Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:55:52.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Date of the Mosaics of the Rotunda at Thessaloniki

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Michael Vickers
Get access

Extract

In a recent important article on the mosaics of the basilica of St. Demetrius at Thessaloniki, R. S. Cormack proposes a list of churches in the city with mosaics ‘for which a late fifth century date must be considered.’ The list comprises the Acheiropoietos basilica, the first phase of the basilica of St. Demetrius, and Hosios David. The purpose of this article is to show that the mosaics of the second phase of the Rotunda (now known as the church of St. George) should be included in Cormack's list.

The first thing to note about the Rotunda mosaics is that there has been less than unanimity concerning the date of their construction. Volbach, Lazarev and Cormack, amongst others, follow Dyggve and Torp in dating the mosaics to c. 400 or slightly earlier; Diehl and Dalton dated them to the fifth century, Weigand to the sixth and Holtzinger to the seventh or eighth century, all on largely stylistic grounds. What are obviously needed are some objective dating criteria, and these are to be found, not so much in the mosaics themselves, but rather in the building fabric and the furniture of the converted Rotunda. The conversion of the Rotunda, incidentally, consisted of the blocking of an opaion in the cupola and the addition of an ambulatory, a monumental entrance to the south, an apse to the east (Plate XXIII) and various subsidiary buildings to east and west. The mosaics were placed in the cupola and in the niches which connected the main body of the Rotunda with the ambulatory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Papers of the British School at Rome , Volume 38 , November 1970 , pp. 183 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © British School at Rome 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘The mosaic decoration of S. Demetrios, Thessaloniki; a re-examination in the light of the drawings of W. S. George,’ BSA, 64 (1969), 49Google Scholar.

2 Volbach, W. F. and Hirmer, M., Early Christian Art (London, 1961), 335–6Google Scholar; Lazarev, V. N., Storia della pittura bizantina (Turin, 1967), 35 and 56 n. 24Google Scholar; op. cit., 47.

3 Studia Orientalia I. Pedersen dicata (Copenhagen, 1953), 68–9Google Scholar; Acta of the 9th International Congress of Byzantine Studies, Thessaloniki 1953 (Athens, 1955), 489–98Google Scholar (cited below as Torp, 1953) and Mosaikkene i St Georg-Rotunden i Thessaloniki (Oslo, 1963)Google Scholar, passim (cited below as Torp, 1963).

4 Diehl, C., Manuel d'art byzantin (Paris, 1925), I, 133Google Scholar; Dalton, O.M., East Christian Art (Oxford, 1925), 143Google Scholar.

5 ByzZeit, 39 (1939), 116 ff.Google Scholar; Holtzinger, H., Altchristliche und Byzantinische Baukunst (3rd edn., Leipzig 1909), 138Google Scholar.

6 Vickers, M., ‘The date of the Walls of Thessalonica,’ Istanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri Yıllıgı, 15–6 (1969), 313–8Google Scholar. Cf. The Prosopography of the later Roman Empire, ii (forthcoming), s.v. Hormisdas.

6a Grierson, P., Dumbarton Oaks Catalogue, ii, pt. 1 (Washington, D.C., 1968), 125–6Google Scholar, where sixth a seventh century examples are quoted.

7 Soteriou, G., Arch. Delt. 4 (1918), suppl., 21, fig. 25Google Scholar; , G. and Soteriou, M., I Vasiliki tou Aghiou Dimitriou Thessalonikis (Athens, 1952), pl. 94bGoogle Scholar.

8 Texier, C. and Pullan, R. P., Byzantine Architecture (London, 1864), 134 and 150Google Scholar; Omont, H., RA, 3me sér., 24 (1894), 212Google Scholar; Tafrali, O., Topographie de Thessalonique (Paris, 1913), 76–7, 152–4Google Scholar.

9 Op. cit., 116, fig. 43a.

10 BCH, 44 (1920), 32Google Scholar, fig. 15, bottom.

11 Ibid., 34–6, figs. 16 and 17, pl. III–IV (legend) and CRAI, 1920, 300–3Google Scholar.

12 Torp, 1963, 12 (kindly translated by Mr. M. Chesnutt).

13 Cf. notes 3 above.

14 Op. cit., 35.

15 Seyahatname, viii (Ed. Kurumu, Türk Tarih, Istanbul, 1928), 155Google Scholar. I am most grateful to Dr. P. A MacKay for bringing his unpublished translation of Evliya to my attention and for allowing me to make use of it.

16 Miracula, i, 1Google Scholar; PG, cxvi, 1220Google Scholar.

17 Op. cit., 49.

18 E.g., Franckl, P., Gothic Architecture (Harmondsworth, 1962), pl. 116Google Scholar.

19 Best illustrated in Volbach and Hirmer, op. cit., pls. 78–9; for bibliography: ibid., 326, and Cormack, op. cit., 24 n. 34.

20 Hébrard, op. cit., 28–30 and pl. III–IV.

21 Op. cit., 24.

22 Cf. Volbach and Hirmer, op. cit., pl. 214.

23 Kautzsch, R., Kapitellstudien (Berlin/Leipzig, 1936), 73–5Google Scholar.

24 Krautheimer, R., Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (Harmondsworth, 1965), 74–5 and 94Google Scholar.

25 Cf. Cormack, op. cit., 43.

26 Torp, 1953, 491 and pl. 164, fig. 3, and Torp, 1963, 44 ff.