Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:06:25.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental differentiation of Leishmania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. Kirk
R. Kirk
Affiliation:
Stack Memorial Research Laboratories, Khartoum, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is generally accepted that the various species of Leishmania of men and dogs are morphologically indistinguishable. Therefore it has been argued that, according to the present rules of taxonomy, they should all be included in one species, L. donovani (Laveran & Mesnil, 1903), Ross, 1903. A review of the literature indicates, however, that this view is not generally acceptable, while strict adherence to the morphological rule would require the inclusion of the Leishmania of lizards (L. hemidactyli, L. agamae, etc.) in the same species as those of men and dogs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , January 1950 , pp. 58 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S. (1929). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 23, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, S. (1947). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, S. & Ashbel, R. (1940). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 34, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, G. & Caminopetros, J. (1930). C.R. Acad. Sci., 191, 800.Google Scholar
Caminopetros, J. (1936). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 122, 45.Google Scholar
Fuller, H. S. & Geiman, Q. M. (1942). J. Parasit. 28, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, C. A. (1943). Biol. Rev. 18, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, R. (1949). Parasitology. 39, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senekji, H. & Zebouni, N. (1941). Amer. J. Hyg. 34 c, 67.Google Scholar