Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:25:53.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The life-cycle of Bucephaloides gracilescens (Rudolphi, 1819) Hopkins, 1954 (Digenea: Gasterostomata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. A. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Cards.

Extract

The cercaria and sporocyst of Bucephaloides gracilescens are described from Abra alba (Wood). Observations were made on the behaviour of the cercaria and the mechanism of release from the first intermediate host. The metacercaria was obtained experimentally for the first time using Ciliata mustela (L.), a species of Gadidae from rock pools, as second intermediate host. It has not previously been recorded from this fish. Unsuccessful attempts were made to infect species of fishes from three other families, namely, Bothidae, Pleuronectidae and Gobiidae, confirming the high degree of host specificity of the metacercaria to Gadidae. The metacercaria, its development and effect on the host are briefly discussed. It was linked with the adult on the basis of comparative morphology and ecology of the hosts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A. & Idris Jones, E. (1933). Records of parasitic worms from marine fishes at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 18, 627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, A. Jr (1957). Fish trematodes from Norwegian waters. IIa. The Norwegian species of the orders Aspidogastrea and Digenea (Gasterostomata). Universitetet i Bergen. Arbok 4, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. D. & Fraser, P. G. (1955). The mode of infection of the hake, Merluccius merluccius (L.) by the trematode Bucephalopsis gracilescens (Rud.). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (19541955) 124, 105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B. (1947). The Trematoda of British fishes. London: Ray Society, 364 pp.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. (1953). Aperçu general sur l'histoire naturelle des parasites animaux de la morue atlante – arctique Gadus callariae L. (=morhua L.). Paris, 423 pp.Google Scholar
Eckmann, F. (1932). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematodenfamilie Bucephalidae. Z. Parasitank 5, 94111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, S. H. (1954). The American species of trematode confused with Bucephalus (Bucephalopsis) haimeanus. Parasitology 44, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, B. L., Bowers, E. A. & Richards, J. G. (1966). The ultrastructure of the daughter sporocyst of Cercaria bucephalopsis haimeana Lacaze-Duthiers, 1854 (Digenea: Bucephalidae) from the edible cockle, Cardium edule L. Parasitology 56, 753–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, J. (1905). Internal parasites and diseased conditions of fishes. Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society (1904–1905) 19, 278300.Google Scholar
Kniskern, V. B. (1952). Studies on the trematode family Bucephalidae Poche, 1907. Part 2. The life history of Rhipidocotyle septpapillata Krull, 1934. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 71, 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. (1907). Larval trematodes of the Northumberland coast. Transactions of the Natural History Society of Northumberland, Durham and Newcastle-upon-Tyne N.S. 1, 437–54.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. (1908). Fish trematodes of the Northumberland coast. I. Report of the Northumbrian Sea Fisheries Committee 1907, pp. 2367.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. (1912). A Review of the British Marine Cercariae. Parasitology 9, 416–56.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. (1934). Sur quelques trematodes de poissons marins de la region de Banyuls. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale 75, 567–81.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. A. (1973 a). The life-cycle of Prosorhynchus crucibulum (Rudolphi, 1819) Odhner, 1905, and a comparison of its cercaria with that of Prosorhynchus squamatus Odhner, 1905. Parasitology 66, 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. A. (1973 b). The life-cycle of Bucephalus haimeanus Lacaze-Duthiers, 1854 from Cardium edule L. Parasitology 67, 341–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, A. (1785). Structure and Physiology of Fishes. Edinburgh: C. Elliott.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1909). A contribution towards a knowledge of the entozoa of British Marine Fishes. Part 2. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4, (8), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1914). Trematode parasites of fishes in the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 10, 466505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1915). A list of the trematode parasites of British marine fishes. Parasitology 7, 339–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P. (1868). Entozoa, iakttagna hos skandinaviska hafsfisker. 1. Platyhelminthes. Lunds universitets årsskrift 4, Art. 8, 164.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1876). Bidrag till Skandinaviens helminthfauna. I. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens, handlinger 14, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1961). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed., 998 pp. London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Riley, J. D. (1971). In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. (ed. Holme, N. A. and McIntyre, A. D.), pp. 286–90. IBP Handbook no. 16. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. H. (1905). Feeding experiments for determining the life history of an oyster parasite. Biological Bulletin Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass. 8, 233–5.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. H. (1906). A study of the life history of Bucephalus haimeanus; a parasite of the oyster. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 49, 635–90.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. H. (1909). Account of experiments for determining the complete life-cycle of Gasterostomum gracilescens. Science 29, 432–3.Google Scholar
Woodhead, A. E. (1929). Life history studies on the trematode family, Bucephalidae. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 48, 256–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar