Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:39:06.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The hatching mechanism of the egg of Fasciola hepatica L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. A. Wilson
R. A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Imperial College Field Station, Ashurst Lodge, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hatching mechanism of the liver fluke egg was investigated and a new interpretation put forward. Light stimulates the miracidium and, when fully activated, the miracidium is responsible for altering the permeability of the membrane on the internal concave surface of the viscous cushion. Prior to expansion the cushion (a fibrillar mucoprotein complex) is in a dehydrated or semihydrated state. The change in permeability of the enclosing membrane allows the fluid egg contents to permeate into the cushion. The fibrillar matrix becomes hydrated and an increase in volume occurs. This compresses the miracidium and sacs and an internal pressure is set up which gradually increases until the operculum finally ruptures and flies back violently. The cushion and miracidium are then expelled by the hypertonicity of the egg contents.

I would like to thank Professor O. W. Richards, in whose department this work was carried out, also Dr F. Call and Professor B. G. Peters for their many helpful criticisms. I am also grateful to Miss Mary Morris for assistance with the electron microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1968 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, C. H. (1925). The life cycle of the human intestinal fluke Fasciolopsis buski (Lankester). Am. J. Hyg. (Monograph Series) 4, 98 pp.Google Scholar
Elson, L. A. & Morgan, W. T. J. (1933). A colorimetric method for the determination of glucosamine. Biochem. J. 27, 1824–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedl, F. E. (1961). Studies on larval Fascioloides magna. III. Mass hatching of miracidia by exposure to nitrogen. J. Parasit. 47, 770–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattes, O. (1926). Zur Biologie der Larvenentwicklung von Fasciola hepatica, besonders über den Einfluss der Wasserstoffionenkonzentration auf das Ausschlupfen der Miracidien. Zool. Anz. 69, 138–56.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Rienits, K. G. (1953). The electrophoresis of acid mucopolysaccharides on filter paper. Biochem. J. 53, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowan, W. B. (1956). The mode of hatching of the egg of Fasciola hepatica. Expl Parasit. 5, 118–37.Google Scholar
Rowan, W. B. (1957). The mode of hatching of the egg of Fasciola hepatica. II. Colloidal nature of the viscous cushion. Expl Parasit. 6, 131–42.Google Scholar
Smith, I. (1960). Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Techniques. Vol. 1. Chromatography. London: Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. P. (1883). The life history of the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 23, 99–133.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1967 a). The structure and permeability of the shell and vitelline membrane of the egg of Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology 57, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1967 b). The protonephridial system in the miracidium of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 21, 307–20.Google Scholar