Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:56:30.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the metacercaria of Maritrema linguilla Jäg., 1908 (Digenea: Microphallidae) in the intermediate host, Ligia oceanica (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

L. R. Benjamin  and
B. L. James
L. R. Benjamin
Affiliation:
Marine Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University College, Swansea SA2 8PP
B. L. James
Affiliation:
Marine Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University College, Swansea SA2 8PP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The first two phases in the growth of Maritrema linguilla in Ligia oceanica, which occur in unencysted specimens in the pleopod sinuses, from day 0 to day 28 post-infection (p.i.), include a 3-fold increase in size, an enormous increase in the relative size of the excretory bladder, metamorphosis of papilliform extensions of the tegument into microvilli and development of single pointed spines and cystogenous gland cells. The third phase, from day 29 to day 38 p.i., following migration to the dorsal haemocoel, includes production of 3 cyst wall layers, the loss of single pointed spines and a considerable decrease in the relative size of the excretory bladder. The fourth phase from day 39 to day 42 p.i., involves a further increase in body size and the formation of digitiform spines. The fifth, sixth and final phases from day 43 to day 120 p.i. first include the completion of the last two cyst wall layers and then an increase in body size and development of the digestive, excretory and reproductive systems to almost adult dimensions but sperm, ova, vitelline globules and eggs are produced only in the final host.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 221 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, L. R. (1984). Studies on Maritrema linguilla Jäg. 1908 (Digenea: Microphallidae). Ph.D. thesis, University College, Swansea.Google Scholar
Biguet, J., Deblock, S. & Capron, A. (1958). Contribution à la connaissance des Microphallidae Travassos, 1920 (Trematoda). II. Considération sur quelques genres de la sous-famille des Microphallinae Ward, 1901. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 33, 398–444.Google Scholar
Ching, H. L. (1963). The description and life cycle of Maritrema laricola sp.n. (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 41, 881–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deblock, S. H. & Tran Van Ky, P. (1966). Contribution à 1'étude des Microphallidae Travassos, 1920 (Trematoda) des côtes de France. XIII. Description de deux espèces nouvelles à cycle évolutif abrège originaires de Corse. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 41, 313–35.Google Scholar
Hendow, H. (1984). Studies on the occurrence and development of marine Microphallidae (Digenea): Maritrema linguilla. Ph.D. thesis, University College, Swansea.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L. (1956). The life cycle of Crassiphiala bulboglossa (Trematoda: Strigeidae) development of the metacercaria and cyst and effect on the fish hosts. Journal of Parasitology 42, 438–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1908). Kleine Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Vogeltrematoden. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten 48, 302–17.Google Scholar
James, B. L. (1968). The characters and distribution of the subspecies and varieties of Littorina saxatilis (Olivi 1792) in Britain. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 9, 143–65.Google Scholar
James, B. L. (1969). The Digenea of the intertidal prosobranch Littorina saxatilis (Olivi). Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 7, 273–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalantan, A. (1979). Studies on the development, ultrastructure and biochemistry of microphallid Digenea. Ph.D. thesis. University College, Swansea.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. (1914). Some larval trematodes from Millport. Parasitology 7, 1–11.Google Scholar
Newell, C. R. (1986). The marine fauna and flora of the Isles of Scilly: some marine digeneans from invertebrate hosts. Journal of Natural History 20, 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J. (1976). Etude comparée de la repartition des oils chez deux cercaires de Microphallidae parasites d'Hydrobia ulvae, Maritrema subdolum Jägerskiöld, 1909 [sic] et Maritrema linguilla Jägerskiöld, 1909 [sic]. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles, Marseilles 99, 11–17.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1957). The morphology and life history of the digenetic trematode, Microphallus similis (Jägerskiold, 1900) Baer, 1943. Biological Bulletin of Marine Biological Laboratories, Woods Hole 112, 254–65.Google Scholar
Uspenskaia, A. V. (1963). Parasite Fauna of Benthic Crustaceans from the Barents Sea. (In Russian.) Leningrad: Moskua.Google Scholar