Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:39:23.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eimeria stiedai in rabbits: the presence of an oocyst residuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. C. Norton
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, M.A.F.F., New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey, and Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs, PE172DA
Janet Catchpole
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, M.A.F.F., New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey, and Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs, PE172DA
M. Elaine Rose
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, M.A.F.F., New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey, and Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs, PE172DA

Extract

Observations on 5 different isolates of Eimeria stiedai from pure infections in laboratory-reared rabbits have confirmed the presence of an oocyst residuum. This structure was seen in 89–100% of the oocysts in cultures prepared both from the liver and from the faeces at different times during the patent period. The residuum consisted of 1–7 or more granules situated centrally in the oocyst and partially concealed by 4 sporocysts. The differential diagnosis of E. stiedai and E. coecicola is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carvalho, J. C. M. (1942). Eimeria neoleporis n.sp., occurring naturally in the cottontail and transmissible to the tame rabbit. Iowa State College Journal of Science 16, 409–10.Google Scholar
Coudert, P. (1975). Les coccidioses, une menace permanente. La Revue de l'elevage no. 24F, 93–9.Google Scholar
Coudert, P., Yvoré, P. & Provot, F. (1973). Sporogonie d'Eimeria stedai (Lindemann, 1865) Kisskalt et Hartmann, 1907. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 4, 371–88.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1922). The discovery of the coccidia. Parasitology 14, 342–8.Google Scholar
Dürr, U., Galle, H. K. & Heunert, H. H. (1971). Eimeria stiedai (Sporozoa) Exogene Phase. Film Nr. E 1952 der Encyclopaedia Cinematographica, Göttingen; Begleittext in Publ. Wiss. Film, Sect. Biologie, cited by Pellérdy, L. P. in Coccidia and Coccidiosis, 2nd ed., p. 434. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Dürr, U., Heunert, H. H. & Milthaler, B. (1971). Beobachtungen zur Sporogonie von Eimeria stiedai (Protozoa, sporozoa). Acta veterinaria Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 21, 421–32.Google Scholar
Gill, B. S. & Ray, H. N. (1960). The coccidia of the domestic rabbit and the common field hare of India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of Calcutta 13, 128–43.Google Scholar
Kessel, J. F. & Jankiewicz, H. A. (1931). Species differentiation of the coccidia of the domestic rabbit based on a study of the oocysts. American Journal of Hygiene 14, 304–24.Google Scholar
Kheissin, E. M. (1947 a). A new species of rabbit coccidia (Eimeria coecicola n.sp.). Compte Rendu de l'académie des Sciences, USSR 55, 177–9.Google Scholar
Kheissin, E. M. (1947 b). Variability of the oocysts of Eimeria magna Pérard. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 26, 1730.Google Scholar
Kheissin, E. M. (1959). Observations on residual bodies of oocysts and spores of some Eimeria species from rabbits and Isospora species from fox, ferret and hedgehog. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 38, 1776–84.Google Scholar
Kheissin, E. M. (1968). On the distinctness of the species Eimeria neoleporis Carvalho, 1942 from the cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus mearnsii and Eimeria coecicola Kheissin, 1947 from the tame rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus. Acta Protozoologica Warsaw 6, 512.Google Scholar
Kisskalt, K. J. & Hartmann, M. (1907). Practicum der Bakteriologie und Protozoologie. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Kotlán, S. & Pellérdy, L. P. (1949). Survey of the species of Eimeria occurring in the domestic rabbit. Acta veterinaria Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 1, 317–31.Google Scholar
Levine, N. D. (1973). Protozoan parasites of domestic animals and of man. 2nd ed.Minneapolis: Burgess.Google Scholar
Levine, N. D. & Ivens, V. (1972). Coccidia of the Leporidae. Journal of Protozoology 19, 572–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindemann, K. (1865). Weiteres über Gregarinen. Bulletin of the Society Imp. Nat. Moscow 38, 381–7.Google Scholar
Owen, D. (1970). Life cycle of Eimeria stiedai. Nature, London 227, 304.Google Scholar
Pellérdy, L. P. (1954). Beiträge zur Spezifität der Coccidien des Hasen und Kaninchens. Acta veterinaria Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 4, 481–7.Google Scholar
Pellérdy, L. P. (1965). Coccidia and Coccidiosis. 1st ed.Akademiae Kiado, Hungary: Budapest.Google Scholar
Pellérdy, L. (1974). Coccidia and Coccidiosis. 2nd ed.Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Rose, M. E. (1959). A study of the life cycle of Eimeria stiedae (Lindemann, 1865) and the immunological response of the host. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wagenbach, G. E. & Burns, W. C. (1969). Structure and respiration of sporulating Eimeria stiedae and E. tenella oocysts. Journal of Protozoology 16, 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed