Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:28:17.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Schistosoma haematobium infection on reproductive success and male outcrossing ability in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Bulinus truncatus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. J. Schrag
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
D. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD

Summary

The schistosome intermediate snail host, Bulinus truncatus (Mollusca: Planorbidae), has two reproductive (phally) morphs. Both aphallics and euphallics can self-fertilize, but aphallics cannot donate sperm because they do not develop a functional penis and prostate. This study investigated the interactions between phally and fitness consequences of Schistosoma haematobium infection in B. truncatus. Snails which developed patent infections produced 26% fewer eggs than controls and 35% fewer eggs than exposed snails which did not develop infections. This reduction was due to a lower lifetime production of egg masses and a smaller mean number of eggs/mass in infected snails relative to control or exposed snails. However, there was no evidence of increased mortality in infected snails. Contrary to reports of fecundity compensation in other intermediate host snails, egg production post-exposure during the pre-patent period did not increase relative to that of controls in either infected or exposed snails. Phally did not influence susceptibility to infection or length of the prepatent period. Furthermore, lifetime egg, egg mass and hatchling production, as well as mean eggs/mass and number of hatchlings reaching maturity, did not differ significantly between aphallics and euphallics within control or exposed experimental groups. However, within the infected group euphallics produced 38% fewer eggs, smaller egg masses, and fewer hatchlings reaching maturity than aphallics, supporting the prediction of a cost to the growth and maintenance of a full male tract. This cost was detectable only when snails were under the stress of infection. The proportion of euphallic offspring produced did not differ across experimental groups. We discuss these results in light of alternative host strategies to minimize fitness costs of infection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1979). Prevalence of schistosome infections within molluscan populations: observed patterns and theoretical predictions. Parasitology 79, 6394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D. S. (1980). Freshwater Snails of Africa and Their Medical Importance. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Brown, D. S. & Wright, C. A. (1972). On a polyploid complex of freshwater snails (Planorbidae: Bulinus) in Ethiopia. Journal of Zoology, London 167, 97132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E. L. (1982). The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Chu, K. Y. & Dawood, I. K. (1970). Cercarial production from Biomphalaria alexandrina infected with Schistosoma mansoni. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 42, 197–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Crews, A. E. & Yoshino, T. P. (1989). Schistosoma mansoni: effect of infection on reproduction and gonadal growth in Biomphalaria glabrata. Experimental Parasitology 68, 326–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Larambergue, M. (1939). Etude de l'autofécondation chez les gastéropodes pulmonés: recherches sur l'aphallie et fécondation chez Bulinus (Isidora) contortus Michaud. Bulletin Biologique 73, 2131.Google Scholar
Fryer, S. E., Oswald, R. C., Probert, A. J. & Runham, N. W. (1990). The effect of Schistosoma haematobium infection on the growth and fecundity of three sympatric species of Bulinid snails. Journal of Parasitology 76, 557–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geraerts, W. P. M. & Joosse, J. (1984). Freshwater snails (Basommatophora). In The Mollusca Volume 7: Reproduction (ed. Tompa, A. S., Verdonk, N. H. & van den Biggelaar, J. A. M.), pp. 142207. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1980). Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35, 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1978). An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evolutionary Theory 3, 191–4.Google Scholar
Jarne, P., Finot, L., Bellec, C., & Delay, B. (1992). Aphally versus euphally in self-fertile hermaphrodite snails from the species Bulinus truncatus (Pulmonata: Planorbidae). American Naturalist 139, 424–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lively, C. M. (1987). Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature, London 328, 519–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuleman, E. A. (1972). Host–parasite inter-relationships between the freshwater pulmonate Biomphalaria pfeifferi and the trematode Schistosoma mansoni. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 22, 355427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchella, D. J. (1985). Host life-history variation in response to parasitism. Parasitology 90, 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchella, D. J. & Loverde, P. T. (1981). A Cost of increased early reproductive effort in the snail Biomphalaria glabrata. American Naturalist 118, 876–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchella, D. J. & Loverde, P. T. (1983). Laboratory comparison of the relative success of Biomphalaria glabrata stocks which are susceptible and insusceptible to infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 86, 335–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollo, C. D. & Hawryluk, M. D. (1988). Compensatory scope and resource allocation in two species of aquatic snails. Ecology 69, 146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schallig, H. D. F. H., Sassen, M. J. M., Hordijk, P. L. & De Jong-Brink, M. (1991). Trichobilharzia ocellata: influence of infection on the fecundity of its intermediate snail host Lymnaea stagnalis and cercarial induction of the release of schistosomin, a snail neuropeptide antagonizing female gonadotropic hormones. Parasitology 102, 8591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrag, S. J. & Read, A. F. (1992). Temperature determination of male outcrossing ability in a simultaneous hermaphrodite gastropod. Evolution 46, 1698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrag, S. J., Rollinson, D., Keymer, A. E. & Read, A. F. (1992). Heritability of male outcrossing ability in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Bulinus truncatus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae). Journal of Zoology, London 226, 311–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrag, S. J., Mooers, A. Ø., Ndifon, G. T. & Read, A. F. (1993). Ecological correlates of male outcrossing ability in a simultaneous hermaphrodite snail. American Naturalist (in the Press).Google Scholar
Smith Trail, D. R. (1980). Behavioural interactions between parasites and hosts: host suicide and the evolution of complex life cycles. American Naturalist 116, 7791.Google Scholar
Sturrock, B. M. (1966). The influence of infection with Schistosoma mansoni on the growth rate and reproduction of Biomphalaria pfeifferi. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 60, 187–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, J. A., Jones, J. T. & Kusel, J. R. (1986). Increased oviposition and growth in immature Biomphalaria glabrata after exposure to Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 93, 443–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tompa, A. S., Verdonk, N. H. & Van Den Biggelaar, J. A. M. (1984). The Mollusca Volume 7: Reproduction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, M. E. J. (1989). The effect of Schistosoma infection on the mortality rates of Bulinus globosus and Biomphalaria pfeifferi. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 83, 137–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C. A. & Bennett, M. S. (1967). Studies on Schistosoma haematobium in the laboratory. I. A strain from Durban, Natal, South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 61, 221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar