Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T20:47:12.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hybridization and introgression of the mitochondrial genome between the two species Anisakis pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) using a wide genotyping approach: evolutionary and ecological implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2025

Simonetta Mattiucci*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Parasitology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Marialetizia Palomba
Affiliation:
Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy
Beatrice Belli
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Parasitology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Renato Aco-Alburqueque
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Parasitology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy
Paolo Cipriani
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Parasitology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Nordnes, Bergen, Norway
Xavier Roca-Gerones
Affiliation:
Secció de Parasitologia, Departament de Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l’Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Mario Santoro
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy
Stephen C. Webb
Affiliation:
Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand
Giuseppe Nascetti
Affiliation:
Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Simonetta Mattiucci; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Anisakis pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) are the two zoonotic anisakids infecting cetaceans as well as pelagic/demersal fish and squids. In European waters, A. pegreffii prevails in the Mediterranean Sea, while A. simplex (s.s.) in the NE Atlantic Ocean. Abiotic conditions likely play a significant role in shaping their geographical distribution. The Iberian Atlantic and Alboran Sea waters are sympatric areas of the two species. A total of 429 adults and L3 stage from both sympatric and allopatric areas were studied by a wide nuclear genotyping approach (including newly and previously found diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at nuclear DNA (nDNA) and microsatellite DNA loci) and sequenced at mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cox2. Admixture between the two species was detected in the sympatric areas studied by STRUCTURE Bayesian analysis; NEWHYBRIDS revealed different categories of hybridization between the two species, representing approximately 5%. A tendency for F1 female hybrids to interbreed with the parental species at the geographical distribution limits of both species was observed. This finding suggests that hybridization occurs when the two parental species significantly differ in abundance. Mitochondrial introgression of A. simplex (s.s.) in A. pegreffii from Mediterranean waters was also detected, likely as a result of past and/or paleo-introgression events. The high level of genetic differentiation between the two species and their backcrosses indicates that, despite current hybridization, reproductive isolation which maintains evolutionary boundaries between the two species, exists. Possible causes of hybridization phenomena are attempted, as well as their evolutionary and ecological implications, also considering a sea warming scenario in European waters.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

The evolutionary boundary between closely related parasite species represents an important window to study microevolutionary processes, speciation mechanisms, genetic architecture and gene flow between interacting species. Such boundaries are often permeable, leading to natural hybridization phenomena in contact zones. Currently, attention is directed towards describing patterns of genetic variation across the genome of closely related parasites species to disentangle and characterize patterns of ongoing hybridization and introgression phenomena (Calvani and Slapeta, Reference Calvani and Slapeta2020).

Previous genetic, phylogenetic, morphological and ecological evidence supports the view that the two anisakid species of the Anisakis simplex (s.l.) complex, i.e. A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), constitute two well-genetically differentiated sister taxa (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Webb, Paoletti, Marcer, Bellisario, Gibson and Nascetti2014). The two species differ in geographical distribution, phenotypic traits – such as differential intra-vitam (reviewed in Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018) and post-mortem migration capability in the musculature of their intermediate/paratenic fish hosts (Cipriani et al., Reference Cipriani, Acerra, Bellisario, Sbaraglia, Cheleschi, Nascetti and Mattiucci2016, Reference Cipriani, Giulietti, Bao, Palomba, Mattiucci and Levsen2024) – as well as differential gene expression of some adaptive and immunomodulatory molecules under thermal cues (Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Paoletti, Colantoni, Rughetti, Nascetti and Mattiucci2019, Reference Palomba, Cipriani, Giulietti, Levsen, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020a). Certain environmental abiotic conditions, such as sea temperature (Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Quiazon, Itoh, Fujise and Yoshinaga2023; Mladineo et al., Reference Mladineo, Charouli, Jelić, Chakroborty and Hrabar2023), represent determinant drivers in shaping their geographical ranges (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Diez et al., Reference Diez, Chust, Andonegi, Santurtún, Abaroa, Bilbao, Maceira and Mendibil2022; Díez et al., Reference Díez, Santos, Boyra, Chust, Santurtún, Maceira, Mendibil, Bilbao and Abaroa2024). Similarly, biotic variables, such as host availability, diversity and preference, also play a significant role (Mattiucci and Nascetti, Reference Mattiucci and Nascetti2008; Klimpel et al., Reference Klimpel, Busch, Kuhn, Rohde and Palm2010; Kuhn et al., Reference Kuhn, Garcıa-Màrquez and Klimpel2011; Shamsi and Barton, Reference Shamsi and Barton2023). Indeed, both species share a wide range of definitive hosts, mostly oceanic dolphins, mysticetes and phocoenids (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Cipriani et al., Reference Cipriani, Palomba, Giulietti, Marcer, Mazzariol, Santoro, Alburqueque, Covelo, López, Santos, Pierce, Brownlow, Davison, McGovern, Frantzis, Alexiadou, Højgaard, Mikkelsen, Paoletti, Nascetti, Levsen and Mattiucci2022). The range of their intermediate/paratenic hosts includes a wide array of demersal and pelagic fish and squids, within the geographical distribution of the two species (reviewed in Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Shamsi and Barton, Reference Shamsi and Barton2023). The two species exhibit allopatric zonation following a latitudinal gradient. Anisakis pegreffii is widespread in the Mediterranean Sea and the Austral region, between 30°S and 60°S; in the Atlantic, its northern distribution limit is the Iberian coast up to the Bay of Biscay (Diez et al., Reference Diez, Chust, Andonegi, Santurtún, Abaroa, Bilbao, Maceira and Mendibil2022; Díez et al., Reference Díez, Santos, Boyra, Chust, Santurtún, Maceira, Mendibil, Bilbao and Abaroa2024). A. pegreffii is also widely distributed in the South Pacific Ocean, from the East China Sea (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Cheon and Choi2009; Ding et al., Reference Ding, Gu, Yi, Yan, Wang and Tung2022) to New Zealand waters, in sympatric condition with A. berlandi (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021; Shamsi and Barton, Reference Shamsi and Barton2023). Genetic sub-structuring of A. pegreffii from Austral and Boreal regions, as inferred from population genetics analyses using microsatellite loci (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019), suggests that geographic distance restricts gene flow between ‘antipodean’ populations of this parasite species. Despite the genetic sub-structuring, genetic differentiation (Fst) values observed at 5 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci indicate a high gene flow (Nm = 7.8) between Boreal and Austral populations of A. pegreffii (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019). This genetic pattern is likely shaped by different cetacean populations, oceanographic barriers and the historical microevolutionary lineage diversification of the species in distinct waters (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Webb, Paoletti, Marcer, Bellisario, Gibson and Nascetti2014, Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019, Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Canestrelli, Nascetti, Palomba, Smit and Sures2025; Blažeković et al., Reference Blažeković, Pleić, Đuras, Gomerčić and Mladineo2015; Ding et al., Reference Ding, Gu, Yi, Yan, Wang and Tung2022).

Anisakis simplex (s.s.) distribution ranges approximately from 35°N to the Arctic Seas, circumpolarly. Its southern geographic limit in North-East (NE) Atlantic waters seems to be the Iberian Atlantic coast (see Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018). However, in some regions, the geographic ranges of the two Anisakis species (i.e. A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.)) overlap. These regions include the NE Atlantic Ocean (Spanish−Portuguese coast) (Abollo et al., Reference Abollo, Gestal and Pascual2001; Pontes et al., Reference Pontes, D’Amelio, Costa and Paggi2005; Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Acerra, Paoletti, Cipriani, Levsen, Webb, Canestrelli and Nascetti2016; Cipriani et al., Reference Cipriani, Palomba, Giulietti, Marcer, Mazzariol, Santoro, Alburqueque, Covelo, López, Santos, Pierce, Brownlow, Davison, McGovern, Frantzis, Alexiadou, Højgaard, Mikkelsen, Paoletti, Nascetti, Levsen and Mattiucci2022; Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Rodríguez, Pascual, González and Abollo2023) and the Western Pacific Ocean (the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan), (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Cheon and Choi2009; Suzuki et al., Reference Suzuki, Murata, Hosaka and Araki2010; Chou et al., Reference Chou, Wang, Chen, Chen, Chen and Shih2011; Quiazon et al., Reference Quiazon, Yoshinaga and Ogawa2011; Ding et al., Reference Ding, Gu, Yi, Yan, Wang and Tung2022), where they are often found in sympatry and syntopy, at both larval and adult stages.

In these contact areas of their geographical distribution, the occurrence of ‘putative hybrids’ or ‘recombinant genotypes’ between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) has been reported, either as larval stages or as adults (Abollo et al., Reference Abollo, Paggi, Pascual and D’Amelio2003; Martín-Sánchez et al., Reference Martín-Sánchez, Artacho-Reinoso, Díaz-Gavilán and Valero-López2005; Umehara et al., Reference Umehara, Kawakami, Matsui, Araki and Uchida2006; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Cheon and Choi2009; Suzuki et al., Reference Suzuki, Murata, Hosaka and Araki2010; Chou et al., Reference Chou, Wang, Chen, Chen, Chen and Shih2011; Quiazon et al., Reference Quiazon, Yoshinaga and Ogawa2011; Molina-Fernández et al., Reference Molina-Fernández, Malagón, Gómez-Mateos, Benítez, Martín-Sánchez and Adroher2015; Abattouy et al., Reference Abattouy, Valero, Lozano, Barón, Romero and Martín-Sánchez2016; Gómez-Mateos et al., Reference Gómez-Mateos, Merino-Espinosa, Corpas-López, Valero-López and Martín-Sánchez2020), as well as from allopatric regions such as the Mediterranean Sea (Farjallah et al., Reference Farjallah, Busi, Mahjoub, Slimane, Paggi, Said and D’Amelio2008; Meloni et al., Reference Meloni, Angelucci, Merella, Siddi, Deiana, Orrù and Salati2011; Cavallero et al., Reference Cavallero, Ligas, Bruschi and D’Amelio2012, Reference Cavallero, Costa, Caracappa, Gambetta and D’Amelio2014; Chaligiannis et al., Reference Chaligiannis, Lalle, Pozio and Sotiraki2012; Pekmezci et al., Reference Pekmezci, Onuk, Bolukbas, Yardimci, Gurler, Acici and Umur2014). However, these studies were typically based on a single marker (i.e. the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA), lacking the resolution to determine whether the observed shared polymorphism between the two taxa was due to incomplete lineage sorting, historical introgression, ongoing hybridization and/or introgression. Indeed, hybridization, introgression and the retention of ancestral polymorphism in closely related parasitic taxa could generate patterns of genetic variation that complicate their disclosure, when choosing an unsuitable number of genetic/molecular markers (Anderson, Reference Anderson2001). Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Acerra, Paoletti, Cipriani, Levsen, Webb, Canestrelli and Nascetti2016) used a multilocus approach with nuclear markers (allozyme loci and EF1 α nuclear DNA (nDNA) sequence analysis) to distinguish parental taxa and F1 hybrids among A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) specimens sampled along the Iberian Atlantic coast. Similarly, Roca-Geronès et al. (Reference Roca-Geronès, Alcover, Godínez-González, Montoliu and Fisa2021) detected F1 hybrids in the same sympatric area using the same markers. Both studies, however, reported discordant results when applying polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) analysis of the ITS region of rDNA to the same specimens analysed with the multilocus approach. This highlights the risk of misidentifying parental Anisakis species and their hybrid categories (F1 hybrids and backcrosses) when relying solely on a single nuclear marker. Given that a large number of diagnostic markers are required to accurately identify F1 and Fn hybrid categories (i.e. backcrosses) between closely related species (Tarroso et al., Reference Tarroso, Pereira, Martínez‐Freiría, Godinho and Brito2014), a multilocus approach is essential for characterizing hybrid gene pools. True hybrid events in contact zones between closely related species involve amalgamations of independently evolved genomes, leading to intergenomic interactions. In these cases, evolutionary processes such as recombination and selection can occur, making it essential to study these phenomena using joint data from both nuclear and cytoplasmic markers. In this context, the combined use of some DNA microsatellite loci developed in species of the A. simplex (s.l.) complex (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020) and Nas10 nDNA (Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020b) has allowed to describe the first report on the natural interspecific hybridization between A. pegreffii and A. berlandi in one of their contact areas (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021) included in the species’ geographical ranges of distribution.

The use of microsatellite DNA loci has revealed the existence of sex-linked loci in the three species of the A. simplex (s.l.) complex (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021). These are genes located on the X chromosome. These chromosomes are maternally inherited, as they lack a paternal chromosomal counterpart and thus possess only a single copy of the gene. In general, in ascaridoid nematodes, males are XO, and females are XX (Müller and Tobler, Reference Müller and Tobler2000; Foster et al., Reference Foster, Grote, Mattick, Tracey, Tsai, Chung, Cotton, Clark, Geber, Holroyd, Korlach, Li, Libro, Lustigman, Michalski, Paulini, Rogers, Teigen, Twaddle, Welch, Berriman, Dunning Hotopp and Ghedin2020). However, exceptions are common, such as in Ascaris suum, which possesses 19 autosomes and 5 X chromosomes (2n = 38A + 10X in females, 38A + 5X in males) (Müller and Tobler, Reference Müller and Tobler2000). Preliminary cytogenetic studies recently conducted in vitro on A. pegreffii have shown that this parasite species has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 18A (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023). However, no distinct chromosomal organization patterns between males and females were reported.

In the present paper, a multilocus genotyping approach was applied on several specimens of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), incorporating a broader set of novel and previously detected diagnostic nuclear and mitochondrial loci. Additionally, a Bayesian population structure approach was applied and validated for the two species. The aims were to: (1) develop and validate new diagnostic nuclear markers between the two species; (2) define the genetic structure of the two species in the contact zone spanning the Atlantic Iberian coast and Mediterranean waters of the Alboran Sea, in comparison with their allopatric populations; (3) assess the occurrence of different patterns of ongoing hybridization between the two interacting species in this sympatric area; (4) detect mitochondrial introgression in their genome; (5) investigate the causes of the distribution of these hybridization/introgression phenomena, as well the potential evolutionary and ecological implications of the findings; and, finally, (6) disclose the potential occurrence of sex-linkage in the newly scored SSR loci.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

A total of N = 429 Anisakis spp. specimens were collected from sampling localities in the NE Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and South Pacific waters (New Zealand) (Fig. 1). These locations include regions where the two sibling species A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii are reported both in allopatry (e.g. the North Sea for A. simplex (s.s.); the Central-Eastern Mediterranean Sea and New Zealand waters for A. pegreffii) and in sympatry (e.g. the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula and the Alboran Sea). Specifically, N = 314 third-stage larvae (L3) were collected from various fish hosts, while N = 115 adult nematodes were obtained from cetacean host species. The adult specimens were first sex-discriminated according to the main morphological diagnostic features between males and females (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018). Details about sample collections, including the localities of the intermediate/paratenic (fish) and definitive (cetacean) hosts and the number of adult male and female specimens studied, are reported in Table 1. Collected nematodes were repeatedly washed in saline solution and preserved by freezing at −20 °C in distilled water or stored in 70% alcohol until their genotyping.

Figure 1. Collecting sites of A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii analysed in the present study, mapped onto the geographical range of the two parasite species (coloured in red and green, respectively). ADS, Adriatic Sea; TYR, Tyrrhenian Sea; IOS, Ionian Sea; TOR, Torrevieja (Mediterranean Spain coast); ALB, Alboran Sea; CDZ, Cadíz (Atlantic Spain Coast); HUE, Huelva (Atlantic Spain Coast); VIG, Vigo (Atlantic Spain Coast); BSB, Bay of Biscay; SCO, Seas West of Scotland; NWS, Norwegian Sea; NZE, New Zealand coast.

Table 1. Number of specimens analysed from definitive and intermediate/paratenic hosts reported with sampling area, genotyped at nuclear (EF1 α-1, Nas10, Sod and Adk nDNA and SSR loci) and mitochondrial (mtDNA cox2) gene loci

NA ♂♂, number of adult male nematodes; NA ♀♀, number of adult female nematodes; NL3, number of species at third larval stage.

Multi-marker genotyping approach based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes

Approximately 2 mg of tissue was cut from each larval and adult specimen, using a portion from the cephalic end for adults. DNA extraction was performed using the Quick-gDNA Miniprep Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The 429 sampled individuals were first genotyped using nuclear markers (EF1 α-1 and Nas10 nDNA gene loci) previously developed for the A. simplex (s.l.) complex. PCR amplification of the elongation factor EF1 α nDNA was performed using the primers EF-F and EF-R (Table 2) following the procedures detailed in Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Acerra, Paoletti, Cipriani, Levsen, Webb, Canestrelli and Nascetti2016). For the Nas10 nDNA gene, PCR amplification was performed using the primers Nas10-F and Nas10-R (Table 2) following the procedures detailed in Palomba et al. (Reference Palomba, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020b).

Table 2. Locus name, primers sequences and fragment bp size of the gene loci used in the present study. For SSR nuclear loci, the repeat type and the fluorescent dye used to label the primer are also reported

* = labelled primer. Fluorescent dyes: VIC = green; PET = red; NED = yellow, FAM = blue.

The same specimens were then genotyped for a total of 7 microsatellite loci (i.e. Anisl 00314, Anisl 00875, Anisl 00185, Anisl 05784, Anisl 07132, Anisl 08059 and Anisl 10535), previously developed and validated in the three species of the A. simplex (s.l.) complex (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020). Additionally, the other 4 SSR loci (i.e. Anisl 4, Anisl 7, Anisl 15 and Anisl 22) among those developed in Mladineo et al. (Reference Mladineo, Trumbić, Radonić, Vrbatović, Hrabar and Bušelić2017a) were here scored for the first time on specimens of the two parasite species. The amplification of microsatellite loci was carried out in three multiplex PCRs: Anisl 05784, Anisl 08059, Anisl 00875 and Anisl 07132 in Multiplex 1; Anisl 00185, Anisl 00314, Anisl 10535 and Anisl 7 in Multiplex 2; Anisl 4, Anisl 15 and Anisl 22 in Multiplex 3 (Table 2). The PCR conditions followed those described in Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019).

To increase the number of diagnostic loci necessary to discriminate patterns of hybridization between the two species, additional nuclear gene loci, i.e. the superoxide dismutase (Sod) and the adenylate kinase (Adk) nDNA, were selected. Primers for these loci were designed for this work based on transcriptome sequences of A. pegreffii previously deposited by Palomba et al. (Reference Palomba, Libro, Di Martino, Rughetti, Santoro, Mattiucci and Castrignanò2022) using the online software program Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). PCR amplifications were performed using the primers SOD-F and SOD-R for the Sod nDNA gene and ADK-F and ADK-R for the Adk nDNA gene (see Table 2). Both PCRs were carried out in a 25 μL volume containing 1 μL of each 10 mM primer, 2 μL of 25 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 5 μL of 5 × buffer (Promega), 0.8 μL of 10 mM mix containing the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs, Promega), 5 U of Go-Taq Polymerase (Promega) and 2 μL of total DNA. The PCR conditions for the amplification of Sod nDNA were as follows: 95 °C for 2 min (initial denaturation), followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s (denaturation), 57 °C for 45 s (annealing), 72 °C for 90 s (extension) and followed by post-amplification at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR conditions for the amplification of Adk nDNA were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 1 min. The 2 new gene loci were thus validated on the same specimens (N = 431) of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) that had previously been analysed using other nuclear markers. The purified PCR products from all markers were sequenced by an external company (Bio-Fab Research©).

Finally, all the specimens tested at those nuclear loci were sequenced at the mitochondrial cox2 gene (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Webb, Paoletti, Marcer, Bellisario, Gibson and Nascetti2014) using the primers 211 F and 210 R (Nadler and Hudspeth, Reference Nadler and Hudspeth1998) (Table 2), following the procedures detailed in Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Webb, Paoletti, Marcer, Bellisario, Gibson and Nascetti2014).

Genetic data analysis

The sequences obtained from the N = 429 individuals at both mitochondrial and nuclear gene loci were edited and then aligned with reference sequences using the software ClustalX v.2. The same sequences were also analysed using Genemapper v.4.1 and PeakScanner v.2. (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). MICRO-CHECKER v.2.2.3 (Van Oosterhout et al., Reference Van Oosterhout, Hutchinson, Wills and Shipley2004) was used to check for genotyping errors. ARLEQUIN v.3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer, Reference Excoffier and Lischer2010) was used to calculate the genetic diversity indices observed at the 11 SSR loci, i.e. the observed heterozygosity (Ho), the expected heterozygosity (He) and the mean number of alleles per locus (A). This software also assessed the occurrence of Hardy−Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) at each SSR locus through exact test outcomes, and it was also used to estimate the fixation index (FIS) from the genetic datasets acquired from the SSR loci in the analysed populations of the two Anisakis species. In addition, AMOVA and matrix of pairwise genetic differentiation (Fst) (Wright, Reference Wright1949, Reference Wright1965) were calculated using ARLEQUIN v.3.5 on microsatellite and nuclear single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data.

A model-based Bayesian clustering algorithm was implemented in STRUCTURE v.2.3.3 (Pritchard et al., Reference Pritchard, Stephens and Donnelly2000) using the genotypes at the diagnostic nuclear SNPs and diagnostic and partially diagnostic (between the 95% and 99%) SSR loci, in order to evaluate the admixture of pure lineages and to estimate mixing proportions between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii in the analysed samples.

With the number of clusters (K) set between 1 and 3, 20 replicates of the analysis were carried out, each with 100 000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations and a burn-in period of 50 000 steps. The admixture model assumes that each individual has ancestry from one or more of K genetically distinct sources (Lawson et al., Reference Lawson, Van Dorp and Falush2018). The best K value was identified using both the log probability of the data and the rate of change in the log probability of the data between successive K values as the optimality criteria (Evanno et al., Reference Evanno, Regnaut and Goudet2005). A model-based Bayesian clustering method implemented in NEWHYBRIDS v.1.1 (Anderson and Thompson, Reference Anderson and Thompson2002) was used to evaluate the most parsimonious allocation of samples. Specifically, the analysis tested for the presence of pure parental individuals (A. simplex (s.s.) or A. pegreffii), F1 hybrids and backcrossed individuals to both species. TCS haplotype network construction was carried out using PopART v.1.7 (Clement et al., Reference Clement, Posada and Crandall2002). The analysis was performed using the statistical parsimony procedure (95% parsimony connection limit), implemented in TCS v.1.21 (Templeton et al., Reference Templeton, Crandall and Sing1992).

Results

Genotyping Anisakis spp. specimens by EF1 α-1 and Nas 10 nDNA regions

Sequences of 409 bp from the nuclear EF1 α-1 nDNA partial region were obtained for all 429 larval and adult specimens analysed in this study (Table 1). This fragment revealed 2 diagnostic SNPs distinguishing A. pegreffii from A. simplex (s.s.), as reported by Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Acerra, Paoletti, Cipriani, Levsen, Webb, Canestrelli and Nascetti2016). Based on this analysis, N = 340 specimens, homozygous for these SNPs, were assigned to A. pegreffii, whereas N = 70 specimens, homozygous for the alternative allele, were assigned to A. simplex (s.s.). Heterozygous genotypes at these diagnostic loci were found in N = 19 individuals (Fig. 2) from the sympatric areas here studied. A total of 4 sequences of the EF1 α-1 nDNA region were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV088038/39 for A. pegreffii and PV088040/41 for A. simplex (s.s.).

Figure 2. Chromatograms at the diagnostic SNPs in Nas10, EF1 α-1, Sod and Adk nDNA loci and electropherograms of the 5 diagnostic and partially diagnostic SSR loci (Anisl 7, Anisl 22, Anisl 15, Anisl 4 and Anisl 10535), showing the heterozygous genotype having a double peak between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii exhibited by admixed specimens between the two species.

Similarly, a 451 bp sequence fragment of the Nas10 nDNA region was obtained for all 429 specimens analysed. The sequences revealed 1 diagnostic SNP between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii (see Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020b). This position resulted homozygous CC in the A. simplex (s.s.) individuals (N = 70) from both its sympatric and allopatric populations, whereas it was always homozygous GG in A. pegreffii (N = 338) from its allopatric and sympatric populations here examined. However, patterns of heterozygote genotypes at that diagnostic position were found in those individuals (N = 19) also resulted heterozygous at the EF1 α-1 nDNA as above described, plus 2 specimens; all of them collected from the sympatric areas here studied (Fig. 2).

A total of 4 sequences of the Nas10 nDNA region were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers PV088042/43 for A. pegreffii and PV088044/45 for A. simplex (s.s.).

Diagnostic SNPs at the novel Sod and Adk nDNA gene loci

Fixed diagnostic nucleotide positions capable of discriminating between the two species were detected at both Sod and Adk nDNA gene loci (Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B). In particular, a 706 bp fragment of the Sod nDNA region was obtained for all of the 429 specimens analysed. This fragment revealed the presence of 6 fixed alternative (i.e. diagnostic) SNPs between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) (Fig. 3A). Based on these positions, N = 340 specimens, being homozygous for the 6 diagnostic SNPs, were assigned to A. pegreffii, whereas N = 78 specimens, also being homozygous for the alternative SNPs, were assigned to A. simplex (s.s.). Finally, a total of N = 11 specimens showed a heterozygous genotype at all 6 diagnostic positions (shown in Fig. 2). These individuals were among the N = 21 also observed as heterozygous at the diagnostic SNPs found at the Nas10 nDNA. A total of 4 sequences of the Sod nDNA region were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV088050/51 for A. pegreffii and PV088052/53 for A. simplex (s.s.).

Figure 3. (A) Alignment of the region of the Sod nDNA, showing the 100% diagnostic positions: 6 SNPs (black triangles) between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii. (B) Alignment of the region of the Adk nDNA, showing the 100% diagnostic positions: 8 SNPs (black triangles) between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii.

Similarly, a 1062 bp fragment of the Adk nDNA region was obtained from the same N = 429 allopatric and sympatric specimens of the two targeted species. This fragment revealed the presence of 8 diagnostic SNPs between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), showing fixed alternative nucleotides between the two species (Fig. 3B). Based on these diagnostic positions, N = 338 specimens were assigned to A. pegreffii, whereas N = 71 specimens, showing the opposite SNPs, were assigned to A. simplex (s.s.). Among the total number of tested specimens, N = 20 individuals showed a heterozygous genotype at all the 8 diagnostic SNPs (shown in Fig. 2) among the N = 21 heterozygous found at the diagnostic SNPs found at the Nas10 nDNA. A total of 4 sequences of the Adk nDNA region were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV088046/47 for A. pegreffii and PV088048/49 for A. simplex (s.s.).

Novel diagnostic SSR DNA loci

Finally, the same 429 individual specimens were also genotyped at 11 scored SSR DNA loci within the metapopulations of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) (Table 3). Differences in the overall genetic diversity values of the different populations of the two species were observed, based on both the A value and the He value per locus (Table 3). All the microsatellite loci scored in the present study were polymorphic, with the total number of alleles varying in A. pegreffii between 5 (e.g. at loci Anisl 7 and Anisl 22) and up to 13 at the newly scored locus Anisl 4 (Table 3). In A. pegreffii, the A value across the 11 SSR loci was 8.7. In A. simplex (s.s.), the A value was 9.6 with the newly scored locus Anisl 22 showing the highest number of alleles N = 25, while the minimum number of alleles was found at the loci Anisl 10535 and Anisl 8059 (Table 3).

Table 3. Genetic diversity, at 11 SSR loci, in populations of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) analysed in the present study. No estimates were possible for the locus Anisl 15 because it was monomorphic in A. pegreffii populations

N, number of genotyped specimens at each locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; A, number of alleles detected at each locus; P value, significance (P<0.05) of the deviation from HWE expectation.

*** P≪0.01.

No significant deviations between Ho and He were observed at loci Anisl 10185 and Anisl 08059 in all analysed samples of A. pegreffii. Similarly, in A. simplex (s.s.), no significant departures from HWE were observed at loci Anisl 10535, Anisl 07132, Anisl 05784 and Ansil 08059 (Table 3). Significant deviations from HWE were found in both species at loci Anisl 00185 and Anisl 7, as well as at the newly tested loci Anisl 4, Anisl 22 and Anisl 15 (Table 3). These loci showed a marked excess of homozygotes in the two species (Table 3), with positive FIS values (Suppl. Figure 1a). Generally, positive FIS values indicate an excess of homozygote genotypes at the selected loci, while negative values indicate an excess of heterozygotes from the expected HWE (Suppl. Figure 1a). When dividing the genotypes at these 5 loci into adult male and female worms, they were found to be in HWE in the female genotypes (Table 4). The male individuals of both species were homozygous at those loci (FIS = 1) (Suppl. Figure 1b), likely due to their hemizygosity state, indicative of X-linked inheritance. At the newly scored locus Anisl 15, the specimens of A. pegreffii were monomorphic (Table 4), showing only the allele 231 (Suppl. Table 1), preventing the demonstration of sex-linkage in A. pegreffii. In contrast, this locus was sex-linked in A. simplex (s.s.), as were the other 2 newly tested SSR loci, i.e. Anisl 4 and Anisl 22 in both species. Accordingly, no significant departures from the HWE were found between the expected homozygous and heterozygous females at these loci, nor at locus Anisl 7 in the two Anisakis spp. (Table 4). Analogously, no significant departure from HWE was found at the locus in any of the populations of A. pegreffii (Table 4).

Table 4. Genetic diversity at the 5 sex-linked loci (i.e. Anisl 00314, Anisl 7, Anisl 4, Anisl 22 and Anisl 15) in A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) estimated in adult female specimens. Estimates at the locus Anisl 15 were not possible because it is monomorphic in A. pegreffii

N, number of genotyped specimens at each locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; P value, significance (P<0.05) of the deviation from HWE expectation.

Allele frequencies estimated in A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) are reported in Suppl. Table 1. For the sex-linked loci (i.e. Anisl 00314, Anisl 7, Anisl 4, Anisl 15 and Anisl 22), allele frequencies were calculated considering the hemizygosity of male specimens, with males considered monoallelic and females biallelic, according to Mattiucci et al. (Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019). Among the newly tested SSR loci, Anisl 4, Anisl 15 and Anisl 22 showed significant differences in allele frequencies between the two sibling species (Fig. 4). Indeed, Anisl 15 and Anisl 7 were 100% diagnostic between the two species. A total of N = 11 specimens showed at these SSR loci both the allele of the parental taxon A. simplex (s.s.) and that of A. pegreffii (Fig. 2).

Figure 4. Distribution of allele frequencies at the partially diagnostic and 100% diagnostic SSR loci between A. pegreffii (green) and A. simplex (s.s.) (red).

Identification of genetic admixture between the two species by Bayesian multi-marker genotyping approach

The results inferred from the Bayesian clustering algorithm of all 429 genotyped specimens performed by STRUCTURE 2.3.3., using the N = 17 100% diagnostic SNPs found in the nuclear loci, plus the genotypes found at the partially diagnostic loci (between 95% and 99%). SSR loci between the two parental species, i.e. Anisl 10535 and Anisl 05784, of the 429 specimens are presented in Fig. 5A. We excluded sex-linked loci (i.e. Anisl 15 and Anisl 7), despite being 100% diagnostic between the two parental taxa, in order to include in the analysis also the male specimens. Using the K = 2 clustering option, implemented by the Evanno method, the dataset best fit a ΔK = 48.765.

Figure 5. (A) Percentage contribution (Q) of each specimen of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) to each cluster following a Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE on 17 diagnostic SNPs at nDNA gene loci (EF1 α-1, Nas10, Sod and Adk) and at the SSR loci (i.e. Anisl 10535 and Anisl 05784; sex-linked loci were excluded to include male specimens in the elaboration), with K = 2. (B) The posterior probability of assignment to 1 of 5 genotype classes following a Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in NEWHYBRIDS. Those specimens with evidence of admixture were assigned to pure A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), F1 hybrids or backcrossed categories with a 100% posterior probability value of assignment.

According to the STRUCTURE analysis, it was possible to assign with a posterior probability of assignment of 100%, N = 406 specimens to the two pure parental taxa: A. pegreffii or A. simplex (s.s.). In particular, N = 337 individuals were identified as A. pegreffii, including both adults and L3 of Anisakis (Fig. 5A; Table 5). Similarly, N = 69 individuals were assigned to A. simplex (s.s.) with a posterior probability of p = 100% (Fig. 5A; Table 5). Finally, a total of N = 23 individuals, as evidenced by the results obtained by the single nuclear marker above reported, showed admixtures in their nuclear genome, including L3 and adult specimens collected from the Atlantic Iberian and Alboran Sea coast (Fig. 5A; Table 5). In the case of these admixed individuals, NEWHYBRIDS, carried out on the same genotypes observed at all the nuclear gene loci tested, disclosed that N = 11 individuals were F1 hybrids between the two parental taxa, with 100% posterior probability (Fig. 5B). Additionally, NEWHYBRIDS showed that among the remaining 12 individuals showing admixture genome in the STRUCTURE analysis, N = 3 individuals were backcrosses to A. pegreffii, while N = 9 were backcrossed to A. simplex (s.s.) (Fig. 5B; Table 5). Only 1 adult female resulted to be F1 hybrid genotype, while all the backcrossed individuals were L3-stage larvae collected from fish hosts (Table 5). Concordant results between STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS were achieved in the assignment of the remaining 406 specimens tested to the two pure parental genomes, A. pegreffii or A. simplex (s.s.), with 100% posterior probability (Table 5).

Table 5. Number of specimens assigned to different classes of introgression or to parental species: Pure parental A. pegreffii; Pure parental A. simplex (s.s.); F1 Hybrid; Backcross × A. pegreffii; Backcross × A. simplex (s.s.), on the basis of a Bayesian clustering approach implemented in STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS combining the diagnostic SNPs at nDNA gene loci and SSR loci. The number of specimens by mtDNA cox2 gene locus is also represented

Mitochondrial inference of the pure and hybrid specimens

The results obtained from the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cox2 sequence analysis of all those N = 429 specimens studied at the nuclear gene loci are reported in Table 5. The haplotype parsimony network (TCS) inferred from mtDNA cox2 sequences of all the specimens, as recognized by the STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS analyses, showed the presence of two major haplogroups represented by the two pure parental taxa (Fig. 6). The TCS analysis of mtDNA cox2 haplotypes resulted in a star-like tree for both haplogroups (Fig. 6). The haplotypes H23, H26, H30 and H31 were found as the most frequent in the pure parental specimens of A. pegreffii recognized by the STRUCTURE analysis of the nuclear genome. Analogously, specimens showing the nuclear genome of A. simplex (s.s.) recognized by STRUCTURE inference mostly exhibited the haplotypes H7 and H14 shared by all metapopulations of the parasite species (Fig. 6). Full concordance with nuclear genotyping was obtained in the recognition of all pure specimens collected from the allopatric areas, i.e. of A. pegreffii from off New Zealand coast and of A. simplex (s.s.) collected from the Norwegian Sea.

Figure 6. Statistical parsimony haplotype network (TCS) among mtDNA cox2 haplotypes showed by pure specimens of the two parental species A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) and by their hybrid individuals, plus the specimens from ATYS, ADS and EMS sea waters showing mitochondrial introgression. Circles suggest the two different haplogroups represented by the parental species (A. pegreffii: light green, A. simplex (s.s.): light red).

The TCS network also revealed that among the confirmed F1 hybrids detected by NEWHYBRIDS, N = 4 had A. pegreffii maternal inheritance (Fig. 6; Table 5), whereas N = 7 had A. simplex (s.s.) maternal inheritance (Fig. 6; Table 5). The haplotypes shown by these F1 individuals were also observed in the respective parental taxa: H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H7 and H8 in A. simplex (s.s) and H6, H9 and H21 in A. pegreffii. Additionally, 1 backcross of A. pegreffii had A. pegreffii maternal inheritance, showing the haplotype H9. Other larval backcrosses to A. pegreffii found in Merluccius merluccius from the Alboran Sea and Cadiz had A. simplex (s.s.) maternal inheritance showing haplotypes H15 and H22, which were shared with other pure specimens of A. simplex (s.s.). Most backcrosses of A. simplex (s.s.), observed as L3 in fish from NE Atlantic waters, had A. simplex (s.s.) maternal inheritance, showing haplotypes H7, H10, H11, H12, H13 and H14, while 2 backcrosses of A. simplex (s.s.) had A. pegreffii maternal inheritance showing haplotypes H16 and H17.

Interestingly, among the N = 337 individuals assigned to A. pegreffii with 100% posterior probability value by STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS, N = 16 specimens collected from the Adriatic, Ionian and Tyrrhenian Sea showed a mito-nuclear discordance. Indeed, the mtDNA cox2 of these specimens belonged to the A. simplex (s.s.) haplogroup (Fig. 6). In particular, 4 individuals shared the same H7 haplotype previously observed in other A. simplex (s.s.) specimens from Atlantic Iberian coast (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Berzano, O’Keeffe, Cotter, McEvoy, Thomas, Maoiléidigh and Whelan2010; Klapper et al., Reference Klapper, Kochmann, O’Hara, Karl and Kuhn2016; Pons-Bordas et al., Reference Pons-Bordas, Hazenberg, Hernandez-Gonzalez, Pool, Covelo, Sanchez-Hermosin, Lopez, Saavedra, Fraija-Fernandez, Fernandez and Aznar2020; Simsek et al., Reference Simsek, Pekmezci, Yildirim, Duzlu, Onder, Ciloglu, Sursal, Yilmaz, Gonulalan and Inci2020; Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023) and Adriatic Sea waters (Buselic et al., Reference Buselic, Hrabar, Calic, Radonic, Poljak and Mladineo2015). The remaining individuals (N = 12) exhibited the haplotypes H18, H19, H20, H21 and H22 (Fig. 6). Among these haplotypes, H20 was previously observed in the Mediterranean Sea waters (Buselic et al., Reference Buselic, Hrabar, Calic, Radonic, Poljak and Mladineo2015), and their sequences matched (100%) with those obtained from the Adriatic Sea and Tunisian coast, whereas H18, H19, H21 and H22 resulted as new haplotypes, not matching with other sequences deposited in GenBank (Fig. 6). A total of 4 sequences of the cox2 mtDNA were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV088034/35 for A. pegreffii and PV088036/37for A. simplex (s.s.).

Interspecific and intraspecific genetic differentiation inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial data

Excluding the sex-linked loci due to male hemizygosity, the AMOVA analysis of all nuclear gene loci analysed in this study revealed that, for both species, most of the genetic variation was significantly allocated within individuals (≈72% and ≈95%). Notable variation was found among individuals within populations, with FIT = 0.27 (P=0.0000) in A. pegreffii and FIT = 0.05 (P=0.3206) in A. simplex (s.s.) (data not shown).

A high level of genetic differentiation was found at the interspecific level between the metapopulations of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), based on the SSR loci and the SNPs at the nDNA scored, with an average Fst ≈ 0.95. A significant genetic differentiation was also observed between backcrosses to A. simplex (s.s.) vs pure parental A. pegreffii (on average, Fst ≈ 0.64), as well as between backcrosses to A. pegreffii vs pure parental A. simplex (s.s.) (on average, Fst ≈ 0.60) (data not shown). Lower but significant differentiation values were observed between F1 hybrids and the parental taxa (Fst ≈ 0.45 and Fst ≈ 0.49, respectively, vs A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.)).

Similarly, at the cytoplasmic level, a significantly high level of differentiation (Fst = 0.73; P<0.0000) was inferred from the mtDNA cox2 dataset, between the two haplogroups (i.e. A. pegreffii and A. simplex s.s.).

Discussion

Novel nuclear diagnostic markers between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.)

Efforts have been recently made to pinpoint genome regions and individual SNPs that are diagnostic (i.e. 100% alternative) between the three sibling species in the A. simplex (s.l.) complex (i.e. A. simplex (s.s.), A. pegreffii and A. berlandi) to study their geographical contact zones (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Acerra, Paoletti, Cipriani, Levsen, Webb, Canestrelli and Nascetti2016, Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019; Gómez-Mateos et al., Reference Gómez-Mateos, Merino-Espinosa, Corpas-López, Valero-López and Martín-Sánchez2020; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021). For the first time, we identified and validated genetic diagnostic variants in novel autosomal nDNA of A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii, using a large number of specimens from both allopatric populations and the contact zones along the Atlantic Iberian coast and Mediterranean Sea waters. Indeed, 14 fixed diagnostic alternative SNPs were discovered in 2 newly analysed autosomal gene loci, i.e. Sod and Adk nDNA (Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B). In addition, further SSR loci, including autosomal and sex-linked ones, among those developed and studied in A. simplex (s.l.) (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019; Bello et al., Reference Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Nascetti and Mattiucci2020), were found to be of diagnostic value for distinguishing the two parental taxa here studied. In particular, the loci Anisl 4, Anisl 7, Anisl 22 and Anisl 15 were found to have 99% or 100% of diagnostic value between the two taxa (Fig. 4). Similarly, among these loci, Anisl 15 showed also fixed alternative alleles between A. berlandi and A. pegreffii (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021). Finally, Anisl 10535 and Anisl 05784 have been confirmed as partially diagnostic between the two taxa, as previously observed (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019).

Novel sex-linked SSR loci

The validation of the newly scored SSR loci Anisl 4, Anisl 22, and Anisl 15 in a large sample of A. simplex (s.s.) individuals (N = 69) revealed the existence of additional sex-linked microsatellite loci in these species (i.e. Anisl 00314 and Anisl 7) (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Bello, Paoletti, Webb, Timi, Levsen, Cipriani and Nascetti2019). Indeed, while loci Anisl 4 and Anisl 22 were previously found to be sex-linked in A. pegreffii (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021), the same loci, along the Anisl 15, were identified for the first time as sex-linked in A. simplex (s.s.) in this study.

Sex-linked loci are genes located on the X chromosome. In our sample, which included both male and female adult specimens, we verified the potential occurrence of sex-linkage in the newly scored SSR loci. They inherit the chromosome(s) from the mother only, lacking the paternal chromosomal counterpart, thus possessing just one copy of that gene. So far, the proportion of sex-linked microsatellites in the whole genome of the A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) can be estimated at about 33%, as found in our previous SSR analysis in A. berlandi (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021). XX/XO female/male sex determination appears to be common among nematodes (Harvey and Viney, Reference Harvey and Viney2001), since it is frequently reported that males have 1 less chromosome than females (Walton, Reference Walton, Chitwood and Chitwood1940). To date, preliminary cytogenetic studies recently carried out on A. pegreffii (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023) have revealed that A. pegreffii seems to possess a diploid number of 2n = 18, likely consisting of autosomal holocentric chromosomes (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023). However, no specific data on sexual chromosomes were provided by the same Authors. Additionally, by using a telomeric probe (TTAGGC)n in A. pegreffii, Moratal et al. (Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023) identified the presence of a conserved telomeric sequence, with variability in signal intensity at the telomeric ends of chromosomes. Hypervariability in the length of telomeric repeats is not unusual in animals (Rocco et al., Reference Rocco, Costagliola and Stingo2001), likely due to the low copy number of DNA repeats and the non-clustered organization of the tandem repeats (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023). It has been also hypothesized that the low number of chromosomes found in some cells of A. pegreffii is due to the loss of chromosomes during the metaphase (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023). However, no data concerning this phenomenon were provided by the same Authors. Further cytological work, combined with short and long-read sequencing technology, would shed light on whole chromosome-assemblage genomes, including sex chromosomes of the anisakid parasites, and their evolutionary significance.

In addition, the possible use of sex-linked loci for female/male identification has been recently discussed (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021), and the finding of the new sex-linked loci, here achieved, will offer in future studies a higher-resolution power for their use in distinguishing male and female worms of these parasites, at any life-history stage.

Distribution of different patterns of nuclear and mitochondrial introgression

According to the biological species concept (Mayr, Reference Mayr1963; Arnold, Reference Arnold1997), which defines species as reproductively isolated, interspecific hybrids should be extremely rare. In reality, the evolutionary boundaries between species are permeable, with some estimates suggesting that hybridization may occur in up to 10% of animal species and 25% in plants (Schwenk et al., Reference Schwenk, Brede and Streit2008). The ubiquity of natural hybridization in terrestrial environments suggests it as a major driving force in evolutionary biology (Abbott et al., Reference Abbott, Albach, Ansell, Arntzen, Baird, Bierne, Boughman, Brelsford, Buerkle, Buggs, Butlin, Dieckmann, Eroukhmanoff, Grill, Cahan, Hermansen, Hewitt, Hudson, Jiggins, Jones, Keller, Marczewski, Mallet, Martinez‐Rodriguez, Möst, Mullen, Nichols, Nolte, Parisod, Pfennig, Rice, Ritchie, Seifert, Smadja, Stelkens, Szymura, Väinölä, Wolf and Zinner2013), even if it can also lead to evolutionary dead ends and genetic swamping if hybrids are rare and isolated (Porretta and Canestrelli, Reference Porretta and Canestrelli2023). Previously, naturally occurring hybrids among parasites were thought to be quite rare, but next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses have recently enabled the detection of different patterns of natural hybridization in closely related parasite species (Criscione et al., Reference Criscione, Anderson, Sudimack, Peng, Jha, Williams-Blangero and Anderson2007; Steinauer et al., Reference Steinauer, Hanelt, Mwangi, Maina, Agola, Kinuthia, Mutuku, Mungai, Wilson, Mkoji and Loker2008; Huyse et al., Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009; Chaudhry et al., Reference Chaudhry, Redman, Abbas, Muthusamy, Ashraf and Gilleard2015; Hecht et al., Reference Hecht, Thompson, Lavin, Zarlenga and Rosenthal2016; Leger and Webster, Reference Leger and Webster2017; Calvani and Slapeta, Reference Calvani and Slapeta2020), as well as in parasites’ vectors (Weetman et al., Reference Weetman, Steen, Rippon, Mawejje, Donnelly and Wilding2014; Mancini et al., Reference Mancini, Spinaci, Gordicho, Caputo, Pombi, Vicente, Dinis, Rodrigues, Petrarca, Weetman, Pinto and Della Torre2015; Caputo et al., Reference Caputo, Pichler, Bottà, De Marco, Hubbart, Perugini, Pinto, Rockett, Miles and Della Torre2021). Most of these studies have been carried out in contact zones, where the biogeographic distribution of these parasite or vector species overlaps. The two Anisakis species here studied in their contact zone are genetically well differentiated, as evidenced by the high Fst values observed at both nuclear and mitochondrial levels. This implies that multiple markers are required to characterize their hybrids’ gene pools. With multiple diagnostic nuclear markers, the probability of misclassification of an individual into an alternative category is very low and can be estimated by Mendelian principles. Indeed, when a backcrossing event is hypothesized to occur with the same parental species, several diagnostic nuclear markers may allow the identification of hybrid origin up to the third generation of backcrossing (fourth-generational hybrids). Thus, the multilocus assay used in the present study, employing a wider set of diagnostic SNPs (N = 17), was able to capture patterns of admixture reflection between the parental genomes. In fact, the NEWHYBRIDS analysis clearly shows that interspecific hybridization between the two species has led to genetic introgression of parental lineages (Fig. 5B). The presence of first- and later-generation hybrids among specimens of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) from the contact zone of the Atlantic Iberian coast and the Alboran Sea indicates that recent introgression has occurred, demonstrating contemporary interspecific gene exchange. The combined analysis of microsatellites and SNP at nuclear loci indicate symmetric patterns of genomic hybridization, with approximately 5% of admixture between the two interacting species. It would be also interesting to test by a multigenotyping approach, whether gene introgression between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) exhibits similar rates in other sympatric areas of their distribution (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Ding et al., Reference Ding, Gu, Yi, Yan, Wang and Tung2022), potentially reflecting the species’ evolutionary history.

To date, introgression has not been reported between the two more phylogenetically divergent taxa of the A. simplex (s.l.) complex, A. pegreffii and A. berlandi. Indeed, only F1 hybrids, but not later generations of hybrid individuals, have been found between them in their overlapping geographical range in New Zealand waters (Bello et al., Reference Bello, Palomba, Webb, Paoletti, Cipriani, Nascetti and Mattiucci2021).

Ecological and evolutionary implications of the hybridization and mitochondrial introgression

In parasites, hybridization and introgression could have microevolutionary and ecological implications, including potential emerging public health concerns (Webster et al., Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013; Huyse et al., Reference Huyse, Van den Broeck, Hellemans, Volckaert and Polman2013; Boissier et al., Reference Boissier, Moné, Mitta, Bargues, Molyneux and Mas-Coma2015; Chaudhry et al., Reference Chaudhry, Redman, Abbas, Muthusamy, Ashraf and Gilleard2015). In our samples, the presence of hybrids appears to be driven by both ecological and evolutionary factors.

The achieved results suggest that there is a strong tendency for hybridization to take place between the two parental species when they greatly differ in abundance, and a tendency of the F1 hybrids to cross with the parental females at the respective limits of the geographical distribution of the two species. Although conclusions are only tentative, because the number of hybrid categories discovered is small with respect to the parental specimens, the data suggest a density-dependent mating pattern. The scarcity of the rarer species along the latitude distribution of the two species may be an important factor in increasing the likelihood of interspecific hybridization. Indeed, the numerical disparity between adult specimens of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) has been generally observed in the contact zone here studied (Levsen et al., Reference Levsen, Cecilie, Cipriani, Mattiucci, Gay, Hastie, Bušelić, Mladineo, Karl, Ostermeyer, Buchmann, Højgaard, González, Pascual and Pierce2018; Cipriani et al., Reference Cipriani, Palomba, Giulietti, Marcer, Mazzariol, Santoro, Alburqueque, Covelo, López, Santos, Pierce, Brownlow, Davison, McGovern, Frantzis, Alexiadou, Højgaard, Mikkelsen, Paoletti, Nascetti, Levsen and Mattiucci2022) along a latitudinal gradient, co-infecting the same individual definitive hosts. The ecological conditions required by the two species shift in this geographic area, initially favouring A. pegreffii and, moving northward, A. simplex (s.s.). Stochastic processes related to demographic disparities between the two interacting species at the limit of their respective geographic distribution in NE Atlantic waters – specifically, the Bay of Biscay for A. pegreffii and conversely, the Morocco Atlantic coast for the species A. simplex (s.s.), where this species has been rarely detected at its larval stage (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018) – could occur.

The numerosity of the two species in their hosts follows this pattern. Under these circumstances, the syntopic disparity of the two species occurring at the adult stage in a definitive host from a contact area may promote heterospecific mating pairings. Indeed, among the F1 and backcross individuals found in the northern part of the sympatric area here studied, most of them have shown a mitochondrial genome of A. pegreffii, indicating that they were originated from females at the geographic limit of the parasite species distribution (Diez et al., Reference Diez, Chust, Andonegi, Santurtún, Abaroa, Bilbao, Maceira and Mendibil2022; Díez et al., Reference Díez, Santos, Boyra, Chust, Santurtún, Maceira, Mendibil, Bilbao and Abaroa2024) (Fig. 7B). The opposite trend was observed in the southern part of the sympatric area (i.e. Portuguese and Alboran Sea coast), from where most of the F1 and backcross individuals have shown A. simplex (s.s.) mitochondrial genome, indicating females of the species at its limit of distribution (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7. Spatial distribution and relative proportions of the F1 hybrids, backcrosses and mitochondrial introgressed specimens detected, in the present study, by multi-markers approach according to their nuclear genotype (A) as inferred from STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS (see FIGURE 5), and mithocondrial genes (B).

In addition, the combined effect of different proportions of mature worms of the two species coinfecting the same definitive host in a contact area, coupled with their differential timing of sexual maturity, could be at the base of occasional hybridization events. Indeed, a possible differential reproductive timing could influence the fertilization success in the two closely related species, by preventing interspecific mating as a pre-copula mechanism of reproductive isolation. For instance, in vitro culture experimental works, carried out from L3 to reproductive adult stage of the two species, have demonstrated that females of A. pegreffii reach maturity and begin egg production from the 25th day of culture (Moratal et al., Reference Moratal, Zrzavá, Hrabar, Dea-Ayuela, López-Ramon and Mladineo2023), while it has been observed that males of A. pegreffii reach maturity between the 40th and 50th day (Nascetti et al., Reference Nascetti, Paggi, Orecchia, Smith, Mattiucci and Bullini1986; Mattiucci et al., unpublished data). In contrast, both males and females of A. simplex (s.s.) reach the reproductive stage around the 30th day of in vitro culture (Nascetti et al., Reference Nascetti, Paggi, Orecchia, Smith, Mattiucci and Bullini1986; Mattiucci et al., unpublished data).

The findings reported in the present study seem to suggest that some mechanisms of reproductive isolation, both pre- and post-copula, might be not fully efficient in overlapping areas. Generally speaking, hybridization events may give rise to F1 hybrids with low viability and sterility, thereby preventing gene flow between the two parental taxa. It is also possible that F1 hybrids are seldomly able to backcross with one of the two parental species, giving rise to the Fn generation of hybrids. This can result in either 50% of genome admixture in F1 hybridization or introgression (i.e. the introduction of single genes from one species into another closely related species through repeated backcrossing events). In our sample, the Fst values observed between the parental taxa and backcrosses at the nuclear level suggest that, despite ongoing hybridization in the contact zone between the two closely related species, some post-copula mechanisms of reproductive isolation may also be present, maintaining the evolutionary boundary of the species.

However, hybrid zones involve amalgamations of independently evolving genomes, and various sexual asymmetries can be disclosed by joint data from cytoplasmatic and nuclear markers. For instance, the occurrence of mito-nuclear discordance (Table 5) demonstrated by 16 specimens from the eastern Mediterranean Sea showing the nuclear genome of the parental A. pegreffii with the cytoplasmic genome of the parental A. simplex (s.s.). This mito-nuclear discordance indicates mitochondrial introgression in the genome of A. pegreffii in this area. In several hybrid zones, the pronounced discordance across nuclear and mitochondrial loci appears to reflect different historical appearances of introgression (Porretta and Canestrelli, Reference Porretta and Canestrelli2023). Indeed, a common phenomenon is cytoplasmic ‘capture,’ where mtDNA genotypes characteristic of one species occur against the predominant nuclear background of the interacting species. The occurrence of interspecies introgression of mitochondrial genomes was detected in other parasitic nematodes, such as between Trichinella spiralis and T. britovi (Franssen et al., Reference Franssen, Bilska-Zajac, Deksne, Spog, Pozio, Rosenthal, Rozycki and Van der Giessen2015). This phenomenon, here observed in L3-stage larvae of A. pegreffii from eastern Mediterranean samples at a conspicuous rate, was not previously described in other allopatric and sympatric areas of the two Anisakis species. However, similar findings of mito-nuclear discordance in Anisakis individuals – despite being based on only 1 nuclear gene locus (i.e. ITS regions of rDNA) – were reported by Mladineo et al. (Reference Mladineo, Bušelić, Hrabar, Vrbatović and Radonić2017b) from the Adriatic Sea (Croatian coast). It is important to note that in our sample only a few specimens (N = 4) displayed the most common haplotype (i.e. H7), which is shared with other populations of the parental taxon A. simplex (s.s.). In contrast, the remaining haplotypes (N = 12) were private, occurring only in those introgressed specimens. Among these, H18 and H19 resulted to be private haplotypes, never found in other sympatric or allopatric populations of the two parental taxa (Fig. 6; Fig. 7B), while the H20, frequently found in our samples, was previously detected from the Tunisian coast of Mediterranean Sea and from the Adriatic Sea. This pattern suggests that this finding would be the result of both past and/or paleo-introgression hybridization phenomena that occurred in the genome of the interacting species. It is hypothesized that limited hybridization between the two taxa had occurred over several episodes. Past and/or paleo-introgression phenomena could be attributed to repeated immigration of the parental taxon A. simplex (s.s.) from the Atlantic Ocean, which might contribute to the observed mito-nuclear discordance. Supporting this hypothesis is the finding of private haplotypes found in the Mediterranean Sea, which form a distinct mitochondrial lineage from other haplotypes (Fig. 6). These could represent remnant haplotype lineages which survived in different micro-refugia in Mediterranean waters, following a secondary contact between the two separated lineages occurred during the Plio-Pleistocene period (5.3–2.0 Ma). Similar paleo-introgression inferences have been extensively reported for other marine invertebrate taxa in the Mediterranean Sea (Schmitt et al., Reference Schmitt, Fritz, Delfino, Ulrich and Habel2021).

Another possible explanation for this finding is that mtDNA tends to introgress more readily than nDNA, being genes contributing to reproductive isolation mechanisms generally located in the latter, rather than in mtDNA (Barton and Jones, Reference Barton and Jones1983). Among additional factors driving the nuclear and cytoplasmic introgression, the asymmetry between fitness of males and females can lead to differential exchange for nuclear and cytoplasmic loci. Sex-biased processes or dissortative preference in female mate choice could play a role in mitochondrial introgression. For instance, sperm-egg recognition proteins could be generally highly specialized, making interspecific zygote formation nearly precluded between the two species. In gonochoristic parasites, it has been observed that sperms penetrating egg’s jelly coat have proteins binding specifically with receptors present on the egg of its own species (Mehlhorn, Reference Mehlhorn1988). This mechanism has not been yet described in anisakid parasites, where the direct contact between females and males in the definitive host and copulation likely ensures sperm transfer. However, the asymmetry of hybrid fertility has been evoked in some animals (Mastrantonio et al., Reference Mastrantonio, Urbanelli and Porretta2019) to explain instances where mtDNA appears to cross species boundaries. This may occur if fertile females leave open the possibility for interspecific cytoplasmic recombination. Hybridization between heterospecific individuals has been documented in invertebrates as playing a role even in promoting the paternal leakage and mitochondrial heteroplasmy (Mastrantonio et al., Reference Mastrantonio, Urbanelli and Porretta2019), where mitochondrial genomes from both parental species can occur within an individual due to relaxing mechanisms in the egg-sperm recognition. In this context, the possible occurrence of heteroplasmy between the two Anisakis species, behind the mtDNA introgression, can be also considered. In theory, significant genomic divergence can be accumulated during the process of speciation, creating strong barriers to gene flow and leaving other genomic regions, such as the mitochondrial genome, more permeable to introgression (Michel et al., Reference Michel, Sim, Powell, Taylor, Nosil and Feder2010). To clarify this phenomenon, a complete cytoplasmic genome analysis and a linkage map would also be necessary to determine the impact of any genomic rearrangements of the two species in their contact areas.

However, the maintenance of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) as distinct phylogenetic lineages, coupled with the high level of differentiation between backcrosses and parental taxa observed in this study, despite recurrent hybridization in the contact area, suggests that certain microevolutionary processes likely act as barriers to gene flow (e.g. selection against hybrids, assortative mating and genomic incompatibility between species).

F1 hybrids may exhibit reduced viability or fertility, with these effects potentially being more pronounced in one sex. Haldane (Reference Haldane1922) hypothesized that in hybrid populations, if one sex is absent, rare or sterile, it is typically the heterogametic sex. Consequently, ongoing introgression of nuclear genes can occur via either male or female hybrids. In our sample from the sympatric areas, 1 adult female worm was found to have an F1 genome, possessing A. pegreffii mtDNA (Fig. 7B), whereas the most identified F1 hybrids and backcross individuals were L3-stage larvae, possessing an A. simplex (s.s.) (N = 16) or A. pegreffii (N = 6) mtDNA (Fig. 7B). According to the SSR sex-linked loci, those 16 third-stage L3 larvae, i.e. N = 10 F1, plus N = 3 backcrosses, were all females, while N = 9 backcrosses were males. According to the same sex-linked loci, the sex assignment to the mitochondrial introgressed individuals resulted to be N = 3 females and N = 3 males. Thus, in our case, since most of the F1 hybrids were female worms, ongoing hybridization seems to be predominantly maintained by females. This finding seems to align with Haldane’s rule. Various causes of Haldane’s rule, such as post-zygotic sterility and inviability of hybrids, have been proposed for several vertebrates and invertebrates, including chromosomal rearrangements, incompatibility between sex chromosomes and autosomes, and the dominance theory of sex-linked genes (Cowell, Reference Cowell2022). These processes may contribute to maintaining reproductive boundaries between the two parasite species here studied.

Future studies on these nematode parasites, with Mendelian inheritance, will enhance our understanding of how mechanisms of reproductive isolation between closely related species drive the evolutionary force which has led to the high success of their offspring, even in sympatric and syntopic conditions. This would also explain the mechanisms that maintain species reproductive barriers, as well the relatively low frequency of hybrids (here found to be around 5%) observed in the overlapping populations of the two Anisakis species. Further investigation of selective pressures and patterns of genomic introgression will be necessary to determine the phenotypic traits involved in reproductive isolation between the two species, and the nature of hybridization between them.

Hybridization can also represent a fertile field for natural selection, promoting certain genotypes/haplotypes and producing more potential adaptive phenotypes with respect to the parental species in determined conditions. A ‘transgressive hybrid’ refers to hybrids expressing phenotypes which are not resident in either of the two parental taxa. This can result in the fixation of more adaptive alleles in certain genes, potentially related to new environmental variables. Indeed, since hybridization can generate both phenotypic and genetic variants, the occurrence of natural hybrids between interacting species of parasites may be linked to the presence of emerging and rapidly changing environmental factors that favour the survival of hybrid phenotypes. It could also happen that, though hybrids may be poorly adapted to either parental species’ habitats, they can sometimes outcompete parental species in changing habitats, conferring a selective advantage (King et al., Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015). In this respect, introgressive hybridization could play a key role also in the microevolutionary ecology of the Anisakis species in the contact zone here studied.

The current distribution of the two parental Anisakis species in European waters (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Díez et al., Reference Díez, Santos, Boyra, Chust, Santurtún, Maceira, Mendibil, Bilbao and Abaroa2024) is shaped by complex biotic and abiotic factors. Water temperature and salinity play a crucial role in determining egg hatching and the survival of the first larval stages (Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Quiazon, Itoh, Fujise and Yoshinaga2023). The parental genomes of the two Anisakis species would provide a set of genes having a selective advantage in relation to these variables, defining their temperature and salinity tolerance limits. In this context, the mixed genome of introgressed individuals may be favoured over the parental genomes at the boundaries of their distribution ranges, offering a broader temperature tolerance to their free-living-stage larvae. Interestingly, this study found that the differential pattern of hybridization along the northern Iberian Atlantic coast is mainly composed of F1 hybrids and backcrossed individuals with the parental A. simplex (s.s.); this area represents the northern limit of the geographical distribution of the pure parental taxon, A. pegreffii (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Diez et al., Reference Diez, Chust, Andonegi, Santurtún, Abaroa, Bilbao, Maceira and Mendibil2022) (Fig. 7A). The opposite trend was observed along the southern part of Atlantic Iberian coast and Alboran Sea waters, where, aside from F1 hybrids, backcrosses with the parental A. pegreffii were identified, mostly showing an A. simplex (s.s.) mitochondrial inheritance. This region represents the southern limit of the geographic distribution of the pure parental taxon A. simplex (s.s.) (Fig. 7A). According to this finding, we could hypothesize that the new gene combinations found in F1 and Fn individuals may enable them to tolerate marine environments that would be unfavourable to their parental species.

As the distribution of the two species of Anisakis in European waters may shift under climate change (Levsen et al., Reference Levsen, Cecilie, Cipriani, Mattiucci, Gay, Hastie, Bušelić, Mladineo, Karl, Ostermeyer, Buchmann, Højgaard, González, Pascual and Pierce2018; Diez et al., Reference Diez, Chust, Andonegi, Santurtún, Abaroa, Bilbao, Maceira and Mendibil2022; Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Marchiori, Tedesco, Fioravanti, Marcer, Gustinelli, Aco-Alburqueque, Belli, Canestrelli and Mattiucci2023), eventually enlarging their contact area, the likelihood of hybridization events could increase. This could lead either to a lower fitness of the introgressed individuals following the admixture or to the enhancement of the evolutionary adaptation of the hybrid genotypes to new local conditions (King et al., Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015).

Finally, concerning the zoonotic role of these parasites, no data are so far available about the findings of hybrid genotypes identified as agents of human anisakiasis. So far, only two markers (i.e. ITS region of rDNA and/or mtDNA cox2) have been used to identify larval stages of etiological agents of these cases (Mattiucci et al., Reference Mattiucci, Cipriani, Levsen, Paoletti and Nascetti2018; Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Marchiori, Tedesco, Fioravanti, Marcer, Gustinelli, Aco-Alburqueque, Belli, Canestrelli and Mattiucci2023; Shamsi and Barton, Reference Shamsi and Barton2023). Future studies, based on genotyping of larval stages causing human anisakiasis using a broader set of nuclear markers, will provide a more comprehensive genetic characterization of the larval individuals responsible for the zoonotic disease.

Conclusions

The present work demonstrates that contemporary hybridization between the parasite taxa A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) occurs in the contact marine areas here studied, and that viable F1 hybrids have contributed to genomic introgression within the parental lineages. Since most of the hybrid individuals were identified as females based on sex-linked SSR loci, it can be hypothesized that ongoing hybridization is predominantly maintained by females in the sympatric area studied. The present study also shows the existence of A. simplex (s.s.) mitochondrial introgression in A. pegreffii from the Mediterranean Sea waters, not previously detected in other allopatric populations of the parasite species, supporting the hypothesis of paleo-introgression events occurred in these waters.

The useful application of a multilocus nuclear genotyping approach and a Bayesian analysis to investigate the genetic structure of the sister taxa included in complex species in sympatric areas, as well as to assign each individual specimen to specific hybrid categories, has been provided. Further, it has shown that the use of the only mitochondrial gene locus (i.e. mtDNA cox2) in the genetic/molecular identification of these parasites, especially when dealing with populations of these parasite species collected from their contact areas, can lead to the misidentification of specimens, due to the occurrence of nuclear hybridization and mitochondrial introgression phenomena.

As the distribution of the two species of Anisakis in European waters can shift under climate change eventually enlarging their contact area, the likelihood of hybridization events could increase. This could lead either to a lower fitness of the introgressed individuals following the admixture or to the enhancement of the evolutionary adaptation of the hybrid genotypes to new local conditions Thus, monitoring the hybridization and introgression phenomena between the two Anisakis species in this sympatric area would represent a tool for monitoring changes in the geographical distribution of the two species in NE Atlantic waters, under a sea temperature increase scenario.

Finally, further investigation may reveal that hybrid individuals between A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) could both alter the host-parasite co-evolutionary adaptation with their natural hosts and exhibit differential pathogenesis pathways, including those affecting accidental hosts (e.g. human infection).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182025000228

Author contributions

SM, GN and MP designed the whole study and wrote the main manuscript. SM, MP, BB and RA performed laboratory work and genetic data gathering. SM, MP and BB performed statistical genetic analyses. MS, SCW and PC worked on cetaceans’ post-mortem inspection and collected parasite samples. All the Authors participated in the revision process of the manuscript.

Financial support

The work was supported by a grant received from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) − PRIN 2022 − Project Title ‘PARAsites do matter: looking for “SIGNAls” of thermal change and habitat distUrbance of Mediterranean maRine Ecosystem through a genetic and transcriptomic approach of a trophic-web transmitted parasite (PARA-SIGNATURE)’.

Competing interests

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Abattouy, N, Valero, A, Lozano, J, Barón, SD, Romero, C and Martín-Sánchez, J (2016) Population genetic analysis of Anisakis simplex s.l. and Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda, Anisakidae) from parapatric areas and their contact zone. Parasite Epidemiology and Control 1, 169176. doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2016.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abbott, R, Albach, D, Ansell, S, Arntzen, JW, Baird, SJE, Bierne, N, Boughman, J, Brelsford, A, Buerkle, CA, Buggs, R, Butlin, RK, Dieckmann, U, Eroukhmanoff, F, Grill, A, Cahan, SH, Hermansen, JS, Hewitt, G, Hudson, AG, Jiggins, C, Jones, J, Keller, B, Marczewski, T, Mallet, J, Martinez‐Rodriguez, P, Möst, M, Mullen, S, Nichols, R, Nolte, AW, Parisod, C, Pfennig, K, Rice, AM, Ritchie, MG, Seifert, B, Smadja, CM, Stelkens, R, Szymura, JM, Väinölä, R, Wolf, JBW and Zinner, D (2013) Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26(2), 229246. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abollo, E, Gestal, C and Pascual, S (2001) Anisakis infestation in marine fish and cephalopods from Galician waters: An updated perspective. Parasitology Research 87, 492499. doi:10.1007/s0043Google ScholarPubMed
Abollo, E, Paggi, L, Pascual, S and D’Amelio, S (2003) Occurrence of recombinant genotypes of Anisakis simplex s.s. and Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in an area of sympatry. Infections, Genetics and Evolution 3(3), 175181. doi:10.1016/s1567-1348(03)00073-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, EC and Thompson, EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160(3), 12171229. doi:10.1093/genetics/160.3.1217Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, TJC (2001) The dangers of using single locus markers in parasite epidemiology: Ascaris as a case study. Trends in Parasitology 17, 183188. doi:10.1016/S1471-4922(00)01944-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, ML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. United States of America: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N and Jones, JS (1983) Mitochondrial DNA: New clues about evolution. Nature 306, 317318. doi:10.1038/306317a0Google ScholarPubMed
Bello, E, Palomba, M, Webb, SC, Paoletti, M, Cipriani, P, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2021) Investigating the genetic structure of the parasites Anisakis pegreffii and A. berlandi (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in a sympatric area of the southern Pacific Ocean waters using a multilocus genotyping approach: First evidence of their interspecific hybridization. Infection Genetics and Evolution 92, . doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104887Google Scholar
Bello, E, Paoletti, M, Webb, SC, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2020) Cross-species utility of microsatellite loci for the genetic characterisation of Anisakis berlandi (Nematoda: Anisakidae). Parasite 27, . doi:10.1051/parasite/2020004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blažeković, K, Pleić, IL, Đuras, M, Gomerčić, T and Mladineo, I (2015) Three Anisakis spp. isolated from toothed whales stranded along the eastern Adriatic Sea coast. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 1731. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.07.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissier, J, Moné, H, Mitta, G, Bargues, MD, Molyneux, D and Mas-Coma, S (2015) Schistosomiasis reaches Europe. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 15(7), 757758. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00084-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buselic, I, Hrabar, J, Calic, A, Radonic, I, Poljak, V and Mladineo, I (2015) Risk Assessment of Human Infection with Anisakis Spp. in the European Anchovy and Sardine from the Eastern Adriatic Sea. Valencia, Spain: 9th International Symposium on Fish Parasites.Google Scholar
Calvani, NED and Slapeta, J (2020) Fasciola species introgression: Just a fluke or something more? Trends in Parasitology 31(1), 2534. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2020.09.008Google Scholar
Caputo, B, Pichler, V, Bottà, G, De Marco, C, Hubbart, C, Perugini, E, Pinto, J, Rockett, KA, Miles, A and Della Torre, A (2021) Novel genotyping approaches to easily detect genomic admixture between the major Afrotropical malaria vector species, Anopheles coluzzii and An. gambiae. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(5), 15041516. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallero, S, Costa, A, Caracappa, S, Gambetta, B and D’Amelio, S (2014) Putative hybrids between two Anisakis cryptic species: Molecular genotyping using high resolution melting. Experimental Parasitology 146, 8793. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2014.08.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallero, S, Ligas, A, Bruschi, F and D’Amelio, S (2012) Molecular identification of Anisakis spp. from fishes collected in the Tyrrhenian Sea (NW Mediterranean). Veterinary Parasitology 187(3–4), 563566. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaligiannis, I, Lalle, M, Pozio, E and Sotiraki, S (2012) Anisakidae infection in fish of the Aegean Sea. Veterinary Parasitology 184(2–4), 362366. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.007Google ScholarPubMed
Chaudhry, U, Redman, EM, Abbas, M, Muthusamy, R, Ashraf, K and Gilleard, JS (2015) Genetic evidence for hybridisation between Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei in natural field populations and its implications for interspecies transmission of anthelmintic resistance. International Journal for Parasitology/International Journal for Parasitology 45(2–3), 149159. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.09.002Google ScholarPubMed
Chou, YY, Wang, CS, Chen, HG, Chen, HY, Chen, SN and Shih, HH (2011) Parasitism between Anisakis simplex (Nematoda: Anisakidae) third-stage larvae and the spotted mackerel Scomber australasicus with regard to the application of stock identification. Veterinary Parasitology 177, 324331. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, P, Acerra, V, Bellisario, B, Sbaraglia, G, Cheleschi, R, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2016) Larval migration of the zoonotic parasite Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus: Implications to seafood safety. Food Control 59, 148157. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.043Google Scholar
Cipriani, P, Giulietti, L, Bao, M, Palomba, M, Mattiucci, S and Levsen, A (2024) Post-mortem tissue migration of Anisakis simplex (s.s.) larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in three commercially harvested fish species from the Northeast Atlantic: The role of storage time and temperature. Food Control 157, . doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, P, Palomba, M, Giulietti, L, Marcer, F, Mazzariol, S, Santoro, M, Alburqueque, RA, Covelo, P, López, A, Santos, MB, Pierce, GJ, Brownlow, A, Davison, NJ, McGovern, B, Frantzis, A, Alexiadou, P, Højgaard, DP, Mikkelsen, B, Paoletti, M, Nascetti, G, Levsen, A and Mattiucci, S (2022) Distribution and genetic diversity of Anisakis spp. in cetaceans from the northeast Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. Scientific Reports 12, . doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17710-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, M, Posada, D and Crandall, KA (2002) TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9, 16571659. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.xGoogle Scholar
Cowell, F (2022) 100 years of Haldane’s rule. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 36, 337346. doi:10.1111/jeb.14112Google ScholarPubMed
Criscione, CD, Anderson, JD, Sudimack, D, Peng, W, Jha, B, Williams-Blangero, S and Anderson, TJ (2007) Disentangling hybridization and host colonization in parasitic roundworms of humans and pigs. Proceedings Biological Sciences 274, 26692677. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0877Google ScholarPubMed
Diez, G, Chust, G, Andonegi, E, Santurtún, M, Abaroa, C, Bilbao, E, Maceira, A and Mendibil, I (2022) Analysis of potential drivers of spatial and temporal changes in anisakid larvae infection levels in European hake, Merluccius merluccius (L.), from the North-East Atlantic fishing grounds. Parasitology Research 121(7), 19031920. doi:10.1007/s00436-022-07446-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díez, G, Santos, M, Boyra, G, Chust, G, Santurtún, M, Maceira, A, Mendibil, I, Bilbao, E and Abaroa, C (2024) Variation in the levels of anisakid infection in the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus) from the Bay of Biscay during the period 2000–2023 (ICES Subarea 8). Parasitology Research 123, . doi:10.1007/s00436-023-08096-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F, Gu, S, Yi, MR, Yan, YR, Wang, WK and Tung, KC (2022) Demographic history and population genetic structure of Anisakis pegreffii in the cutlassfish Trichiurus japonicus along the coast of mainland China and Taiwan. Parasitology Research 121, 28032816. doi:10.1007/s00436-022-07611-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S and Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14, 26112620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L and Lischer, HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10, 564567. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farjallah, S, Busi, M, Mahjoub, MO, Slimane, B, Paggi, L, Said, K and D’Amelio, S (2008) Molecular characterization of larval anisakid nematodes from marine fishes off the Moroccan and Mauritanian coasts. Parasitology International 57, 430436. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2008.05.002Google ScholarPubMed
Foster, JM, Grote, A, Mattick, J, Tracey, A, Tsai, Y, Chung, M, Cotton, JA, Clark, TA, Geber, A, Holroyd, N, Korlach, J, Li, Y, Libro, S, Lustigman, S, Michalski, SL, Paulini, M, Rogers, MB, Teigen, L, Twaddle, A, Welch, L, Berriman, M, Dunning Hotopp, JC and Ghedin, E (2020) Sex chromosome evolution in parasitic nematodes of humans. Nature Communications 11(1), 112. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15654-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franssen, F, Bilska-Zajac, E, Deksne, G, Spog, H, Pozio, E, Rosenthal, B, Rozycki, M and Van der Giessen, J (2015) Genetic evidence of interspecies introgression of mitochondrial genome between Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi under natural condition. Infection Genetics and Evolution 36, .Google Scholar
Gomes, TL, Quiazon, KM, Itoh, N, Fujise, Y and Yoshinaga, T (2023) Effects of temperature on eggs and larvae of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto and Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) and its possible role on their geographic distributions. Parasitology International 92, . doi:10.1016/j.parint.2022.102684Google ScholarPubMed
Gómez-Mateos, M, Merino-Espinosa, G, Corpas-López, V, Valero-López, A and Martín-Sánchez, J (2020) A multi-restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping approach including the beta-tubulin gene as a new differential nuclear marker for the recognition of the cryptic species Anisakis simplex s.s. and Anisakis pegreffii and their hybridization event. Veterinary Parasitology 283, . doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, JBS (1922) Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics 12, 101109. doi:10.1007/BF02983075Google Scholar
Harvey, SC and Viney, ME (2001) Sex determination in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Genetics 158, 15271533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecht, LBB, Thompson, PC, Lavin, ES, Zarlenga, DS and Rosenthal, BM (2016) Hybridization is limited between two lineages of freeze-resistant Trichinella during coinfection in a mouse model. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 38, 146151. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.12.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huyse, T, Van den Broeck, F, Hellemans, B, Volckaert, FA and Polman, K (2013) Hybridisation between the two major African schistosome species of humans. International Journal of Parasitology 43(8), 687689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.04.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huyse, T, Webster, BL, Geldof, S, Stothard, JR, Diaw, OT, Polman, K and Rollinson, D (2009) Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species. PLOS Pathogens 5(9), . doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, KC, Stelkens, RB, Webster, JP, Smith, DF and Brockhurst, MA (2015) Hybridization in parasites: Consequences for adaptive evolution, pathogenesis, and public health in a changing world. PLOS Pathogens 11(9), . doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005098Google Scholar
Klapper, R, Kochmann, J, O’Hara, RB, Karl, H and Kuhn, T (2016) Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination of beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella): Parasite infra-communities vs. limited resolution of cytochrome markers. PLoS One 11(4), . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153964CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimpel, S, Busch, MW, Kuhn, T, Rohde, A and Palm, HW (2010) The Anisakis simplex complex off the South Shetland Islands (Antarctica): Endemic populations versus introduction through migratory hosts. Marine Ecology Progress Series 403, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T, Garcıa-Màrquez, J and Klimpel, S (2011) Adaptive radiation within marine anisakid nematodes: A zoogeographical modelling of cosmopolitan, zoonotic parasites. PLoS One 6, . Through migratory hosts. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 403, 1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028642.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawson, DJ, Van Dorp, L and Falush, D (2018) A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots. Nature Communications 9, . doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7Google Scholar
Lee, MH, Cheon, D and Choi, C (2009) Molecular genotyping of Anisakis species from Korean sea fish by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Food Control 20, 623626. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leger, E and Webster, JP (2017) Hybridizations within the Genus Schistosoma: implications for evolution, epidemiology and control. Parasitology 144, 6580. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016001190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levsen, A, Cecilie, SS, Cipriani, P, Mattiucci, M, Gay, M, Hastie, LC, Bušelić, I, Mladineo, I, Karl, H, Ostermeyer, U, Buchmann, K, Højgaard, DP, González, AF, Pascual, S and Pierce, GJ (2018) A survey of zoonotic nematodes of commercial key fish species from major European fishing grounds: Introducing the FP7 PARASITE exposure assessment study. Fisheries Research 202, 421. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2017.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, E, Spinaci, MI, Gordicho, V, Caputo, B, Pombi, M, Vicente, JL, Dinis, J, Rodrigues, A, Petrarca, V, Weetman, D, Pinto, J and Della Torre, A (2015) Adaptive potential of hybridization among malaria vectors: Introgression at the immune locus TEP1 between Anopheles coluzzii and A. gambiae in ‘Far-West’. Africa PloS One 10(6), . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127804Google Scholar
Martín-Sánchez, J, Artacho-Reinoso, ME, Díaz-Gavilán, M and Valero-López, A (2005) Structure of Anisakis simplex s.l. populations in a region sympatric for A. pegreffii and A. simplex s.s. Absence of reproductive isolation between both species. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 141(2), 155162. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrantonio, V, Urbanelli, S and Porretta, D (2019) Ancient hybridization and mtDNA introgression behind current paternal leakage and heteroplasmy in hybrid zones. Scientific Reports 9, . doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55764-wGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattiucci, S, Acerra, V, Paoletti, M, Cipriani, P, Levsen, A, Webb, SC, Canestrelli, D and Nascetti, G (2016) No more time to stay ‘single’ in the detection of Anisakis pegreffii, A. simplex (s.s.) and hybridization events between them: A multi-marker nuclear genotyping approach. Parasitology 143, 9981011. doi:10.1017/s0031182016000330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattiucci, S, Bello, E, Paoletti, M, Webb, SC, Timi, JT, Levsen, A, Cipriani, P and Nascetti, G (2019) Novel polymorphic microsatellite loci in Anisakis pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) (Nematoda: Anisakidae): Implications for species recognition and population genetic analysis. Parasitology 146(11), 13871403. doi:10.1017/S003118201900074XGoogle Scholar
Mattiucci, S, Cipriani, P, Canestrelli, D, Nascetti, G and Palomba, M (2025) Molecular approaches for investigating the population genetic structure of aquatic parasites. In Smit, NJ, and Sures, B (eds), Aquatic Parasitology: Ecological and Environmental Concepts and Implications of Marine and Freshwater Parasites. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mattiucci, S, Cipriani, P, Levsen, A, Paoletti, M and Nascetti, G (2018) Molecular epidemiology of Anisakis and anisakiasis: An ecological and evolutionary road map. Advances in Parasitology 99, 93263. doi:10.1016/bs.apar.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattiucci, S, Cipriani, P, Webb, SC, Paoletti, M, Marcer, F, Bellisario, B, Gibson, DI and Nascetti, G (2014) Genetic and morphological approaches distinguish the three sibling species of the Anisakis simplex species complex, with a species designation as Anisakis berlandi n. sp. for A. simplex sp. C (Nematoda: Anisakidae). The Journal of Parasitology 100(2), 199214. doi:10.1645/12-120.1Google Scholar
Mattiucci, S and Nascetti, G (2008) Advances and trends in the molecular systematics of anisakid nematodes, with implications for their evolutionary ecology and host-parasite co-evolutionary processes. Advances in Parasitology 66, 47148. doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(08)00202-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H (1988) Parasitology in Focus: Facts and Trends, with Contributions by Bunnag, D and Others. Berlin, DE: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Meloni, M, Angelucci, G, Merella, P, Siddi, R, Deiana, C, Orrù, G and Salati, F (2011) Molecular characterization of Anisakis larvae from fish caught off Sardinia. Journal of Parasitology 97(5), 908914. doi:10.1645/GE-2742.1Google ScholarPubMed
Michel, AP, Sim, S, Powell, THQ, Taylor, MS, Nosil, P and Feder, JL (2010) Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 97249729. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000939107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mladineo, I, Bušelić, I, Hrabar, J, Vrbatović, A and Radonić, I (2017b) Population parameters and mito-nuclear mosaicism of Anisakis spp. in the Adriatic Sea. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 212, 4654. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2017.01.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mladineo, I, Charouli, A, Jelić, F, Chakroborty, A and Hrabar, J (2023) In vitro culture of the zoonotic nematode Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda, Anisakidae). Parasites and Vectors 16(1), . doi:10.1186/s13071-022-05629-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mladineo, I, Trumbić, Ž, Radonić, I, Vrbatović, A, Hrabar, J and Bušelić, I (2017a) Anisakis simplex complex: Ecological significance of recombinant genotypes in an allopatric area of the Adriatic Sea inferred by genome derived simple sequence repeats. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 215223. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina-Fernández, D, Malagón, D, Gómez-Mateos, M, Benítez, R, Martín-Sánchez, J and Adroher, FJ (2015) Fishing area and fish size as risk factors of Anisakis infection in sardines (Sardina pilchardus) from Iberian waters, southWestern Europe. International Journal of Food Microbiology 203, 2734. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moratal, S, Zrzavá, M, Hrabar, J, Dea-Ayuela, MA, López-Ramon, J and Mladineo, I (2023) Fecundity, in vitro early larval development and karyotype of the zoonotic nematode Anisakis pegreffii. Veterinary Parasitology 323, . doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, F and Tobler, H (2000) Chromatin diminution in the parasitic nematodes Ascaris suum and Parascaris univalens. International Journal for Parasitology 30(4), 391399. doi:10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00199-XGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, TM, Berzano, M, O’Keeffe, SM, Cotter, DM, McEvoy, SE, Thomas, KA, Maoiléidigh, NP and Whelan, KF (2010) Anisakid larvae in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) grilse and post-smolts: Molecular identification and histopathology. Journal of Parasitology 96(1), 7782. doi:10.1645/GE-2194.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadler, SA and Hudspeth, DS (1998) Ribosomal DNA and phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nemata: Secernentea): Implications for morphological evolution and classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10(2), 221236. doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0514Google ScholarPubMed
Nadler, SA and Hudspeth, DSS (2000) Phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nematoda: Ascaridida) based on three genes and morphology: hypotheses of structural and sequence evolution. Journal of Parasitology 86, 380393. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0380:POTANA]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nascetti, G, Paggi, L, Orecchia, P, Smith, JW, Mattiucci, S and Bullini, L (1986) Electrophoretic studies on the Anisakis simplex complex (Ascaridida: Anisakidae) from the Mediterranean and North-East Atlantic. International Journal of Parasitology 16(6), 633640. doi:10.1016/0020-7519(86)90032-9Google ScholarPubMed
Palomba, M, Cipriani, P, Giulietti, L, Levsen, A, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2020a) Differences in gene expression profiles of seven target proteins in third-stage larvae of Anisakis simplex (sensu stricto) by sites of infection in blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou). Genes 11, . doi:10.3390/genes11050559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palomba, M, Libro, P, Di Martino, J, Rughetti, A, Santoro, M, Mattiucci, S and Castrignanò, T (2022) De novo transcriptome assembly and annotation of the third stage larvae of the zoonotic parasite Anisakis pegreffii. BMC Research Notes 15(1), . doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06099-9Google ScholarPubMed
Palomba, M, Marchiori, E, Tedesco, P, Fioravanti, M, Marcer, F, Gustinelli, A, Aco-Alburqueque, R, Belli, B, Canestrelli, D and Mattiucci, S (2023) An update and ecological perspective on certain sentinel helminth endoparasites within the Mediterranean Sea. Parasitology 150, . doi:10.1017/S0031182023000951Google ScholarPubMed
Palomba, M, Paoletti, M, Colantoni, A, Rughetti, A, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2019) Gene expression profiles of antigenic proteins of third stage larvae of the zoonotic nematode Anisakis pegreffii in response to temperature conditions. Parasite 26, . doi:10.1051/parasite/2019055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palomba, M, Paoletti, M, Webb, SC, Nascetti, G and Mattiucci, S (2020b) A novel nuclear marker and development of an ARMS-PCR assay targeting the metallopeptidase 10 (Nas10) locus to identify the species of the Anisakis simplex (s.l.) complex (Nematoda, Anisakidae). Parasite 27, . doi:10.1051/parasite/2020033Google Scholar
Pekmezci, GZ, Onuk, EE, Bolukbas, CS, Yardimci, B, Gurler, AT, Acici, M and Umur, S (2014) Molecular identification of Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from marine fishes collected in Turkish waters. Veterinary Parasitology 201, 8294. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.01.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pons-Bordas, C, Hazenberg, A, Hernandez-Gonzalez, A, Pool, RV, Covelo, P, Sanchez-Hermosin, P, Lopez, A, Saavedra, C, Fraija-Fernandez, N, Fernandez, M and Aznar, FJ (2020) Recent increase of ulcerative lesions caused by Anisakis spp. in cetaceans from the North-East Atlantic. Journal of Helminthology 94, . doi:10.1017/S0022149X20000115Google ScholarPubMed
Pontes, T, D’Amelio, S, Costa, G and Paggi, L (2005) Molecular characterization of larval anisakid nematodes from marine fishes of Madeira by a PCR-based approach, with evidence for a new species. Journal of Parasitology 91, . doi:10.1645/GE-565R1.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porretta, D and Canestrelli, D (2023) The ecological importance of hybridization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38(11), 10971108. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.07.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945959. doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiazon, KM, Yoshinaga, T and Ogawa, K (2011) Distribution of Anisakis species larvae from fishes of the Japanese waters. Parasitology International 60, 223226. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2011.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramilo, A, Rodríguez, H, Pascual, S, González, ÁF and Abollo, E (2023) Population genetic structure of Anisakis simplex infecting the European hake from North-East Atlantic fishing grounds. Animals 13(2), . doi:10.3390/ani13020197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roca-Geronès, X, Alcover, MM, Godínez-González, C, Montoliu, I and Fisa, R (2021) Hybrid genotype of Anisakis simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii identified in third- and fourth-stage larvae from sympatric and allopatric Spanish marine waters. Animals 11, . doi:10.3390/ani11082458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocco, L, Costagliola, D and Stingo, V (2001) (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequence in selachian chromosomes. Heredity 87, 583588.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, T, Fritz, U, Delfino, M, Ulrich, W and Habel, JC (2021) Biogeography of Italy revisited: Genetic lineages confirm major phylogeographic patterns and a pre-Pleistocene origin of its biota. Frontiers in Zoology 18, . doi:10.1186/s12983-021-00418-9Google Scholar
Schwenk, K, Brede, N and Streit, B (2008) Introduction. Extent, processes and evolutionary impact of interspecific hybridization in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 12(363), 28052811. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0055Google Scholar
Shamsi, S and Barton, DP (2023) A critical review of anisakidosis cases occurring globally. Parasitology Research 122(8), 17331745. doi:10.1007/s00436-023-07881-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simsek, E, Pekmezci, GZ, Yildirim, A, Duzlu, O, Onder, Z, Ciloglu, A, Sursal, N, Yilmaz, E, Gonulalan, Z and Inci, A (2020) Investigation of Anisakis larvae in different products of ready-to-eat fish meat and imported frozen fish in Turkey. International Journal of Food Microbiology 333, . doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108829CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinauer, ML, Hanelt, B, Mwangi, IN, Maina, GM, Agola, LE, Kinuthia, JM, Mutuku, MW, Mungai, BN, Wilson, WD, Mkoji, GM and Loker, ES (2008) Introgressive hybridization of human and rodent schistosome parasites in western Kenya. Molecular Ecology 17(23), 50625074. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03957.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, J, Murata, R, Hosaka, M and Araki, J (2010) Risk factors for human Anisakis infection and association between the geographic origins of Scomber japonicus and anisakid nematodes. International Journal of Food Microbiology 137(1), 8893. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarroso, P, Pereira, RJ, Martínez‐Freiría, F, Godinho, R and Brito, JC (2014) Hybridization at an ecotone: Ecological and genetic barriers between three Iberian vipers. Molecular Ecology 23(5), 11081123. doi:10.1111/mec.12671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, AR, Crandall, KA and Sing, CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132, 619633. doi:10.1002/jqs.937CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umehara, A, Kawakami, Y, Matsui, T, Araki, J and Uchida, A (2006) Molecular identification of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto and Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from fish and cetacean in Japanese waters. Parasitology International 55, 267271. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2006.07.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Oosterhout, C, Hutchinson, WF, Wills, DP and Shipley, P (2004) MICRO‐CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4, 535538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, AC (1940) Gametogenesis. In Chitwood, GB, and Chitwood, MB, Introduction to Nematodology. Babylon New York: Cambridge University Press, .Google Scholar
Webster, BL, Diaw, OT, Seye, MM, Webster, JP and Rollinson, D (2013) Introgressive hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium group species in Senegal: Species barrier break down between ruminant and human schistosomes. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7(4), . doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002110Google ScholarPubMed
Weetman, D, Steen, K, Rippon, EJ, Mawejje, HD, Donnelly, MJ and Wilding, CS (2014) Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis. Parasites and Vectors 7(345), 19. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S (1949) The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15(1), 323354. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19, 395420. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.xGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Collecting sites of A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii analysed in the present study, mapped onto the geographical range of the two parasite species (coloured in red and green, respectively). ADS, Adriatic Sea; TYR, Tyrrhenian Sea; IOS, Ionian Sea; TOR, Torrevieja (Mediterranean Spain coast); ALB, Alboran Sea; CDZ, Cadíz (Atlantic Spain Coast); HUE, Huelva (Atlantic Spain Coast); VIG, Vigo (Atlantic Spain Coast); BSB, Bay of Biscay; SCO, Seas West of Scotland; NWS, Norwegian Sea; NZE, New Zealand coast.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of specimens analysed from definitive and intermediate/paratenic hosts reported with sampling area, genotyped at nuclear (EF1 α-1, Nas10, Sod and Adk nDNA and SSR loci) and mitochondrial (mtDNA cox2) gene loci

Figure 2

Table 2. Locus name, primers sequences and fragment bp size of the gene loci used in the present study. For SSR nuclear loci, the repeat type and the fluorescent dye used to label the primer are also reported

Figure 3

Figure 2. Chromatograms at the diagnostic SNPs in Nas10, EF1 α-1, Sod and Adk nDNA loci and electropherograms of the 5 diagnostic and partially diagnostic SSR loci (Anisl 7, Anisl 22, Anisl 15, Anisl 4 and Anisl 10535), showing the heterozygous genotype having a double peak between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii exhibited by admixed specimens between the two species.

Figure 4

Figure 3. (A) Alignment of the region of the Sod nDNA, showing the 100% diagnostic positions: 6 SNPs (black triangles) between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii. (B) Alignment of the region of the Adk nDNA, showing the 100% diagnostic positions: 8 SNPs (black triangles) between A. simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii.

Figure 5

Table 3. Genetic diversity, at 11 SSR loci, in populations of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) analysed in the present study. No estimates were possible for the locus Anisl 15 because it was monomorphic in A. pegreffii populations

Figure 6

Table 4. Genetic diversity at the 5 sex-linked loci (i.e. Anisl 00314, Anisl 7, Anisl 4, Anisl 22 and Anisl 15) in A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) estimated in adult female specimens. Estimates at the locus Anisl 15 were not possible because it is monomorphic in A. pegreffii

Figure 7

Figure 4. Distribution of allele frequencies at the partially diagnostic and 100% diagnostic SSR loci between A. pegreffii (green) and A. simplex (s.s.) (red).

Figure 8

Figure 5. (A) Percentage contribution (Q) of each specimen of A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) to each cluster following a Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE on 17 diagnostic SNPs at nDNA gene loci (EF1 α-1, Nas10, Sod and Adk) and at the SSR loci (i.e. Anisl 10535 and Anisl 05784; sex-linked loci were excluded to include male specimens in the elaboration), with K = 2. (B) The posterior probability of assignment to 1 of 5 genotype classes following a Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in NEWHYBRIDS. Those specimens with evidence of admixture were assigned to pure A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.), F1 hybrids or backcrossed categories with a 100% posterior probability value of assignment.

Figure 9

Table 5. Number of specimens assigned to different classes of introgression or to parental species: Pure parental A. pegreffii; Pure parental A. simplex (s.s.); F1 Hybrid; Backcross × A. pegreffii; Backcross × A. simplex (s.s.), on the basis of a Bayesian clustering approach implemented in STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS combining the diagnostic SNPs at nDNA gene loci and SSR loci. The number of specimens by mtDNA cox2 gene locus is also represented

Figure 10

Figure 6. Statistical parsimony haplotype network (TCS) among mtDNA cox2 haplotypes showed by pure specimens of the two parental species A. pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) and by their hybrid individuals, plus the specimens from ATYS, ADS and EMS sea waters showing mitochondrial introgression. Circles suggest the two different haplogroups represented by the parental species (A. pegreffii: light green, A. simplex (s.s.): light red).

Figure 11

Figure 7. Spatial distribution and relative proportions of the F1 hybrids, backcrosses and mitochondrial introgressed specimens detected, in the present study, by multi-markers approach according to their nuclear genotype (A) as inferred from STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS (see FIGURE 5), and mithocondrial genes (B).

Supplementary material: File

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 1

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material
Download Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 2.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 2

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material
Download Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 3

Mattiucci et al. supplementary material
Download Mattiucci et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 143.9 KB