Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:17:02.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The anatomy of Köllikeria filicollis (Rudolphi, 1819), Cobbold, 1860 (Trematoda: Digenea) showing that the sexes are not entirely separate as hitherto believed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. Harford Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Extract

The anatomy of Köllikeria filicollis (Rudolphi, 1819), Cobbold, 1860 (Trematoda: Digenea) is described in detail.

An account is given of the integument and musculature of the worm and the structure of the cyst in which it is found, followed by a discussion of the body wall in other digenetic trematodes. The alimentary canal, excretory system, nervous system and genitalia are also described.

The study shows that the sexes are not entirely separate in all members of the genus Köllikeria as hitherto believed.

The systematic position of K. filicollis is discussed and a specific diagnosis is given for the species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, H. A. (1938). On two species of the trematode genus Didymozoon from the mackerel. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 32, 485–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B. (1946). The Trematoda, 644 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph. (1926). Sur l'état actuel de la classification des Didymozoonidae Monticelli, 1888 (Didymozoidae Poche, 1907). Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 4, 148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. W. & Hamilton, J. M. (1941). Studies on host-parasite reactions to larval parasites. IV. The cyst of Uvulifer ambloplitis (Hughes). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 60, 498507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, N. (1935). Notes on the family Didymozoonidae (Monticelli, 1888). Japan. J. Zool. 6, 279335.Google Scholar
Nigrelli, R. F. (1939). Didymocystis coatesi, a new monostome from the eye muscles of the Wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri (C. V.). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 58, 170–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlaug, T. O. (1948). The finer structure of the body wall and parenchyma of three species of digenetic trematodes. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 67, 236–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, H. S. (1909). The cuticula and sub-cuticula of trematodes and cestodes. Amer. Naturalist, 43, 705–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1947). Physiological and histochemical observations on the adult liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. III. Egg shell formation. Parasitology, 38, 128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1946). Interrelationships and taxonomy of the digenetic trematodes. Biol. Rev. 21, 148–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagener, G. R. (1858). Enthelminthica. No. 6. Ueber Distoma campanula (Gasterostoma frimbriatum Siebold) Duj. und Monostoma bipartitum Wedl. Arch. Naturgesch. 24. Jahrg., 1, 250–6.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1934). Studies on helminth fauna of Japan. Part 2. Trematodes of fishes, 1. Japan. J. Zool. 5, 249541.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1938). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 24. Trematodes of fishes. Japan. J. Zool. 8, 1574.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1953). Systema helminthum. Part 1. Digenetic trematodes of fishes, 405 pp. Tokyo: Maruzen Co.Google Scholar
Yosufzai, H. K. (1953). Shell gland and egg shell formation in Fasciola hepatica L. Parasitology, 43, 8894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar