Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:37:03.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations Upon Chilomastix from Bufo vulgaris, with notes on Chilomastix aulastomi1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop
Ann Bishop
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Biology and Parasitology, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Chilomastix from Bufo vulgaris has been grown in culture media but a “pure” strain was not obtained. Division and encystment occurred.

2. Two types of division were found. In one type the original cytostome and flagella persisted and a new set was formed from one pair of basal granules. In the other type the original cytostome disappeared and two new ones were formed from the two pairs of basal granules. This second type of division is similar to that of Chilomastix aulastomi from Haemopis sanguisuga.

3. It is therefore probable that two species of Chilomastix are present in Bufo vulgaris.

4. Cysts of Chilomastix from Bufo vulgaris and of Chilomastix aulastomi were studied. Nuclear division was never seen in them.

I wish to offer my best thanks to Mr Clifford Dobell, F.R.S., for kindly reading through the manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 507 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexeieff, A. (1909). Les flagellés parasites de l'intestin des batraciens indigènes. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 67, 199.Google Scholar
Alexeieff, A. (1910). Sur les flagellés intestinaux des poissons marins. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (5), 6, 1.Google Scholar
Alexeieff, A. (1912). Sur quelques noms de genre des flagellés qui doivent disparaître de la nomenclature pour cause de synonymie ou pour toute autre raison. Diagnoses de quelques genres récemment étudiés. Zool. Anz. 39, 674.Google Scholar
Alexeieff, A. (1914). Notes protistologiques. Zool. Anz. 43, 515.Google Scholar
Alexeieff, A. (1914 a). Notes protistologiques. Zool. Anz. 44, 193.Google Scholar
Bělař, K. (1921). Protozoenstudien III. Arch. Protistenk. 43, 431.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (1930). The action of hydrochloric acid upon cultures of Trichomonas. Parasitology, 22, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1931). The morphology and method of division of Trichomonas. Parasitology 23, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1931 a). A description of Embadomonas n.spp. from Blatta orientalis, Rana temporaria, Bufo vulgaris, Salamandra maculosa; with a note upon the “cyst” of Trichomonas batrachorum. Parasitology 23, 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1932). A note upon Trichomonas sanguisugae Alexeieff 1911. Parasitology 24, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1933). The morphology and division of Hexamita gigas n.sp. (Flagellata). Parasitology 25, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1934). Observations upon Embadomonas intestinalis in culture. Parasitology 26, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeck, W. C. (1921). Chilomastix mesnili and a method for its culture. J. exp. Med. 33, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeck, W. C. and Tanabe, M. (1926). Chilomastix gallinarum. Morphology, division and cultivation. Amer. J. Hyg. 6, 319.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1922). Quelques observations sur les protozoaires parasites intestinaux de l'homme et des animaux. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 15, 132.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. J. and Pekkola, W. (1918). Chilomastix mesnili(Wenyon 1910). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 11, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and O'connor, F. W. (1921). The Intestinal Protozoa of Man. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and Laidlaw, P. P. (1926). On the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and some other entozoic amoebae. Parasitology, 18, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassé, P. P. (1926). Contribution à l'étude des flagellés parasites. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 65, 345.Google Scholar
Harding, W. A. (1910). A revision of the British leeches. Parasitology, 3, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegner, R. W. (1923). Nuclear division within the cysts of the human intestinal protozoon Chilomastix mesnili. Amer. J. Hyg. 3, 349.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A. and Swezy, O. (1920). On the morphology and mitosis of Chilomastix mesnili(Wenyon), a common flagellate of the human intestine. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 20, 117.Google Scholar
Leiva, L. (1921). Observations on Chilomastix intestinalis Kuczinski. J. Parasit. 8, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nattan-Larrier, B. L. (1912). Infection humaine due à Tetramitus mesnili. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 5, 495.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1910). A new flagellate (Macrostoma mesnili n.sp.) from the human intestine with some remarks on the supposed cyst of Trichomonas. Parasitology, 3, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1926). Protozoology. London.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and O'Connor, F. W. (1917). Human Intestinal Protozoa in the Near East. London.Google Scholar