Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:24:39.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The communities of helminth parasites of Heterandria bimaculata (Teleostei: Poeciliidae) from the upper Río La Antigua basin, east-central Mexico show a predictable structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO ,
MARÍA TERESA NOVELO-TURCOTTE ,
GABRIELA VAZQUEZ ,
JUAN MANUEL CASPETA-MANDUJANO ,
BENJAMÍN QUIROZ-MARTÍNEZ  and
MARIO FAVILA
GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Helmintología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Apartado Postal 70-153 C. P. 04510 México, D. F., Mexico
MARÍA TERESA NOVELO-TURCOTTE
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Helmintología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Apartado Postal 70-153 C. P. 04510 México, D. F., Mexico
GABRIELA VAZQUEZ
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, C.P. 91070, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
JUAN MANUEL CASPETA-MANDUJANO
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Laboratorio de Parasitología de Animales Silvestres, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad Número 1001, Colonia Chamilpa, C.P. 62209, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
BENJAMÍN QUIROZ-MARTÍNEZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Helmintología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Apartado Postal 70-153 C. P. 04510 México, D. F., Mexico
MARIO FAVILA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, C.P. 91070, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
*
* Corresponding author: Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Helmintología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Apartado Postal 70-153 C. P. 04510 México, D. F., Mexico. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated a basic generalization in parasite community ecology stating that stochastic processes played a major part in determining the composition of helminth communities of freshwater fish, or on the contrary, if these communities are predictable, diverse and structured species assemblages. We determined the species pool of helminth parasites of a tropical freshwater fish Heterandria bimaculata in its heartland, the upper Río La Antigua basin in east-central Mexico. Approaching our data from the metapopulation standpoint we studied the spatial patterns, and examined the variation in composition and richness of the component communities across different locations. We tested the prediction that helminth species may be recognized as common or rare; and also two hypotheses anticipating depauperate communities and decay of similarity between component communities with increasing distance. We found these communities composed by a highly structured and predictable set of specialist autogenic helminth species that are constant and abundant, dominating all components throughout space. The prediction that it is possible to recognize common and rare species was met. Richer than expected communities were found, as well as highly homogeneous component communities, where neighbouring components were more similar than distant ones. We speculated that the processes shaping the development of these component communities include stable, predictable habitats through time, allowing for a slow gradual dispersion process limited by host and parasite species capabilities. Our study suggests that metapopulation theory can assist in the prediction of community composition and in the understanding of spatial and temporal community variability.

Keywords

metapopulation theoryspecies richnesscommon/rare speciesdistance decay of similarity
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 141 , Issue 7 , June 2014 , pp. 970 - 980
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre-Macedo, M. L., Vidal-Martínez, V. M., González-Solís, D. and Caballero, P. I. (2007). Helminth communities of four commercially important fish species from Chetumal Bay, Mexico. Journal of Helminthology 81, 19–31.Google Scholar
Bellay, S., Lima, D. P. Jr., Takemoto, R. M. and Luque, J. L. (2011). A host-endoparasite network of neotropical marine fish: are there organizational patterns? Parasitology 138, 1945–1952.Google Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I., Koehler, A. V., Martin, A. and Poulin, R. (2012). Upstream-downstream gradient in infection levels by fish parasites: a common river pattern? Parasitology 140, 266–274. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001527.Google Scholar
Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. and Shostak, A. W. (1997). Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.Google Scholar
Carney, J. P. and Dick, T. A. (1999). Enteric helminths of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens Mitchill): stochastic or predictable assemblages? Journal of Parasitology 85, 785–795.Google Scholar
Carney, J. P. and Dick, T. A. (2000). Helminth communities of yellow perch (Perca flavescens (Mitchill)): determinants of pattern. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 538–555.Google Scholar
Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M. (2010). Nematode Parasites of Freshwater Fish in Mexico. AGT Editor, México, DF.Google Scholar
Esch, G. W., Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. and Aho, J. M. (1988). Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization. Parasitology 96, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, K. J. (1994). Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
Goater, C. P., Baldwin, R. E. and Scrimgeour, G. J. (2005). Physico-chemical determinants of helminth component community structure in whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformes) from adjacent lakes in Northern Alberta, Canada. Parasitology 131, 713–722.Google Scholar
Guégan, J. F. and Kennedy, C. R. (1993). Maximum local helminth parasite community richness in British freshwater fish: a test of the colonization time hypothesis. Parasitology 106, 91–100.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. and Price, P. W. (1986). Communities of parasites. In Community Ecology Pattern and Process (ed. Kikkawa, J. and Anderson, D. J.), pp. 187–213. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Valverde, A. and Hortal, J. (2003). Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología 8, 151–161.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A. and Valtonen, E. T. (2004). Helminth assemblages of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) in intercontinental lakes: similarity as a function of species specific parasites and geographical separation. Journal of Parasitology 90, 471–476.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A., Cheng, G. H. and Valtonen, E. T. (2005). Within-lake dynamics in the similarity of parasite assemblages of perch (Perca fluviatilis). Parasitology 131, 817–823. doi: 10.1017/S00331182005008425.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Helminth communities in freshwater fish: structured communities or stochastic assemblages? In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. and Aho, J. M.), pp. 131–156. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1995). Richness and diversity of macroparasite communities in tropical eels Anguilla reinhardtii in Queensland, Australia. Parasitology 111, 233–245.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (2001). Metapopulation and community dynamics of helminth parasites of eels Anguilla anguilla in the River Exe system. Parasitology 122, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C. R. (2009). The ecology of parasites of freshwater fishes: the search for patterns. Parasitology 136, 1653–1662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C. R. and Bush, A. O. (1994). The relationship between pattern and scale in parasite communities: a stranger in a stranger land. Parasitology 109, 187–196.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. and Guégan, J.-F. (1994). Regional versus local helminth parasite richness in British freshwater fish: saturated or unsaturated parasite communities? Parasitology 109, 175–185.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. and Guégan, J.-F. (1996). The number of niches in intestinal helminth communities of Anguilla anguilla: are there enough spaces for parasites? Parasitology 113, 293–302.Google Scholar
Lacerda, A. C. F., Bellay, S., Takemoto, R. M. and Pavanelli, G. C. (2013). Randomness of component communities of parasites of fish in a neotropical floodplain. Pan American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 8, 39–50.Google Scholar
Lima, D. P. Jr., Giacomini, H. C., Takemoto, R. M., Agostinho, A. A. and Bini, L. M. (2012). Patterns of interactions of a large fish-parasite network in a tropical floodplain. Journal of Animal Ecology 81, 905–913.Google Scholar
Luque, J. L., Felizardo, N. N. and Tavares, L. E. R. (2008). Community ecology of the metazoan parasites of namorado sandperches, Pseudopercis numida Miranda-Ribeiro, 1903 and P. semifasciata Cuvier, 1829 (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae), from the coastal zone of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68, 269–278.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Mercado-Silva, N., Lyons, J., Díaz-Pardo, E., Navarrete, S. and Gutiérrez-Hernández, A. (2012). Environmental factors associated with fish assemblage patterns in a high gradient river of the Gulf of Mexico slope. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. R., Minckley, W. L. and Norris, S. M. (2005). Freshwater Fishes of Mexico. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. A. and Dick, T. A. (2002). Factors shaping the parasite communities of trout-perch, Percopsis omiscomaycus Walbaum (Osteichthyes: Percopsidae), and the importance of scale. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 1986–1999.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (1998). Comparison of three estimators of species richness in parasite component communities. Journal of Parasitology 84, 485–490.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2003). The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts. Journal of Biogeography 30, 1609–1615.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2007). Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. and Luque, J. L. (2003). A general test of the interactive–isolationist continuum in gastrointestinal parasite communities of fish. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1623–1630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. and Morand, S. (1999). Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations. Parasitology 119, 369–374.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. and Mouillot, D. (2004). The evolution of taxonomic diversity in helminth assemblages of mammalian hosts. Evolutionary Ecology 18, 231–247.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. and Valtonen, E. T. (2002). The predictability of helminth community structure in space: a comparison of fish populations from adjacent lakes. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 1235–1243.Google Scholar
Roij, J. D. and MacColl, A. D. C. (2012). Consistent differences in macroparasite community composition among populations of three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Parasitology 139, 1478–1491.Google Scholar
Pineda-López, R., Salgado-Maldonado, G., Soto-Galera, E., Hernández-Camacho, N., Orozco-Zamorano, A., Contreras-Robledo, S., Cabañas-Carranza, G. and Aguilar-Aguilar, R. (2005). Helminth parasites of viviparous fishes in Mexico. In Viviparous Fishes (ed. Uribe, M. C. and Grier, H. J.), pp. 455–474. New Life Publications, Mexico.Google Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G. and Kennedy, C. R. (1997). Richness and similarity of helminth communities in the tropical cichlid fish Cichlasoma urophthalmus from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Parasitology 114, 581–590.Google Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G. and Quiroz-Martínez, B. (2013). Taxonomic composition and endemism of the helminth fauna of freshwater fishes of Mexico. Parasitology Research 112, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3175-4.Google Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G., Cabañas-Carranza, G., Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M., Soto-Galera, E., Mayén-Peña, E., Brailovsky, D. and Báez-Valé, R. (2001). Helminth parasites of freshwater fishes of the Balsas River drainage, Southwestern Mexico. Comparative Parasitology 68, 196–203.Google Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G., Aguilar-Aguilar, R., Soto-Galera, E., Cabañas-Carranza, G. and Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M. (2005). Helminth parasites of freshwater fishes of the Río Papaloapan basin. Parasitology Research 96, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soberón, J. M. and LLorente, B. J. (1993). The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biology 7, 480–488.Google Scholar
Vidal-Martínez, V. M. and Kennedy, C. R. (2000). Potential interactions between the intestinal helminths of the cichlid fish Cichlasoma synspilum from southeastern Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 86, 691–695.Google Scholar
Vidal-Martínez, V. M. and Poulin, R. (2003). Spatial and temporal repeatability in parasite community structure of tropical fish host. Parasitology 127, 387–398.Google Scholar