Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:03:20.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maturation of the scolex syncytium in the metacestode of Hymenolepis diminuta, with special reference to microthrix formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Sylvia Richards  and
C. Arme
K. Sylvia Richards
Affiliation:
Parasitology Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
C. Arme
Affiliation:
Parasitology Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The entire surface of the early developmental stages of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta bears microvilli. Posteriad differentiation produces a microthrix-bearing surface on the presumptive scolex region, commencing before scolex retraction in cysticercoids in Tenebrio molitor kept at 26°C. During sucker development, the scolex syncytial cytoplasm possesses electron-dense discoidal bodies, aligned parallel to the surface. They become associated with the apical membrane, domes are formed and electron-dense spine-like profiles become apparent. Elevation on short shafts follows, and multilaminate baseplates are then discernible. Fewer microvilli are now present and vesicles with asymmetric membranes (denser inner leaflet) occur within the syncytial cytoplasm. Before scolex retraction, this differentiation extends to the level of the suckers; thus the neck, which becomes reflected on retraction, still possesses only microvilli. After retraction, differentiation proceeds rapidly with increased growth of existing microtriches, discoidal bodies possibly contributing to the shaft support material; the reflected neck develops microtriches and the microvilli are shed into the scolex retraction cavity. The ‘asymmetric’ vesicles increase numerically, some fusing with the apical membrane and releasing their contents. Concurrently, apical membrane asymmetry (denser outer leaflet) becomes apparent. The adult-type surface is formed by 3 days post-scolex retraction, coinciding with the earliest time that the metacestode is infective to the final host.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 341 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caley, J. (1974). The functional significance of scolex retraction and subsequent cyst formation in the cysticercoid larva of Hymenolepis microstoma. Parasitology 68, 207–27.Google Scholar
Conway-Jones, P. B. & Rothman, A. H. (1978). Hymenolepis microstoma: Tegumentary disks. Experimental Parasitology 44, 108–15.Google Scholar
Cooper, N. B., Allison, V. F. & Ubelaker, J. E. (1975). The fine structure of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta. III. The scolex. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 46, 229–39.Google Scholar
Gabrion, C. & Verdier, J.-M. (1978). Étude ultrastructurale du cysticercoïde de Hymenolepis stylosa (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Annales de Parasitologie humaine et comparée 53, 131–46.Google Scholar
Hess, E. (1980). Ultrastructural study of the tetrathyridium of Mesocestoides corti Hoeppli, 1925: tegument and parenchyma. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 61, 135–59.Google Scholar
HulÍnskÁ, D. (1980). The morphogenesis of the microtriches in the tegument of Taenia hydatigena throughout its larval development. Folia Parasitologia (Praha) 27, 329–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, R. D., Oaks, J. A. & Mueller, J. F. (1974). Brush border development in the tegument of the tapeworm Spirometra mansonoides. Journal of Parasitology 60, 209–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, R. D., Voge, M. & Sogandares-Bernal, F. (1982). The metacestode tegument: Fine structure, development, topochemistry, and interactions with the host. In Cysticercosis: Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives (ed. Flisser, A., Willms, K., Laclette, J. P., Larralde, C., Ridaura, C. and Beltrán, F.), pp. 307–61. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
RamÍrez-Bon, E., Merchant, M. T., GonzÁlez-Del Pliego, M. & CaÑedo, L. (1982). Ultrastructure of the bladder wall of the metacestode of Taenia solium. In Cysticercosis: Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives, (ed. Flisser, A., Willms, K., Laclette, J. P., Larralde, C., Ridaura, C. and Beltrán, F.), pp. 261–80. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1981). Observations on the microtriches and stages in their development and emergence in Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Caryophyllidea: Cestoda). International Journal for Parasitology 11, 369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1983 a). The rostellar tegumentary cytoplasm of the metacestode of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cyclophyllidea: Cestoda). Parasitology 86, 83–8.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1983). Junctional complexes in the inner cyst tissue of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda). Parasitology 87, 295–306.Google Scholar
Timofeev, V. A. & Kuperman, B. I. (1972). Origin and formation of microtrichia in Cestoda exemplified on Triaenophorus nodulosus — an electron-optic study. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 207, 757–9.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, J. E. (1980). Structure and ultrastructure of the larvae and metacestodes of Hymenolepis diminuta. In Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta, (ed. Arai, H. P.), pp. 59–156. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Voge, M. & Heyneman, D. (1957). Development of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the intermediate host Tribolium confusum. University of California Publications in Zoology 59, 549–80.Google Scholar