Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:21:53.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immune response profiles in vaccinated and non-vaccinated high- and low-responder mice during infection with the intestinal nematode Trichinella spiralis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Robinson ,
T. Bellaby  and
D. Wakelin
K. Robinson
Affiliation:
MRC Experimental Parasitology Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD
T. Bellaby
Affiliation:
MRC Experimental Parasitology Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD
D. Wakelin
Affiliation:
MRC Experimental Parasitology Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

NIH and C57 BL/10 (BIO) mice show genetically determined differences in their response to Trichinella spiralis infection. This study examines the influence of these on parameters of the immune response to infection after vaccination using muscle-larval excretory–secretory antigen in Freund's complete adjuvant. Serum antibody levels were greatly elevated when mice of both strains were vaccinated prior to infection; however, NIH produced significantly higher-level antibody responses than B10. Vaccination accelerated and increased the capacity of mesenteric lymph node T-cells to proliferate in vitro in response to specific antigen stimulation in both mouse strains but, in general, the stimulation indices of NIH cells were higher than those of the B10. The capacity of mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC) and spleen cells (SC) to produce IL-5 and γIFN was measured after specific in vitro stimulation and early γIFN secretion was noted in the supernatants of NIH MLNC and SC, but not in B10 SC. Concentrations of IL-S rose steadily over the first 10–14 days after infection in cell cultures from both strains. Prior vaccination of these animals appeared to enhance cytokine levels. It is postulated that the efficacy of vaccination in NIH mice is a consequence of their genetically determined capacity to produce early and high-level responses to the antigens of T. spiralis and to express these in intestinal effector mechanisms.

Keywords

Trichinella spiralisnematodevaccinationimmunity
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 110 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 71 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolas-Fernandez, F. & Wakelin, D. (1989). Infectivity of Trichinella isolates in mice is determined by host responsiveness. Parasitology 99, 83–8.Google Scholar
Crook, K. & Wakelin, D. (1994). Induction of T lymphocyte subsets and levels of Interleukin-2 and Interleukin-3 after infection with Trichinella spiralis are similar in mice of high- and low-responder phenotypes. International Journal for Parasitology 24, 119–26.Google Scholar
Else, K. J. & Grencis, R. K. (1991). Cellular immune responses to the murine nematode parasite Trichuris muris. I Differential cytokine production during acute or chronic infection. Immunology 72, 508–13.Google Scholar
Grencis, R. K., Hultner, L. & Else, K J. (1991). Host protective immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice: activation of Th subsets and lymphokine secretion in mice expressing different response phenotypes. Immunology 74, 329–32.Google Scholar
Jungery, M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1982). Antibody response to stage-specific Trichinella spiralis surface antigens in strong and weak responder mouse strains. Journal of Immunology 129, 839–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, E. A. B., Cruz, E. S., Hauda, K. M. & Wassom, D. L. (1991). γIFN- and IL-5-producing cells compartmentalize to different lymphoid organs in Trichinella spiralis-infected mice. Journal of Immunology 147, 306–11.Google Scholar
Lee, T. D. G., Grencis, R. K. & Wakelin, D. (1982). Specific cross-immunity between Trichinella spiralis and Trichuris muris: immunization with heterologous infections and antigens, and transfer of immunity with heterologous immune mesenteric lymph node cells. Parasitology 84, 381–9.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. F. (1983). Immunoregulation and the induction and expression of host-protective immune responses to parasites. In Regulation of the Immune Response (ed. Ogra, P. L., Jacobs, D. M. & Buffalo, N. Y.), pp. 278–287. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Pond, L., Wassom, D. L. & Hayes, C. E. (1992). Influence of resistant and susceptible genotype, IL-1, and lymphoid organ on Trichinella spiralis-induced cytokine secretion. Journal of Immunology 149, 957–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, K., Bellaby, T. & Wakelin, D. (1994). Vaccination against the nematode Trichinella spiralis in high- and low-responder mice. Effects of different adjuvants upon protective immunity and immune responsiveness. Immunology 82, 261–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Taguchi, T., McGhee, J. R., Coffman, R. L., Beagley, K. W., Eldridge, J. H., Takhatsu, K. & Kiyono, H. (1990). Detection of individual mouse splenic T cells producing γIFN and IL-5 using the enzyme linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay. Journal of Immunological Methods 128, 65–73.Google Scholar
Tuohy, M., Lammas, D. A., Wakelin, D., Huntley, J. F., Newlands, G. F. J. & Miller, H. R. P. (1990). Functional correlations between mucosal mast cell activity and immunity to Trichinella spiralis in high and low responder mice. Parasite Immunology 12, 675–85.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1988). Helminth infections. In Genetics of Resistance to Bacterial and Parasitic Infection (ed. Wakelin, D. & Blackwell, J. M.), pp. 153–224. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Lloyd, M. (1976). Immunity to primary and challenge infections of Trichinella spiralis in mice: a re-examination of conventional parameters. Parasitology 72, 173–82.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D., Mitchell, L. A., Donachie, A. M. & Grencis, R. K. (1986). Genetic control of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice. Response of rapid- and slow-responder strains to immunization with parasite antigens. Parasite Immunology 8, 159–70.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Wilson, M. M. (1977). Transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in the mouse with mesenteric lymph node cells: time of appearance of effective cells in donors and expression of immunity in recipients. Parasitology 74, 215–24.Google Scholar
Wassom, D. L., Brooks, B. O., Cypress, R. H. & David, C. S. (1983). A survey of susceptibility to infection with Trichinella spiralis of inbred mouse strains sharing common H-2 alleles but different genetic backgrounds. Journal of Parasitology 69, 1033–7.Google Scholar