Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:11:53.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil-transmitted helminth infections in school children from Cocle Province, Republic of Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

L. J. Robertson ,
D. W. T. Crompton ,
D. E. Walters ,
M. C. Nesheim ,
D. Sanjur  and
E. A. Walsh
L. J. Robertson
Affiliation:
1Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
D. W. T. Crompton
Affiliation:
1Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
D. E. Walters
Affiliation:
2Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetic Research, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT
M. C. Nesheim
Affiliation:
3Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 14853, USA
D. Sanjur
Affiliation:
3Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 14853, USA
E. A. Walsh
Affiliation:
1Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A survey was carried out to determine values for the prevalence and intensity of infection of intestinal helminths in children living in Cocle Province, Republic of Panama. The data set consisted of the results of microscopic examinations (modified Kato Katz technique) of stool samples collected in November 1987 from 661 children attending primary schools in 4 communities in the province. The overall prevalences of Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm and Trichuris trichiura infections were found to be 18·2, 12·0 and 27·5% respectively. There were significant differences between the infection prevalence values for children attending the different schools, but not with respect to age or sex. Positive associations were detected between particular pairs of infections and these were most evident when Trichuris trichiura was involved. The data revealed evidence of a positive association between siblings at one school only for each helminth infection.

Keywords

Ascaris lumbricoidesTrichuris trichiurahookwormprevalenceinfection intensityintestinal helminths
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 287 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annan, A., Crompton, D. W. T., Walters, D. E. & Arnold, S. E. (1986). An investigation of intestinal parasites in pre-school children in Ghana. Parasitology 92, 209–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cort, W. W., Stoll, N. R., Sweet, W. C., Riley, W. A. & Shapiro, L. (1929). Studies on hookworm, Ascaris and Trichuris in Panama. American Journal of Hygiene (Monographic Series) 9, 1–215.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. E., Scott, M. E., Bundy, D. A. P. & Golden, M. H. N. (1988). Clustering of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura infections with households. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82, 282–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haswell-Elkins, M. R., Elkins, D. B. & Anderson, R. M. (1987). Evidence for predisposition in humans to infection with Ascaris, hookworm, Enterobius and Trichuris in a South Indian fishing community. Parasitology 95, 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, C. V., Asaolu, S. O., Crompton, D. W. T., Stoddart, R. C., MacDonald, R. & Torimiro, S. E. A. (1989). The epidemiology of Ascaris lumbricoides and other soil-transmitted helminths in primary school children from Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Parasitology 99, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. & Pagel, M. (1989). Predisposition to helminth infection. In Hookworm Disease: Current Status and New Directions (ed. Schad, G. A. & Warren, K. S.). London and Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis (in the Press).Google Scholar
Martin, L. K. & Beaver, P. C. (1968). Evaluation of Kato thick-smear technique for quantitative diagnosis of helminth infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 17, 381–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migasena, S. & Gilles, H. M. (1987). Hookworm infection. In Intestinal Helminthic Infections (ed. Pawlowski, Z. S.). pp. 617–27. London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Ramos, C. M. (1975). Estudio de la incidencia de parasitos gastrointestinales en algunas comunidades de la region montanosa de la Provincia de Cocle. Realizado en 1974. Boletin Informativo, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Farmacia, Universidad de Panama 1975.Google Scholar
Taren, D. L., Nesheim, M. C., Crompton, D. W. T., Holland, C. V., Barbeau, I., Rivera, G., Sanjur, D., Tiffany, J. & Tucker, K. (1987). Contributions of ascariasis to poor nutritional status in children from Chiriqui Province, Republic of Panama. Parasitology 95, 603–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, D. E. (1986). On the reliability of Bayesian confidence limits for a difference of two proportions. Biometrical Journal 28, 337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D., Burke, G. & Owen Hendley, J. (1974). Ascariasis: a family disease. Journal of Pediatrics 84, 853–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1967). Control of Ascariasis. WHO Technical Report Series No. 379. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1985). Diagnostic techniques for intestinal parasitic infections (IPI) applicable to primary health care (PHC) services. W.H.O./P.D.P./85.2., 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.Google Scholar