Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:57:10.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The attachment of the monogenean Diplozoon paradoxum to the gills of Rutilus rutilus L. II. Structure and mechanism of the adhesive apparatus.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

I. L. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth*

Extract

The adhesive apparatus of Diplozoon paradoxum consists of four pairs of clamps and a pair of small hooks which apparently persists from the larval stage. The sclerotized framework which supports each clamp bears great resemblance to that of a Discocotyle clamp but certain differences, particularly in the fair-lead region, may make it mechanically more efficient.

A clamp of Diplozoon paradoxum operates on an extrinsic muscle-tendon-fair-lead-hinged-jaws principle as do the clamps of Discocotyle, Plectanocotyle and Kuhnia. It appears likely that other species of Diplozoon will be found to possess this clamping mechanism despite statements to the contrary.

It is a pleasure to record my thanks to Dr F. G. Rees, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, for her encouragement and guidance and to Dr J. Llewellyn, University of Birmingham, for his valuable help and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was done while receiving a grant from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bovet, J. (1959). Observations sur l'oeuf et l'oncomiracidium de Diplozoon paradoxum von Nordmann, 1832. Bull. Soc. neuchâtel. Sci. nat. 82, 231–45.Google Scholar
Bychowsky, B. E. & Nagibina, L. F. (1959). On the systematics of the genus Diplozoon Nordmann (Monogenoidea). Zool. Zh. 38, 362–77. (In Russian: English summary p. 377.)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1956). The adhesive mechanisms of monogenetic trematodes: the attachment of Plectanocotyle gurnardi (v. Ben. & Hesse) to the gills of Trigla. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 35, 507–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1957). The mechanism of the attachment of Kuhnia scombri (Kuhn, 1829) (Trematoda: Monogenea) to the gills of its host Scomber scombrus L. including a note on the taxonomy of the parasite. Parasitology, 47, 30–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1958). The adhesive mechanisms of monogenetic trematodes: the attachment of species of the Diclidophoridae to the gills of gadoid fishes. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 37, 6779.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. & Owen, I. L. (1960). The attachment of the monogenean Discocotyle sagittata Leuckart to the gills of Salmo trutta L. Parasitology, 50, 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterba, von G. (1957). Zur Morphologie und Biologie der Gattung Diplozoon. Zool. Anz. 158, 181–96.Google Scholar
Yin, W-Y. & Sproston, N. G. (1948). Studies on the monogenetic trematodes of China: part 5. A note on Diplozoon nipponicum Goto, from the goldfish. Sinensia, 19, 6185.Google Scholar