolica exhibens Insecta Carnioliae indigena et distributa in ordines, genera, species, varietates metodo Linnaeana. Vindobonae.Google Scholar
Segal, D. B., Humphrey, J. M., Edwards, S. J. & Kirby, M. D. (1968). Parasites of man and domestic animals in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia. A host list and bibliography. Experimental Parasitology 23 (3), 412–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séguy, E. (1944). Insectes ectoparasites. Faune de France 43, 195.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 85, 1–350.Google Scholar
Spencer, G. J. (1966). Anoplura from British Columbia and some adjacent areas. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 63, 23–30.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. (1829). Systematic Catalogue of British Insects. London.Google Scholar
Stojanovich, C. J. & Pratt, H. D. (1965). Key to Anoplura of North America. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, CDC, Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
Systematics Association Committee for Descriptive Biological Terminology (1962). Terminology of simple symmetrical plane shapes. Taxon 11, 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. B. (1938). A new species of Solenopotes (Anoplura, Siphunculata). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (11), 634–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. L. & Becklund, W. W. (1970). Checklist of the internal and external parasites of deer, Odocoileus hemionus and O. virginianus, in the United States and Canada. Index-Catalog of Medical and Veterinary Zoology, Special publication No. 1.Google Scholar
Webb, J. E. (1949). The evolution and host-relationships of the sucking lice of the Ferungulata. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 119 (1), 133–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, Z. (1966). Anoplura. In: Polsk Akademia NAUK, Instytut Zoologiczny, Katalog Fauni Polski 19 (2), 1–32.Google Scholar
Weisser, C. F. & Kim, K. C. (1973). Rediscovery of Solenopotes tarandi (Mjöberg, 1915) (Linognathidae, Anoplura) with ectoparasites of the Barren ground caribou. Parasitology 66, 123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzel, R. & Johnson, P. (1966). Checklist of the sucking lice of Panama. In: Wenzel, R. and Tipton, V., Ectoparasites of Panama, pp. 273–9. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Ill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, G. K. (1972). Deer of the World. The Viking Press.Google Scholar