Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:00:53.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasite density and the fecundity of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Hideto Kino
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Handa-cho 3600, Hamamatsu 431–31, Japan

Summary

The larval output of Angiostrongylus cantonensis at different initial densities in rats was examined throughout the reproductive life-span of the worms using a modified dilution technique. With an initial density of 2 worms the mean duration of larval output was 414·2 days. The output was at a level above 50000 larvae/female/day from 15 to 45 weeks after infection. The mean total output was 18·9×106 larvae/female. The larval output/female decreased with an increase in the worm burden and also with the passage of time after infection. The longevity of host rats also decreased with increasing worm density and many of the heavily infected rats died early during infection. These results suggest that worm density has an effect on the fecundity of this parasite, and that the effects may be due to fibrous changes in host lung tissue but not changes in the physiology of the worms. It is also suggested that density-dependent effects on fecundity play a role in the population dynamics of both the parasite and host as regulatory mechanisms in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alicata, J. E. & Jindrak, K. (1970). Angiostrongylosis in the Pacific and Southeast Asia. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C., Russel, P. F. & Jung, R. C. (1970). Clinical Parasitology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Ghazal, A. M. & Avery, R. A. (1974). Population dynamics of Hymenolepis nana in mice: fecundity and the ‘crowding effect’. Parasitology 69, 403–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinski, W. & Wunder, B. A. (1975). Ecological energetics of small mammals. In Small Mammals: their Productivity and Population Dynamics (ed. Golley, F. B., Petrusewicz, K. and Ryszkowski, L.), pp. 173204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Anderson, K. (1974). Some effects of population density in infection of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitsch) in golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus Waterhouse) and common gull (Larus canus L.). Parasitology 69, 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. L. (1956). Survival rates of Malayan rats. Bulletin of Raffles Museum 27, 526.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. B. (1962). Parasites and diseases. In Pacific Island Rat Ecology. Honolulu: B. P. Bishop Museum, Bulletin 225, 190–9.Google Scholar
Jones, A. W. & Tan, B. D. (1971). Effect of crowding upon growth and fecundity in the mouse bile duct tapeworm, Hymenolepis microstoma. Journal of Parasitology 57, 8893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1975). Ecological Animal Parasitology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. & Sandars, D. F. (1955). The life history of the rat lung-worm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 3, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, K. (1966). Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in albino rats. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 15, 116–23.Google Scholar
Noble, E. R. & Noble, G. A. (1976). Parasitology: the Biology of Animal Parasites, 4th Edn.Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. (1951). The ‘crowding effect’ in tapeworm infections. Journal of Parasitology 37, 174–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, L. S. (1961). The influence of population density on patterns and physiology of growth in Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) in the definitive host. Experimental Parasitology 11, 332–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, A., Noda, S., Nojima, H., Yuyama, Y., Kawabata, N. & Matayoshi, S. (1980). A survey of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in the Amani Islands. 1. The occurrence of A. cantonensis in snails and rodents in Yoron-jima. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 29, 383–90.Google Scholar
Scheer, B. T., Straub, E., Fields, M., Meserve, E. R., Hendrick, C. & Deuel, H. J. Jr. (1947). The effect of fat level of the diet on general nutrition. IV. The comparative composition of rats in relation to intake of fat and calories. Journal of Nutrition 34, 581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, P. P., Rosen, L., Laqueur, G. L. & Sawyer, T. K. (1963). Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in rats and rhesus monkeys, and observations on the survival of the parasite in vitro. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 12, 358–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, W. K. & Dobson, C. (1982 a). Antibody responses in rats infected with Angiostrongylus cantonensis and the passive transfer of protective immunity with immune serum. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 67, 32967–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, W. K. & Dobson, C. (1982 b). Population dynamics of Angiostrongylus cantonensis during primary infection in rats. Parasitology 85, 399409.Google Scholar