We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
(Faculty of Humanities, Archaeology, University of Southampton / British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome) [email protected]; [email protected]
Stephen Kay
Affiliation:
(Faculty of Humanities, Archaeology, University of Southampton / British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome) [email protected]; [email protected]
Elena Pomar
Affiliation:
(Faculty of Humanities, Archaeology, University of Southampton / British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome) [email protected]; [email protected]
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Chapkanski, S., Goiran, J.P, Rosa, C., Keay, S., Kay, S., Damien, E. and Gallet, X. (in press) Analyses des matériaux de construction bruts par la Spectroscopie Moyen InfraRouge (SMIR). Bulletin Archéologique des Écoles Françaises à l'Etranger.Google Scholar
Goiran, J.P., Salomon, F., Tronchere, H., Carbonel, P., Djerbi, H. and Ognard, C. (2011) Caractéristiques sédimentaires du basin portuaire de Claude: nouvelles données pour la localisation des ouvertures. In Keay, S. and Paroli, L. (eds), Portus and its Hinterland, 31–45. London: Archaeological Monographs of the British School at Rome 18.Google Scholar
Kay, S., Pomar, E., Keay, S., Strutt, K., Chapkanski, S. and Goiran, J-P. (2019) Integrating geophysical and geoarchaeological surveys for the reconstruction of a Roman port infrastructure: the Claudian harbour at Portus. In Bonsall, J. (ed.), New Global Perspectives on Archaeological Prospection, 99–103. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Keay, S. and Kay, S. (2018) The Roman Ports Project. Papers of the British School at Rome86: 317–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, S., Earl, G. and Felici, F. (2011) Excavation and survey at the Palazzo Imperiale 2007–2009. In Keay, S. and Paroli, L. (eds), Portus and its Hinterland, 67–91. London: Archaeological Monographs of the British School at Rome 18.Google Scholar
Keay, S., Millett, M., Paroli, L. and Strutt, K. (2005) Portus. An archaeological survey of the port of Imperial Rome. London: Archaeological Monographs of the British School at Rome 15.Google Scholar
Keay, S., Felici, F., Kay, S., Mladenovic, D., Pomar, E., Cascino, R. and Frumenti, I. (2019) The Roman Ports Project. Papers of the British School at Rome87: 323–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugli, G. and Filibeck, G. (1935) Il Porto di Roma imperiale e l'Agro Portuense. Bergamo: Officine dell'Istituto Italiano d'Arti Grafiche.Google Scholar
Scrinari, V.S.M. (1984) Scavi al Porto di Claudio. Archeologia Laziale6: 213–19.Google Scholar
Scrinari, V.S.M. (1987) Indagine al porto di Claudio. Archeologia Laziale8: 181–88.Google Scholar
Testaguzza, O. (1970) Portus: illustrazione dei porti di Claudio e Traiano e della città di Porto a Fiumicino. Rome: Julia Editrice.Google Scholar