Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:07:50.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial and temporal variation in the infracommunity structure of helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus(Rodentia: Muridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. S. J. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN
W. I. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN

Summary

Mean species richness and diversity of the helminth infracommunity of Apodemus sylvaticus in woodland areas of Co. Down, Northern Ireland, varied in time and space. Variation in infracommunity structure among individual hosts, however, always accounted for more than 60% of the variation in the data from different places or different times. Helminth species richness increased with increasing population density, the percentage of the host population 16 weeks old or older, and the proportion of the host population with animal material in their stomachs, at two sites monitored over 33 months. The basis for spatial variation in infracommunity structure is less certain but host dynamics and differences in diet are likely to play some role. It is concluded that analysis at the infracommunity level focuses closely on the potential for species interactions and overlap in resource utilization. Infracommunity structure, at least in the case of A. sylvaticus, varies markedly in time and space and between individual hosts. Such variation should not be ignored in comparative studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bush, A. O. & Holmes, J. C. (1986). Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. R. (1985). The population dynamics of wood mice and yellow-necked mice. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 55, 315–38.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Price, P. W. (1986). Communities of parasites. In Community Ecology: Pattern and Process (ed. Anderson, D. J. and Kikkawa, J.), pp. 187–213. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1986). Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 56, 205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. W. (1964). Studies on the helminth parasites of small mammals from selected areas in Wales. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. W. (1968). Studies on the helminth parasites of the long-tailed field mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus from Wales. Journal of Zoology, London 154, 287312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S. S. J. (1982). A field study on the biology of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia: Muridae) and its helminth parasites. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S. S. J. & Montgomery, W. I. (1987). Biochemical, physiological and morphological variation in unarmed hymenolepids (Eucetoda: Cyclophyllidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 91, 293324.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S. S. J. & Montgomery, W. I. (1988). Cyclic and non-cyclic dynamics in populations of the helminth parasites of wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus. Journal of Helminthology 62, 7890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, R. W. (1974). An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry, 2nd Edn. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978). Ecological Methods, 2nd Edn. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Timon-David, J. (1959). Recherches sur les kystes à Brachylamius du cyclostoma. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée 34, 271–87.Google Scholar