Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T06:03:45.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship

III. The response of sheep to primary Infection with Haemonchus contortus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. K. Dineen ,
A. D. Donald ,
B. M. Wagland  and
Jan Offner
J. K. Dineen
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
A. D. Donald
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
B. M. Wagland
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
Jan Offner
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two groups of sheep born and raised worm-free were dosed with 3000 infective Haemonchus contortus larvae. Group 1 were each given a single dose of infective larvae on day 0 while the group 3 animals were dosed with 100 infective larvae per day for 30 consecutive days. The results of faecal worm-egg counts performed on alternative days, and of differential worm counts carried out on animals slaughtered at crucial times during the course of infection, showed that retardation of development at the 4th larval stage occurred in the group 3 infections and was the major effect of control of the parasitic burden. There was no evidence that egg production per female was affected.

Three animals of the nineteen infected in group 1 died during the course of the experiment owing to the pathogenic effects of the worm burden. Deaths did not occur among the animals of group 3. This finding was correlated with the observation that haematocrit levels were consistently lower among the animals of group 1 than among those of group 3.

The results are interpreted in terms of the theory of threshold behaviour of the immunological response to parasitic infection.

We are greatly indebted to Dr D. F. Stewart for his interest and constructive criticism during the course of these studies, and to Mr E. Teleki and Misses Helen Giller and Lindy Stothart for their valuable technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 1965 , pp. 515 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Das, K. M. & Whitlock, J. H. (1960). Subspeciation in Haemonchus contortus (Rudolphi, 1803) Nematoda Trichostrongyloidea. Cornell Vet. 50, 182–97.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K. (1963 a). Immunological aspects of parasitism. Nature, Lond., 197, 268–9.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K. (1963 b). Antigenic relationship between host and parasite. Nature, Lond., 197, 471–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dineen, J. K., Donald, A. D., Wagland, B. M. & Turner, J. H. (1965). The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. II. The response of sheep to primary and secondary infection with Nematodirus spathiger. Parasitology, 55, 163–71.Google Scholar
Donald, A. D., Dineen, J. K., Turner, J. H. & Wagland, B. M. (1964). The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. I. Nematodirus spathiger infection in sheep. Parasitology, 54, 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1948). Epidemiology of parasitic diseases, with special reference to studies with nematode parasites of sheep. Aust. vet. J. 24, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. F. (1963). The phenomena of host resistance and the course of infection of Ostertagia ostertagi in calves. Parasitology, 53, 63–84.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. F. (1953). Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. V. The nature of the ‘self-cure’ phenomenon. Aust. J. agric. Res. 4, 100–17.Google Scholar
Veglia, F. (1915). The anatomy and life history of the Haemonchus contortus (Rud.). Rep. vet. Res. S. Afr. 3, 4, 349–500.Google Scholar