Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:19:27.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change of mate and mating competition between males of Schistosoma intercalation and S. mansoni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

L. A. Tchuem Tchuenté ,
V. R. Southgate ,
D. Imbert-Establet  and
J. Jourdane
L. A. Tchuem Tchuenté
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Animale (URA CNRS 698), Centre de Biologie et d' Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, Université, Avenue de Villeneuve, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France
V. R. Southgate
Affiliation:
The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London, UK
D. Imbert-Establet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Animale (URA CNRS 698), Centre de Biologie et d' Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, Université, Avenue de Villeneuve, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France
J. Jourdane
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Animale (URA CNRS 698), Centre de Biologie et d' Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, Université, Avenue de Villeneuve, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous studies on mating behaviour of Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni, two human schistosomes which may overlap in parts of Africa, have shown that in mixed infections in mice there are no physiological barriers preventing heterospecific pairings. However, when choice is possible, matings occur preferentially between partners of the same species. In this paper, further experimental studies on mating behaviour of the two species were conducted. Sequential infections showed that heterospecific pairs of worms change partners to homospecific pairs when given the opportunity. The change of mate is a progressive process requiring up to, at least 8 weeks, and this phenomenon is due to the male worm seeking the appropriate female. S. mansoni males are better at pairing with females than S. intercalcatum males, and they will change partner to pair with homologous females in preference to heterologous females whenever given the opportunity. Moreover, in the absence of S. mansoni female worms, unpaired S. mansoni male worms pull away female S. intercalatum from male S. intercalatum. It appears from this study that S. mansoni males are much more competitive than S. intercalatum males at pairing with females, and this is a disadvantage for S. intercalatum in situations of sympatry.

Keywords

Schistosoma intercalatumSchistosoma mansonichange of matemating competitionhomospecific pairsheterospecific pairs
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 110 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 45 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, J. C. (1965). Mating behavior and development of schistosomes in the mouse. Journal of Parasitology 51, 605–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basch, P. F. & Nicolas, C. (1989). Schistosoma mansoni:pairing of male worms with artificial surrogate females. Experimental Parasitology 68, 202–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burden, C. S. & Ubelaker, J. E. (1981). Schistosma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium: differences in development. Experimental Parasitology 51, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, C., Fournier, A. & Xia, M. (1987). LeS Schistosomes. Pour la Science 116, 80–8.Google Scholar
Erickson, D. G. (1974). An efficient technique for exposure of rodents to Schistosoma haematobium. Journal of Parasitology 60, 553–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, L. K., Fried, B. & Cohen, L. M. (1982). Schistosoma mansoni: Adult worm chemoattraction, with and without barriers. Experimental Parasitology 54, 271–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eveland, L. K. & Haseeb, M. A. (1986). Schistosome behaviour in vitro. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 1687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, L. K. & Fried, B. (1987). Intra and interspecific chemoattraction studies on Schistosoma mansoni, S. japonicum and S. haematobium in the absence of barriers. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 1293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., Jones, C. A. & Hoffman, W. A. (1930). Studies on schistosomiasis mansoni in Puerto Rico II. Biological studies 2. The mammalian phase of the life cycle. Puerto Rican Journal of Public Health and Tropical Medicine 10, 133–96.Google Scholar
Fried, B. & Haseeb, M. A. (1990). Intra- and interspecific chemoattraction in Echinostoma caproni and E. trivolvis adults in vitro. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 57, 72–3.Google Scholar
Hairston, N. G. (1965). On the mathematical analysis of schistosome populations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 33, 45–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Haseeb, M. A. & Eveland, L. K. (1986). Chemical communication in adult schistosomes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 1699–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imperia, P. S., Fried, B. & Eveland, L. K. (1980). Pheromonal attraction of Schistosoma mansoni females toward males in the absence of worm tactile behavior. Journal of Parasitology 66, 682–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jourdane, J. & Theron, A. (1980). Schistosoma mansoni: cloning by microsurgical transplantation of sporocysts. Experimental Parasitology 50, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberatos, J. D. (1987). Schistosoma mansoni: male-biased sex ratios in snails and mice. Experimental Parasitology 64, 165–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, R. M. (1979). Mating of Schistosoma mansoni in vitro. Experimental Parasitology 25, 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. & Wilson, R. A. (1980). Migration of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni from the lungs to the hepatic portal system. Parasitology 80, 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. F., Garcia, E. G., Wood, S. M., Diasanta, R., Almonte, R., Calica, E., Davern, K. M. & Tiu, W. U. (1990). Studies on the sex ratio of worms in schistosome infections. Parasitology 101, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popiel, I. (1986). Male-stimulated female maturation in Schistosoma: A Review. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 1745–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, A. F. & Nee, S. (1990). Male schistosomes: more than just muscle? Parasitology Today 6, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollinson, D., Imbert-Establet, D. & Ross, G. C. (1986). Schistosoma mansoni from naturally infected Rattus rattus in Guadeloupe: identification, prevalence and enzyme polymorphism. Parasitology 93, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollinson, D. & Southgate, V. R. (1987). The genus Schistosoma: a taxonomic appraisal. In The Biology of Schistosomes: From Genes to Latrines (ed. Rollinson, D. & Simpson, A. J. G.), pp. 1–49. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D., Southgate, V. R., Vercruysse, J. & Moore, P. J. (1990). Observations on natural and experimental interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. curassoni from west Africa. Acta Tropica 47, 101–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, J. R. (1977). Schistosoma mansoni: pairing in vitro and development of females from single sex infections. Experimental Parasitology 41, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirazian, D. & Schiller, E. L. (1982). Mating recognition by Schistosoma mansoni in vitro. Journal of Parasitology 68, 650–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, R. B. (1952). Uniparental miracidia of Schistosomatium douthitti and their progeny (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae). American Midland Naturalist 48, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D., Ross, G. C. & Knowles, R. J. (1982). Mating behavior in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum. Journal of Natural History 16, 491–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, O. D. (1953). The relationship of sex in Schistosoma mansoni to migration within the hepatic portal system of experimentally infected mice. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 47, 139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchuem, Tchuenté L. A., Imbert-Establet, D., Delay, B. & Jourdane, J. (1993). Choice of mate, a reproductive isolating mechanism between Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni in mixed infections. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 179–85.Google Scholar
Tchuem, Tchuenté L. A., Imbert-Establet, D., Southgate, V. R. & Jourdane, J. (1994). Interspecific stimulation of parthenogenesis in Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni. Journal of Helminthology 68, 167–73.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1987). Cercariae to liver worms: development and migration in the mammalian host. In The Biology of Schistosomes: From Genes to Latrines (ed. Rollinson, D. & Simpson, A. J. G.), pp. 115–146. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., Southgate, V. R. & Knowles, R. J. (1972). What is Schistosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 66, 20–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C. A., Southgate, V. R. & Ross, G. C. (1979). Enzymes in Schistosoma intercalatum and the relative status of the lower Guinea and Zaire strains of the parasite. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 523–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed