Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T11:53:17.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric properties of the Thai Spiritual Well-Being Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

Suchira Chaiviboontham ,
Noppawan Phinitkhajorndech ,
Somchit Hanucharurnkul  and
Thaniya Noipiang
Suchira Chaiviboontham*
Affiliation:
Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Noppawan Phinitkhajorndech
Affiliation:
Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Somchit Hanucharurnkul
Affiliation:
Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Thaniya Noipiang
Affiliation:
Outpatient Department, Lamphun Hospital, Lamphun, Thailand
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Suchira Chaiviboontham, Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Ratchathewee, Bangkok, Thailand, 10400. E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified Thai Spiritual Well-Being Scale in patients with advanced cancer.

Method:

This cross-sectional study was employed to investigate psychometric properties. Some 196 participants from three tertiary hospitals in Bangkok and suburban Thailand were asked to complete a Personal Information Questionnaire (PIQ), The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), and the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS). Validity was determined by known-group, concurrent, and constructs validity. Reliability was estimated using internal consistency by Cronbach's α coefficients.

Results:

Three factors were extracted: so-called existential well-being, religious well-being, and peacefulness accounted for 71.44% of total variance. The Cronbach's α coefficients for total SWB, EWB, RWB, and peacefulness were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.93, respectively.

Significance of Results:

These findings indicate that the Thai SWBS is a valid and reliable instrument, and it presented one more factor than the original version.

Keywords

Spiritual Well-Being ScaleThaiAdvanced cancer
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 14 , Issue 2: Measurement Development in Palliative and Supportive Care , April 2016 , pp. 109 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balboni, T.A., Paulk, M.E., Balboni, M.J., et al. (2010). Provision of spiritual care to patients with advanced cancer: Associations with medical care and quality of life near death. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bredle, J.M., Salsman, J.M., Debb, S.M., et al. (2011). Spiritual well-being as a component of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT–Sp). Religions, 2, 77–94.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Gibson, C., et al. (2010). Meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bufford, R.K., Paloutzian, R.F. & Ellison, C.W. (1991). Norms for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 19(1), 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.D., Yoon, D.P. & Johnstone, B. (2010). Determining relationships between physical health and spiritual experience, Religious practices, and congregational support in a heterogeneous medical sample. Journal of Religion and Health, 49, 3–17.Google Scholar
Chaiviboontham, S. (2014). Factors predicting the effectiveness of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care, 13, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dein, S., Cook, C.C.H., Powell, A. et al. (2010). Religion, spirituality and mental health. The Psychiatric Bulletin, 34, 63–64.Google Scholar
DeVellis, R.F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, A., Pang, N., Shiu, V., et al. (2010). Review: The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: A meta-study of qualitative research. Palliative Medicine, 24, 753.Google Scholar
Ellison, C.W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 11, 330–340.Google Scholar
Get-Kong, S., Hanucharurnkul, S., McCorkle, R., et al. (2010). Symptom experience, palliative care and spiritual well-being among Thais with advanced cancer. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 14(3), 219–234.Google Scholar
Imam, S.S, Karim, N.H.A., Jusoh, N.R., et al. (2009). Malay version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Is Malay Spiritual Well-Being Scale a psychometrically sound instrument? International Journal of Behavioral Science, 14(1), 72–83.Google Scholar
Jafari, N., Zamani, A., Lazenby, M., et al. (2013). Translation and validation of the Persian version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT–Sp) among Muslim Iranians in treatment for cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11, 29–35.Google Scholar
Kunsongkeit, W., Suchaxaya, P., Panuthai, S., et al. (2004). Spiritual health of Thai people. Thai Journal of Nursing Research, 8(1), 64–82.Google Scholar
Lazenby, M., Khatib, J., Al-Khair, F., et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT–Sp) in an Arabic-speaking, predominantly Muslim population. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 220–227.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, M.F., Smith, L.A., Fisher, J.D., et al. (1991). An evaluation of the construct validity of the spiritual well-being scale: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 19, 94–102.Google Scholar
Lucette, A., Bredart, A., Vivat, B., et al. (2014). Pilot-testing the French version of a provisional European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORCT) measure of spiritual well-being for people receiving palliative care for cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 23, 221–227.Google Scholar
Musa, A.S. & Pevalin, D.J. (2012). An Arabic version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J.M. (2009). Religion, spirituality, and physical health. In Psychology, religion, and spirituality, pp. 311–345. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O. & Shama, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Noipiang, T. (2002). Perceived severity of illness, social support, and spiritual well-being among breast cancer patients. Master of Nursing Science thesis. Chiangmai, Thailand: Chiangmai University.Google Scholar
Park, N.S., Lee, B.S., Sun, F., et al. (2011). Typologies of religiousness/spirituality: Implications for health and well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(3), 828–839.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, R.F. & Ellison, C.W. (1982). Lonelinessspiritual well-being and the quality of life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Portenoy, R.K., Thaler, H.T., Kornblith, A.B., et al. (1994). The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: An instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. European Journal of Cancer, 30(9), 1326–1336.Google Scholar
Puchalski, C.M. (2012). Spirituality in the cancer trajectory. Annals of Oncology, 23(Suppl. 3), 49–55. doi; 10.1093/annonc/mds088.Google Scholar
Richards, P.S. & Bergin, A.E. (eds.). (1997). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Scott, E.L., Agresti, A.A. & Fitchett, G. (1998). Factor analysis of the “spiritual well-being scale” and its clinical utility with psychiatric inpatients. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 314–321.Google Scholar
Unterrainner, H.F., Lewis, A.J. & Fink, A. (2014). Religious/spiritual well-being, personality and mental health: A review of result and conceptual issues. Journal of Religion and Health, 53, 382–392.Google Scholar
Vallurupalli, M., Lauderdale, K., Balboni, M.J., et al. (2011). The role of spirituality and religious coping in the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative radiation therapy. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 10, 81–87.Google Scholar
Vivat, B., Young, T., Efficace, F., et al. (2013). Cross-cultural development of the EORTC-SWB 36: A stand-alone measure of spiritual well-being for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliative Medicine, 27, 457–469.Google Scholar
Waltz, C.F., Stickland, O.L. & Lenz, E.R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar