Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:58:52.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case-control study to identify risk factors for bovine cysticercosis on farms in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

F. FLÜTSCH ,
D. HEINZMANN ,
A. MATHIS ,
H. HERTZBERG ,
R. STEPHAN  and
P. DEPLAZES
F. FLÜTSCH
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
D. HEINZMANN
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
A. MATHIS
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
H. HERTZBERG
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
R. STEPHAN
Affiliation:
Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 272, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
P. DEPLAZES*
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author: Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 446358501. Fax: +41 446358907. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Taenia saginata cysticercosis causes financial losses to the beef industry and farmers, and represents a significant source for human infection in many countries. A case-control study was conducted to identify risk factors for bovine cysticercosis on farms in Switzerland. The case group (n=119) consisted of farms with infected cattle identified at slaughter in 2005 and 2006. Infections were confirmed by morphological or molecular diagnosis. The control group (n=66) comprised randomly selected farms with cattle slaughtered in the same period but with no evidence or history of infection. In personal structured interviews with the farmers, information regarding local surroundings and farm management was collected. Logistic regression revealed the following 5 factors as being positively associated with the occurrence of bovine cysticercosis: the presence of a railway line or a car park close to areas grazed by cattle, leisure activities around these areas, use of purchased roughage and organized public activities on farms attracting visitors. This information is considered useful for government authorities to direct control strategies as well as for farmers to take measures tailored to local situations.

Keywords

Taenia saginatabovine cysticercosisrisk factorsepidemiologyfood-borne zoonosis
Type
Original Articles
Information
Parasitology , Volume 135 , Issue 5 , May 2008 , pp. 641 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2000). Opinion of the scientific committee on veterinary measures relating to public health on the control of taeniosis/cysticercosis in man and animals. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scv/out36_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2004). Opinion of the scientific panel on biological hazards on risk assessment of a revised inspection of slaughter animals in areas with low prevalence of Cysticercus. EFSA Journal 176, 1–24.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2005). Verordnung des EVD vom 23 November 2005 über die Hygiene beim Schlachten (VHyS). Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft, Bern, Switzerland. http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/c817_190_1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2006). Trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and antimicrobial resistance in the European Union in 2004. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620772157.htmGoogle Scholar
Azzilonna, F. (1992). Untersuchungen zur Epidemiologie von Taenia saginata. Dissertation, University of Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Boone, I., Thys, E., Marcotty, T., de Borchgrave, J., Ducheyne, E. and Dorny, P. (2007). Distribution and risk factors of bovine cysticercosis in Belgian dairy and mixed herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabaret, J., Geerts, S., Madeline, M., Ballandonne, C. and Barbier, D. (2002). The use of urban sewage sludge on pastures: the cysticercosis threat. Veterinary Research 33, 575–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordeiro, G. M. (2004). On Pearson's residuals in generalized linear models. Statistics and Probability Letters 6, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deplazes, P., Eckert, J., Pawlowski, Z. S., Machowska, L. and Gottstein, B. (1991). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnostic detection of Taenia saginata copro-antigens in humans. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 85, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derksen, S. and Keselman, H. J. (1992). Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: Frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 45, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorny, P., Vercammen, F., Brandt, J., Vansteenkiste, W., Berkvens, D. and Geerts, S. (2000). Sero-epidemiological study of Taenia saginata cysticercosis in Belgian cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 88, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A. and Johnstone, P. D. (1976). Factors regulating tapeworm populations: dispersion of eggs of Taenia hydatigena on pasture. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 70, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, B. (1991). Cysticercus bovis-Infektionen: Häufigkeit und Bekämpfungsvorschläge. Dissertation, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, L. M., Montero, E., Harrison, L. J., Parkhouse, R. M. and Garate, T. (2000). Differential diagnosis of Taenia saginata and Taenia solium infection by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38, 737–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good, P. (1994). Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, M., Busato, A. and Gottstein, B. (1996). Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen der Zystizerkose des Rindes. Swiss Vet 13, 5–11.Google Scholar
Kyvsgaard, N. C., Ilsoe, B., Willeberg, P., Nansen, P. and Henriksen, S. A. (1991). A case-control study of risk factors in light Taenia saginata cysticercosis in Danish cattle. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 32, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, T., Craig, P. S., Ito, A., Chen, X., Qiu, D., Qiu, J., Sato, M. O., Wandra, T., Bradshaw, H., Li, L., Yang, Y. and Wang, Q. (2006). Taeniasis/cysticercosis in a Tibetan population in Sichuan Province, China. Acta Tropica 100, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. (1998). Cysticercosis and taeniosis: Taenia saginata, Taenia solium, and Asian Taenia. In Zoonoses (ed. Palmer, S. R., Lord, Soulsby and Simpson, D. I. H.), pp. 635–649. Oxford University Press Inc, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, A., Deplazes, P. and Eckert, J. (1996). An improved test system for PCR-based specific detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. Journal of Helminthology 70, 219–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murrell, K. D. (2005). WHO/FAO/OIE Guidelines for the Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Taeniosis/Cysticercosis. WHO/FAO/OIE, Paris, 139 pp.Google Scholar
Pawlowsky, Z. S. and Schultz, M. G. (1972). Taeniasis and cysticercosis (Taenia saginata). Advances in Parasitology 10, 269–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. S. (1938). Karl Pearson: An Appreciation of Some Aspects of his Life and Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2006). R 2.3.1: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrievable from: http://www.R-project.org. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Hidalgo, R., Benitez-Ortiz, W., Dorny, P., Geerts, S., Geysen, D., Ron-Roman, J., Proano-Perez, F., Chavez-Larrea, M. A., Barrionuevo-Samaniego, M., Celi-Erazo, M., Vizcaino-Ordonez, L. and Brandt, J. (2003). Taeniosis-cysticercosis in man and animals in the Sierra of Northern Ecuador. Veterinary Parasitology 118, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefanic, S., Shaikenov, B. S., Deplazes, P., Dinkel, A., Torgerson, P. R. and Mathis, A. (2004). Polymerase chain reaction for detection of patent infections of Echinococcus granulosus (‘sheep strain’) in naturally infected dogs. Parasitology Research 92, 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trachsel, D., Deplazes, P. and Mathis, A. (2007). Identification of taeniid eggs in the faeces from carnivores based on multiplex PCR using targets in mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology 134, 911–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th Edn. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandra, T., Sutisna, P., Dharmawan, N. S., Margono, S. S., Sudewi, R., Suroso, T., Craig, P. S. and Ito, A. (2006). High prevalence of Taenia saginata taeniasis and status of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Bali, Indonesia, 2002–2004. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 100, 346–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed