Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:19:45.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the Non-Combed Eyed Siphonaptera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Karl Jordan  and
N. C. Rothschild
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of certain species of fleas in relation to the epidemiology of plague has been so amply demonstrated (see Journal of Hygiene, vols. vi. 1906, p. 426 and vii. 1907, p. 395) that an explanation appears scareely necessary for our publishing a paper dealing with a revision of the non-pectinated eyed Siphonaptera. With the demonstration that fleas are capable of transmitting plague, their study at once ceased to be the mere hobby of a small group of entomological specialists. An accurate knowledge of fleas, both with regard to their structure and biology, is at present a matter of prime importance to those who concern htemselves with the prophylaxis of plague.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1908 , pp. 1 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, (1743–1746), Micrographia illustrata.Google Scholar
Advisory Committee (1906), Reports on Plague Investigations in India. Journ. of Hygiene, vi. 4.Google Scholar
Advisory Committee(1907), Reports on Plague Investigations in India. Journ. of Hygiene, vii. 3.Google Scholar
Agassiz, and Gould, (1855), Allgemeine Zoologie, i.Google Scholar
Albin, (1736), Natural History of Spiders, and other curious Insects.Google Scholar
Amoreux, (1789), Notice des insectes de la France.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1895), Concerning Fleas. Journ. of the Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., x., reprinted from the British Medical Journal (January, 1895).Google Scholar
Anderson, (1856), Lake N'Gami.Google Scholar
Baker, H. (1753), Employment for the Microscope.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1895), Preliminary Studies in Siphonaptera. Canad. Entomol., xxvii.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1899), On one new and two previously known fleas. Entomol. News, x.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1904), A Revision of American Siphonaptera. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxvii.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1905 a), The Classification of the American Siphonaptera. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxix.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1905 a), Fleas and Disease. Soc. Entomologica, xx.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1905 b), Fleas and Disease. Soc. Entomologica, xx.Google Scholar
Balfour, (1906), A Haemogregarine of Mammals. Second Report of the Wellcome Research Laboratories at Khartoum.Google Scholar
Barbut, (1781), Genera Insectorum.Google Scholar
Barton, (1866), Fleas at Ventnor. Entomologist, iii.Google Scholar
Bergh, (1885), Die Flohlarve als Pseudoparasit des Meuschen. Monatsh. d. Prakt. Dermatol., iv.Google Scholar
Bertolotto, (1834), Histoire de la Puce.Google Scholar
Bielet, (1881), Bull, de la Soc. Vaudoise (2), xvii.Google Scholar
Blanchard, (1840), Histoire naturelle des Insectes, iii.Google Scholar
Blathwayt, (1895), Aphaniptera. Internat. Journ. of Microsc. and Nat. Sci., v.Google Scholar
Boden, (1882), Pulex feeding on lepidopterous larvae. Entomologist, xv.Google Scholar
Bonanni, (1691), Observations circa viventia.Google Scholar
Bonanni, (1709), Mitsaeum Kircherianum.Google Scholar
Borrich, (1676), Dissertationes. Act. Hafniens., iv.Google Scholar
Bouché, (1835), Bemerkungen über die Gattung Pulex. Nova Acta Acad. Leopold., xvii, 1.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, (1769), Article “Puce.” Dict. d'hist. Nat., ix.Google Scholar
Camerarius, (1714), De Pulice, in Elias Camerarius Specim. medicinae eclect.Google Scholar
Cestone, (1699), A new Discovery of the original Flea. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., xxi.Google Scholar
Charleton, (1668), Onomasticon Zoicon.Google Scholar
Charleton, (1677), Excercitationes, edit. ii. (this is another edition of the Onomasticon).Google Scholar
Cooke, (1871), Fleas, Fleas! Science Gossip, vii.Google Scholar
Cuno, (1734), Observationes.Google Scholar
Dahl, (1898), Über den Floh und seine Stellung im System. Sitzungsber. der Gesellsch. Naturforsch. Freunde zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Dallas, (1857), Elements of entomology.Google Scholar
Defrance, (1824), Notice sur la Puce irritante. Ann. d. Sci. Nat., i.Google Scholar
Degeer, (1778), Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes, vii.Google Scholar
Dimmock, (1884), An earwig capturing and devouring Pulex irritans. Psyche, iv.Google Scholar
Dufour, (1844), Anatomie des Diptères. Ann. d. Sci. Nat. (3), i.Google Scholar
Dufour, (1861), Des Cocons de la Puce. Ann. de la Soc. Entomol. de France (4), i.Google Scholar
Dugès, (1832), Recherches sur les charactères zoologiques du genre Pulex, et sur la multiplicité qu'il enferme. Ann. d. Sci. Nat., xxvii.Google Scholar
Dujardin, (1843), Nouveau tnanuel complet de l'observateur au microscope.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, (1875), Notes on the entomology of Kerguelen's Island. Entom. Monthly Mag., xii.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1901), Zur Kenntnis der Flöhe und Sandflöhe. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. für Syst., xix.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1903), Die Landarthropoden der antarktischen Inseln St Paul und Neu-Amsterdam. Wiss. Ergebn. der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition Valdivia.Google Scholar
Eating, (1896), Reise in Inner-Arabien.Google Scholar
Fabricius, (1775), Systema Entomologiae.Google Scholar
Fabricius, (1781), Species Insectorum, ii.Google Scholar
Fabricius, (1787), Mantissa Insectorum, ii.Google Scholar
Fabricius, (1794), Entomologia Systematica, iv.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, , Survey of Nature, ii. (year of issue not given).Google Scholar
Frisch, (1734), Beschreibung von allerley Insecten in Teutschland, xi.Google Scholar
Froggatt, (1901), Domestic Insects. Agricult. Gaz. of N. S. Wales, xii. 5.Google Scholar
Fuessly, (1775), Verzeichniss der Schweizerischen Insecten.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlonge, (1870), On the Pulex irritans, or Bed Flea. Journ. of Quekett Microscopic. Club, ii.Google Scholar
Furlonge, (1872), On the internal structure of the Pulex irritans. Journ. of Quekett Microscopic. Club, iii.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, (1762), Histoire abrégée des Insectes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, (1844), Histoire naturelle des Insectes Aptères, iii.Google Scholar
Gmelin, (1790), Systema Naturae, i. 5.Google Scholar
Griendel, von Ach (1687), Micrographia nova.Google Scholar
Guérin, (1825), Article “Puce.” Encyclop. Méethodique, x.Google Scholar
Hadfield, (1867), Fleas in Southern India. Zoologist (2), ii.Google Scholar
Haliday, (1856), On the Affinities of the Aphaniptera among Insects. Nat. Hist. Review, iii. Proceedings.Google Scholar
Herzog, (1904), A new species of Rat-flea. Bull, of the Bureau of Government Laboratories, Manila, xxiii.Google Scholar
Heymons, (1899), Die systematische Stellung der Puliciden. Zool. Anzeiger, xxii.Google Scholar
Hilger, (1901), Verzeichnis der bis jetzt im Grossherzogtum Baden aufgefundenen Aphaniptera. Mitteil. d. Badischen Zoolog. Ver., i.Google Scholar
Hooke, (1665), Micrographia.Google Scholar
Joblot, (1718), Observations d'Hist. natur., i.Google Scholar
Jördens, (1801), Entomologie und Helminthologie.Google Scholar
Jordan, (1896), On Mechanical Selection and other problems. Novitates Zoologicae, iii.Google Scholar
Jordan, (1905), Der Gegensatz zwischen geographischer und nicht-geographischer Variation. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., lxxxiii.Google Scholar
Jordan, and Rothschild, (1906), A Revision of the Sarcopsyllidae. Thompson, Yates and Johnston Laboratories Report, vii. 1.Google Scholar
Jourdain, (1899), Appareil buccal des Pulex. Bull. de la Soc. Entomol. de France.Google Scholar
Kirby, and Spence, (1826), Introduction to Entomology, iii.Google Scholar
Kniphof, (1759), Dissertatio de Pediculis inguinalibus, Insectis et Vermibus homini molestis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohaut, (1903), Magyaroszág bolhái. Allattani Közlem., ii.Google Scholar
Kolenati, (1859), Die Parasiten des Altvaters.Google Scholar
Kolenati, (1863), Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Phthirio-Myiarien. Home Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, ii.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, (1884), Die systematische Stellung der Puliciden.Google Scholar
Lamarck, (1816), Histoire naturelle des Anim. sans Vertèbres, iii.Google Scholar
Latreille, (1796), Précis d'Entomologie.Google Scholar
Latreille, (1805), Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes, xiv.Google Scholar
Latreille, (1809), Genera Crustac. et Insect., iv.Google Scholar
Leach, (1815), Article “Entomology.” Brewster, Edinburgh Encyclop., ix.Google Scholar
Ledermueller, (1761), Mikroskopische Gemüths-und Augen-Ergötzung.Google Scholar
Leeuwenhoek, (1695), Arcana naturae detecta ope microscopiorum. (Other editions in 1696,1698, 1719, 1722.)Google Scholar
Leeuwenhoek, (1698), Epistolae.Google Scholar
Leeuwenhoek, (1706), Microscopical observations on the structure of the proboscis of a Flea. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., xxv.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1730), Systema Naturae, ed. i.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1744), Systema Naturae, ed. vi.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1846), Fauna Suecica, ed. I.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1748), Systema Naturae, ed. vii.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1756), Systema Naturae, ed. ix.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1758), Systema Naturae, ed. X.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1760), Systema Naturae, ed. Langius.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1761), Fauna Suecica, ed. ii.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1768), Systema Naturae, ed. Xxii.Google Scholar
Lucas, (1839), Article “Puces.” Guérin, Diet. Pittoresque d'Hist. Nat., iii.Google Scholar
Lucas, (1849), Article “Puce.” Orbigny, Diet. d'Hist. Nat., x.Google Scholar
Maitland, (1857), Herklots Bouwstoffen, ii.Google Scholar
Martynn, (1785), Article “Flea.” New Diet, of Nat. Hist.Google Scholar
Meinert, (1896), Pulicidae danicae. Entomol. Meddeleser, v.Google Scholar
Meissner, (1905), Über einige parasitische Flohe. Sooietas Entomologiea, xx.Google Scholar
Moschetti, (1544), De Pulice.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1776), Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus.Google Scholar
Müller, P. L. S. (1775), Vollständiges Natursystem, v.Google Scholar
Muralto, (1682), Anatomia Pulicis vulgaris. Ephem. Acad. Nat. Curios., Dec. ii. Ann. 1. Observ. 54.Google Scholar
Newman, (1851), On the Affinities of the Pulicites. Zoologist, ix. Appendix.Google Scholar
Newman, (1866), What is the Natural Food of Fleas, etc.? Entomologist, iii.Google Scholar
Osborn, (1896), Insects affecting domestic animals. Bulletin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (2), Entom. v.Google Scholar
Oudemans, (1900), Nederland. Insecten.Google Scholar
Packard, (1889), Guide to the Study of Insects.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, (1894), On the Systematic Posit of the Siphonaptera. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural Risk xxvi.Google Scholar
Perez, (1895), Note sur le mode de propagation de la Puce. Actes Soc. Linnéennt Bordeaux, xlvii.Google Scholar
Raius, (1710), Historia insectorum.Google Scholar
Railliet, (1890), Article “Puce.” Nouv. Did. Médic. Vétérin., xviii.Google Scholar
Ray, (1788), Zoologie universelle.Google Scholar
Ritsema, (1873), Lijst van in Nederland waargenomen soorten van Suctoria Aphaniptera. Tijdschr. v. Entomol., xvi. Verslag.Google Scholar
Ritsema, (1874), Versuch einer chronologischen Übersicht der bisher beschriebenen oder bekannten Arten Gattung Pulex. Correspondzbl. des zoologisck-mineral. Vereins Regensburg, xxviii.Google Scholar
Ritsema, (1881), Nieuwe Naamlijst van Nederlandsche Suctoria. Tijdschr. v. Entomol., xxiv. Verslag.Google Scholar
Roemer, (1789), Genėra Insectorum.Google Scholar
Rösel, (1749), Insecten-Belustigungen ii. Mucken und Schnacken.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1895), Casual Notes on Fleas. Novitates Zoologicae, ii.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1903), New Species of Siphonaptera from Egypt and the Soudan. Entom. Monthly Mag. (2), xiv.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1905 a), Further Contributions to the knowledge of the Siphonaptera. Novitates Zoologicae, xi.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1905 b), New Species of Siphonaptera from Egypt. Entomologist, xxxvii.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1905), Some New Siphonaptera. Novitates Zoologicae, xii.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1905 a), A new Egyptian Flea. Entomologist, xxxix.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1906 b), Note on the species of fleas found on rats. Journ. of Hygiene, vi.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1906 c), Note on the Siphonaptera from the Argentine described by the late Professor Dr Weyenbergh. Novitates Zoologicae, xiii.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1908), Siphonaptera. Sjöstet' Kilimandjaro-Meru Expedition.Google Scholar
Samouelle, (1819), The entomologist's useful compendium.Google Scholar
Savigny, (1816), Mémoires sur les animaux sans vertèbres.Google Scholar
Schellenherg, (1798), Helvetische Entomologie, i.Google Scholar
Schenkling, (1864), Der Floh. Rossmässler, Aus der Heimath.Google Scholar
Schrank, (1781), Insecta Austriaca.Google Scholar
Schrank, (1804), Fauna Boica, iii. 1.Google Scholar
Schwenckfeld, (1603), Theriotropheum, Silesiae.Google Scholar
Scopoli, (1763), Entomologia Carniolica.Google Scholar
Scott, (1882), Science Gossip, xviii.Google Scholar
Sharp, (1899), Cambridge Natural History, Insects, ii.Google Scholar
Shaw, (1806), General Zoology, vi.Google Scholar
Shaw, and Nodder, (1794), The Naturalist Miscellany, v.Google Scholar
Silby, (1802), System of Natural History, xiii.Google Scholar
Smith, (1894), Informal remarks on fleas. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington, iii.Google Scholar
, S. S. (1871), The flea (Pulex irritans). Science Gossip, vii.Google Scholar
Stephens, (1829), British Insects.Google Scholar
Stewenson, (1802), Elements of Natural History, ii.Google Scholar
Streubel, (1866), Exter, des Flohs.Google Scholar
Sulzer, (1761), Kennzeichen der Insecten.Google Scholar
Sulzer, (1776), Abgekürzte Gesehichte der Insecten.Google Scholar
Swainson, and Schuckard, (1840), On the History and Natural Arrangements of Insects.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschenberg, (1905 a), Die Flöhe.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, (1905 b), Pulex kerguelensis. Notes from the Leyden Museum, i.Google Scholar
Thon, and Reichenbach, (1838), Die Insecten, Krebse und Spinnenthiere.Google Scholar
Tiraboschi, (1904), Les Rats, les Souris et leurs Parasites Cutanés. Arch. de Parasitol., viii.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, (1907), État actuel de la Question du Véhicule de la Peste. Arch. de Parasitol., xi.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, (1884), Description of the Anatomy of the flea. Trans. Ottawa Natural. Club, i. 1.Google Scholar
Vallisnieri, (1733), Opera fisico-mediche.Google Scholar
Villiers, (1789), Caroli Linnei Entomologia, iv.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1893), Aphanipterologische Studien, II. Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, xxvii.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1894), Notiz über Pulex pallidus und Sarcopsylla gallinacea Westw. aus Transcaspien, Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae xxviii.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1895), Pulex lamellifer. Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae xxix.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1898), Aphanipterologische Studien, iii. Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, xxxi.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1901), Aphanipterologische Studien, iv. Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, xxxv.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1902), Aphanipterologische Studien, v. Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, xxxvi.Google Scholar
Wagner, (1903), [Notes on species of fleas allied to Pulex pallidus Tasch.] (in Russian). Rev. Russe d'Entomol.Google Scholar
Wahlgren, (1903), Aphanipterologische Notizen. Arkiv for Zoologi, i.Google Scholar
Wahlgren, (1904), Zwei neue Puliciden aus Egypten. Results of the Swedish Zool. Exped. to Egypt and the White Nile.Google Scholar
Walckenaer, (1802), Faune Parisienne, ii.Google Scholar
Walker, (1856), Diptera Britannica, iii.Google Scholar
WebBter, (1904), The so-called Human Flea, Pulex irritans, infesting the Opossum, Didelphis virginiana. Canadian Entomologist, xxxvi.Google Scholar
Weiss, (1762), Observatio de pulice. Acta Helvetica, v.Google Scholar
Westwood, (1840), Introduction to a modem Classification of Entomology, ii.Google Scholar
Weyenbergh, (1881), Sobra la familia Pulicidae. Periodico Zool. Soc. Zool. Argentina, iii.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, (1811), Unterhaltungen aus der Naturgesckiehte, iii.Google Scholar
Witherby, (1902), Bird Hunting on the White Nile.Google Scholar
Wood, (1821), Illustrations of the Linnean genera of Insects.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, (1876), Insects At Home.Google Scholar