Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:30:50.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterization and B-cell epitope analysis of the TSP11 gene in Echinococcus infection strains from Yunnan Province

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2024

Qian Xu
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Zhengqing Wang
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Jinrong Zi
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Xuan Cai
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Fangwei Wu
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Benfu Li
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Jia Peng
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Jianxiong Li
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Xinliu Yan
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Ying Dong*
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
Yaming Yang*
Affiliation:
Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, 665000, China
*
Corresponding author: Ying Dong; Email: [email protected]; Yaming Yang; Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author: Ying Dong; Email: [email protected]; Yaming Yang; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This study investigates the molecular intricacies of the transmembrane protein TSP11 gene in Echinococcus strains isolated from livestock and patients in Yunnan Province afflicted with Echinococcus granulosus (E. granulosus) between 2016 and 2020. Gene typing analysis of the ND1 gene revealed the presence of the G1 type, G5 type and untyped strains, constituting 52.4, 38.1 and 9.5%, respectively. The analysis of 42 DNA sequences has revealed 24 novel single nucleotide polymorphic sites, delineating 11 haplotypes, all of which were of the mutant type. Importantly, there were no variations observed in mutation sites or haplotypes in any of the hosts. The total length of the TSP11 gene's 4 exons is 762 bp, encoding 254 amino acids. Our analysis posits the existence of 6 potential B-cell antigenic epitopes within TSP11, specifically at positions 49-KSN-51, 139-GKRG-142, 162-DNG-164, 169-NGS-171, 185-DS-186 and 231-PPRFTN-236. Notably, these epitopes exhibit consistent presence among various intermediate hosts and haplotypes. However, further validation is imperative to ascertain their viability as diagnostic antigens for E. granulosus in the Yunnan Province.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Echinococcosis, also known as hydatid disease, is a persistent cystic zoonotic parasitic disease that affects humans and both domestic and wild odd-toed ungulates. It is caused by the larval stage of the dog tapeworm, a member of the Echinococcus, family Taeniidae, specifically E. granulosus (Chi, Reference Chi2015).

Designated by the World Health Organization as one of the 20 easily neglected tropical diseases, E. granulosus is regionally endemic throughout Europe, North and East Africa, Central Asia, the Middle East, Central and South America and Australia (World Health Organization, 2021; Hogea et al., Reference Hogea, Ciomaga, Muntean, Muntean, Popa and Popa2024), it currently affects approximately 3 million patients with this disease, leading to an estimated annual economic loss of 760 million USD. In the livestock industry, the infection of domestic animals by the larval stage of Echinococcus results in economic losses exceeding 3 billion USD annually due to reduced weight and lower fertility (Budke et al., Reference Budke, Deplazes and Torgerson2006; Otero-Abad and Torgerson, Reference Otero-Abad and Torgerson2013; Oian et al., Reference Oian, Abela-Ridder, Wu and zhou2017).

China bears one of the highest incidences of hydatid disease, with primary endemic areas including Xinjiang, Sichuan, Qinghai, Tibet, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia and semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral regions (Sivalingam and Shepherd, Reference Sivalingam and Shepherd2012). Incomplete statistics indicate that by the end of 2016, over 368 counties (districts) in China had been affected by hydatid disease, with an incidence rate among the population ranging from 0.6 to 4.5%, totalling approximately 170 000 patients (Kolaskar and Tongaonkar, Reference Kolaskar and Tongaonkar1990; Jiang, Reference Jiang2002). Hydatid disease constitutes 40% of the global burden (Wu, Reference Wu2017). In Yunnan Province, Echinococcus endemic areas are concentrated primarily west of 25°N latitude, in regions highly affected by hydatid disease, including Ganzi in Sichuan, Changdu in Tibet and others (Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Liu, Schantz, Akira, Carol, He, Zhang and Chen2000; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Wang, Yi, Huang, Yu, Qiu, Xiao, Xu, Xu, Qi, Qin and Li2012; Lei and Wang, Reference Lei and Wang2012). Notably, counties (districts) such as Deqen and Dali exhibit an incidence rate of 0.06% among the population, with all infections identified as E. granulosus. However, the Diqing region also demonstrates high infection rates among animal hosts, indicating a potential risk of natural focal transmission (Li et al., Reference Li, Wu, YAN, ZI, Peng, BAO, CAI and Yang2019; Li et al., Reference Li, He, ZI, Wu, YAN, Wang, Peng, CAI, Yan and Yang2020).

Mitigating the disease burden of human echinococcosis involves both effective patient treatment and accurate diagnoses. Presently, the primary treatment for hydatid disease involves the surgical excision of lesion tissue and chemotherapy (Wen et al., Reference Wen, Tuerganeli, Shao, Lin, Li, Tuerhongjiang, Lv and Zhang2015). While surgical intervention can promptly alleviate the harm caused by hydatid disease, it is associated with high recurrence rates and numerous postoperative complications (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Tuerganeli, Ran, Wen and SHAO2019), necessitating adjunctive drug therapy (Aghayev, Reference Aghayev2016). Very few adverse events have been reported by treatment with albendazole, however, even a single dose treatment (for empirical or seasonal use) of albendazole (400 mg) could cause acute liver toxicity in adult patients (Chai et al., Reference Chai, Jung and Hong2021).

Conversely, diagnostic methods reliant on imaging technology are not conducive to clear diagnoses of early-stage, non-cystic patients with echinococcosis (Craig et al., Reference Craig, Chabalgoity, Gavidia, Gilman, Gonzalez, Lorca, Naquira and Schantz2007). Consequently, immunodiagnostic tools have gained widespread use in recent years for epidemiological screening and early diagnosis of echinococcosis (Li and Gao, Reference Li and Gao2017). Nevertheless, the antigen employed for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection plates typically comprises echinococcosis cyst fluid. The complexity of protein components in the cyst fluid compromises the accuracy of detecting Echinococcus due to cross-reactivity with other tapeworms of the family Diplotriaenidae. Therefore, selecting specific and highly sensitive coating antigens has become a focal point of current research (Chow et al., Reference Chow, Gauci, Cowman and Lightowlers2004; Liu et al., Reference Liu, MENG, QIAO, Chen, Ma, HU, CAI and Chen2015; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Lu, Ma, Zhang, Wang, Meng, Wang and Bo2018). Notably, the 4-transmembrane protein (TSP11) on the surface of Echinococcus, identified for its pivotal role in stimulating the host's acquired immune response, serves as a specific marker for echinococcosis infection (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Bo, Zhang, Ma, Wang and Lu2017). This current study aimed to analyse the polymorphism of the TSP11 gene distributed in Yunnan and its surrounding areas and investigation of B antigenic determinant cluster of this protein for use as a diagnostic antigen.

Materials and methods

Study sample

Throughout the implementation of the ‘Yunnan Province Hydatid Disease Monitoring Program’ from 2016 to 2020, post-slaughter inspections and parasitic infection checks were carried out on the organs of livestock (hosts) including cattle, pigs and sheep, which displayed cysts, cystic formations or nodules. Following slaughter, we collected organ tissues with cystic masses and fluid from lesions for parasitic infection examination. The samples encompassed single-cystic, multi-vesicular and collapsed internal cyst types of hepatic hydatid disease with an average cyst diameter >5 cm. Additionally, various types of hepatic hydatid with an average cyst diameter <5 cm, situated in the first or second porta hepatis and likely to cause severe complications (such as obstructive jaundice, portal hypertension, Budd–Chiari syndrome) were included. We also considered various types of hepatic hydatid disease where drug adverse reactions were significant (hepatorenal dysfunction and other detrimental side effects), or patients struggled to adhere to medication, or the cyst continued to enlarge after more than 6 months of drug treatment. In these cases, tissues from surgically removed cystic masses and fluid from lesions were gathered for parasitic infection examination (National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, 2017).

Microscopic confirmation of echinococcosis infection and its genotyping

The collected tissues from affected organs and fluid from lesions underwent immediate optical microscopy (10–40×) to identify Echinococcus cyst walls, daughter cysts, protoscoleces or small hooks (Zhu and Su, Reference Zhu, Su, Zhu and Su2019).

For samples testing positive for E. granulosus infection, we further sequenced the ND1 gene to identify the genotype. PCR amplification of the ND1 gene for types 1 and 5 utilized primers designed with reference sequences MN199128.1 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN199128.1) and KY766908.1 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY766908.1) (Table 1) (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Xu, ZI, Yan, Peng, li, Cai, Wu and Yang2023).

Table 1. Primer sequence and other information

Design of primers for Echinococcus TSP11 gene

The primers for amplifying the Echinococcus TSP11 gene were designed based on the reference sequence (XP_024352489.1) ((Huang et al., Reference Huang, Wang, Liang, Deng, Lai, Gu and Zhang2017)) (Table 1).

Echinococcus DNA extraction and nested PCR amplification of ND1 and TSP11 gene

Approximately 20 mg of tissue exhibiting cyst-like changes was excised from the affected organs and cut into 5–10 mm fragments. DNA extraction of Echinococcus was conducted following the guidelines of the DNA extraction kit, and the extracted DNA was stored at −20°C for subsequent use.

The nested PCR amplification for NAD1 and TSP11 genes involved 4 reaction systems, each comprising DNA template (2.5 μL), 2 × Taq enzyme (14.0 μL), primer forward and reverse (10 μmol /L each, 0.7 μL), and ddH2O (7.1 μL). The PCR reaction conditions were set at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 45 sec and 72°C for 1 min 30 sec, concluding with 72°C for 10 min (Han and Gao, Reference Han and Gao2020). The second-round amplification products were visualized through 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the resulting products were sent to Guangzhou Tianyi Huiyuan Genetic Technology Co., Ltd., for bidirectional sequencing.

TSP11 gene polymorphism and evolutionary relationships of sequences from different host sources

The PCR product sequencing results were compiled using DNAStar 11.0 or BioEdit 7.2.5 software to generate DNA sequences for the NAD1 and TSP11 genes. The organized sequences of 2 genes were individually analysed using BLAST, comparing them against the reference sequences MN199128.1 and XP_024352489.1. The query coverage and identity were examined, and when both query coverage and identity exceeded 98%, it was indicative that the organized sequencing sequences represented the target sequences. A match of both coverage (Query cover) and similarity (Identifies) exceeding 98% confirmed the compiled sequences as the target sequences. The coding DNA sequences (CDS) for the 4 exons encoding the TSP11 gene were concatenated from the 5′ to 3′ end (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Dong, Deng, Mao, Chen, Zhang and Jiang2020). Amino acid sequences were deduced using MEGA 7.0.26 software for TSP11 and the alignment file. DnaSP 5.10 software was employed to identify haplotypes, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites, and their mutation types (synonymous/non-synonymous) for the 4 exons of the TSP11 gene. Expected heterozygosity (He) and nucleotide diversity (π) were calculated for each haplotype (Dong et al., Reference Dong, Liu, Xu, Liu, Deng and Chen2019 and Xu et al., Reference Xu, Dong, Deng, Mao, Chen, Zhang and Jiang2020). All base substitutions were verified by examining the sequencing peak charts. Network 10.0 software was used to create intermediate network evolutionary diagrams for each haplotype.

Prediction of B-cell antigenic determinants of different haplotypes of the TSP11 gene

B-cell epitopes of TSP11 were predicted using the IEDB online platform (https://www.iedb.org/) and the ‘Protean’ module of DNAStar 11.0. Comparative analysis of different hydrophilicity plots (Ponomarenko et al., Reference Ponomarenko, Papangelopoulos, Zajonc, Peters, Sette and Bourne2011), accessibility (Allcorn and Martin, Reference Allcorn and Martin2002), flexibility (Li et al., Reference Li, Zheng, Feng, Hu, Huang and Chen2016), antigenicity (Resende et al., Reference Resende, Rezende, Oliveira, Batista, Corrêa-Oliveira, Reis and Ruiz2012) and β-turn regions among the amino acid chains of different TSP11 haplotypes (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Lin, Lin, Lin and You2014) was conducted. Parameters such as hydrophilicity, antigenic index, flexibility and β-turn were assessed to identify common B-cell antigenic epitopes among different intermediate hosts and haplotypes. Points with the highest local average hydrophilicity were often situated at or adjacent to the antigenic determinant clusters (epitopes). Surface accessibility prediction considered the likelihood of amino acid residues in the antigen coming into contact with corresponding antibodies or solvent molecules. Polar amino acids, more likely to be exposed on the protein surface, were deemed probable components of antigenic epitopes. Amino acid residues with high activity represented flexible sites likely to form antigenic epitopes. The β-turn region and structurally loose, prominently exposed, deformable and twisted areas in irregularly coiled regions were identified as potential antigenic epitope regions exposed on the protein surface that could easily bind to antibodies.

Statistical analysis

Establishing a counting database within Excel software, we conducted chi-square tests to analyse the distribution variances among intermediate hosts exhibiting different genotypes of Echinococcus, nucleotide peptides of the TSP11 gene, and disparities in haplotype detection rates across diverse intermediate hosts, maintaining a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results

Sample collection sites and Echinococcus infection

Between 2016 and 2020, a comprehensive total of 42 samples of visceral tissues from Echinococcus were meticulously collected and subjected to rigorous testing. These samples comprised 13 of human origin (4 from Jianchuan County, 4 from Ganzi Prefecture, 3 from Yulong County and 2 from Weixi County), 13 sourced from pigs (5 from Daguan County, 3 from Eryuan County, 3 from Lushui City, 1 from Shangri-La and 1 from Weixi), 14 originating from cattle (as illustrated in Fig. 1a, b) (13 from Shangri-La and 1 from Weixi) and 2 derived from sheep (1 from Weixi and 1 from Honghe). These samples encompassed 37 instances of diseased liver tissues and 6 cases of diseased lung tissues (as depicted in Figs 1c–e) (refer to Supplementary Material 1 for further details).

Figure 1. Intermediate host, diseased organ, protocephalic segment of Echinococcus granulosus

Note: a: Yak from Weixi County, Diqing Prefecture; b: Diqing Tibetan pig; c: the liver; d: lungs; e: diseased part of the lung (arrow points to the diseased part); f, g: hydatid (40X); h, i: protoscolex (10X)

Echinococcus was detected in all 42 samples of infected tissues (Fig. 1f–i). Under microscopic examination, structures with double-layered cyst walls enclosing fluid and sand-like bodies were observed. The inner layer of the cyst wall was pink, and the cyst fluid was either transparent or slightly turbid. Small hooks floated in the fluid, and internally, elliptical or circular structures resembling ‘original heads’ were observed, which were invaginated and contracted (Fig. 1f, g, green arrows). Inside the ‘original heads,’ brown elliptical structures were identified as calcareous corpuscles (Fig. 1h, i, black arrows). The wheel-shaped structure represented a sucker (Fig. 1h, brown arrows), and the bushy structure featured small hooks (Fig. 1h, i, purple arrows).

Sequencing of gene PCR amplification products

PCR amplification of TSP11 and ND1 genes produced target bands of approximately 1021 and 1232 bp respectively (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Electrophoresis Map of PCR Amplified Products of TSP11 Gene and ND1 Gene in the Pathological Organs of Echinococcus granulosus

Note: M: DNA marker; 1. 2: Negative control of the first and second rounds of PCR of TSP11 gene; 3: TSP11 gene PCR positive control; 12. 13: Negative control of ND1 gene in the first and second rounds of PCR; 14: ND1 gene positive control; 4. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: amplification products of TSP11 gene; 16. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22: amplification products of ND1 gene

42 ND1 Gene Sequences of the 42 ND1 genes exhibited greater than 98% similarity with the reference sequences MN199128.1 and KY766908.1. Among these, the ND1 gene DNA sequences of 22 samples were identical to MN199128.1, with a length of 894 bp, classifying them as Type 1. 16 samples exhibited ND1 gene DNA sequences identical to KY766908.1, also with a length of 894 bp, categorizing them as Type 5. For the remaining 4 samples, the similarity to both MN199128.1 and KY766908.1 did not reach 100%, designating them as an undefined genotype (Table 2).

Table 2. Interspecific difference of ND1 gene

In all, 3 distinct genotypes were identified: Type 1, Type 5 and undefined, constituting 52.4, 38.1 and 9.5% of the total, respectively. While all 3 genotypes were detectable across intermediate hosts including humans, pigs, cattle and sheep, the discrepancies in their detection rates did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.045, P = 0.083 and P = 0.0428) (refer to Table 2).

Nucleotide diversity of TSP11 gene CDS sequences

Sequencing the TSP11 gene from the 42 Echinococcus samples resulted in complete coding DNA sequences (CDS), each comprising 4 exons with a length of 762 bp. These sequences exhibited greater than 98% similarity with the reference sequence XP_024352489.1. The nucleotide diversity index (π) was calculated to be 0.00413. There were 24 polymorphic sites, with the most frequent biallelic site being c.127 (42.9%, 18/42), and the minor allele frequency (MAF) for c.192 was 26.2% (11/42). There were 8 singleton variable sites and 16 parsimony informative sites (2 variants). Among the 24 polymorphic sites, 66.7% (16/24) were located at the third base of amino acid codons, and only 6.25% (1/16) of base substitutions resulted in amino acid variations. The proportions for the second and first base positions were 8.3% (2/24) and 25.0% (6/24), respectively (Table 3). The detection rates of these 24 polymorphic sites in sequences from different intermediate hosts such as humans, pigs, cattle and sheep showed no statistically significant differences.

Table 3. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the TSP11 gene of Echinococcus granulos

Multiple mutations and evolutionary analysis of TSP11 gene CDS sequences

The alignment of the 42 TSP11 gene CDS sequences with the reference sequence (XP_024352489.1) revealed the presence of 11 haplotypes. Haplotype Hap_1 perfectly matched the reference sequence, with the remaining 10 haplotypes (Hap_2 to Hap_11) representing mutated forms of the reference sequence (XP_024352489.1), resulting in expected heterozygosity (He) of 0.6622. Among them, Hap_2 had the highest frequency (57%, 24/42), followed by Hap_3 (19%, 8/42) and Hap_8 (4.8%, 2/42), with the remaining haplotypes each accounting for (2.4% 1/42) (Table 4). The mildest mutations were observed in Hap_2 (57%, 24/42) and Hap_9 (2.4%, 1/42), while the most intense mutation was observed in Hap_8 ( 4.8%, 2/42). Hap_4, Hap_5 and Hap_11 were exclusive to human samples, Hap_6 was only found in pig samples, and Hap_7, Hap_8, Hap_9, Hap_10 and Hap_12 were solely present in cattle samples. Both Hap_2 and Hap_3 were detected in samples from humans, pigs, cattle and sheep, with no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups (P = 0.197 and P = 0.387) (Table 4).

Table 4. Different haplotypes having mutations in TSP11gene

The network diagram illustrated that the 11 haplotypes (Hap_2 to Hap_12) evolved from the reference sequence (XP_024352489.1) (Hap_1) through 1 mutation (Hap_2, Hap_9), progressing to 2 mutations (Hap_3, Hap_4, Hap_5, Hap_12), 3 mutations (Hap_6), 6 mutations (Hap_7), 8 mutations (Hap_10), 12 mutations (Hap_11) and 13 mutations (Hap_8). Notably, Hap_8 and Hap_11 shared the c.229 and c.231 positions, representing the same protein F77L, counted as 1 mutation in Table 4. Additionally, Hap_11 had 2 mutations at position c.747, reverting to the wild-type allele S (S249), making the joint mutation multiplicity higher in Hap_8 and Hap_11 than indicated in Table 4 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Evolutionary network of haplotype of TSP11 gene in the diseased organs of Echinococcus granulosus.

Note: The size of the circle is proportional to the number of isolates showing a particular haplotype; lines represent evolutional steps connecting haplotypes.

Prediction of B-cell antigen precursors in the amino acid chain of the TSP11 gene

The translation of the 11 haplotypes (Hap_2 to Hap_12) of the TSP11 gene CDS into amino acid chains, followed by prediction using IEBD and DNA Star software, revealed 5 and 10 B-cell antigenic determinant clusters, respectively (Table 5). These clusters had lengths ranging from 3 to 40 amino acids, with an average hydrophilicity value of 0.460 (see Supplementary Material 2 for detailed results). The predicted regions, such as 49-KSN-51, 139-GKRG-142, 162-DNG-164, 169-NGS-171, 185-DS-186 and 231-PPRFTN-236, were identified as 6 conserved B-cell antigenic epitopes among the 11 amino acid chains (Table 5).

Table 5. Prediction of antigen determinant of TSP11 gene

Note: aThe first and second digits are the starting position of the amino acid chain;

b 160–199 amino acid chain segments appear;

c 5–7 amino acid chains do not predict conserved B-cell epitopes in DNA Star;

d Bold letters indicate B-cell antigen epitopes conserved by amino acid chains that overlap the 2 prediction methods.

Discussion

This study builds upon both morphological and genetic confirmation of E. granulosus sensu lato, focusing on the identification of B-cell antigenic epitopes in the TSP11 protein of the protoscolex of Yunnan Province and its surrounding regions. The diversity of the ND1 gene sequence presently allows the classification of E. granulosus into 10 genotypes (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Liu, Zhao and Zhang2015) and 5 strains. Specifically, G1–G3 represent E. granulosus strains (Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto), with G1 for the sheep strain, G2 for the Tasmanian sheep strain(this genotype is not currently recognized as valid)and G3 for the water buffalo strain (Omadang et al., Reference Omadang, Chamai, Ejobi, Erume, Oba and Ocaido2024). The remaining strains, G4–G10, include the horse strain (G4 – Echinococcus equinus), Ortlepp's strain (G5 – Echinococcus ortleppi) and the Canadian strain (G6–G10) comprising the camel strain (G6), pig strain (G7), deer strain (G8), Poland strain (G9)(this genotype is not currently recognized as valid)and elk strain (G10) (Nakao et al., Reference Nakao, McManus, Schantz, Craig and Ito2007;, Reference Nakao, Yanagida, Konyaev, Lavikainen, Odnokurtsev, Zaikov and Ito2013; Wassermann et al., Reference Wassermann, Addy, Kokolova, Okhlopkov, Leibrock, Oberle, Oksanen and Romig2024). The predominant genotypes observed among the E. granulosus samples in this study were G1 and G5, with G1 being the most prevalent. However, the differences in detection rates of G1 and G5 genotypes across various intermediate hosts such as humans, pigs, cattle and sheep did not attain statistical significance, indicating an absence of bias in host sources. However, its prevalence was slightly lower than the previously reported detection rates of 98.1 and 97.9% in Chinese populations and animals (Alvarez et al., Reference Alvarez, Romig and Lightowlers2014; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yang, Zeng, Zhao, Liu, Piao, Jiang, Cao, Shen, Liu and Zhang2014). This discrepancy may be attributed to the high sensitivity of the ND1 full-gene sequence alignment utilized for genotyping in this study, resulting in 9.5% of the sample sequences being unclassified according to the published reference sequences.

The Tetraspanin (TSP) family is a crucial component of the tetraspanin-enriched membrane microdomain (TEM) superfamily, comprising 4 main subfamilies: the CD family (CD9, CD81 and CD151), the slow retinal degeneration (RDS) family (RDS-ROM), the uroplakin family (UPK1A/1B) and the CD63 family (CD63 and TSPAN31). These proteins, ranging from 200 to 350 amino acids (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Song, Xie, Zhong, Wang, Zheng, Gu, Wang, Peng and Yang2015; Xian et al., Reference Xian, Zhao, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Meng, Ma, Wang and Bo2021), exhibit a structural composition that includes 2 extracellular domains known as the small extracellular loop (EC1) and large extracellular loop (EC2/LEL), an intracellular loop (transitioning from structural domain 2–3), and N- and C-terminal tails. Among the 4 highly conserved transmembrane domains (TM1–4) of TSP, the EC2/LEL structural domain, referred to as the ‘Tetraspanin Structural Web,’ serves as a binding site for numerous ligand proteins and stands out as an area of concentration for anti-TSP antibodies (Piratae et al., Reference Piratae, Tesana, Jones, Brindley, Loukas, Lovas, Eursitthichai, Sripa, Thanasuwan and Laha2012; Graham et al., Reference Graham, Sunryd, Mathavan, Weir, Larsen, Halim, Clausen, Cousin, Alfandari and Hebert2020; Ahmed et al., Reference Ahmed, Neelakanta and Sultana2021).

TSP11 has long been recognized as a promising candidate protein for vaccine development targeting various diseases, including schistosomiasis (Tran et al., Reference Tran, Pearson, Bethony, Smyth, Jones, Duke, Don, McManus, Correa-Oliveira and Loukas2006; Cardoso et al., Reference Cardoso, Macedo, Gava, Kitten, Mati, de Melo, Caliari, Almeida, Venancio, Verjovski-Almeida and Oliveira2008; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Cai, Yin, Hao, Lu, Wang, Wang and Chen2010; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Li, Duke, Jones, Kuang, Zhang, Blair, Li and McManus2011), clonorchiasis (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Chung, Sohn, Hong and Yong2012; Chaiyadet et al., Reference Chaiyadet, Krueajampa, Hipkaeo, Plosan, Piratae, Sotillo, Smout, Sripa, Brindley, Loukas and Laha2017), opisthorchiasis (Piratae et al., Reference Piratae, Tesana, Jones, Brindley, Loukas, Lovas, Eursitthichai, Sripa, Thanasuwan and Laha2012; Tomii et al., Reference Tomii, Santos and Nozaki2019; Phumrattanaprapin et al., Reference Phumrattanaprapin, Chaiyadet, Brindley, Pearson, Smout, Loukas and Laha2021), Manson's schistosomiasis (Pearson et al., Reference Pearson, Pickering, McSorley, Bethony, Tribolet, Dougall, Hotez and Loukas2012; Cheng et al., Reference Cheng, Curti, Rezende, Kwityn, Zhan, Gillespie, Plieskatt, Joshi, Volkin, Hotez, Middaugh and Bottazzi2013; Curti et al., Reference Curti, Kwityn, Zhan, Gillespie, Brelsford, Deumic, Plieskatt, Rezende, Tsao, Kalampanayil, Hotez and Bottazzi2013; Jia et al., Reference Jia, Schulte, Loukas, Pickering, Pearson, Mobli, Jones, Rosengren, Daly, Gobert, Jones, Craik and Mulvenna2014), filariasis (Dakshinamoorthy et al., Reference Dakshinamoorthy, Munirathinam, Stoicescu, Reddy and Kalyanasundaram2013) and pulmonary hydatid disease (Dang et al., Reference Dang, Watanabe, Kajino, Oku, Matsumoto, Yagi, Kouguchi and Sugimoto2009a, Reference Dang, Yagi, Oku, Kouguchi, Kajino, Watanabe, Matsumoto, Nakao, Wakaguri, Toyoda and Sugimoto2009b, Reference Dang, Yagi, Oku, Kouguchi, Kajino, Matsumoto, Nakao, Wakaguri, Toyoda, Yin and Sugimoto2012a, Reference Dang, Feng, Yagi, Sugimoto, Li and Oku2012b). Additionally, it has been explored as a potential target for detecting Taenia solium infection in pigs. The detection of circulating antigen TSP11 in the human body has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing cysticercosis (Hancock et al., Reference Hancock, Pattabhi, Whitfield, Yushak, Lane, Garcia, Gonzalez, Gilman and Tsang2006; Moribe and Mekada, Reference Moribe and Mekada2013). In this study, the TSP11 gene CDS length of the protoscoleces in 42 samples remained consistently at 894 bp, resulting in an amino acid chain of 298 aa. The 24 reported SNP mutations were novel, and their detection differences among strains from various hosts, including humans, pigs, cattle and sheep, were statistically insignificant. While there is a certain bias in the host source diversity of the TSP11 gene CDS sequence – with Hap_4, Hap_5 and Hap_11 sequences detected exclusively in human-derived strains, Hap_6 only in pig-derived strains, and Hap_9 and Hap_12 only in cattle-derived strains – and Hap_7, Hap_8 and Hap_10 exclusively present in sheep-derived strains, these haplotypes are largely situated at the evolutionary distant end. Hap_2 and Hap_3, considered earlier ancestors, are detectable in parasitic strains from all 4 intermediate hosts (Fig. 3), suggesting the rationale for selecting sequences from Hap_2 and Hap_3 for the detection of antigens in the 4 intermediate hosts.

A comprehensive evaluation of B-cell antigenic epitopes for the 42 amino acid chains, considering hydrophilicity (Ponomarenko et al., Reference Ponomarenko, Papangelopoulos, Zajonc, Peters, Sette and Bourne2011), accessibility (Allcorn and Martin, Reference Allcorn and Martin2002), flexibility (Li et al., Reference Li, Zheng, Feng, Hu, Huang and Chen2016) and antigenicity (Resende et al., Reference Resende, Rezende, Oliveira, Batista, Corrêa-Oliveira, Reis and Ruiz2012), reveals 6 peptide regions, namely 49-KSN-51, 139-GKRG-142, 162-DNG-164, 169-NGS-171, 185-DS-186 and 231-PPRFTN-236, distributed across strains from different species and haplotypes. These 6 peptide chains exhibit robust conservation. Among the 24 SNPs, only the c.492 C > T synonymous mutation appears in the second amino acid (G164G) codon within the 162-DNG-171 peptide chain. However, among these 6 B-cell antigenic epitopes, based on the findings of Wang et al. (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang, Lu, Zhang, Meng and Wang2020) and Xian Jinwen (Xian et al., Reference Xian, Zhao, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Meng, Ma, Wang and Bo2021) regarding the strong antigenicity and immunogenicity of the 227-WQYGPPRFTNGAHN-240 peptide chain and its extracellular loop (LEL) region, and considering the principle that B-cell antigenic epitopes are preferably composed of 5–15 amino acid residues (Gong, Reference Gong2016), this study supports the utilization of the 231-PPRFTN-236 peptide chain as an immunodiagnostic tool for developing a broadly effective immune diagnosis for E. granulosus protoscoleces infection in different hosts.

This study marks a significant milestone as it successfully obtained the gene sequencing sequences of the 4 exons of the TSP11 gene from within the epidemic region of Yunnan Province, E. granulosus sensu lato. This achievement contributes substantially to the augmentation of shared data within GenBank. Furthermore, the study delves into the mutation sites and haplotypes of the TSP11 gene, offering valuable insights into the potential applications of the tetraspanin family in addressing E. granulosus. Nevertheless, certain limitations exist. The lack of specific township localization in the sample sources restricts the ability to make precise comparisons of the prevalence in different regions. Additionally, due to spatial constraints, this paper does not extend to the validation of the diagnostic antigen's efficacy selected from the TSP11 gene. Moving forward, the research group plans to undertake pertinent studies to evaluate and substantiate the diagnostic antigen's effectiveness for E. granulosus.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on prevalent intermediate hosts in the endemic regions of Yunnan Province, primarily infected with G1 and G5 genotypes of E. granulosus protoscoleces. The report introduces 24 novel nucleotide peptide sites and uncovers 11 haplotypes for the TSP11 transmembrane protein in Yunnan, all representing mutated forms. Proposing 6 potential B-cell antigenic epitopes in TSP11, the study maintains consistency among different intermediate hosts and haplotypes, laying the groundwork for considering TSP11 protein as a candidate antigen for diagnosing different species of E. granulosus protoscolecess, offering theoretical support for the diagnosis of E. granulosus.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182024000726.

Data availability statement

Availability of Data: The materials and data related to this study are currently unavailable.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the disease prevention and control centers in the provinces and cities of Diqing, Dali, Nujiang, and Lijiang in Yunnan for their wholehearted support.

Author contributions

Xu Qian: Conducted PCR amplification experiments, data analysis, and manuscript writing. Dong Ying: Formulated the experimental plan, provided technical guidance, and ensured the quality control of the paper. Wang Zhengqing: Participated in experimental operations.Yang Yaming, Zi Jinrong, Cai Xuan, Wu Fangwei, Li Benfu, Peng Jia, Li Jianxiong, Yan Xinliu: Involved in sample collection and participated in pathogen diagnostics.

Financial support

This project received support from the Science and Technology Talent Platform Plan (Academician Workstation), with project number 202305AF15067, and the Key Laboratory for Research on Prevention and Treatment of Hydatid Disease of the National Health Commission, with funding number 202103.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

The samples were obtained from discarded tissues generated during the surgical treatment of echinococcosis patients and the exploration of the pathogenic nature of deceased animal diseases.The research did not involve the personal privacy of the research subjects during the pathogenic research.

References

Aghayev, RM (2016) Liver echinococcosis complicated with lesions of bile ducts in Azerbaijan. Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology 6, 125130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, W, Neelakanta, G and Sultana, H (2021) Tetraspanins as potential therapeutic candidates for targeting flaviviruses. Frontiers in Immunology 12, 630571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allcorn, LC and Martin, ACR (2002) SACS--self-maintaining database of antibody crystal structure information. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 18, 175181.Google ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, RCA, Romig, T and Lightowlers, MW (2014) Echinocossus gralunosus sensu lato genotypes infecting humans--review of current knowledge. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budke, CM, Deplazes, P and Torgerson, PR (2006) Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, 296303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, FC, Macedo, GC, Gava, E, Kitten, GT, Mati, VL, de Melo, AL, Caliari, MV, Almeida, GT, Venancio, TM, Verjovski-Almeida, S and Oliveira, SC (2008) Schistosoma mansoni tegument protein Sm29 is able to induce a Th1-type of immune response and protection against parasite infection. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2, e308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chai, JY, Jung, BK and Hong, SJ (2021) Albendazole and mebendazole as anti-parasitic and anti-cancer agents: an update. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 59, 189225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaiyadet, S, Krueajampa, W, Hipkaeo, W, Plosan, Y, Piratae, S, Sotillo, J, Smout, M, Sripa, B, Brindley, PJ, Loukas, A and Laha, T (2017) Suppression of mRNAs encoding CD63 family tetraspanins from the carcinogenic liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini results in distinct tegument phenotypes. Scientific Reports 7, 14342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, WQ, Curti, E, Rezende, WC, Kwityn, C, Zhan, B, Gillespie, P, Plieskatt, J, Joshi, SB, Volkin, DB, Hotez, PJ, Middaugh, CR and Bottazzi, ME (2013) Biophysical and formulation studies of the Schistosoma mansoni TSP-2 extracellular domain recombinant protein, a lead vaccine candidate antigen for intestinal schistosomiasis. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9, 23512361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, ZC (2015) Practical Clinical Hepatology, 2Edn. Beijing: People's Military Medical Publisher.Google Scholar
Chow, C, Gauci, CG, Cowman, AF and Lightowlers, MW (2004) Echinocossus gralunosus: oncosphere-specific transcription of genes encoding a host-protective antigen. Experimental Parasitology 106, 183186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, PS, Chabalgoity, JA, Gavidia, CM, Gilman, RH, Gonzalez, AE, Lorca, M, Naquira, C and Schantz, PM (2007) Prevention and control of cystic echinococcosis. The Lancet Infectious 7, 385394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curti, E, Kwityn, C, Zhan, B, Gillespie, P, Brelsford, J, Deumic, V, Plieskatt, J, Rezende, WC, Tsao, E, Kalampanayil, B, Hotez, PJ and Bottazzi, ME (2013) Expression at a 20L scale and purification of the extracellular domain of the Schistosoma mansoni TSP-2 recombinant protein: a vaccine candidate for human intestinal schistosomiasis. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9, 23422350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakshinamoorthy, G, Munirathinam, G, Stoicescu, K, Reddy, MV and Kalyanasundaram, R (2013) Large extracellular loop of tetraspanin as a potential vaccine candidate for filariasis. PLoS One 8, e77394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dang, ZS, Watanabe, J, Kajino, K, Oku, YB, Matsumoto, J, Yagi, KP, Kouguchi, H and Sugimoto, C (2009a) Molecular cloning and characterization of a T24-like protein in Echinococcus multilocularis. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 168, 117119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dang, ZS, Yagi, KP, Oku, YB, Kouguchi, H, Kajino, K, Watanabe, J, Matsumoto, J, Nakao, R, Wakaguri, H, Toyoda, A and Sugimoto, C (2009b) Evaluation of Echinococcus multilocularis tetraspanins as vaccine candidates against primary alveolar echinococcosis. Vaccine 27, 73397345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dang, ZS, Yagi, KP, Oku, YB, Kouguchi, H, Kajino, K, Matsumoto, J, Nakao, R, Wakaguri, H, Toyoda, A, Yin, H and Sugimoto, C (2012a) A pilot study on developing mucosal vaccine against alveolar echinococcosis (AE) using recombinant tetraspanin 3: vaccine efficacy and immunology. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dang, ZS, Feng, JC, Yagi, KP, Sugimoto, C, Li, W and Oku, Y (2012b) Mucosal adjuvanticity of fibronectin-binding peptide (FBP) fused with echinococcus multilocularis tetraspanin 3: systemic and local antibody responses. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, Y, Liu, SP, Xu, YC, Liu, Y, Deng, Y and Chen, MN (2019) Mutations and predicted structure change of G6PD isolated from a patient with primaquine-induced hemolysis in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 37, 399405.Google Scholar
Gong, FL (2016) Medical Immunology, 3rd Edn. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Graham, JB, Sunryd, JC, Mathavan, K, Weir, E, Larsen, ISB, Halim, A, Clausen, H, Cousin, H, Alfandari, D and Hebert, DN (2020) Endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane protein TMTC3 contributes to O-mannosylation of E-cadherin, cellular adherence, and embryonic gastrulation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 31, 167183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, M, Tuerganeli, AJ, Ran, B, Wen, H and SHAO, YM (2019) Analysis on the quality of life of hydatid patients in a hospital of xinjiang. XinJiang Medical Journal 49, 671675.Google Scholar
Han, J and Gao, GQ (2020) Medical Molecular Biology Techniques, 4rd Edn. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hancock, K, Pattabhi, S, Whitfield, FW, Yushak, ML, Lane, WS, Garcia, HH, Gonzalez, AE, Gilman, RH and Tsang, VC (2006) Characterization and cloning of T24, a Taenia solium antigen diagnostic for cysticercosis. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 147, 107117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogea, MO, Ciomaga, BF, Muntean, MM, Muntean, AA, Popa, MI and Popa, GL (2024) Cystic Echinococcosis in the early 2020s: a review. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 9, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, YJ, Lin, SC, Lin, YL, Lin, KH and You, SN (2014) A meta-learning approach for B-cell conformational epitope prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, DD, Song, XJ, Xie, Y, Zhong, XQ, Wang, N, Zheng, Y, Gu, XB, Wang, T, Peng, XR and Yang, GY (2015) Molecular insights into a tetraspanin in the hydatid tapeworm Echinocossus gralunosus. Department of Parasitology 8, 311.Google Scholar
Huang, Y, Wang, Q, Yi, DY, Huang, L, Yu, WJ, Qiu, DC, Xiao, N, Xu, KJ, Xu, GF, Qi, YF, Qin, SC and Li, SC (2012) Prevelance investigation and evaluation of human echinococcosis in sichuan province. Journal of Preventive Medicine Information 28, 594598.Google Scholar
Huang, LH, Wang, YQ, Liang, S, Deng, HM, Lai, JB, Gu, J and Zhang, XJ (2017) Molecular Biology Techniques: Foundation and Enhancement, 4rd Edn. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Jia, XY, Schulte, L, Loukas, A, Pickering, D, Pearson, M, Mobli, M, Jones, A, Rosengren, KJ, Daly, NL, Gobert, GN, Jones, MK, Craik, DJ and Mulvenna, J (2014) Solution structure, membrane interactions, and protein binding partners of the tetraspanin Sm-TSP-2, a vaccine antigen from the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 289, 71517163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, CP (2002) Recent prevalence of hydatid disease in China. Notification of Disease Prevention and Control 17, 7779.Google Scholar
Jiang, N, Cai, PF, Yin, JG, Hao, LL, Lu, HJ, Wang, XR, Wang, H and Chen, QJ (2010) Characterization of antibody responses to the Sj23 antigen of Schistosoma japonicum after infection and immunization. Acta Tropica 116, 914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, TY, Chung, EJ, Sohn, WM, Hong, SH and Yong, TS (2012) Molecular characterization of Clonorchis sinensis tetraspanin 2 extracellular loop 2. Parasitology Research 110, 707711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolaskar, AS and Tongaonkar, PC (1990) A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. Febs Letters 276, 172174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lei, ZL and Wang, LY (2012) Control situation and primary task of keyparasitic diseases in China. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 30, 15.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, W and Gao, JL (2017) Echinococcosis and its diagnostic techniques. Chinese Journal of Health Inspection 27, 19741976.Google Scholar
Li, BQ, Zheng, LL, Feng, KY, Hu, LL, Huang, GH and Chen, L (2016) Prediction of linear b-cell epitopes with mrmr feature selection and analysis. Current Bioinformatics 11, 2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, BF, Wu, FW, YAN, XL, ZI, JR, Peng, J, BAO, XY, CAI, X and Yang, YM (2019) Epidemiological analysis of echinococcosis in Yunnan Province from 2012 to 2017. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 5, 576582.Google Scholar
Li, BF, He, WS, ZI, JR, Wu, FW, YAN, XL, Wang, ZQ, Peng, J, CAI, X, Yan, J and Yang, YM (2020) Analysis of the prevalence of and control measures for echinococcosis in Shangri la. Yunnan Province. Journal of Pathogen Biology 15, 14361441.Google Scholar
Li, BF, Wang, ZQ, Xu, Q, ZI, JR, Yan, XL, Peng, J, li, JX, Cai, X, Wu, FW and Yang, YM (2023) Cloning and sequence analysis of the partial nad1 gene within mitochondrial DNA of Echinococcus granulosus. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 41, 306311.Google Scholar
Liu, TL, MENG, QL, QIAO, J, Chen, C, Ma, Y, HU, ZX, CAI, XP and Chen, CF (2015) Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of TSP1 and TSP6 gene of Echinocossus gralunosus. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 30, 4146.Google Scholar
Moribe, H and Mekada, E (2013) Tetraspanins in lower eukaryotes. Tetraspanins. Proteins and Cell Regulation 9, 187201.Google Scholar
Nakao, M, McManus, DP, Schantz, PM, Craig, PS and Ito, A (2007) A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Parasitology 134, 713722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakao, M, Yanagida, T, Konyaev, S, Lavikainen, A, Odnokurtsev, VA, Zaikov, VA and Ito, A (2013) Mitochondrial phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae) with emphasis on relationships among Echinococcus canadensis genotypes. Parasitology 140, 16251636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oian, MB, Abela-Ridder, B, Wu, WP and zhou, XN (2017) Combating echinococcosis in China: strengtheningthe research and development. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 6, 14431447.Google Scholar
Omadang, L, Chamai, M, Ejobi, F, Erume, J, Oba, P and Ocaido, M (2024) Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis among livestock in pastoral and agro-pastoral areas in Uganda. Parasitology 151, 6876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otero-Abad, B and Torgerson, PR (2013) A systematic review of the epidemiology of echinococcosis in domestic and wild animals. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, 2249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, MS, Pickering, DA, McSorley, HJ, Bethony, JM, Tribolet, L, Dougall, AM, Hotez, PJ and Loukas, A (2012) Enhanced protective efficacy of a chimeric form of the schistosomiasis vaccine antigen Sm-TSP-2. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phumrattanaprapin, W, Chaiyadet, S, Brindley, PJ, Pearson, M, Smout, MJ, Loukas, A and Laha, T (2021) Orally administered bacillus spores expressing an extracellular vesicle-derived tetraspanin protect hamsters against challenge infection with carcinogenic human liver fluke. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 223, 14451455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piratae, S, Tesana, S, Jones, MK, Brindley, PJ, Loukas, A, Lovas, E, Eursitthichai, V, Sripa, B, Thanasuwan, S and Laha, T (2012) Molecular characterization of a tetraspanin from the human liver fluke. Opisthorchis viverrini. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, 1939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponomarenko, J, Papangelopoulos, N, Zajonc, DM, Peters, B, Sette, A and Bourne, PE (2011) IEDB-3D: structural data within the immune epitope database. Nucleic Acids Research 39, D1164D1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, JM, Liu, FJ, Schantz, P, Akira, I, Carol, D, He, JG, Zhang, Y and Chen, XW (2000) Epidemiological study onhuman hydatidosis in Tibetan region of western Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses 16, 7780.Google Scholar
Resende, DM, Rezende, AM, Oliveira, NJD, Batista, ICA, Corrêa-Oliveira, R, Reis, AB and Ruiz, JC (2012) An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivalingam, GN and Shepherd, AJ (2012) An analysis of B-cell epitope discontinuity. Molecular Immunology 51, 304309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomii, K, Santos, HJ and Nozaki, T (2019) Genome-Wide analysis of known and potential tetraspanins in entamoeba histolytica. Genes (Basel) 10, 885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tran, MH, Pearson, MS, Bethony, JM, Smyth, DJ, Jones, MK, Duke, M, Don, TA, McManus, DP, Correa-Oliveira, R and Loukas, A (2006) Tetraspanins on the surface of Schistosoma mansoni are protective antigens against schistosomiasis. Nature Medicine 12, 835840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, ZR, Bo, XW, Zhang, YY, Ma, X, Wang, ZX and Lu, PP (2017) Protein profile analyses of protoscoleces in echinocossus gralunosus. Acta Weterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 48, 15191528.Google Scholar
Wang, WY, Wang, YF, Lu, BY, Ma X, Zhang, YY, Meng, JM, Wang, ZR and Bo XW (2020) Differential expression and bioinformatic analysis of the TSP11 gene of Echinocossus gralunosus at different developmental stages. Journal of Pathogen Biology 1, 2531.Google Scholar
Wassermann, M, Addy, F, Kokolova, L, Okhlopkov, I, Leibrock, S, Oberle, J, Oksanen, A and Romig, T (2024) High genetic diversity of Echinococcus canadensis G10 in northeastern Asia: is it the region of origin? Parasitology 151, 93101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, H, Tuerganeli, AJ, Shao, YM, Lin, RY, Li, HT, Tuerhongjiang, TX, Lv, GD and Zhang, WB (2015) Research achievements and challenges for echinococcosis control. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 33, 466471.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2021) Ending the Neglect to Attain the Sustainable Development Goals: a Road Map for Neglected Tropical Diseases 2021–2030. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wu, WP (2017) Prevalence and distribution of two types of echinococcosis in China. China Animal Health 7, 79.Google Scholar
Xian, JW, Zhao, PP, Wang, N, Wang, WY, Zhang, YY, Meng, JM, Ma, X, Wang, ZR and Bo, XW (2021) Molecular characterization of a tetraspanin TSP11 gene in echinocossus gralunosus and evaluation its immunoprotection in model dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8, 759283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, MF, Lu, PP, Ma, X, Zhang, YY, Wang, WY, Meng, JM, Wang, ZR and Bo, XW (2018) Advances in Echinocossus gralunosus proteomics. Acta Weterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 49, 466476.Google Scholar
Xu, YC, Dong, Y, Deng, Y, Mao, XH, Chen, MN, Zhang, CL and Jiang, LB (2020) Polymorphisms of circumsporozoite protein gene and population structure analysis of Plasmodium vivax with different infection sources in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Parasitologyand Parasitic Diseases 38, 6773.Google Scholar
Yang, D, Liu, AQ, Zhao, W and Zhang, WZ (2015) Research progress on the typing and classification of Echinocossus gralunosus. Journal of Tropical Medicine 09, 12961299.Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Li, J, Duke, M, Jones, MK, Kuang, L, Zhang, JF, Blair, D, Li, YS and McManus, DP (2011) Inconsistent protective efficacy and marked polymorphism limits the value of Schistosoma japonicum tetraspanin-2 as a vaccine target. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5, e1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, TM, Yang, D, Zeng, ZL, Zhao, W, Liu, AQ, Piao, DX, Jiang, T, Cao, JP, Shen, YJ, Liu, H and Zhang, WZ (2014) Genetic characterization of human-derived hydatid cysts of Echinocossus gralunosus sensu lato in Heilongjiang Province and the first report of G7 genotype of E. canadensis in humans in China. PloS One 9, e109059e109059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, XP and Su, C (2019) Echinococcus granulosus. In Zhu, XP and Su, C (eds), Human Parasitology. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, pp. 145148.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Primer sequence and other information

Figure 1

Figure 1. Intermediate host, diseased organ, protocephalic segment of Echinococcus granulosusNote: a: Yak from Weixi County, Diqing Prefecture; b: Diqing Tibetan pig; c: the liver; d: lungs; e: diseased part of the lung (arrow points to the diseased part); f, g: hydatid (40X); h, i: protoscolex (10X)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Electrophoresis Map of PCR Amplified Products of TSP11 Gene and ND1 Gene in the Pathological Organs of Echinococcus granulosusNote: M: DNA marker; 1. 2: Negative control of the first and second rounds of PCR of TSP11 gene; 3: TSP11 gene PCR positive control; 12. 13: Negative control of ND1 gene in the first and second rounds of PCR; 14: ND1 gene positive control; 4. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: amplification products of TSP11 gene; 16. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22: amplification products of ND1 gene

Figure 3

Table 2. Interspecific difference of ND1 gene

Figure 4

Table 3. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the TSP11 gene of Echinococcus granulos

Figure 5

Table 4. Different haplotypes having mutations in TSP11gene

Figure 6

Figure 3. Evolutionary network of haplotype of TSP11 gene in the diseased organs of Echinococcus granulosus.Note: The size of the circle is proportional to the number of isolates showing a particular haplotype; lines represent evolutional steps connecting haplotypes.

Figure 7

Table 5. Prediction of antigen determinant of TSP11 gene

Supplementary material: File

Xu et al. supplementary material 1

Xu et al. supplementary material
Download Xu et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 29.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Xu et al. supplementary material 2

Xu et al. supplementary material
Download Xu et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 3.5 MB