Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:16:31.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of acari

vi. parasitic mites from mammalian hosts obtained in ceylon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. A. Turk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present paper is mainly concerned with the records and descriptions of new species of parasitic acari obtained in Ceylon and sent to me during 1947 by Mr Gordon B. Thompson, of whose collection they form a part. The study of the specimens of the tropical rat mite, Echinolaelaps echidninus (Berl.), represented in this material led me to re-examine both the literature and the specimens of this species contained in my own collection, and I have included in the present paper the results of this investigation and have established various forms of the species which this necessitates besides showing the probable relationships existing between them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , January 1950 , pp. 63 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlese, A. (1887). Acari, Myriapoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta, Fasc. 39, p. 157. Padua.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1912). Gli Insetti. 2, Fasc. 1–3, pp. 71–2. Milan.Google Scholar
Buitendijk, A. N. (1945). Voorloopige Catalogus van de Acari in de Collectie-Oudemans. Zoöl. Meded. 24, 281–391.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1932). Ectoparasites of Marquesan rats. Bull. Bishop Mus. Honolulu, 98, 117–27.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1913). On three new species of Gamasid mites found on rats. Bull. Ent. Bes. 4, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914 a). Preliminary list of the Acari occurring on the brown rat (Mus norvegicus) in Great Britain with the description of a new species. Bull. Ent. Res. 5, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914 b). Report on the Arachnida and Myriapoda collected by the Brit. Ornth. Union Exped. and Wollaston Exped. to Dutch Guinea. Trans. Zool. Soc. 20, pt. 10, 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1915). On some new Acarine parasites of rats. Bull. Ent. Res. 6, 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. (1940). Introductory. The New Systematic, pp. 1–46. London.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1928). Laelaps-Studien. Tijdschr. Ent. 70, 163–209.Google Scholar
Radioed, O. D. (1947). Two new bat mites of the genus Ancystropus. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 117, 305–12.Google Scholar
Trägåkdh, I. (1931). Acarina from Juan Fernandez. In The Natural History of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, 3, 553–628.Google Scholar
Turk, F. A. (1946). A new genus and two new species of mites parasitic on Muridae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 11, 13, 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H., Graf, , (1926). Malayische Acari Treubia, 8, 1–198.Google Scholar
Wommersley, H. (1937). Studies in Australian Acarina Laelaptidae. 1. New records and species of Laelaps and allied genera. Parasitology, 29, 530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar