Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:50:07.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The embryos of Filaria loa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Otto V. Huffman
Otto V. Huffman
Affiliation:
(From the Laboratory of the Cincinnati Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The embryo of Filaria loa has never been fully studied or described and for this reason the hypothesis put forward by manson, that the Filaria diurna is the larva of Filaria loa, remains unproven. when manson suggested this connection he had at hand some sketches of embryos which leuckart had made and sent to him. as these sketches were not of sufficient aid to establish the identity of the embryos with the larvae found by him in the blood, and as no metamorphosis takes place in the larvae while circulating in the blood, it is reasonable to suppose that they must have been rather crude sketches. however, the hypothesis came to be accepted because it was well supported by the fact that the two worms have the same geographical distribution and also by the occasional discovery of both in the same host. at the same time that this hypothesis was advanced, manson changed the name from Filaria sanguinis hominis major to Filaria sanguinis hominis diurna and said that the species was practically indistinguishable on morphological grounds from the well-known Filaria sanguinis hominis of Lewis (Filaria nocturna, Manson) i.e.Filaria bancrofti. this fact made it all the more necessary to observe embryos taken from an adult female Filaria loa before venturing to state the origin of the larvae found in the blood.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1911 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashburn, P. M. and craig, O. F. (1906). a new blood filaria of man; Filaria philippinensis. Am. Journ. Med. Sci., vol. cxxxii. pp. 435–443 (with figures).Google Scholar
brumpt, M. C. (1904). Filaria loa guyot, est la forme adulte de la microfilaire désignée sous le nom de filaria diurna Manson. Compt.Rend. Soc. Biol. (paris), vol. lvi. pp. 630–632.Google Scholar
Burrows, D. (15. i. 1910). A case of Filarial infection in which both the Filaria loa (male) and numerous Filaria diurna were obtained together. Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg. (London), Vol. xiii. p. 25.Google Scholar
Burrows, D. (15. ii. 1910). The relationship of Microfilaria diurna to Filaria loa. Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg. (London), vol. xiii. p. 49.Google Scholar
Foran, B. F. (15. II. 1910). Some notes on Filariasis in the Ikotepene District, South Nigeria. Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg. (London), Vol. xiii. p. 50.Google Scholar
Huffman, O. V. and Wherry, Wm B. (1911). a description of four filaria loa removed from the same patient. parasitology, vol. iv. p. 7. PI. ii.Google Scholar
Livon, J. (fils) et al. Pénaud, (1906). Un cas de Filaria loa, avec œdèmes inter-mittents, microfilaires dans le sang, l'urine et la salive; éosinophilic marquée. Étude de la filaire adulte et des ceufs—leur évolution.—Naissance des microfilaires et éiude morphologique de ces parasites embryonaires. Compt. Rend. Soc. de Biol. (Paris), Vol. lxi. No. 35. pp. 510–512.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1904). zur kenntnis des baues der filaria loa. zool. jahrb. syst. vol. xx. pp. 549–574.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1905). “Filaria loa Guyot, 1778,” in Handb. der Tropenkrankheiten, her-ausgegeben von Dr C. Mense (Leipzig; J. A. Barth), Vol. i. pp. 177–179 (with bibliography).Google Scholar
Manson, P. (3. i. 1891). The Filaria sanguinis hominis major and minor, two new species of haematozoa. Lancet (London), vol. i. pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
Manson, P. (1893). The Geographical Distribution, Pathological Relations, and Life History of Filaria sanguinis hominis diurna and of Filaria sanguinis hominis perstans, in connection with Preventive Medicine. (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.)Google Scholar
Manson, P. (1897). On certain new species of Nematode Haematozoa occurring in America. Brit. Med. Journ., pp. 1837–1838.Google Scholar
Manson, P. (1899). On Filarial Periodicity. Brit. Med. Journ., pp. 644–655.Google Scholar
Manson, P. (1901). “Filarida,” in A System of Medicine, Ed. by Allbutt, T. C. (London: Macmillan and Co.)Google Scholar
Manson, P. (iii. 1910). On the nature and origin of Calabar swellings. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg., Vol. iii. pp. 244–256.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M. (1908). précis de parasitologic humaine (paris: F. R. de Rudeval), pp. 482, 487.Google Scholar
Wherry, Wm B. and McDill, John R. (1905). Notes on a case of haemato-chyluria, together with some observations on the morphology of the embryo nematode—Filaria nocturna. Journ. Infect. Diseases, Vol. ii. pp. 412–420.Google Scholar