Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:55:22.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lernaeocera lusci (Copepoda: Pennellidae) on bib (Trisopterus luscus) from Southampton Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

N. A. Evans ,
P. J. Whitfield ,
R. N. Bamber  and
P. M. Espin
N. A. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS
P. J. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS
R. N. Bamber
Affiliation:
Central Electricity Generating Board, Marine Biological Laboratory, Fawley, Southampton SO4 1TW
P. M. Espin
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

O-group bib, Trisopterus luscus caught on the cooling water intake screens of Fawley Power Station in March and April 1982 were infected (prevalence = 34·8%; intensity = 1·65/infected fish) with adult females of the pennellid parasitic copepod Lernaeocera lusci. The bib sample of 293 fish was divided, for analysis, into 5 length classes. In each of these the level of parasitization with L. lusci was broadly similar and in all 5 classes the parasite population was over-dispersed. Of the living copepods on T. luscus, 93% possessed egg strings while the remaining 7% consisted of earlier developmental stages. The majority of the parasites were attached to gill arches and here they exhibited distinct microhabitat and orientation preferences. A 3–2–4–1 descending order of gill arch utilization was apparent and copepods were non-randomly distributed along the dorso-ventral axis of gill arches with medial and ventral sectors being more heavily used than dorsal ones. An analysis was carried out on the body and egg string wet weights of parasites removed from fish harbouring different parasite densities. As copepod density increased neither the mean parasite body weight nor egg string weight altered significantly. Length/weight relationships of uninfected and infected fish were remarkably similar and thus provided no evidence that L. lusci has a marked effect on the condition of O-group T. luscus. The study demonstrated a significant positive association between infection with L. lusci and heavy infections with metacercarial cysts of Cryptocotyle lingua.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boxshall, G. A. (1974). Infections with parasitic copepods in North Sea marine fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54, 355–72.Google Scholar
Fernando, C. H. & Hanek, C. (1976). Gills. In Ecological Aspects of Parasitology, (ed. Kennedy, C. R.), pp. 209–226. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. (1940). The Saltash tuck-net fishery and the ecology of some estuarine fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 24, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. H. A. (1975). Fish and weed on Fawley Generating Station screens, February 1973–January 1974. Central Electricity Research Laboratories Internal Note RD/L/N 129/75/, 23 pp.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1958). Lernaeocera obtusa n.sp.; its biology and its effect on the haddock. Marine Research, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland 3, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1963). Parasites as biological tags. ICNAF Special Publication No. 4, 31–37.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1979). Parasitic Copepoda of British Fishes. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
Mann, H. (1952). Lernaeocera branchialis (Copepoda parasitica) und seine Schadwirkung bei einigen Gadiden. Archiv für Fischereiwissenschaft 4, 133–43.Google Scholar
Paling, J. E. (1968). A method of estimating the relative volumes of water flowing over the different gills of freshwater fish. Journal of Experimental Biology 48, 533–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, T. & Scott, A. (1913). The British Parasitic Copepoda. Vols 1 and 2. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
Sindermann, C. J. (1961). Parasite tags for marine fish. Journal of Wildlife Management 25, 41–7.Google Scholar
Slinn, D. J. (1970). An infection of adult Lernaeocera (Copepoda) on wild sole (Solea solea) kept under hatchery conditions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 50, 787–800.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. & Wootten, R. (1978). Anisakis and Anisakiasis. Advances in Parasitology 16, 93–163.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G. (1941). The developmental stages of Lernaeocera branchialis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 25, 441–6.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G. & Hartley, P. H. T. (1941). The ecology of some parasitic copepods of gadoids and other fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 25, 361–92.Google Scholar
Sundnes, G. (1970). Lernaeocera branchialis (L.) on cod (Gadus morhua L.) in Norwegian waters. Institute of Marine Research, Bergen.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, W. L. F. (1977). Aspects of the biology offish populations from the Medway Estuary, based on power station inlet sampling, with special reference to parasitism and pollution. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, W. L. F. (1978). The effects of Lernaeocera branchialis on the Merlangius merlangus population in the Medway Estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 13, 709–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broek, W. L. F. (1979). Copepod ectoparasites of Merlangius merlangus and Platichthys flesus. Journal of Fish Biology 14, 371–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootten, R. (1974). The spatial distribution of Dactylogyrus amphibothrium on the gills of the ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernua and its relation to the relative amounts of water passing over the parts of the gills. Journal of Helminthology 48, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar