Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:50:50.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Terri Schiavo and the use of artificial nutrition and fluids: Insights from the Catholic tradition on end-of-life care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

JOHN J. PARIS
Affiliation:
Theology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts

Extract

The recent events surrounding the case of Terri Schiavo have highlighted the moral implications of end-of-life care. Among the issues raised by Terri's parents against the withdrawal of her feeding tube was that doing so would be “euthanasia” and, as such, would violate their daughter's Roman Catholic religious beliefs. The emotionally charged rhetoric and the political posturing in this case drowned out both rational discourse and historical memory. Politicians and even a few bishops and cardinals were quick to join the parents in denouncing the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube as “euthanasia” or “murder.” However, the interpretation of the Catholic position on the sanctity of life that led to that moral judgment is not in line with the centuries-long Catholic position on end-of-life care.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishops of Texas and Texas Conference of Catholic Health Facilities. (1990). An interim pastoral statement on artificial nutrition and hydration. Origins, 20, 4.Google Scholar
Cronin, D. (1958). The Moral Law in Report to the Ordinary and Extraordinary Means of Conserving Life, Dissertatio ad Laudem in Facultate Theologica Pontificae Universitatis Gregorianae, Romae.
DeVitoria, F. (1587). Relectio de temperentia. Reflectiones Theologicae, Lugdundi.
John Paul II. (2004). Care for the patients in a “permanent” vegetative state. Origins, 33, 43.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (1950). The duty of using artificial means of preserving life. Theological Studies, 12, 550556.Google Scholar
Lynch, R.N. (2003). Statement of Bishop Robert N. Lynch concerning the Terri Schiavo case, August 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.dioceseofstpete.org/news.php?NID=9 (Accessed May 2, 2005).
McCarthy, J.J. (1980). The development of the doctrine of ordinary and extraordinary means of preserving life in Catholic moral theology before the Karen Quinlan case. Linacre Quarterly, 47, 215231.Google Scholar
McCormick, R.A. (1974). To save or let die: The dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA, 229, 172176.Google Scholar
Myers, J.J. (2005). Whether in life or in death, we are the lord's. Available at: www.rcan.org/archbish/jjm_letters/whetherinlife.htm (Accessed October 10, 2005).
Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1980). Vatican Declaration on Euthanasia, Origins, 10, 154157.Google Scholar
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Inc. (2001). Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Catholic Health Association.