Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:03:19.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic control of immune responses to parasites: selection for responsiveness and non-responsiveness to Trichuris muris in random-bred mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. Wakelin
D. Wakelin
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Populations of Schofield strain, random-bred mice were shown to have a bimodal variation in ability to bring about immune expulsion of the nematode Trichuris muris. This variation was genetically determined and independent of the size of infection experienced. The proportion of mice unable to achieve worm expulsion (non-responders) was relatively constant in various populations of the strain but was increased by selective breeding from mice of known status. Crosses made between non-responder and responder mice produced progeny that were almost all (92%) of responder phenotype, showing that the ability to achieve worm expulsion was inherited as a dominant characteristic. It is suggested that the genetic control involves a small number of genes; the possible immunological mechanisms by which control is mediated are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1975 , pp. 377 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, J. E. (1942). Natural resistance to helminthic infections. Journal of Parasitology 28, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackert, J. E., Pratt, I. & Freeman, A. E. (1936). Resistant and susceptible groups of white leghorn chickens to the nematode Ascaridia lineata (Schneider). Anatomical Record 67, (1 Suppl.) 130.Google Scholar
Biozzi, G., Stiffel, C., Mouton, D., Bouthillier, Y. & Decreusefond, C. (1971). Genetic regulation of the function of antibody producing cells. In Progress in Immunology (ed. Amos, B.), pp. 629–45. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, M. R., Dunning, W. F. & Bullock, F. D. (1933). Genetic factors in relation to the etiology of malignant tumors. American Journal of Cancer 17, 894–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowen, J. W. (1961). Experimental analysis of genetic determinants in resistance to infectious disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 91, 689–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, P. W., Miller, R. F. & Stewart, M. A. (1940). An analysis of environmental and genetic factors influencing stomach worm infestation in sheep. Journal of Genetics 39, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDevitt, H. O. & Benacerraf, B. (1969). Genetic control of specific immune responses. Advances in Immunology 11, 31–74.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. F., Grumet, F. C. & McDevitt, H. O. (1972). Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of thymectomy on the primary and secondary antibody response of mice to poly-L (Tyr, Glu)-poly-D, L-Ala-poly-L-Lys. Journal of Experimental Medicine 135, 126–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sucharit, S. & MacDonald, W. W. (1973). Brugia pahangi in small laboratory animals: attempts to increase susceptibility of white rats to Brugia pahangi by host selection. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 4, 71–7.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1967). Acquired immunity to Trichuris muris in the albino laboratory mouse. Parasitology 57, 516–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1969). Studies on the immunity of albino mice to Trichuris muris. The stimulation of immunity by chemically abbreviated infections. Parasitology 59, 549–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1970). Studies on the immunity of albino mice to Trichuris muris. Suppression of immunity by cortisone acetate. Parasitology 60, 229–37.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1973). The stimulation of immunity to Trichuris muris in mice exposed to low-level infections. Parasitology 66, 181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1974). Genetic control of the immune response of mice to the nematode Trichuris muris. Transactions of the Royal Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 68, 277.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1975 a). Immune expulsion of Trichuris muris from mice during a primary infection: analysis of the components involved. Parasitology 70, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1975 b). Genetic control of immune responses to parasites: immunity to Trichuris muris in inbred and random-bred strains of mice. Parasitology 71, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassom, D. L., DeWitt, C. W. & Grundmann, A. W. (1974). Immunity to Hymenolepis citelli by Peromyscus maniculatus: genetic control and ecological implications. Journal of Parasitology 60, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassom, D. L., Guss, V. M. & Grundmann, A. W. (1973). Host resistance in a natural host-parasite system. Resistance to Hymenolepis citelli by Peromyscus maniculatus. Journal of Parasitology 59, 117–21.Google Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1933). Inherited and acquired factors in resistance to infection. I. Development of resistant and susceptible lines of mice through selective breeding. Journal of Experimental Medicine 57, 793–843.Google Scholar
Whitlock, J. H. (1955). A study of the inheritance of resistance to trichostrongylidosis in sheep. Cornell Veterinarian 45, 422–39.Google Scholar
Whitlock, J. H. (1958). The inheritance of resistance to trichostrongylidosis in sheep. I. Demonstration of the validity of the phenomena. Cornell Veterinarian 48, 127–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitlock, J. H. & Madsen, H. (1958). The inheritance of resistance to trichostrongylidosis in sheep. II. Observations on the genetic mechanism in trichostrongylidosis. Cornell Veterinarian 48, 134–45.Google ScholarPubMed