Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:10:59.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-read sequencing improves assembly of Trichinella genomes 10-fold, revealing substantial synteny between lineages diverged over 7 million years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

PETER C. THOMPSON Open the ORCID record for PETER C. THOMPSON [Opens in a new window] ,
DANTE S. ZARLENGA ,
MING-YUAN LIU  and
BENJAMIN M. ROSENTHAL
PETER C. THOMPSON*
Affiliation:
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
DANTE S. ZARLENGA
Affiliation:
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
MING-YUAN LIU
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, First Hospital/Institute of Zoonoses, Jiangsu Co-innovation Centre for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Jilin University, 5333 Xian Road, 130062 Changchun, People's Republic of China
BENJAMIN M. ROSENTHAL
Affiliation:
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
*
*Corresponding author: USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, BARC-East Bldg. 1180 Rm. 104, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Genome assemblies can form the basis of comparative analyses fostering insight into the evolutionary genetics of a parasite's pathogenicity, host–pathogen interactions, environmental constraints and invasion biology; however, the length and complexity of many parasite genomes has hampered the development of well-resolved assemblies. In order to improve Trichinella genome assemblies, the genome of the sylvatic encapsulated species Trichinella murrelli was sequenced using third-generation, long-read technology and, using syntenic comparisons, scaffolded to a reference genome assembly of Trichinella spiralis, markedly improving both. A high-quality draft assembly for T. murrelli was achieved that totalled 63·2 Mbp, half of which was condensed into 26 contigs each longer than 571 000 bp. When compared with previous assemblies for parasites in the genus, ours required 10-fold fewer contigs, which were five times longer, on average. Better assembly across repetitive regions also enabled resolution of 8 Mbp of previously indeterminate sequence. Furthermore, syntenic comparisons identified widespread scaffold misassemblies in the T. spiralis reference genome. The two new assemblies, organized for the first time into three chromosomal scaffolds, will be valuable resources for future studies linking phenotypic traits within each species to their underlying genetic bases.

Keywords

Genomicslong-read assemblysyntenyscaffoldingrepetitive DNATrichinellachromosomenematode
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 144 , Issue 10 , September 2017 , pp. 1302 - 1315
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Assefa, S., Keane, T. M., Otto, T. D., Newbold, C. and Berriman, M. (2009). ABACAS: algorithm-based automatic contiguation of assembled sequences. Bioinformatics 25, 1968–1969.Google Scholar
Blaxter, M. L., De Ley, P., Garey, J. R., Liu, L. X., Scheldeman, P., Vierstraete, A., Vanfleteren, J. R., Mackey, L. Y., Dorris, M., Frisse, L. M., Vida, J. T. and Thomas, W. K. (1998). A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature 392, 71–75.Google Scholar
Boyd, E. M. and Huston, E. J. (1954). The distribution, longevity and sex ratio of Trichinella spiralis in hamsters following an initial infection. The Journal of Parasitology 40, 686–690.Google Scholar
Coghlan, A. and Wolfe, K. H. (2002). Fourfold faster rate of genome rearrangement in nematodes than in Drosophila. Genome Research 12, 857–867.Google Scholar
Darling, A. E., Mau, B. and Perna, N. T. (2010). progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5, e11147.Google Scholar
Dittmar, K. (2009). Old parasites for a new world: the future of paleoparasitological research. A review. Journal of Parasitology 95, 365–371.Google Scholar
Foth, B. J., Tsai, I. J., Reid, A. J., Bancroft, A. J., Nichol, S., Tracey, A., Holroyd, N., Cotton, J. A., Stanley, E. J., Zarowiecki, M., Liu, J. Z., Huckvale, T., Cooper, P. J., Grencis, R. K. and Berriman, M. (2014). Whipworm genome and dual-species transcriptome analyses provide molecular insights into an intimate host-parasite interaction. Nature Genetics 46, 693–700.Google Scholar
Garrett, K. A., Dendy, S. P., Frank, E. E., Rouse, M. N. and Travers, S. E. (2006). Climate change effects on plant disease: genomes to ecosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 44, 489–509.Google Scholar
Ghedin, E., Bringaud, F., Peterson, J., Myler, P., Berriman, M., Ivens, A., Andersson, B., Bontempi, E., Eisen, J., Angiuoli, S., Wanless, D., Von Arx, A., Murphy, L., Lennard, N., Salzberg, S., Adams, M. D., White, O., Hall, N., Stuart, K., Fraser, C. M. and El-Sayed, N. M. A. (2004). Gene synteny and evolution of genome architecture in trypanosomatids. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 134, 183–191.Google Scholar
Guiliano, D., Hall, N., Jones, S., Clark, L., Corton, C., Barrell, B. and Blaxter, M. (2002). Conservation of long-range synteny and microsynteny between the genomes of two distantly related nematodes. Genome Biology 3, Research0057.1–Research0057.14.Google Scholar
Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. and Tesler, G. (2013). QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075.Google Scholar
Gursch, O. F. (1949). Intestinal phase of Trichinella spiralis (Owen, 1835) Railliet, 1895. The Journal of Parasitology 35, 19–26.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L., Lindsay, A., Hammond, C., Montgomery, S. P., Wilkins, P. P., da Silva, A. J., McAuliffe, I., de Almeida, M., Bishop, H., Mathison, B., Sun, B., Largusa, R. and Jones, J. L. (2012). Outbreak of human trichinellosis in northern California caused by Trichinella murrelli . The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 87, 297–302.Google Scholar
Hillier, L. W., Miller, R. D., Baird, S. E., Chinwalla, A., Fulton, L. A., Koboldt, D. C. and Waterston, R. H. (2007). Comparison of C. elegans and C. briggsae genome sequences reveals extensive conservation of chromosome organization and synteny. PLoS Biol 5, e167.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E. P. and Brooks, D. R. (2008). A macroevolutionary mosaic: episodic host-switching, geographical colonization and diversification in complex host-parasite systems. Journal of Biogeography 35, 1533–1555.Google Scholar
Holterman, M., van der Wurff, A., van den Elsen, S., van Megen, H., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., Bakker, J. and Helder, J. (2006). Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1792–1800.Google Scholar
Husemann, P. and Stoye, J. (2010). r2cat: synteny plots and comparative assembly. Bioinformatics 26, 570–571.Google Scholar
Kapel, C. M. O. and Gamble, H. R. (2000). Infectivity, persistence, and antibody response to domestic and sylvatic Trichinella spp. in experimentally infected pigs. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 215–221.Google Scholar
Kapel, C. M. O., Webster, P. and Gamble, H. R. (2005). Muscle distribution of sylvatic and domestic Trichinella larvae in production animals and wildlife. Veterinary Parasitology 132, 101–105.Google Scholar
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Meintjes, P. and Drummond, A. (2012). Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649.Google Scholar
Korhonen, P. K., Pozio, E., La Rosa, G., Chang, B. C. H., Koehler, A. V., Hoberg, E. P., Boag, P. R., Tan, P., Jex, A. R., Hofmann, A., Sternberg, P. W., Young, N. D. and Gasser, R. B. (2016). Phylogenomic and biogeographic reconstruction of the Trichinella complex. Nature Communications 7, 10513.Google Scholar
Lanctôt, C., Cheutin, T., Cremer, M., Cavalli, G. and Cremer, T. (2007). Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 104–115.Google Scholar
Merchant, N., Lyons, E., Goff, S., Vaughn, M., Ware, D., Micklos, D. and Antin, P. (2016). The iPlant collaborative: cyberinfrastructure for enabling data to discovery for the life sciences. PLoS Biology 14, e1002342.Google Scholar
Mitreva, M. and Jasmer, D. P. (2008). Advances in the sequencing of the genome of the adenophorean nematode Trichinella spiralis . Parasitology 135, 869–880.Google Scholar
Mitreva, M., Jasmer, D. P., Zarlenga, D. S., Wang, Z., Abubucker, S., Martin, J., Taylor, C. M., Yin, Y., Fulton, L., Minx, P., Yang, S.-P., Warren, W. C., Fulton, R. S., Bhonagiri, V., Zhang, X., Hallsworth-Pepin, K., Clifton, S. W., McCarter, J. P., Appleton, J., Mardis, E. R. and Wilson, R. K. (2011). The draft genome of the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis . Nature Genetics 43, 228–235.Google Scholar
Mohandas, N., Pozio, E., La Rosa, G., Korhonen, P. K., Young, N. D., Koehler, A. V., Hall, R. S., Sternberg, P. W., Boag, P. R., Jex, A. R., Chang, B. C. H. and Gasser, R. B. (2014). Mitochondrial genomes of Trichinella species and genotypes – a basis for diagnosis, and systematic and epidemiological explorations. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 1073–1080.Google Scholar
Mutafova, T., Dimitrova, Y. and Komandarev, S. (1982). The karyotype of four Trichinella species. Seitschrift fur Parasitenkunde 67, 115–120.Google Scholar
Parra, G., Bradnam, K. and Korf, I. (2007). CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061–1067.Google Scholar
Peacock, C. S., Seeger, K., Harris, D., Murphy, L., Ruiz, J. C., Quail, M. A., Peters, N., Adlem, E., Tivey, A., Aslett, M., Kerhornou, A., Ivens, A., Fraser, A., Rajandream, M.-A., Carver, T., Norbertczak, H., Chillingworth, T., Hance, Z., Jagels, K., Moule, S., Ormond, D., Rutter, S., Squares, R., Whitehead, S., Rabbinowitsch, E., Arrowsmith, C., White, B., Thurston, S., Bringaud, F., Baldauf, S. L., Faulconbridge, A., Jeffares, D., Depledge, D. P., Oyola, S. O., Hilley, J. D., Brito, L. O., Tosi, L. R. O., Barrell, B., Cruz, A. K., Mottram, J. C., Smith, D. F. and Berriman, M. (2007). Comparative genomic analysis of three Leishmania species that cause diverse human disease. Nature Genetics 39, 839–847.Google Scholar
Pozio, E. (2007). World distribution of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans. Veterinary Parasitology 149, 3–21.Google Scholar
Raffaele, S. and Kamoun, S. (2012). Genome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better. Nature Reviews Microbiology 10, 417–430.Google Scholar
Rappaport, I. (1943). A comparison of three strains of Trichinella spiralis II. Longevity and sex ratio of adults in the intestine and rapidity of larval development in the musculature. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene s1-23, 351–362.Google Scholar
Richter, D. C., Schuster, S. C. and Huson, D. H. (2007). OSLay: optimal syntenic layout of unfinished assemblies. Bioinformatics 23, 1573–1579.Google Scholar
Simakov, O., Marletaz, F., Cho, S.-J., Edsinger-Gonzales, E., Havlak, P., Hellsten, U., Kuo, D.-H., Larsson, T., Lv, J., Arendt, D., Savage, R., Osoegawa, K., de Jong, P., Grimwood, J., Chapman, J. A., Shapiro, H., Aerts, A., Otillar, R. P., Terry, A. Y., Boore, J. L., Grigoriev, I. V., Lindberg, D. R., Seaver, E. C., Weisblat, D. A., Putnam, N. H. and Rokhsar, D. S. (2013). Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 493, 526–531.Google Scholar
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. and Zdobnov, E. M. (2015). BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351.Google Scholar
Smit, A. F. and Hubley, R. (2008). RepeatModeler Open-1·0. http://www.repeatmasker.org Google Scholar
Smit, A. F., Hubley, R. and Green, P. (2013). RepeatMasker Open-4·0. http://www.repeatmasker.org Google Scholar
Webb, K. M. and Rosenthal, B. M. (2011). Next-generation sequencing of the Trichinella murrelli mitochondrial genome allows comprehensive comparison of its divergence from the principal agent of human trichinellosis, Trichinella spiralis . Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11, 116–123.Google Scholar
Zarlenga, D. S., Al-Yaman, F., Minchella, D. J. and La Rosa, G. (1991). A repetitive DNA probe specific for a North American sylvatic genotype of Trichinella . Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 48, 131–137.Google Scholar
Zarlenga, D. S., Rosenthal, B. M., Rosa, G. L., Pozio, E. and Hoberg, E. P. (2006). Post-Miocene expansion, colonization, and host switching drove speciation among extant nematodes of the archaic genus Trichinella . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 7354–7359.Google Scholar