Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:39:40.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Adult and Larval Characteristics of a British “Autogenous” Strain of Culex pipiens L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. Marshall  and
J. Staley
J. F. Marshall
Affiliation:
British Mosquito Control Institute, Hayling Island
J. Staley
Affiliation:
British Mosquito Control Institute, Hayling Island
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A strain of Culex pipiens which is autogenous and stenogamic has been found at Hayling Island, England, and compared with British anautogenous strains.

2. Definite characteristics in adults of both sexes and in larvae have been found which separate the autogenous from the anautogenous British strains of C. pipiens.

3. The autogenous strain differs from the anautogenous strains in (a) the lighter colour of the thorax of the adults; (b) the greater average number of hairs on the ninth tergite of the adults; (c) the relative shortness of the male palps in comparison with the proboscis; (d) the larger average number of branches in each of the four siphonal tufts of the fourth instar larvae; (e) the lower siphonal index of the fourth instar larvae; and (f) the greater width of the egg relatively to its length.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 501 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De Boissezon, P. (1929). Remarques sur les conditions de la reproduction chez Culex pipiers L. pendant la période hivernale. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 22 549–53.Google Scholar
De Boissezon, P. (1929). Expériences au sujet de la maturation des æufs chez les Culicides. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 22 683–9.Google Scholar
De Boissezon, P. (1933). De l'utilisation des protéines et du fer d'origine végétale dans la maturation des æufs chez Culer pipiens L. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 114 487–9.Google Scholar
De Boissezon, P. (1934). Nouvelles expériences sur la biologie de Culex pipiens L. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 12 182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, B. (1923). Razze biologiche differenti di Culex pipiens. R.C. Accad. Lincei, 32 457–64.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1929). Ovulation requirements of Culex pipiens L. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, 56 347–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, J. (1931). Le moustique cavernicole ou l'adaptation de Culex pipiens à l'urbanisme moderne. Bull. Acad. Méd., Paris, (3), 106 86–9.Google Scholar
Legendre, J. (1932). Anthropophilie ou zoophilie chez le moustique commun Culex pipiens. Bull. Acad. Méd. (3), 107 317–20.Google Scholar
MacGregor, M. E. (1932). The occurrence of Roubaud's “Race Autogène” in a German strain of Culex pipiens in England: with notes on rearing and bionomics. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 26 307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. F. and Staley, J. (1935). Exhibition of “Autogenous” characteristics by a British strain of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae). Nature, Lond., 135, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. G. (1907). Mosquito Life. New York: Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. O. (1912). Brauchen die Stechmücken zur Reifung ihrer Eier Blut als Nahrung? Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. 16, 27.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1929). Cycle autogène d'attente et générations hivernales suractives inapparentes chez le moustique commun, Culex pipiens L. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 188, 735–8.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1930). Sur l'existence de races biologiques génétiquement distinctes chez le moustique commun, Culex pipiens. C.R. Acad. Sci. 191 1386–8.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1933). Essai synthétique sur la vie du moustique commun (Culex pipiens). L'évolution humaine et les adaptations biologiques du moustique. Ann. Sci. nat. (10), 16 5–168.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. and Toumanoff, C. (1930). Sur une race physiologique suractive du moustique commun, Culex pipiens L. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 23 196–201.Google Scholar
Shute, P. G. (1933). The life history and habits of British mosquitoes in relation to their control by anti-larval operations. J. trop. Med. (Hyg.), 36, 85.Google Scholar
Tate, P. and Vincent, M. (1934). Susceptibility of autogenous and anautogenous races of Culex pipiens toinfection with avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum). Parasitology, 28 512–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, M. (1933). Some observations on the biology of a Hungarian strain of Culex pipiens L. Arb. ung. biol. Forschinst. 6 119–22.Google Scholar