Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:58:25.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light microscope observations of granulomatous reactions against developing Porocephalus crotali (Pentastomida: Porocephalida) in mouse and rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

N. C. Ambrose  and
J. Riley
N. C. Ambrose
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
J. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The development of granulomatous reactions against moulting nymphal pentastomids (Porocephalus crotali) in the tissues of rat and mouse intermediate hosts is described. Adipose tissue and lungs are favoured sites for encystment accounting for 70% of larvae. Six moults separate the primary larva from the final infective stage which first appears about 80 days post-infection (p.i.) and is fully infective by day 120. Larvae, and particularly their cast cuticles, are the foci of granulomatous reactions characterized by an intense eosinophilia. During ecdysis, large numbers of eosinophils permeate the entire lesion but, significantly, degranulation is limited to the underside of cast cuticles where the resultant debris is endocytosed by macrophage/epithelioid cells. A pronounced asymmetry in the granulomatous lesion, evident even in the earliest cysts, results from the accumulation of individual epithelioid granulomas associated with cuticle fragments close to the ventral side of the developing parasite; each is circumscribed by fibrosis. External to this region are extensive tracts of tissue composed of mature plasma cells. Particularly in rats, large numbers of partially degranulated mast cells ( = globule leucocytes) also surround cuticle granulomas, and mast cell granules can accumulate within macrophages and fibroblasts. Inflammation slowly subsides once the infective stage is attained. This 1 cm-long larva resides in a thin, fibrotic, C-shaped cyst and can remain viable for years: uniquely this instar retains its last moulted cuticle as a protective sheath. Nymphal instars II-VI feed predominantly upon eosinophils but we do not yet know whether this requirement is obligate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , August 1988 , pp. 27 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambrose, N. C. & Riley, J. (1988). Fine structural aspects of secretory processes in a pentastomid arthropod parasite in its mouse and rattlesnake hosts. Tissue and Cell (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, F. M., Friedman, M. M., Subba Rao, P. V. & Metcalfe, D. D. (1985). Interactions between mast cells, fibroblasts and connective tissue components. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 77, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E. (1984). Cell-mediated damage to helminths. Advances in Parasitology 23, 143–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernin, J. & McLaren, D. J. (1983). The pathology induced in laboratory rats by Taenia crassiceps and Mesocestoides corti (Cestoda). Parasitology 87, 279–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claman, H. M. (1985). Mast cells, T cells and abnormal fibrosis. Immunology Today 6, 192–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doucet, J. (1965). Contribution a l'étude anatomique, histologique et histochimique des pentastomes (Pentastomida). Memoires de L'office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outer-Mer, Paris 14, 1–50.Google Scholar
Esslinger, J. H. (1962 a). Development of Porocephalus crotali (Humboldt, 1808) (Pentastomida) in experimental intermediate hosts. Journal of Parasitology 48, 452–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslinger, J. H. (1962 b). Hepatic lesions in rats experimentally infected with Porocephalus crotali (Pentastomida). Journal of Parasitology 48, 631–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopps, H. C., Keegan, H. L., Price, D. L. & Self, I. T. (1971). Pentastomiasis. In Pathology of Protozoal and Helminthic Diseases (ed. Marcial-Rojas, R. A.), pp. 970–989. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Huntley, J. F., McGorum, B., Newlands, G. F. J. & Miller, H. R. P. (1984). Granulated intraepithelial lymphocytes: their relationship to mucosal mast cells and globule leucocytes in the rat. Immunology 53, 525–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindsay, M. C., Blaies, D. B. & Williams, J. E. (1982). Taenia taeniaeformis: Immunoglobulin E-containing cells in intestinal and lymphatic tissues of infected rats. International Journal for Pathology 13, 91–9.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. D.Gatrill, A. J., Luty, A. J., Manyasi, D. G., Moore, C., Sayers, G. & Sullaiman, S. (1987). Inflammatory responses to parasites. Parasitology 94, S9–S28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, H. R. P. (1987). Immunopathology of nematode infestation and expulsion. In Immunopathology of the Small Intestine (ed. Marsh, M. N.), pp. 177–208. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., Cosgrove, G. E. & Gengozian, N. (1966). Diseases of an imported primate Tamarinus nigricollis. Laboratory Animal Care 16, 255–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. (1973). The structure of the buccal cavity in relation to the method of feeding of Reighardia sternae Diesing 1864 (Pentastomida). International Journal for Parasitology 3, 149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. (1981). Some observations on the development of Porocephalus crotali (Pentastomida: Porocephalida) in the Western Diamondback Rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). International Journal for Parasitology 11, 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. (1986). The biology of pentastomids. Advances in Parasitology 25, 45–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. & Banaja, A. A. (1975). Some ultrastructural observations on the integument of a pentastomid. Tissue and Cell 7, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J., James, J. L. & Banaja, A. A. (1979). The possible role of the frontal and sub-parietal gland system of the pentastomid Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864) in the evasion of the host immune response. Parasitology 78, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, J. T. (1972). Pentastomiasis: host responses to larval and nymphal infections. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 91, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, J. T. & Cosgrove, G. E. (1972). Pentastomida. In Pathology of Simian Primates (ed. T-W-Fiennes, R. N.), II, pp. 194–204. Basel: Karger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, J. T. & Kuntz, R. E. (1967). Host-parasite relations in some Pentastomida. Journal of Parasitology 53, 202–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, J. T., Hopps, H. L. & Williams, A. O. (1972). Porocephaliasis in man and experimental mice. Experimental Parasitology 32, 117–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, J. T., Hopps, H. L. & Williams, A. O. (1975). Pentastomiasis in Africans. Tropical and Geographical Medicine 27, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Siebert, A. E., Good, A. H. & Simmons, J. E. (1979). Ultrastructural aspects of the host cellular immune response to Taenia crassiceps metacestodes. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 323–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed