Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:43:17.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overview: extreme environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

R. C. Tinsley
R. C. Tinsley
Affiliation:
Bristol University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An important element in most approaches to the subject of parasitism is the consideration of environment. Parasites are set apart within animal ecology because they experience two environments, one the ‘external’ conditions and the other created by the living body of the host. As in any ecological system, external environmental conditions have a major influence on life history parameters: these conditions may be experienced directly by ‘off-host’ stages of a parasite or, to a greater or lesser extent, indirectly through the body of the host. However, uniquely in parasitic associations, the internal (host) environment has a dual influence on the physiological conditions encountered by parasites: first, the host buffers the external conditions (by homeostatic mechanisms moderating environmental fluctuations, by behavioural responses selecting appropriate habitat conditions, etc.), but second, the host creates a suite of hostile factors associated with immune defence. This living, reactive environment has no parallels elsewhere in free-living animal ecology: it has the characteristic of reacting specifically to kill the organisms within its boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 119 , Supplement S1: Parasite Adaptation to Environmental Constraints , December 1999 , pp. S1 - S6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cherry-Garrard, A. (1922). The Worst Journey in the World. Chatto & Windus, London.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M. J. & Chappell, L. H. (1997). Survival of parasites, microbes and tumours: strategies for evasion, manipulation and exploitation of the immune response. Parasitology 115(suppl.), S1–S175.Google Scholar
Gannicott, A. M. & Tinsley, R. c. (1998 a). Larval survival characteristics and behaviour of the gill monogenean Discocotyle sagittata. Parasitology 117, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gannicott, A. M. & Tinsley, R. C. (1998 b). Environmental control of transmission of Discocotyle sagittata (Monogenea): egg production and development. Parasitology 117, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, O., Stien, A., Irvine, J., Langvatn, R. & Albon, s. (1999). Evidence for continued transmission of parasitic nematodes in reindeer during the Arctic winter. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 567–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, M. N. & Roepstorff, A. (1999). Seasonal variation in development and survival of Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis eggs on pastures. Parasitology 119 , 209–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollerenshaw, c. B. (1974). Forecasting liver fluke disease. In The Effects of Meteorological Factors upon Parasites (ed. Taylor, A. E. R & Muller, R.), pp. 33–52. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology 12. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar