Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:35:27.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biology of Cryptochaetum (Diptera) and Eupelmus (Hymenoptera) parasites of Aspidoproctus (Coccidae) in East Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. H. Thorpe
W. H. Thorpe
Affiliation:
From the Sub-Department of Entomology, Zoological Laboratory, Cambridge, and the East African Agricultural Research Station, Amani, Tanganyika Territory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tropical and certain parts of subtropical Africa constitute the home of the genus Aspidoproctus (Coccidae, Monophlebini). The genus is remarkable in several ways, but chiefly because of the very large size attained by some of the species. A. maximus and A. giganteus are almost certainly the largest scale insects in the world, the female being well over 1 in. long and as much as ¾ in. thick. Owing to the relatively degenerate structure of scale insects in general, and in particular because of the poor development of the circulatory and tracheal systems, the biology of scale-inhabiting parasites is always of interest. This is particularly the case in relation to problems of respiration, and many scale parasites are already known (Thorpe, 1931, 1934, 1936) which exhibit very striking respiratory adaptations. Previous to the present paper no parasites had been recorded from the genus Aspidoproctus, yet it appeared extremely improbable on general grounds that these insects were immune from the attacks of the usual dipterous and hymenopterous parasitoids. Accordingly, when opportunity came to visit East Africa, attention was directed particularly to this problem; for it was felt that with insects of such large size and having such a thick dorsal cuticle, the problems to be overcome by the internal parasite would be intensified tenfold, and that any species found would be likely to exhibit structural and physiological adaptations of unusual interest. That this is indeed the case the present paper will show.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , May 1941 , pp. 149 - 168
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brain, C. K. (1915). The Coccidae of South Africa. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr. 5, 65–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrière, C. (1941). Parasitology, 33, 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A. (1920). Studien über Tracheenrespiration. II. Über Gasdiffusion in den Tracheen. Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol. 179, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindinger, L. (1913). Afrikanische Schildläuse. V. Die Schildläuse Deutsch-Ostafrikas. Jb. Hamburg. Wiss. Anst. (1912), 30, (3), 59–100.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, C. P. (1908). Mammoth Scale on Salisbury Kopje. Rhodesian Agric. J. 6, 32–41.Google Scholar
McConnel, W. R. (1918). Eupdminus saltator Lindm. As a parasite of the Hessian fly. J. econ. Ent. 11, 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Meijere, J. H. C. (1916). Studien über Sudostasiatische Dipteren. XI. Tijdschr. Ent. 59, 184–213.Google Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. (1938). EupelmeUa vesicularis Retz. (Chalcididae) as a Predator of Another Chalcid Microplectron, fuscipennis Zett. Parasitology, 30, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, H. (1928). A classification of the higher groups and genera of the coccid family Margarodidae. Tech. Bvll. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 52, 1–239.Google Scholar
Newstead, R. (1910). On a collection of Coccidae and Aleurodidae, chiefly African, in the collection of the Berlin Zoological Museum. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl. 5, 156–74.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. J. & Poos, F. W. (1921). Life history studies of three jointworm parasites. J. agric. Res. 21, 405–26.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1931). The biology, post-embryonic development and economic importance of Cryptochaetum iceryae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) parasitic on Icerya purchasi (Coccidae, Monophlebini). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 929–71.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1934). The biology and development of Cryptochaetum grandicorne, (Diptera), an internal parasite of Guerinia serratulae (Coccidae). Quart. J. micr. Sci. 77, 273–304.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1936). On a new type of respiratory interrelation between an insect (Chalcid) parasite and its host (Coccidae). Parasitology, 28, 517–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1940). A description of two new species of the genus Aspidoproctus (Coccidae, Margarodidae) from tropical Africa. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Loud. Ser. B, 9, 165–71.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1941). A description of six new species of the genus Cryptochaetum (Diptera, Agromyzidae) from East Africa and East Indies, together with a key to the adults and larvae of all known species. Parasitology, 33, 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1939). The Principles of Insect Physiology, pp. 434. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar