Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:44:58.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory studies with some older anticoccidials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. Ryley  and
R. G. Wilson
J. F. Ryley
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
R. G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Features of the anticoccidial activity of nicarbazin, amprolium, zoalene, sulphadimidine, diaveridine, Darvisul, spiramycin, chloramphenicol and Oxytetracycline have been re-investigated both in vivo and in cell culture using Eimeria tenella. Of the drugs studied, only spiramycin was appreciably coccidiocidal, although nicarbazin and amprolium showed possibly slower coccidiocidal activity. In order to show activity against a particular stage in the life-cycle, higher concentrations of drug than those usually recommended for field usage had in most cases to be used. Under these conditions, parasites were usually inhibited as multinucleate 1st generation schizonts. With delayed medication, effects against 2nd generation parasites were in most cases found, and in many cases, although the parasites never matured to give viable merozoites, the large degenerating forms produced were able to cause extensive tissue destruction and haemorrhage. Methodology in this type of study is discussed in relation to more active and more recent anticoccidials, and some further experiments with robenidine reported.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 287 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, S. J. (1959). Antibiotics in chemotherapy of caecal coccidiosis in chickens. Journal of Comparative Pathology 69, 327–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, S. J. & Warren, E. W. (1966). Effects of Chlortetracycline, Oxytetracycline and spiramycin on Eimeria tenella in chicks. Journal of Comparative Pathology 76, 255–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, S. F. M. & Kendall, S. B. (1954 a). The practical application of Sulphamezathine therapy for caecal coccidiosis. Veterinary Record 66, 19–21.Google Scholar
Davies, S. F. M. & Kendall, S. B. (1954 b). The effect of sodium sulphaquinoxaline and sodium sulphamezathine in interrupted schedules of treatment on the development of Eimeria tenella. Journal of Comparative Pathology 64, 87–93.Google Scholar
Jeffers, T. K. (1974). Eimeria tenella: incidence, distribution, and anticoccidial drug resistance of isolants in major broiler-producing areas. Avian Diseases 18, 74–84.Google Scholar
Kendall, S. B. & McCullough, F. S. (1952). Relationships between Sulphamezathine therapy and the acquisition of immunity to Eimeria tenella. Journal of Comparative Pathology 62, 116–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M., Taylor, E. M. & Johnson, J. (1969). A technique for demonstration of coccidiostatic activity of anticoccidial agents. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 88, 148–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. (1967 a). Methyl benzoquate, a new wide-spectrum coccidiostat for chickens. British Veterinary Journal 123, 513–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. (1967 b). Studies on the mode of action of quinolone and pyridone coccidiostats. Journal of Parasitology 53, 1151–60.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. (1975). Lerbek, a synergistic mixture of methyl benzoquate and clopidol for the prevention of chicken coccidiosis. Parasitology 70, 377–84.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. & Wilson, R. G. (1971). Studies on the mode of action of the coccidiostat robenidene. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 37, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. & Wilson, R. G. (1972). Comparative studies with anticoccidials and three species of chicken coccidia in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Parasitology 58, 664–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. & Wilson, R. G. (1975). Laboratory studies with some recent anticoccidials. Parasitology 70, 203–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. & Wilson, R. G. (1976). Drug screening in cell culture for the detection of anticoccidial activity. Parasitology 73, 137–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F., Wilson, R. G. & Betts, M. J. (1974). Anticoccidial activity of an azauracil derivative. Parasitology 68, 69–79.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. H. & Foerster, O. (1964). Die PAS-AO-Methode, eine Spezialfärbung für Coccidien im Gewebe. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 25, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar