Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:09:14.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of goats to tsetse-transmitted challenge with Trypanosoma vivax from East and West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. J. Vos ,
S. K. Moloo  and
P. R. Gardiner
G. J. Vos
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
S. K. Moloo
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
P. R. Gardiner
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To determine if, as is the case with Trypanosoma brucei and T. congolense, serodemes of T. vivax could be distinguished on the basis of immunity to the metacyclic stages of the parasite, attempts were made to immunize goats by infection with infected tsetse, followed by chemotherapy or eventual ‘self-cure’. Thirty goats were infected by tsetse with either clones or stocks of T. vivax from East or West Africa. Twenty-four goats were treated with diminazene aceturate (Berenil, Hoechst A.G.) 2–6 weeks after infection and 6 goats were allowed to self-cure. Infection, followed by treatment, induced immunity to a first homologous challenge by infected tsetse in only 2 of 24 goats (one immune to the East African stock, and the other to a clone of the West African stock). Immunity to a clone of the East African stock was induced in 3 or 4 animals after a second infection and treatment and in the fourth animal of the group following a third infection and treatment. One of 2 goats infected with the clone of the East African stock was immune to challenge at 16 weeks, following self-cure without treatment, and 1 of 4 goats infected with the parent stock was similarly immune when challenged at 40 weeks post-infection. Goats susceptible to infection with East African T. vivax showed evidence of partial immunity by delayed pre-patent periods and depressed parasitaemias after challenge. Goats infected with the relatively more virulent West African T. vivax were, however, completely susceptible to infection after homologous challenge, and showed only a slight delay in pre-patent period. A similar result was obtained in a further 8 goats primed and challenged by large numbers of tsetse (20 or 100 infected tsetse/goat) with the West African T. vivax. In further experiments using a very short treatment interval, infections following challenge were clearly shown to be the result of a lack of immunity rather than relapse following treatment. Lytic antibody activity to cultured metacyclic trypanosomes could not be detected during infection but such activity against bloodstream forms was detected after 2 weeks of infection. It is suggested that the primary reason for the erratic induction of immunity to T. vivax employing this methodology is the low number of metacyclics transmitted by infected tsetse, and thus poor antigenic stimulus encountered by goats upon tsetse challenge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 25 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akol, G. W. O. & Murray, M. (1983). Trypanosoma congolense: susceptibility of cattle to cyclical challenge. Experimental Parasitology 55, 386–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akol, G. W. O. & Murray, M. (1985). Induction of protective immunity in cattle by tsetse-transmitted cloned isolates of Trypanosoma congolense. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 79, 617–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. D. (1986). Antigenic variation during Trypanosoma vivax infections of different host species. Parasitology 92, 51–65.Google Scholar
Barry, J. D. & Gathuo, H. (1984). Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma vivax: isolation of a serodeme. Parasitology 89, 49–58.Google Scholar
Crowe, J. S., Barry, J. D., Luckins, A. G., Ross, C. A. & Vickerman, K. (1983). All metacyclic variable antigen types of Trypanosoma congolense identified using monoclonal antibodies. Nature, London 306, 389–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Gee, A. L. W. (1980). An attempt to immunise against Trypanosoma vivax by cyclical infection followed by treatment. In Host-parasite Relationships in Trypanosoma (Duttonella) vivax with Special Reference to the Influence of Antigenic Variation. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 113–36. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dwinger, R. H. (1985 a). Susceptibility of buffaloes, cattle and goats to tsetse-transmitted infection with different stocks of Trypanosoma vivax. In Studies on the Early Pathogenesis of African Trypanosomiasis in Ruminants. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 107–32. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dwinger, R. H. (1985 b). Potential value of localized skin reactions (chancres) induced by tsetse infected with Trypanosoma congolense for the analysis of serodemes. In Studies on the Early Pathogenesis of African Trypanosomiasis in Ruminants. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 161–80. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Emery, D. L., Akol, G. W. O., Murray, M., Morrison, W. I. & Moloo, S. K. (1980). The chancre – early events in the pathogenesis of African trypanosomiasis in domestic livestock. In The Host Invader Interplay (ed. van der Bossche, H.), pp. 345–56. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland, Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. R., Webster, P., Jenni, L. & Moloo, S. K. (1986 a). Metacyclic Trypanosoma vivax possess a surface coat. Parasitology 92, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R., Thatthi, R., Gathuo, H., Nelson, R. & Moloo, S. K. (1986 b). Further studies of cyclical transmission and antigenic variation of the ILDar 1 serodeme of Trypanosoma vivax. Parasitology 92, 581–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajduk, S. L. (1984). Antigenic variation during the developmental cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Journal of Protozoology 31, 41–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirumi, H., Hirumi, K., Nelson, R. T., Moloo, S. K. & Nantulya, V. M. (1985). Present status of the in vitro cultivation of salivarian trypanosomes with special emphasis on the semi-large scale propagation of metacyclic forms. In International Scientific Council for Trypanosomiasis Research and Control, Publication No. 113. Pp. 102–3.Google Scholar
Hirumi, H., Nelson, R. T. & Hirumi, K. (1983). Complete cyclic development of Trypanosoma vivax n vitro. Journal of Protozoology 30, 6A, Abstract No. 22.Google Scholar
Jenni, L. (1977). Comparisons of antigenic types of Trypanosoma (T) brucei strains transmitted by Glossina m. morsitans. Acta Tropica 34, 35–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Jennings, F. W., Whitelaw, D. D. & Urquhart, G. M. (1977). The relationship between duration of infection with Trypanosoma brucei in mice and the efficacy of chemotherapy. Parasitology 75, 143–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeflang, P., Buys, J. & Blotkamp, C. (1976). Studies on Trypanosoma vivax: Infectivity and serial maintenance of natural bovine isolates in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 6, 413–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, W. I., Black, S. J., Paris, J., Hinson, C. A. & Wells, P. W. (1982). Protective immunity and specificity of antibody responses elicited in cattle by irradiated Trypanosoma brucei. Parasite mmunology 4, 395–407.Google Scholar
Morrison, W. I., Murray, M. & Akol, G. W. O. (1985). Immune responses of cattle to African trypanosomes. In Immunology and Pathogenesis of Trypanosomiasis (ed. Tizard, I.), pp. 103–31. Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Murray, M. & Urquhart, G. M. (1977) Immunoprophylaxis against African trypanosomiasis. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man (ed. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. and McKelvey, J. J., Jr.), pp. 209–41. London and New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Nantulya, V. M., Doyle, J. J. & Jenni, L. (1980 a). Studies on Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. III. Antigenic variation in three cyclically transmitted stocks. Parasitology 80, 123–31.Google Scholar
Nantulya, V. M., Doyle, J. J. & Jenni, L. (1980 b). Studies on Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. IV. Experimental immunization of mice against tsetse fly challenge. Parasitology 80, 133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Musoke, A. J. & Moloo, S. K. (1986). Apparent exhaustion of the variable antigenic repertoire of Trypanosoma vivax in infected cattle. Infection and Immunity 54, 444–7.Google Scholar
Otieno, L. H. & Darji, N. (1979). The abundance of pathogenic African trypanosomes in the salivary secretions of wild Glossina pallidipes. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 73, 583–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J., Murray, M. & McOdimba, F. (1982). A comparative evaluation of the parasitological techniques currently available for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis in cattle. Acta Tropica 37, 307–16.Google Scholar
Voller, A., Bidwell, D. E. & Bartlett, A. (1976). Enzyme immunoassays in diagnostic medicine. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 53, 55–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitelaw, D. D., Moulton, J. E., Morrison, W. I. & Murray, M. (1985). Central nervous system involvement in goats undergoing primary infection with Trypanosoma brucei and relapse infection after chemotherapy. Parasitology 90, 255–68.Google Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1970). The haematocrit centrifuge technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis. Acta Tropica 27, 384–6.Google ScholarPubMed