Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:06:19.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Cestodes of the rat, Rattus rattus Linnaeus, of Ceylon and their epidemiological significance for man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Charles Kulasiri
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Ceylon

Extract

1. Hymenolepis diminuta is shown to be quite frequent in the rat, Rattus rattus, of Colombo; and reasons are suggested for its apparent rarity in man.

2. An extremely low incidence of H. nana in rats was found. It is suggested that this cestode will not be found to parasitize man in Ceylon as long as its murine infection continues to be low.

3. Raillietina madagascariensis is not uncommon in rats in Ceylon; but, until its vector has been detected, the possibility that it may infest man in Ceylon cannot profitably be discussed.

4. Instances of variation in the arrangement of genital pores in R. madagascariensis, and in the general anatomy of H. diminuta were detected.

I am grateful to Dr G. A. R. Perera, Medical Officer of Health, Colombo Municipal Council, for supplying the rats used in this study; to Drs V. Sivalingam and L. G. Jayawardena of this Institute for helpful criticism, and to Dr A. C. J. Weera-koon of the University of Ceylon for revising my manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cameron, T. W. M. & Reesal, M. R. (1951). Studies on the endoparasitic fauna of Trinidad mammals. VII. Parasites of hystricomorph rodents. Canad. J. Zool. 29, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1927). The distribution of Hymenolepis infections in India with a discussion of its epidemiological significance. Indian J. Med. Res. 14, 973.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1949). Introduction to Parasitology. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Craig, C. F. & Faust, E. C. (1945) Clinical Parasitology. London: Henry Kimpton.Google Scholar
De Silva, L. J. (1951 a). Two cases of infestation with Hymenolepis diminuta in children. Indian J. Pediat. 18, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Silva, L. J. (1951 b). Some uncommon intestinal parasites in children and the laboratory diagnosis of Amoebiasis, by a modified culture method. J. Children's Hospital, Colombo, 1 (1), 32.Google Scholar
Lopez-Neyra, C. R. (1949). Raillietinosis humanas. Estudios de Parasitologia comparada sobre Raillietininae parasitas humanas y en especial de las formas Neotropicales. Rev. ibér. Parasit. 9, 299.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I. (1950). Raillietina madagascariensis found in Kyushu, Japan. Kyushu Mem. Med. Sci. 1, 1.Google Scholar
Schiller, E. L. (1952). Studies on the helminth fauna of Alaska. X. Morphological variation in Hymenolepis horrida (Von Linstow, 1901) (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). J. Parasitol. 39, (6), 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, T. (1930). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Vol. II. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1953). Raillietina demerariensis (Cestoda) from Proechimys cayennensis trinitatus of Venezuela. J. Parasitol. 39 (3), 272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voge, M. (1952 a). Variation in some unarmed Hymenolepididae (Cestoda) from rodents. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 57 (1), 1.Google Scholar
Voge, M. (1952 b). Variability of Hymenolepis diminuta in the laboratory rat and the ground squirrel, Citellus leucurus. J. Parasitol. 38 (5), 454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed