Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:01:51.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The laboratory maintenance of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. J. E. Sharp ,
C. J. Secombes  and
A. W. Pike
G. J. E. Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, Scotland AB9 2TN
C. J. Secombes
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, Scotland AB9 2TN
A. W. Pike
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, Scotland AB9 2TN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A protocol for the routine laboratory maintenance of the life-cycle of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, using herring gulls (Larus argentatus), Cyclops abyssorum and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss ( = Salmo gairdneri) as the definitive, first and second intermediate hosts respectively, is described.

Keywords

Diphyllobothrium dendriticumCestodalaboratory maintenancelife-cycle
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , August 1990 , pp. 153 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, K., Ching, H. L. & Vik, R. (1987). A review of freshwater species of Diphyllobothrium with redescriptions and the distribution of D. dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) and D. ditremum (Creplin, 1825) from North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 2216–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. & Gibson, D. I. (1989). A key to three species of larval Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) occurring in European and North American freshwater fishes. Systematic Parasitology 13, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. & Halvorsen, O. (1978). Egg size and form as taxonomic criteria in Diphyllobothrium (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). Parasitology 76, 229–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arai, H. P. (1980). Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bråten, T. (1966). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. VII. Growth, fecundity and fertility of Diphyllobothrium norvegicum Vik, (Cestoda) in the golden hamster. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 13, 39–51.Google Scholar
Bråten, T. (1968 a). An electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of the procercoid of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bråten, T. (1968 b). The fine structure of the tegument of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). A comparison of the plerocercoid and adult stages. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, G. (1969). Experimental undersokning av Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (= D. norvegicum) fran norra Finland. Sartrysianto ur Tiedoksianto-Information 10, 3–17. (English summary).Google Scholar
Bylund, G. & Djupsund, M. (1977). Protein profiles as an aid to taxonomy in the genus Diphyllobothrium. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 51, 241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubb, J. C. (1980). Helminths in freshwater fish. Advances in Parasitology 18, 14–39.Google Scholar
Fange, R. & Grove, D. (1979). Digestion. In Fish Physiology, vol. 8 (ed. Hoar, W. S., Randal, D. J. & Brett, J. R.), pp. 161–260. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grabiec, S., Guttowa, A. & Michajlow, W. (1963). Effect of light stimulus on hatching of coracidia of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 11, 229–37.Google Scholar
Guttowa, A. (1961). Experimental investigations on the systems ‘procercoids of Diphyllobothrium latum-Copepods’. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 9, 371–407.Google Scholar
Guttowa, A. (1967). Experimental coinfection of Copepoda naturally infected with Proteocephalus sp. with the larvae of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 14, 399–404.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. (1970). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. XV. On the taxonomy and biology of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) from north-western Europe. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 18, 113–74.Google Scholar
Hilliard, D. K. (1960). Studies on the helminth fauna of Alaska. XXXVIII. The taxonomic significance of egg and coracidia of some Diphyllobothriid cestodes. Journal of Parasitology 46, 703–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlow, F. (1953). Über die Entwicklung und Anatomie von Diphyllobothrium dendriticum Nitzsch 1824. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 16, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperman, B. I. & Davydov, V. G. (1981). The fine structure of glands in oncospheres, procercoids and plerocercoids of Pseudophyllidea (Cestoidea). International Journal for Parasitology 12, 135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. F. (1959 a). The laboratory propagation of Spirometra mansonoides as an experimental tool. I. Collecting, incubation and hatching of eggs. Journal of Parasitology 45, 353–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, J. F. (1959 b). The laboratory propagation of Spirometra mansonoides (Mueller, 1935) as an experimental tool. II. Culture and infection of the copepod host, and harvesting the procercoid. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 78, 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. F. (1959 c). The laboratory propagation of Spirometra mansonoides (Mueller, 1935) as an experimental tool. III. In vitro cultivation of the plerocercoid larvae in a cell free medium. Journal of Parasitology 45, 561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, T. S. C. & Hopkins, C. A. (1969). Maintenance of Schistocephalus solidus in the laboratory with observations on rate of growth of, and proglottid formation in, the plerocercoid. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26, 741–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronin, N. M., Timoshenko, T. M. & Sanzhieva, S. D. (1989). (Dynamics of egg production and fecundity of the cestode Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). Parasitology 23, 146–52). USSR.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosen, R. & Dick, T. A. (1983). Development and infectivity of the procercoid of Triaenophorus crassus Forel and mortality of the first intermediate host. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 2120–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevchenko, S. F. (1986). (Detection of coproantibodies to antigens in fish eating birds. Byulleten' Vsesoyuznogo Instituta Gel'mintologii im. K. I. Skryabina. No. 46 pp. 66–68). USSR. (Helminthological Abstracts (Series A) (1988). 57 (7), Abstract No. 1913, pp. 226).Google Scholar
Ulmer, M. J. (1970). Notes on rearing snails in the laboratory. In Experiments and Techniques in Parasitology (ed. Mclnnes, A. J. & Voge, M.), pp. 143–144. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Vik, R. (1957). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. I. Taxonomy and ecology of Diphyllobothrium norvegicum n. sp. and the plerocercoid of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 5, 25–93.Google Scholar