Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:05:18.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deep-sea hydrothermal vent parasites: why do we not find more?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2004

I. de BURON  and
S. MORAND
I. de BURON
Affiliation:
College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina 29401, USA
S. MORAND
Affiliation:
CBGP (Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations) Campus International de Baillarguet, 34988 Montferrier sur Lez, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While parasitism is recognized as the most common mode of existence on the planet, and hosts from virtually all ecosystems have been studied, very little is known about the parasites found in deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems and even less is known about their ecology, evolution, and effects on their hosts. The purpose of this work is to offer a comprehensive review of our state of knowledge about parasitism in the deep-sea vents and to pose and address specific questions for future studies. Because the deep-sea environment itself may influence the number and types of parasites found in the vents, non-vent (below 1000 m) and vent deep-sea data were used in a comparative analysis to account for this factor as a potential major determinant of the parasite fauna in the vents. Based upon analysis of these data, it is highly likely that the reason why so few parasites are currently known from deep-sea vents, even given the low diversity of hosts in this ecosystem, is simply that their inconspicuous nature has caused them to be overlooked by vent biologists.

Keywords

parasite diversitydeep-sea hydrothermal vents
Type
Review Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 128 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

BISCOITO, M., SEGONZAC, M., ALMEIDA, A. J., DESBRUYERES, D., GEISTDOERFER, P., TURNIPSEED, M. & VAN DOVER, C. (2002). Fishes from the hydrothermal vents and cold seeps – an update. Cahier de Biologie Marine 43, 359–362.Google Scholar
BRAY, R. A., LITTLEWOOD, D. T. J., HERNIOU, E. A., WILLIAMS, B. & HENDERSON, R. E. (1999). Digenean parasites of deep-sea teleosts: a review and case studies of intrageneric phylogenies. Parasitology 119 (Suppl.), S125–S144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROOKS, D. R. & McLENNAN, D. A. (1993). Parascript: Parasites and the Language of Evolution. Smithsonian University Press, Washington.
BURON, I. de (1988). Hypoechinorhynchus thermaceri n.sp. (Acanthocephala: Hypoechinorhynchoidae) from the deep-sea zoarcid fish Thermarces andersoni Rosenblatt and Cohen, 1986. Journal of Parasitology 74, 339–342.Google Scholar
BURRESON, E. M. ( 1981). A new deep-sea leech Bathybdella sawyeri, n. gen., n. sp., from thermal vent areas on the Galapagos Rift. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 94, 483–491.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, R. A. (1990). Deep water parasites. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 65, S65–S68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMBES, C. (2001). Parasitism: the Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
COMBES, C. & MORAND, S. (1999). Do parasites live in extreme environments? Constructing hostile niches and living in them. Parasitology 119, S107–S110.Google Scholar
DESBRUYÈRES, D. & SEGONZAC, M. (1997). Handbook of Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Fauna. IFREMER, Brest.
GRASSLE, J. F. & MACIOLEK, N. J. (1992). Deep-sea species richness: regional and local diversity estimates from quantitative bottom samples. American Naturalist 139, 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HASHIMOTO, J., OHTA, S. & GAMO, T. (2001). First hydrothermal vent communities from the Indian Ocean discovered. Zoological Science 18, 717–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUMES, A. G. & DOJIRI, M. (1980). A siphonostome copepod associated with a vestimentiferan from the Galapagos Rift and the East Pacific Rise. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 93, 697–707.Google Scholar
HUMES, A. G. & VOIGHT, J. R. (1997). Cholidya polypi (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Tibisdae), a parasite of deep-sea octopuses in the north atlantic and northeastern pacific. Ophelia 46, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUYS, R. & CONROY-DALTON, S. (1997). Discovery of hydrothermal vent Tantulocarida on a new genus of Argestidae (Copepoda: Hapacticoida). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 38, 235–249.Google Scholar
JUSTINE, J.-L., CASSONE, J. & PETTER, A. (2002). Moravecnema segonzaci n.sp., n. gen. (Nematoda: Cystidicolidae) from Pachycara thermophilum (Zoarcidae), a deep-sea hydrothermal vent fish from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Folia Parasitologica 49, 299–303.Google Scholar
LOPEZ-GONZALES, P. J., BRESCIANI, J. & HUYS, R. (2000). Description of Genesis vulcanoctopusi gen. et sp. nov. (Copepoda: Tibisdae) parasitic on a hydrothermal vent octopod and a reinterpretation of the life cycle of cholidyinid hapacticoids. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 41, 241–253.Google Scholar
POULIN, R. (1998). Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites. Chapman and Hall, New York.
TUNNICLIFFE, V. (1991). The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 29, 319–407.Google Scholar
TUNNICLIFFE, V. & FOWLER, C. M. R. (1996). Influence of sea floor spreading on the global hydrothermal vent fauna. Nature, London 379, 531–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DOVER, C. L. (2000). The Ecology of Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Princeton University Press, Princeton.