Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:45:30.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasite communities of a fish assemblage from the intertidal rocky zone of central Chile: similarity and host specificity between temporal and resident fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

G. MUÑOZ*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Valparaíso, Casilla 5080, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile
Y. CORTÉS
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Valparaíso, Casilla 5080, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Summary

The different species of a fish assemblage can, to some extent, be similar in terms of their parasite communities, which can be associated with certain ecological host traits. This study compared the parasite community descriptors between temporal and resident fish species composing an intertidal assemblage from central Chile. Host specificity and similarity indices of parasite communities among the fish species were also considered. A total of 1097 fish representing 14 species were collected during spring and summer of 2 consecutive years. A total spectrum of 40 parasite species was found, of which copepods and trematodes were the commonest. Congeneric fish species had the highest similarities in their parasite communities. Based on a cluster analysis, using only some fish species, no group was distinguished using abundance or prevalence of parasites, because 50% of parasite species had high host specificity and only few of them were shared among fish species. Adult parasites showed high host specificity and were found mainly in resident intertidal fish, whereas the temporal fish had parasites with different degrees of specificity. Consequently, resident intertidal fish were characterized by their own parasite species, meaning that their transmissions might be restricted to the intertidal zone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldana, M., Pulgar, J. M., Ogalde, F. and Ojeda, F. P. (2002). Morphometric and parasitological evidence for ontogenetic and geographical dietary shifts in intertidal fishes. Bulletin of Marine Science 70, 5574.Google Scholar
Bisby, F. A., Roskov, Y. R., Orrell, T. M., Nicolson, D., Paglinawan, L. E., Bailly, N., Kirk, P. M., Bourgoin, T., and van Hertum, J. (2008). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2008 Annual Checklist. CD-ROM; Species 2000: Reading, U.K. http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2008/.Google Scholar
Bray, R. A. (2002). Family Fellodistomidae Nicoll, 1909. In Keys to the Trematoda (ed. Gibson, D. I., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 261293. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O., Aho, J. M. and Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Ecological versus phylogenetic determinants of helminth parasite community richness. Evolutionary Ecology 4, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabaret, J. (2003). Relating parasite communities to host environmental conditions using phylogenetic tools. Parasite 10, 287295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cancino, J. and Castilla, J. C. (1988). Emersion behaviour and foraging ecology of the common Chilean clingfish Sicyases sanguineus (Pisces: Gobiesocidae). Journal of Natural History 22, 249261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, R. and Baeza, H. (1981). Lepeophtheirus dissimulatus Wilson, 1905 and Lepeophtheirus zbigniewi new species (Copepoda: Caligidae) parasites of inshore fishes from the Pacific coast of Chile, South America. Bulletin of Marine Science 3, 318328.Google Scholar
Castro, R. and Baeza, H. (1984). Clavellotis, new genus (Copepoda: Lernaeopodidae) and redescription of Clavellotis dilatata, new combination. Journal of Crustacean Biology 4, 688694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirichigno, N. (1974). Clave para identificar a los peces marinos del Perú, Informe 44. Mar y Ciencia IMARPE. Instituto del mar del Perú, Callao.Google Scholar
Cortés, Y. and Muñoz, G. (2008). Infracomunidades de parásitos eumetazoos del bagre de mar Aphos porosus (Valenciennes, 1837) (Actinopterygii: Batrachoidiformes) en Chile central. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 43, 255263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribb, T. H. (2005). Family Opecoelidae Ozaki, 1925. In Keys to the Trematoda (ed. Jones, A., Gibson, D. I. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 443531. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum, London, UK.Google Scholar
Díaz, F. and George-Nascimento, M. (2002). Estabilidad temporal de las infracomunidades de parásitos en la borrachilla Scartichthys viridis (Valenciennes, 1836) (Pisces: Blenniidae) en la costa central de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75, 641649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George-Nascimento, M. (1987). Ecological helminthology of wildlife animal hosts from South America: a literature review and a search for patterns in marine food webs. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 60, 181202.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. (2002). Family Lecithasteridae Odhner, 1905. In Keys to the Trematoda (ed. Gibson, D. I., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 381398. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, R. and Schiel, D. R. (2006). Seascape-dependent subtidal-intertidal trophic linkages. Ecology 87, 731744.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E. P. (2002). Colonization and diversification: historical and coevolutionary trajectories among cestodes and pinnipeds. The 10th International Congress of Parasitology, Vancouver, Canada, 6569.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E. P., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A. (1999). Phylogentic analysis among the Cyclophyllidea (Eucestoda) based on comparitive morphology, with new hypothesis for co-evolution in vertebrates. Systematic Parasitology 42, 5173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, M. H., Martin, K. L. and Chotkowski, M. A. (1999). Introduction. In Intertidal Fish, Life in Two Worlds (ed. Horn, M. H., Martin, K. L. and Chotkowski, M. A.), pp. 16. Academic Press, San Diego CA, USA.Google Scholar
Huyse, T. and Volckaert, F. A. M. (2005). Comparing host and parasite phylogenies: Gyrodactylus flatworms jumping from goby to goby. Systematic Biology 54, 710718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnov, B. R., Shenbrot, G. I., Khokhlova, I. S. and Poulin, R. (2004). Relation between parasite abundance and the taxonomic distance among a parasite's host species: an example with fleas parasitic on small mammals. Journal for Parasitology 34, 12891297.Google Scholar
Lafferty, K. D., Hechinger, R. F., Shaw, J. C., Whitney, K. L. and Kuris, A. M. (2006). Food webs and parasites in a salt marsh ecosystem. In Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics (ed. Collinge, S. and Ray, C.), pp. 119134. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancelotti, D. and Vásquez, J. (2000). Biodiversidad de macroinvertebrados submareales de la costa chilena: patrones biogeográficos. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73, 797830.Google Scholar
Lowenberg, C. A., and Rau, M. E. (1994). Plagiorchis elegans: emergence, longevity and infectivity of carcarie, and host behavioural modifications during cercarial emergency. Parasitology 109, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, G. F. (1954). La vida de los peces en aguas chilenas. Universidad de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Marcogliese, D. (2005). Transmission of marine parasites. In Marine Parasitology (ed. Rohde, K.), pp. 280286. SCIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G. W., Holmes, J. C., Kuris, A. M. and Schad, G. A. (1982). The use of ecological terms in parasitology. Journal of Parasitology 68, 131133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. and Stafford, S. (2000). Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer Science-Business Media Inc, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Cribb, T. H., Kulbicki, M., Rigby, M. C., Chauvet, C., Dufour, V., Faliex, E., Galzin, R., Lo, C. M., Lo Yat, A., Pichelin, S. and Sasal, P. (2000). Endoparasite species richness of New Caledonian butterfly fishes: host density and diet matter. Parasitology 121, 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, A. A. and Ojeda, F. P. (1997). Feeding guild structure of a rocky intertidal fish assemblage in central Chile. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49, 471479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, A. A. and Ojeda, F. P. (1998). Guild structure of carnivorous intertidal fishes of the Chilean coast: implications of ontogenetic dietary shifts. Oecologia 114, 563573.Google ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, G., Garcías, F., Valdebenito, V. and George-Nascimento, M. (2001). Parasitofauna y alimentación de Notothenia c.f. angustata Hutton, 1875 (Pisces: Nototheniidae) en el intermareal de dos localidades del Golfo de Arauco, Chile. Boletín Chileno de Parasitología 56, 2933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz, G., González, M. T. and George-Nascimento, M. (2004). Similascarophis n.gen.n.spp. (Nematoda: Cystididcolidae) parasitizing marine fishes off the Chilean coast. Journal of Parasitology 90, 823834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, G., Grutter, A. S. and Cribb, T. H. (2007). Structure of the parasite communities of coral reef fish assemblage (Labridae): testing ecological and phylogenetic host factors. Journal of Parasitology 93, 1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, G. and Olmos, V. (2007). Revisión bibliográfica de especies ectoparásitas y hospedadoras de sistemas acuáticos de Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 42, 89–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, G. and Olmos, V. (2008). Revisión bibliográfica de especies endoparásitas y hospedadoras de sistemas acuáticos de Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 43, 173245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, G., Valdebenito, V. and George-Nascimento, M. (2002). La dieta y la fauna de parásitos metazoos del torito Bovichthys chilensis Regan 1914 (Pisces: Bovichthydae) en la costa de Chile centro-sur: variaciones geográficas y ontogenéticas. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75, 661671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. S. (1994). Fishes of the World. 3rd Edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Odum, E. (1995). Ecología: Peligra la Vida. Interamericana McGraw-Hill, Ciudad de México, México.Google Scholar
Pardo-Gandarillas, M. C., Garcias, F. and George-Nascimento, M. (2004). La dieta y la fauna de endoparasitos del pejesapo Gobiesox marmoratus Jenyns, 1842 (Pisces: Gobiesocidae) en el litoral de Chile estan conectadas pero no correlacionadas. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 77, 627637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrochenko, V. I. (1971). Acanthocephala of domestic and wild animals. Academy of Science of the USSR. All-union Society of Helminthologists, Moscow, USSR.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (1997). Parasite faunas of freshwater fish: the relationship between richness and the specificity of parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 10911098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (2007 a). Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology 134, 763776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (2007 b). Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites. 2nd Edn. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Keeney, D. B. (2007). Host specificity under molecular and experimental scrutiny. Trends in Parasitology 24, 2428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. and Mouillot, D. (2003). Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. Parasitology 126, 473480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. and Mouillot, (2005). Combining phylogenetic and ecological information into a new index of host specificity. Journal of Parasitology 91, 511514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purvis, A. and Rambaut, A. (1994). Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts (C.A.I.C.) version 2.6.9. A Statistical Package for the Apple Macintosh. http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/evolve/software/caic/index.html (page visited on January 23rd, 2009).Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1980). Host specificity indices of parasites and their application. Experientia 36, 13691371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1993). Ecology of Marine Parasites. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. and Rohde, P. (2008). How to measure ecological host specificity. Vie et Lilieu-Life and Environmental 58, 121124.Google Scholar
Sasal, P., Desdevises, Y. and Morand, S. (1998). Host specialization and species diversity in fish parasites: phylogenetic conservatism. Ecography 21, 639643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J. and Springer, V. (1973). Clinid fishes of Chile and Peru, with descrition of a new species, Myxodes ornatus, from Chile. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 159, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, E. T. and Julkunen, M. (1995). Influence of the transmission of parasites from prey fishes on the composition of the parasite community of a predatory fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52, 233245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varas, E. and Ojeda, F. P. (1990). Intertidal fish assemblages of the central central Chilean coast: diversity, abundance and trophic patterns. Revista de Biología Marina 25, 5970.Google Scholar
Whittington, I. D. and Horton, M. A. (1996). A revision of Neobenedenia Yamaguti, 1963 (Monogenea: Capsalidae) including a redescription of N. melleni (MacCallum, 1927) Yamaguti, 1963. Journal of Natural History 30, 11131156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar