Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:34:51.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunogenetic correlates of susceptibility to infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus in outbred mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. E. Keymer
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
A. B. Tarlton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
R. W. Hiorns
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
C. E. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
D. I. Pritchard
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS

Summary

Outbred MF1 mice were characterized with respect to their susceptibility to infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) on the basis of faecal egg counts after 8 weeks of repeated infection (50 larvae/week). Selective breeding for resistance and susceptibility was carried out over 3 generations. The H-2 type of a sample of the mice was determined, and antigen recognition assessed on the basis of Western blots against adult and larval H. polygyrus homogenate. The selective breeding programme yielded very strong evidence for the heritability of susceptibility to infection. The results were consistent with a model of single gene control with resistance dominant over susceptibility. The presence of the H-2k haplotype was significantly associated with susceptibility, as was the recognition of a 17 kDa antigen in blots against both larval and adult worm homogenate. The proportion of mice phenotypically susceptible to infection, the proportion bearing the H-2k haplotype, and the proportion recognizing the 17 kDa antigen, were all approximately 0.25.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behnke, J. M. (1987). Evasion of immunity by nematode parasites causing chronic infections in man and domestic/laboratory animals. Advances in Parasitology 26, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, J. M. & Robinson, M. (1985). Genetic control of immunity to Nematospiroides dubius: a 9-day anthelminthic abbreviated immunizing regime which separates weak and strong responder strains of mice. Parasite Immunology 7, 235–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brindley, P. J., Dobson, C., Pattie, W. A. & Sitepu, P. (1986). Genetic control of resistance to infection with Nematospiroides dubius: segregation of genes influencing parasite population dynamics. Heredity 57, 53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cypess, R. H., Lucia, H. L., Zidian, J. L. & Rivera-Ortiz, C. I. (1977). Heligmosomoides polygyrus: temporal, spatial and morphological population characteristics in LAF1/J mice. Experimental Parasitology 42, 3443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Else, K. J., Wakelin, D. M. & Roach, T. I. A. (1989). Host predisposition to trichuriasis: the mouse-T. muris model. Parasitology 98, 275–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, M. W. (1989). Genetic control of the immune repertoire in nematode infections. Parasitology Today 5, 316–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. & Hiorns, R. W. (1986). Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda): the dynamics of primary and repeated infection in outbred mice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 229, 4767.Google ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, D. I., Maizels, R. M., Behnke, J. M. & Appleby, P. (1984). Stage-specific antigens of Nematospiroides dubius. Immunology 53, 325–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Prowse, S. J. & Mitchell, G. F. (1980). On the choice of mice for dissection of strain variations in the development of resistance to infection with Nematospiroides dubius. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medicine 58, 603–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prowse, S. J., Mitchell, G. F., Ey, P. L. & Jenkin, C. R. (1979). The development of resistance in different inbred strains of mice to infection with Nematospiroides dubius. Parasite Immunology 1, 277–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terasaki, P. I. & McClelland, J. D. (1964). Microdroplet assay of human serum cytotoxins. Nature, London 204, 9981000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1978). Genetic control of susceptibility and resistance to parasitic infection. Advances in Parasitology 16, 219308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. M. & Blackwell, J. M. (1988). Genetics of Resistance to Bacterial and Parasitic Infection. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Wassom, D. L., Brooks, B. O., Cypess, R. H. P. & David, C. S. (1983). A survey of susceptibility to infection with Trichinella spiralis of inbred mouse strains sharing common H-2 alleles but different genetic backgrounds. Journal of Parasitology 69, 1033–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassom, D. L., Krco, C. J. & David, C. S. (1987). I-E expression and susceptibility to parasite infection. Immunology Today 8, 3943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar