Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:07:20.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Studies on the Biology of the Pigeon Fly, Pseudolynchia maura Bigot (Diptera Hippoboscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Margaret Jo Prouty  and
G. Robert Coatney
Margaret Jo Prouty
Affiliation:
From the Department of Biology, Nebraska Wesleyan University
G. Robert Coatney
Affiliation:
From the Department of Biology, Nebraska Wesleyan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Observations indicate that the female uses the third pair of legs during deposition as an aid in forcing the larva through the vaginal orifice.

2. The young imago is able to free itself from the pupal case by dragging the case across a rough surface with the forelegs.

3. The act of copulation has been observed and described, including mounting, position and duration.

4. Evidence is presented to show that the insects are positively thermotropic and thigmotropic; negatively phototropic and hydrotropic.

5. The flies react positively to the odours of oil of cloves, camphor and ox gall; negatively to oil of wintergreen and amyl alcohol, and are indifferent to blood, fresh pigeon skin, pigeon scales, feathers, ammonia, oil of thyme, oil origanum, xylol and bergamot.

6. The length of life without food is found to be in direct proportion to the energy expended in motion, ranging from 77 to 109 hours.

7. The flies refuse to take unwarmed food.

8. The insect will not penetrate a perfectly smooth membrane, or one that is rancid.

9. According to data presented. Pseudolynchia maura will not live longer than 117 hours when artificially fed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1934 , pp. 249 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adte, Helen (1915). The sporogony of Haemoproteus columbae. Indian J. Med. Res. 2, 671–80.Google Scholar
Bishopp, F. C. (1929). The pigeon fly—an important pest of pigeons in the United States. J. Econ. Ent. 22, 974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatney, G. Robert (1931). On the biology of the pigeon fly, Pseudolynchia maura Bigot (Dipt. Hippoboscidae). Parasitology, 23, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, L. and Stolz, A. (1928). Beiträge zur Biologie der Schaflausfliege, Melophagusovinus. Archiv f¨r Tiermed. u. Vergleich. Path. 8, 937–106.Google Scholar
Hase, A. (1927). Beobachtungen über d Verhalten, den Herzschlag sowie den Stech- und Saugakt der Pferdelausfliege Hippobosca equina L. (Dipt. Pupipara). Zeitschr.f. Morph. u. Ökol. der Tiere, 8, 187–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1929). Ovulation requirements of Culex pipiens Linn. Biol. Bull. 65, 3477–50.Google Scholar
Rivnay, B. (1930). Technique in the artificial feeding of the bed bug, Cimex lectularius L. J. Parasital. 16, 246–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivnay, B. (1932). Studies in tropisms of the bed bug, Cimex lectularius L. Parasitology, 24, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, Ed. (1909). Note sur un cas tératologique n'empêchant pan la vie normale chez le Lynchia maura Bigot (Diptère). Bull. Soc. d'histoire nat. de l'Afrique du Nord, 1, 13–14.Google Scholar