Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:59:34.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Copulation enhances resistance against an entomopathogenic fungus in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

TERHI M. VALTONEN ,
HEIDI VIITANIEMI  and
MARKUS J. RANTALA
TERHI M. VALTONEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
HEIDI VIITANIEMI
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
MARKUS J. RANTALA
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ecological immunology is based upon the notion that activation and use of the immune system is costly and should thus be traded off against other energy-demanding aspects of life history. Most of the studies on insects that have examined the possibility that mating results in trade-offs with immunity have shown that mating has immunosuppressive effects. The connection between mating and immunity has traditionally been investigated using indirect measures of immunity. However, studies that have assessed the effects of mating on the resistance against real pathogens have had conflicting results. A previous study on Tenebrio molitor showed that copulation decreases phenoloxidase activity in the haemolymph, and concluded that copulation corrupts immunity in this species. In the present study we tested whether mating also affects the ability of T. molitor to resist the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. Interestingly, we found that mating enhanced resistance against the fungal infection and that the effect was stronger on males than females. Furthermore, we found that male beetles were overall more susceptible to the fungal infection than were females, indicating an immunological sex difference in immunity. Our study highlights the importance of the use of real pathogens and parasites in immuno-ecological studies.

Keywords

host resistance testsimmune defencelife history trade-offsmatingsexual dimorphism
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 137 , Issue 6 , May 2010 , pp. 985 - 989
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamo, S. A. (2004 a). How should behavioural ecologists interpret measurements of immunity? Animal Behaviour 68, 1443–1449.Google Scholar
Adamo, S. A. (2004 b). Estimating disease resistance in insects: phenoloxidase and lysozyme-like activity and disease resistance in the cricket Gryllus texensis. Journal of Insect Physiology 50, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahtiainen, J. J., Alatalo, R. V., Kortet, R. and Rantala, M. J. (2005). A trade-off between immune function and sexual signalling in a natural population of the drumming wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 985–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. K., Ameel, J. J. and Waldbaer, G. P. (1970). A method for sexing living pupal and adult yellow mealworms. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63, 1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorka, K. M., Linder, J. E., Winterhalter, W. and Promislow, D. (2007). Post-mating disparity between potential and realized immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 274, 1211–1217.Google Scholar
Fedorka, K. M., Zuk, M. and Mousseau, T. A. (2004). Immune suppression and cost of reproduction in the ground cricket, Allonemobius socius. Evolution 58, 2478–2485.Google Scholar
Fedorka, K. M. and Zuk, M. (2005). Sexual conflict and female immune suppression in the cricket, Allonemobius socius. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1515–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershman, S. N. (2008). Sex-specific differences in immunological costs of multiple mating in Gryllus vocalis field crickets. Behavioural Ecology 19, 810–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knell, R. J. and Webberley, K. M. (2004). Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biological Reviews 79, 557–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclerc, V., Pelte, N., El Chamy, L., Martinelli, C., Ligoxygakis, P., Hoffmann, J. A. and Reichhart, J.-M. (2006). Prophenoloxidase activation is not required for survival to microbial infections in Drosophila. EMBO Reports 7, 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, L. A., Gibson, G., Clark, A. G. and Wolfner, M. F. (2004). Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 14, 1509–1514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKean, K. A. and Nunney, L. (2001). Increased sexual activity reduces male immune function in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 7904–7909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKean, K. A. and Nunney, L. (2005). Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict immunological sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59, 1510–1517.Google Scholar
Moret, Y. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (2000). Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290, 1166–1168.Google Scholar
Peng, J., Zipperlen, P. and Kubli, E. (2005). Drosophila sex-peptide stimulates female innate immune system after mating via Toll and Imd pathways. Current Biology 15, 1690–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. J., Jokinen, I, Kortet, R, Vainikka, A. and Suhonen, J. (2002). Do pheromones reveal male immunocompetence? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 269, 1681–1685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. J., Kortet, R. & Vainikka, A. (2003 a). The role of juvenile hormone in immune function and pheromone production trade-offs: a test of the immunocompetence handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 270, 2257–2261.Google Scholar
Rantala, M. J., Kortet, R., Kotiaho, J. S., Vainikka, A. and Suhonen, J. (2003 b). Condition dependence of pheromones and immune function in the grain beetle Tenebrio molitor. Functional Ecology 17, 534–540.Google Scholar
Rantala, M. J. and Roff, D. A. (2007). Inbreeding and extreme outbreeding cause sex differences in immune defence and life history traits in Epirrita autumnata. Heredity 98, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, M. C. and Moret, Y. (2000). Life-history trade-offs with immune defenses. In Evolutionary Biology of Host-Parasite Relationships: Theory Meets Reality (ed. Poulin, R., Morand, S. and Skorping, A.), pp. 129–142. Elsevier Science Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rolff, J. and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (2002). Copulation corrupts immunity: a mechanism for a cost of mating in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 9916–9918.Google Scholar
Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003). Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 270, 357–366.Google Scholar
Schwarzenbach, G. A. and Ward, P. I. (2007). Phenoloxidase activity and pathogen resistance in yellow dung flies Scathophaga stercoraria. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 2192–2199.Google Scholar
Sheldon, B. C. and Verhulst, S. (1996). Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 317–321.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, K. L., Parsons, N. M. and Adamo, S. A. (2006). Mating enhances parasite resistance in the cricket Gryllus texensis. Animal Behaviour 71, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siva-Jothy, M. T., Tsubaki, Y. and Hooper, R. E. (1998). Decreased immune response as a proximate cost of copulation and oviposition in a damselfly. Physiological Entomology 23, 274–277.Google Scholar
Tyler, R. E., Adams, S. and Mallon, E. B. (2006). An immune response in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestries leads to increased food consumption. BMC Physiology 6, 6.Google Scholar
Van Voorhies, W. A. (1992). Production of sperm reduces nematode lifespan. Nature, London 360, 456–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S., Ruuhola, T. and Rantala, M. J. (2007). Impacts of starvation on immune defense and other life history traits of an outbreaking geometrid, Epirrita autumnata: a possible ultimate trigger of the crash phase of population cycle. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44, 89–96.Google Scholar
Zuk, M. and McKean, K. A. (1996). Sex differences in parasite infections: Patterns and processes. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 1009–1023.Google Scholar