Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:49:18.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-reactions between Eimeria falciformis and Eimeria pragensis in mice induced by trickle infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1998

K. SHEHU
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, Berks RG6 6AJ, UK Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts, Science and Remedial Studies, P.M.B. 3145, Kano, Nigeria.
F. NOWELL
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, Berks RG6 6AJ, UK

Abstract

We describe a laboratory model using Eimeria falciformis and E. pragensis to investigate some of the interactions in double-species infections of Eimeria. Mice were given trickle infections by oral inoculation of 100 sporulated oocysts of one species at 3 or 4 day intervals throughout the experiments and, once immunity had developed, as indicated by cessation of oocyst production, the animals were challenged with a single inoculation of the other species. A trickle infection of E. falciformis gave a significant enhancement of oocyst output from E. pragensis infection as compared with animals that had not received E. falciformis. Histological examination of the mice infected with E. pragensis showed significantly more asexual parasites and a significantly higher female/male ratio in the mice that had received trickle E. falciformis infections than in those that had not. There was no evidence to suggest that extra asexual generations were occurring in these mice. In the converse experimental protocol, trickle E. pragensis infections had no significant effect on a single E. falciformis infection. We discuss the possible mechanisms for the interactions and also how these interactions may influence multiple species infections in animals in their natural habitats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)