Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:22:00.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron microscopy of Eimeria acervulina macrogametogony and oocyst wall formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. M. Pittilo  and
S. J. Ball
R. M. Pittilo
Affiliation:
Department of Histopathology, Bland-Sutton Institute of Pathology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London W1P 7PN
S. J. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, North East London Polytechnic, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Macrogametogony and the formation of the oocyst wall has been examined in Eimeria acervulina. Macrogametes develop within a parasitophorous vacuole. Within the cytoplasm can be observed wall-forming bodies of Type I (WFBI). and Type II (WFBII), a nucleus, mitochondria, canaliculi and polysaccharide granules. WFBII are unusual in possessing a membrane internal to the granular endoplasmic reticulum. Formation of the outer layer of the oocyst wall is preceded by the separation of a veil membrane, and accompanied by morphological changes in the WFBI. WFBI material is deposited between the veil-forming membrane and the two cytoplasmic membranes. A newly formed membrane divides this outer layer during its early development. The inner layer of the oocyst wall is formed from WFBII material which is deposited between the cytoplasmic limiting membranes. The outer layer of the oocyst wall consists of granular and osmiophilic parts, but the inner layer of the wall is homogenous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chobotar, B., Sénaud, J., Ernst, J. V. & Scholtyseck, E. (1980). Ultrastructure of macrogametogenesis and formation of the oocyst wall of Eimeria papillata and Mus musculus. Protistologica 16, 115–24.Google Scholar
Cornaglia, E., Schindler, P., Tassi, P. & Widenhorn, O. (1979). Macrogametogensi di Eimeria acervulina; osservazioni ultrastrutturali. La Clinica Veterinaria 102, 330–5.Google Scholar
Dubremetz, J. F. & Yvoré, P. (1971). Elaboration de la coque oocystique chez la coccidie Eimeria necatrix Johnston 1930 (Sporozoaimes, Coccidiomorphis). Etude au microscope electropnique. Comptes rendus des séances de la société de biologie, Paris 165, 862–6.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. J. P., Birch-Andersen, A., Hutchison, W. M. & Siim, J. Chr. (1977). Ultra-structural studies on the endogenous development of Eimeria brunetti. IV. Formation and structure of the oocyst wall. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica, B 85, 201–11.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. J. P., Hutchison, W. M. & Siim, J. Chr. (1975). The ultrastructural development of the macrogamete and formation of the oocyst wall of Toxoplasma gondii. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica, B 83, 491–505.Google ScholarPubMed
Galloni, M., Guarda, F., Tassi, P., Cornaglia, E., Schindler, P. & Widenhorn, O. (1980). Osservazioni al microscopio elettronico a scansione sul ciclo biologico di Eimeria acervulina. La Clinica Veterinaria 103, 440–7.Google Scholar
Jurajdová, J. (1969). Ultrastructure of Eimeria acervulina gametogony. Acta veterinaria 38, 21–4.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. & Millard, B. J. (1971). The structure and development of the macrogamete and oocyst of Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 62, 31–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, E. (1978). The formation and final structure of the oocyst wall of Eimeria acervulina: A transmission and scanning electron microscope study. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 57, 221–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, E. & Hodges, R. D. (1975). Scanning electron microscopy of the duodenal mucosa of chickens infected with Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 71, 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittilo, R. M. & Ball, S. J. (1979). The fine structure of the developing macrogamete of Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 79, 259–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittilo, R. M. & Ball, S. J. (1980). The ultrastructural development of the oocyst wall of Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 81, 115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, W. L., Speer, C. A. & Hammond, D. M. (1970). Electron and light microscope studies of the oocyst walls, sporocysts and excysting sporozoites of Eimeria callospermophili and E. larimerensis. Journal of Parasitology 56, 918–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholtyseck, E., Mehlhorn, H. & Hammond, D. M. (1971). Fine structure of macrogametes and oocysts of coccidia and related organisms. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 37, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sénaud, J., Augustin, H. & Doens-Juteau, O. (1980). Observations ultrastructurales sur le développement sexué de la coccidie Eimeria acertvulina (Tyzzer, 1929). dans l'épithelium intestinal du poulet: La microgamétogenése et la macrogamétogenèse. Protistologica 16, 241–57.Google Scholar
Witlock, D. R. & Ruff, M. D. (1977). Comparison of the intestinal surface damage caused by Eimeria mivati, E. necatrix, E. maxima, E. brunetti and E. acervulina by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitology 63, 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar