Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T04:57:19.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the Genus Leptomonas Kent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Edward Hindle
Edward Hindle
Affiliation:
From the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nomenclature of the parasitic flagellates of invertebrates is in such a state of chaos at the present time, that I have collected the history of the three more important genera Leptomonas, Herpetomonas, and Crithidia, in the hope that it will end the controversies which surround the application of any one of these names.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1912 , pp. 128 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature

Alexieff, A. (1911). Sur le genre Herpetomonas Kent. Compt, rend. Soc. Biol. LXXI. 455–457.Google Scholar
Alexieff, A. (1912). Notes sur les Herpetomonadidae ( = Trypanosomidae Doflein). Arch. Zool. expér. Series 5, IX. Notes et Revue, xxix–xxxviii.Google Scholar
Burnett, W. J. (1851). On organic relations of some of the Infusoria including investigations concerning the structure and nature of the genus Bodo. Proc. Boat. Soc. Nat. Hist. IV. (1851–54), 124–5.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O. (1878). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Flagellaten und verw. Organismen. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. XXX. 205–281.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O. (1884). Protozoa (in Bronn's Klass. und Ordn. des Thierreichs, Mastigophora).Google Scholar
Chatton, E. (1909). Sur un Trypanosomidae nouveau d'une Nyctéribie, et sur les relations des formes Trypanosoma, Herpetomonas, Leptomonas et Crithidia. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LXVII. 42–4.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. (1911). Sur la systématique des Trypanosomides des Insectes. Loc. cit. LXXI. 578–580.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. and Alilaibe, E. (1908). Co-existence d'un Leptomonas (Herpetomonas) et d'un Trypanosoma chez un muscide non vulnérant, Drosophila confusa Staeger. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LXIV. 1004–6.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. and Léger, A. (1911). Eutrypanosomes, Leptomonas et leptotrypanosomes chez Drosophila confusa Staeger (Museidae). Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LXX. 34–6.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. and Léger, A. (1911). Sur quelques Leptomonas de Muscides et leurs leptotrypanosomes. Loc. cit. pp. 120–2.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. and Léger, M. (1911). Sur l'axostyle des Trypanosomides des Insectes. Loc. cit. LXXI. 575–578.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1901). Die Protozoen als Parasiten u. Krankheitserreger. Jena (Fischer).Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1911). Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde. 3. Aufl. Jena (G. Fischer).Google Scholar
Dunkerly, J. S. (1911). On some stages in the life history of Leptomonas muscaedomesticae. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. LVI. 645–655.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M. and Jollos, V. (1910). Die Flagellatenordnung “Binucleata.” Arch.f. Protistenk. XIX. 81–106.Google Scholar
Kent, W., Saville, (1880–1881). Manual of the Infusoria.Google Scholar
Laveran, A. and Mesnil, F. (1904). Trypanosomes et trypanosomiases. Paris (Masson et Cie.).Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1902). Sur un flagellé parasite de l'Anopheles maculipennis. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LIV. 354–6.Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1903). Sur quelques Cercomonadines nouvelles ou peu connues parasites de l'intestin des Insectes. Arch. f. Protistenk. II. 180–9.Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1903). Sur la systématique des Cercomonadines aciculées sans membrane ondulante. Compt. rend. Ac. Sci. Paris, CXXXIV. 665–7.Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1904). Sur les affinités de l'Herpetomonas subulata et la phylogénie des trypanosomes. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LVII. 615–17.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1856). A synopsis of Entozoa and some of their ecto-congeners, observed by the author. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. VIII. 42–58.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1906). Die im Blute schmarotzenden Protozoen und ihre nächsten Verwandten. In Mense's Handbuch der Tropenkrankheiten, Leipzig, III. 69–268.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1910). Herpetomonads from the alimentary tract of certain dung-flies. Parasitology, III. 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, E. A. (1908). Investigations on the Development of Trypanosomes in Tsetse-Flies and other Diptera. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. LII. 159–260.Google Scholar
Novy, F. G., MacNeal, W. J. and Torrey, H. N. (1907). The Trypanosomes of Mosquitoes and other Insects. Journ. Inf. Dis. IV. 223–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W. S. (1909). A Critical Review of Our Present Knowledge of the Haemoflagellates and Allied Forms. Parasitology, II. 91–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W. S. and Strickland, C. (1908). A Critical Review of the Relation of Bloodsucking Invertebrates to the Life Cycles of the Trypanosomes of Vertebrates, etc. Parasitology, I. 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. (1910). The Structure and Life-History of Crithidia melophagia (Flu.). Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. LV. 189–224.Google Scholar
Porter, A. (1911 a). Some Remarks on the Genera Crithidia, Herpetomonas. and Trypanosoma. Parasitology. IV. 22–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. (1911 b). Further Remarks on the Genera Crithidia, Herpetomonas, and Trypanosoma, and Dr Woodcock's Views thereon. Parasitology. IV. 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. (1911 c). The Structure and Life-History of Crithidia pulicis, n. sp., parasitic in the Alimentary Tract of the Human Flea, Pulex irritans. Parasitology. IV. 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowazek, S. (1904). Die Entwicklung von Herpetomonas. Arb. a. d. kais. Gesundheitsamt. XX. 440–452.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. (1909). Kritische Bemerkungen zum Trypanosomenprobletn. Arch. f. Schiffs-u. Tropenhyg. XIII.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1909). Rapp. Mission. Malad. du sommeil au Congo. Paris.Google Scholar
Senn, G. (1900). Flagellata. In Engler u. Prantl, Natilrliche Pflanzenfamilien. Teil i. Abt. 1 a.Google Scholar
Senn, G. (1902). Der gegenwärtige Stand unserer Kenntnisse von den flagellaten Blutparasiten. Arch. f. Protistenk. I. 344–354.Google Scholar
Stein, F. R. (1878). Der Organismus der Infusionstiere. III. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Strickland, C. (1911). Description of a Herpetomonas parasitic in the Alimentary Tract of the common green bottle-fly, Lucilia sp. Parasitology, IV. 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. (1911). Note on the morphology of Herpetomonas and Crithidia with some remarks on “Physiological Degeneration.” Parasitology, IV. 108–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingle, L. D. (1909). A study on the Life-History of a Flagellate (Crithidia melophagi n. sp.) in the Alimentary Tract of the Sheep-tick (Melophagus ovinus). Journ. Inf. Dis. VI. 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingle, L. D. (1911 a). The Relation of Crithidia melophagia to the Sheep's Blood, with Remarks upon the controversy between Dr Porter and Dr Woodcock. Trans. Am. Micr. Soc. XXX. 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, H. M. (1909). The Haemoflagellates and Allied Forms. In Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, I. fasc. 1, 193–273.Google Scholar
Woodcock, H. M. (1911). A reply to Miss Porter's Note entitled “Some remarks on the genera Crithidia, Herpetomonas, and Trypanosoma.” Parasitology, IV. 150–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar