Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:10:53.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on Theileria parva, the Parasite of East Coast Fever of Cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Although a good deal has been written about East Coast Fever in cattle, the literature relating thereto contains very little direct information regarding the parasite which stands in causal relation to the disease. Robert Koch (1898), who was the first to observe the parasite in cases of East Coast Fever occurring in German East Africa, regarded it as but a variety of Piroplasma bovis (= bigeminum) and described the disease as Texas Fever. Theiler (1904) was the first to distinguish clearly East Coast Fever from Redwater. He stated that “the disease has nothing to do with Texas Fever or Redwater; it is a new disease due to a parasite different to the one found in Texas Fever.” Koch (1903—1904), who gave the disease its distinctive name, reached the same conclusions as Theiler. The investigations of Theiler (1904) established the following facts: Cattle which are immune to Redwater are susceptible to East Coast Fever. East Coast Fever is not communicable by blood inoculations (30 experiments, wherein 5 to 2000 c.c. of East Coast Fever blood were inoculated). He noted the absence of haemoglobinuria in the majority of animals affected with East Coast Fever, its presence in the majority of the animals affected with Redwater. He found that in most cases of East Coast Fever, there was no appreciable decrease in the number of red blood corpuscles, this being in marked contrast to what is observed in Redwater. Theiler noted that cattle might harbour both the parasites of Redwater (P. bovis) and those of East Coast Fever (bacillary forms = T. parva). The former generally appeared in the blood “only towards the end of the fever reaction in East Coast Fever,” being previously latent in the animals which had been “salted” against Redwater. He distinguished “two groups of piroplasmosis,” the inoculable (Redwater, canine and equine piroplasmosis) and the uninoculable (East Coast Fever) by injection of infected blood. The parasites in the latter are much smaller than in the former. He named the parasites of East Coast Fever Piroplasma parvum. Theiler distinguished the parasite of East Coast Fever from P. bovis because of the frequent occurrence of bacillary forms and the minute size of the parasite, but he nevertheless retained the new parasite in the genus Piroplasma.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bettencourt, A., França, C. and Bobges, I. (01. 1907). Un cas de Piroplasmose bacilliforme chez le Daim. Arch. do Real Inst. Bacteriol. Camara Pestana, i. 341349, plates XVII–XVIII.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (1898). Reiseberichte über Rinderpest, Bubonenpest in Indien und Afrika, Tsetse- oder Surrakrankheit, Texasfieber, tropische Malaria, Schwarzwasserfieber, Berlin(J. Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. (1903 and 1904). Reports on Rhodesian Redwater or African Coast Fever. Salisbury: Argus Printing and Publishing Co. [Also (translated) in Arch.f. Tierheilk. 1904; cited by Lichtenheld, 1908, p. 272].Google Scholar
Koch, B. (dated 29. 02. 1904). Fourth Report on African Coast Fever. (Official.) 10 pp. reprint.Google Scholar
Lichtenheld, G. (6. 10. 1908). Ergebnisse der von R. Koch ausgeführten und vorgezeichneten Forschungen über das Küstenfieber der Rinder in Deutsch-Ostafrika. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, lxi. 26272.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, C. P. (1906). Ticks and African Coast Fever. Agricult. Journ., Cape of Good Hope, xxviii. 634643.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. F. (09. 1909). Preliminary note on the transmission of East Coast Fever to cattle by intraperitoneal inoculation of the spleen or portions of the spleen of a sick animal. Journ. compar. Pathol. and Therap., xxii. 213217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. and Graham-Smith, G. S. (10. 1906). Canine Piroplasmosis V. Journ. of Hygiene, vi. 586651, plates XI–XIII, 23 Diagrams.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. and Graham-Smith, G. S. (04. 1907). Canine Piroplasmosis VI. Studies on the morphology and life-history of the parasite. Journ. of Hygiene, vii. 232272, plates I–III, Diagrams 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. and Graham-Smith, G. S. (06. 1908). The mode of multiplication of Piroplasma bovis and P. pitheci in the circulating blood compared with that of P. canis, with notes on other species of Piroplasma. Parasitology, i. 134142, pi. XI, Diagrams 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (09. 1908). Piroplasmosis. (Harben Lecture III.) Journ. Roy. Inst. Publ. Health, xvi. 513526.Google Scholar
Theiler, A. (06. 1904). Rhodesian Tick Fever. Report S. African Assoc. Adv. Sci. (Second Meeting at Johannesburg).Johannesburg:Argus Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd., pp. 201220.Google Scholar
Theiler, A. (12. 1904). East Coast Fever. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 22 pp. reprint.Google Scholar